中国全科医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (24): 3059-3065.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0739

• 用药指导 • 上一篇    

中等长度导管在神经重症患者中输注20%甘露醇的安全性研究

屈媛媛1, 孙艳1, 朱丽璎1, 李洪磊1, 林宝倩1, 张哲1, 臧小英2,*()   

  1. 1.300052 天津市,天津医科大学总医院神经内科
    2.300203 天津市,天津医科大学护理学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 修回日期:2024-06-27 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-06-23
  • 通讯作者: 臧小英

  • 作者贡献:

    屈媛媛提出主要研究目标,负责研究的构思与设计,研究的实施,撰写论文;朱丽璎进行统计学处理,表的绘制与展示;李洪磊、林宝倩进行数据的收集与整理;孙艳、张哲进行论文的修订;臧小英负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责,监督管理。

Study on the Safety of Midline Catheters Infusion of 20% Mannitol in Neurocritical Care Patients

QU Yuanyuan1, SUN Yan1, ZHU Liying1, LI Honglei1, LIN Baoqian1, ZHANG Zhe1, ZANG Xiaoying2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
    2. School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300203, China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Revised:2024-06-27 Published:2025-08-20 Online:2025-06-23
  • Contact: ZANG Xiaoying

摘要: 背景 20%甘露醇是减轻脑水肿、降低颅内压的高渗性脱水利尿药,是神经重症患者的常用药之一,其药液性质为酸性、高渗性。中等长度导管因其价格低廉、操作简单、并发症少等优势目前在临床应用广泛,可作为神经重症患者经济、安全的输液通路,但目前对中等长度导管可输注的药液性质仍存在争议。 目的 探讨中等长度导管在神经重症患者中输注20%甘露醇的安全性研究。 方法 于2019年1月—2022年12月选取在天津医科大学总医院神经内科重症监护室(ICU)住院的262例使用中等长度导管的神经重症患者进行回顾性分析,收集患者的性别、年龄、诊断、其他刺激性药物使用、白细胞计数、血小板计数、白蛋白、D-二聚体、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)等一般资料,根据是否输注甘露醇将其分为甘露醇组(n=89)和非甘露醇组(n=173)。比较两组患者的导管留置时间以及并发症发生率;以是否发生导管置管并发症为因变量,将可能影响并发症发生的变量为自变量进行二分类Logistic回归分析。 结果 甘露醇组患者的导管留置时间为16.50(10.00,26.00)d,非甘露醇组的导管留置时间为17.00(9.00,26.00)d,两组患者的导管留置时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在并发症发生率方面,甘露醇组导管相关并发症发生率为11.24%(10/89),其中渗血5例(5.62%)、渗液2例(2.25%)、静脉炎2例(2.25%)、血栓1例(1.12%)、堵管1例(1.12%),1例同时发生渗血、渗液;非甘露醇组导管相关并发症发生率为12.14%(21/173),其中渗血7例(4.05%)、渗液4例(2.31%)、静脉炎3例(1.73%)、血栓2例(1.16%)、纤维蛋白鞘2例(1.16%)、堵管4例(2.31%)、脱管1例(0.58%),1例同时发生静脉炎、渗液,1例同时发生渗液、血栓;两组患者的并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二分类Logistic回归分析显示导管留置时间(OR=1.022,95%CI=1.004~1.041)、PT(OR=0.833,95%CI=0.702~0.990)是导管相关并发症发生的影响因素(P<0.05)。 结论 经中等长度导管在神经重症患者中输注20%甘露醇是安全的,甘露醇组与非甘露醇组导管留置时间及并发症发生率无明显差异,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 危重病人医疗, 神经重症, 中等长度导管, 20%甘露醇, 导管留置时间, 并发症, 回顾性分析

Abstract:

Background

20% mannitol is a hypertonic dehydrating diuretic to relieve brain edema and reduce intracranial pressure. It is one of the common drugs used in patients with severe neurological conditions, and its liquid properties are acidic and hypertonic. Due to its advantages of low price, simple operation and few complications, midline catheters are widely used in clinical applications, and can be used as an economical and safe infusion pathway for patients with severe neurological conditions. However, the nature of the medicated liquid that can be injected with midline catheters is still controversial.

Objective

To explore the safety of midline infusion of 20% mannitol in patients with severe neurological diseases.

Methods

From January 2019 to December 2022, 262 patients with severe neurology who were hospitalized in the ICU of Neurology Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. General data on gender, age, diagnosis, use of other stimulant drugs, leukocytes, platelets, albumin, D-Dimmer, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were collected. According to whether mannitol was infused or not, they were divided into mannitol group (n=89) and non-mannitol group (n=173). Compare the catheter indwelling time and complications between the two groups.

Results

The indwelling time of catheter in mannitol group was 16.50 (10.00, 26.00) day, and that in non-mannitol group was 17.00 (9.00, 26.00) day. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the incidence of complications, the incidence of catheter-related complications in mannitol group was 11.24% (10/89), including 5 cases of bleeding (5.62%), 2 cases of heterotopia (2.25%), 2 cases of phlebitis (2.25%), 1 case of thrombosis (1.12%), 1 case of catheter occlusion (1.12%). Among them, 1 case had oozing blood and heterotopia at the same time; The incidence of catheter-related complications in the non-mannitol group was 12.14% (21/173), including 7 cases of oozing blood (4.05%), 4 cases of heterotopia (2.31%), 3 cases of phlebitis (1.73%), 2 cases of thrombosis (1.16%), 2 cases of fibrin sheath (1.16%) and 4 cases (2.31%) were catheter occlusioned and 1 case (0.58%) was detached, in which 1 case had phlebitis and heterotopia at the same time and 1 case had heterotopia and thrombosis at the same time. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Secondary Logistic regression analysis showed that catheter retention time (OR=1.022, 95%CI=1.004-1.041) and PT (OR=0.833, 95%CI=0.702-0.990) were factors influencing the occurrence of catheter-related complications (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

It is safe to infuse 20% mannitol through a Midline Catheter in neurocritical care patients, and there is no significant difference in catheter indwelling time and complication rate, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Critical care, Neurocritical care, Midline catheter, 20% mannitol, Catheter indwelling time, Complication, Retrospective analysis

中图分类号: