中国全科医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 559-565.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.421

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

徐州市居民双向转诊支持率及满意度调查研究

孙泓1,苗春霞1*,李寒寒1,卓朗1,姜金星1,许建强1,王问海2,赵世鸿1   

  1. 1.221004 江苏省徐州市,徐州医科大学卫生政策与健康管理研究中心 2.221004 江苏省徐州市卫生与计划生育委员会卫生应急办公室
    *通信作者:苗春霞,副教授;E-mail:jumpinghorse@163.com
  • 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-15
  • 基金资助:
    2019年国家社科基金项目(19BGL251)

Support for and Satisfaction toward Bidirectional Referral System among Xuzhou's Residents:a Survey 

SUN Hong1,MIAO Chunxia1*,LI Hanhan1,ZHUO Lang1,JIANG Jinxing1,XU Jianqiang1,WANG Wenhai2,ZHAO Shihong1   

  1. 1.Health Policy and Health Management Research Center,Xuzhou Medical University,Xuzhou 221004,China
    2.Health Emergency Response Office,Xuzhou Health and Family Planning Commission,Xuzhou 221004,China
    *Corresponding author:MIAO Chunxia,Associate professor;E-mail:jumpinghorse@163.com
  • Published:2020-02-15 Online:2020-02-15

摘要: 背景 十九大提出“健康中国战略”,要求深化医药卫生体制改革,全面建立优质高效的医疗卫生服务体系。双向转诊作为分级诊疗制度的重要内容,目前仍处于下车伊始的阶段,制度的建立和完善仍需要不断地研究和探索。目的 了解居民双向转诊支持及满意状况,探讨其影响因素,为双向转诊制度的实施提供对策和建议。方法 2016年7—8月采用多阶段分层随机抽样的方法,选择1 550名居民作为调查对象。采用自制的调查问卷进行调查,比较不同特征居民双向转诊支持率及满意度的差异,采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析居民双向转诊支持率及满意度的影响因素。结果 共发放问卷1 550份,回收有效问卷1 473份,问卷有效回收率为95.0%。1 473名居民中,双向转诊支持率为53.8%(793/1 473)。不同婚姻状况、年医疗费用、过去1年有无基层就医、转诊经历、是否赞成强制基层首诊、知晓分级诊疗制度、支持分级诊疗制度情况居民双向转诊支持率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,婚姻状况、年医疗费用、转诊经历、赞成强制基层首诊、支持分级诊疗制度情况是居民双向转诊支持情况的影响因素(P<0.05)。有转诊经历的435名居民中433名(99.5%)回答转诊满意度问题,其中133名(30.7%)对转诊满意,101名(23.3%)不满意,199名(46.0%)评价一般。赞同强制基层首诊的满意度〔39.9%(83/208)〕高于不赞同的居民〔22.2%(50/225)〕(χ2=15.878,P<0.001);支持分级诊疗制度的居民满意度〔35.5%(107/301)〕高于不支持的居民〔19.7%(26/132)〕(χ2=10.834,P=0.001);支持双向转诊的居民满意度〔38.5%(74/192)〕高于不支持的居民〔24.5%(59/241)〕(χ2=9.927,P=0.002)。在双向转诊实施过程中,最主要的问题为转诊手续烦琐、医保报销不便和上下医疗机构缺乏交流。结论 徐州市居民对双向转诊的支持率低、满意度低,制度的宣教、实施细节和医疗服务质量影响支持率和满意度。应向医务人员和居民双向精准宣教,优化转诊流程,提高基层医疗卫生机构服务能力。

关键词: 病人转诊, 双向转诊, 分级诊疗, 满意度, 影响因素分析, 数据收集

Abstract: Background The 'Healthy China' strategy was proposed at the 19th CPC National Congress, demanding deepening the reform of the pharmaceutical and healthcare system and comprehensively establishing a high-quality and high-efficient medical and health service system.As an important part of the hierarchical medical system, bidirectional referral system is still in its initial development stage.Its further development and improvement needs constant research and exploration.Objective To investigate residents' support for and satisfaction with the bidirectional referral system, and discuss the influencing factors, providing countermeasures and suggestions for the implementation of the system.Methods By use of multi-stage stratified random sampling, 1 550 residents were selected as the participants from July to August 2016.A self-made questionnaire was used to investigate the participants concerning personal data, support for and satisfaction with bidirectional referral system.Comparisons of support for and satisfaction with bidirectional referral system were made by personal data.Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors for level of support and satisfaction for the system.Results The survey achieved a response rate of 95.0%(1 473/1 550).The rate of support for bidirectional referral system was 53.8%(793/1 473).The level of support for bidirectional referral system in the respondents differed significantly by marital status,annual healthcare expenditure,treatment in primary care in the past year,referral experience,approval of compulsory initial consultation in primary care,awareness of hierarchical medical system and support for hierarchical medical system(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that marital status, annual healthcare expenditure, referral experience, approval of compulsory initial consultation in primary care, and support for hierarchical medical system were associated with the level of support for bidirectional referral system(P<0.05).Of the 435 respondents with referral experience, 433(99.5%) answered referral satisfaction questions, among whom 133 ( 30.7% ) were satisfied with the referral, 101 ( 23.3% ) were dissatisfied with the referral, and 199(46.0%) gave a neutral evaluation of the referral.Those who approved compulsory initial consultation in primary care showed higher level of satisfaction with bidirectional referral system than those disapproved 〔39.9%(83/208)vs 22.2%(50/225)〕(χ2=15.878,P<0.001).Those who were in support of hierarchical medical system showed higher level of satisfaction with bidirectional referral system than those who were not〔35.5%(107/301)vs 19.7%(26/132)〕(χ2=10.834,P=0.001).Those who were in support of bidirectional referral system showed higher level of satisfaction with bidirectional referral system than those who were not〔38.5%(74/192)vs 24.5%(59/241)〕(χ2=9.927,P=0.002).Complicated procedures, inconvenient reimbursement of medical insurance and lack of information exchange were seen as the inadequacies during the implementation of bidirectional referral system.Conclusion The levels of support for and satisfaction with bidirectional referral system are low in Xuzhou's residents, which are influenced by insufficient publicity, and inadequate implementation details of the bidirectional referral system as well as the unsatisfactory quality of medical services.In view of this, precise drumbeating of bidirectional referral system should be intensified in both healthcare workers and residents, the referral process should be optimized, and the service capacities of primary care should be improved.

Key words: Patient transfer, Two-way referral system, Hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, Satisfaction, Root cause analysis, Data collection