中国全科医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (35): 4477-4482.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.565

所属专题: 心房颤动最新文章合集 心血管最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

80岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝方案的调查研究

陈静文,裴菱花,陈超,王审,黄抒伟*   

  1. 310005浙江省杭州市,浙江中医药大学附属第二医院心血管内科
    *通信作者:黄抒伟,主任医师;E-mail:cc123X@163.com
  • 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-12-15
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省中医药十三五重点学科中西医结合危重心血管病防治学(2017-XK-A14)

Investigation of Anticoagulation Strategies in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Aged 80 and Over 

CHEN Jingwen,PEI Linghua,CHEN Chao,WANG Shen,HUANG Shuwei*   

  1. Cardiovascular Department,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Hangzhou 310005,China
    *Corresponding author:HUANG Shuwei,Chief physician;E-mail:cc123X@163.com
  • Published:2020-12-15 Online:2020-12-15

摘要: 背景 目前80岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的抗凝治疗比例普遍偏低,这类人群的抗凝实际情况与指南存在较大差距,抗凝方案的选择缺乏临床证据。目的 调查80岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动住院患者抗凝方案的选择及预后情况。方法 从HIS系统筛选2016年9月—2018年9月浙江中医药大学附属第二医院首次诊断非瓣膜性心房颤动或既往诊断但未进行抗凝治疗的80岁以上患者516例为研究对象,根据出院时抗凝治疗方案不同将患者分为华法林组、利伐沙班组、达比加群酯组、不抗凝组。收集患者性别、年龄、吸烟史、合并疾病〔高血压、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病、心肌病、心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)〕、心房颤动类型(持续性心房颤动、阵发性心房颤动、永久性心房颤动)、缺血性脑卒中史、出血史、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、卒中风险评分(CHA2DS2-VASc评分)、出血风险评分(HAS-BLED评分)、抗凝治疗时间、抗血小板药物应用情况、不良反应(出血事件、缺血性脑卒中、出血性脑卒中、死亡)等情况。采用二元Logistic回归分析探讨患者出现死亡、缺血性脑卒中、出血事件的影响因素。结果 516例患者中接受抗凝治疗137例(26.6%),其中口服华法林21例(4.1%)、口服利伐沙班67例(13.0%)、口服达比加群酯49例(9.5%);不抗凝治疗患者379例(73.5%),其中应用单药抗血小板266例(51.6%)、应用双联抗血小板药物53例(10.3%)、未应用抗血小板药物60例(11.6%)。4组患者性别、年龄、吸烟史、合并疾病(高血压、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病、心肌病、心力衰竭、COPD)、缺血性脑卒中史、出血史、eGFR、CHA2DS2-VASc评分、HAS-BLED评分、出血(轻度、中度、严重)、出血性脑卒中发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组患者缺血性脑卒中发生率及死亡率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。华法林组、利伐沙班组、达比加群酯组抗凝治疗时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二元Logistic回归分析结果显示,CHA2DS2-VASc评分、抗凝治疗方案是缺血性脑卒中的影响因素(P<0.05),抗凝治疗方案是患者发生死亡事件的影响因素(P<0.05),HAS-BLED评分是患者发生出血事件的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 80岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝治疗比例较低。不抗凝治疗(包括口服抗血小板药物)增加了患者死亡、缺血性卒中风险,而华法林与新型口服抗凝药相比同样安全有效,未增加出血及死亡风险。

关键词: 心房颤动;非瓣膜性房颤;老年人, 80岁以上;抗凝药;华法林;达比加群酯;利伐沙班

Abstract: Background The proportion of anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is generally low.The actual situation of anticoagulation in this population is greatly different from the guideline and there is a lack of clinical evidence in the decision of anticoagulant regimens.Objective The study aimed to investigate anticoagulant regimen use and prognosis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients aged 80 and over.Methods 516 patients (≥80 years)with an initial diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or with a previous diagnosis but without anticoagulant therapy treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between September 2016 and September 2018 were selected.An analysis was performed on clinical data obtained via reviewing the electronic medical records in the hospital information system and follow-up data,including gender,age,smoking history,comorbidities 〔hypertension,diabetes,coronary artery disease,cardiomyopathy,heart failure,and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)〕,types of atrial fibrillation(persistent,paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation),history of ischemic stroke,history of hemorrhage,estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),CHA2DS2-VASc score,HAS-BLED score,post-discharge anticoagulant regimen(warfarin,rivaroxaban,dabigatran or using no anticoagulant therapy),duration of anticoagulant treatment,use of antiplatelet drugs,adverse reactions(bleeding events,ischemic stroke,hemorrhagic stroke,and all-cause mortality).The influencing factors of death,ischemic stroke and bleeding events were analyzed using binary Logistic regression.Results Among the participants,137(26.6%)received anticoagulation therapy,including 21 received oral warfarin(4.1%),67 received oral rivaroxaban(13.0%),and 49 received oral dabigatran(9.5%);379(73.5%)received non-anticoagulant therapy,including 266 received single antiplatelet agents(51.6%),53 received dual antiplatelet agents(10.3%),and 60 received no antiplatelet agent(11.6%).Sex ratio,average age,prevalence of comorbidities(hypertension,diabetes,coronary artery disease,cardiomyopathy,heart failure,and COPD),prevalence of having a history of smoking,ischemic stroke or hemorrhage,and average eGFR,CHA2DS2-VASc score,and HAS-BLED score,and hemorrhage(mild,moderate,severe)showed no significant differences among participants used warfarin,rivaroxaban,dabigatran and those used no anticoagulant therapy(P>0.05),but ischemic stroke prevalence and all-cause mortality were significantly different(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the duration of anticoagulation treatment between three anticoagulation treatment groups(P>0.05).Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that CHA2DS2-VASc score and anticoagulant regimen were associated with ischemic stroke(P<0.05).Anticoagulant regimen was associated with death(P<0.05).HAS-BLED score was associated with bleeding events(P<0.05).Conclusion  The prevalence of anticoagulant therapy was relatively low in this group of elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.Non-anticoagulant therapy(including oral antiplatelet agents)increased the risk of death and ischemic stroke,while warfarin showed similar safety and effectiveness to new oral anticoagulants without increasing the risk of bleeding and death.

Key words: Atrial Fibrillation;Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation;Aged, 80 and over;Anticoagulants;Warfarin;Dabigatran;Rivaroxaban