Chinese General Practice ›› 2016, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (34): 4280-4284.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.34.027

Previous Articles    

Reliability and Validity of Application of Client Empowerment Scale in Patients with Chronic Disease

  

  1. Nursing Department,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University;Editorial Department of Journal of Nursing,Guangzhou 510515,China Corresponding author:ZHOU Chun-lan,Nursing Department,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University;Editorial Department of Journal of Nursing,Guangzhou 510515,China;E-mail:lanchun200488@126.com
  • Published:2016-12-05 Online:2026-01-28

患者赋权量表在慢性病患者中应用的信效度研究

  

  1. 510515 广东省广州市,南方医科大学南方医院护理部(周春兰,吉雪);《护理学报》编辑部(周春兰,吴艳妮) 通信作者:周春兰,510515 广东省广州市,南方医科大学南方医院护理部,《护理学报》编辑部;E-mail:lanchun200488@126.com

Abstract: Objective To evaluate reliability and validity of the application of Client Empowerment Scale(CES,Chinese version) in patients with chronic disease.Methods The CES of English version was translated and back-translated and finally a Chinese version of CES was formed after culture adaptation.From July to September in 2015,300 hospitalized patients with chronic diseases in Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey,the investigated contents included patients’ general conditions and CES,and the effective response rate was 100.0%.After one week,20 patients were randomly selected to retest,and the effective response rate was also 100.0%.According to CES scores of two surveys,the reliability and validity of the scale was tested,including content consistency,test-retest reliability,content validity and construct validity.Results The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.956,and the Cronbach’s α of each dimension ranged from 0.698 to 0.900.Test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.991 and the reliability of each dimension was 0.775~0.985.Content validity index(CVI) of each dimension in the scale was 0.821~0.949 with an average CVI of 0.870.Spearman rank correlation showed that among the scores of each dimension were positively correlated(rs value of 0.412~0.877,P<0.05),the scores of the total scale were positively correlated with the scores of each dimension(rs value of 0.652~0.943,P<0.05).Eight common factors were extracted by principal component analysis,and accumulative contribution rate was 59.74%.Conclusion CES of Chinese version is of good reliability and validity,and can be used for evaluating the empowerment level of patients with chronic disease.

Key words: Client Empowerment Scale, Chronic disease, Reliability, Validity

摘要: 目的 评价中文版患者赋权量表(CES)在慢性病患者中应用的信效度。方法 对英文版CES进行翻译和回译,文化调试后形成中文版CES。于2015年7—9月,选取在南方医科大学南方医院接受住院治疗的慢性病患者300例进行问卷调查,内容包括患者的一般情况和CES,问卷有效回收率为100.0%。1周后,随机抽取20例患者进行重测,问卷有效回收率亦为100.0%。根据两次调查的CES得分对量表进行信效度检验,包括内容一致性、重测信度、内容效度及结构效度。结果 总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.956,各维度Cronbach’s α系数为0.698~0.900。总量表的重测信度为0.991,各维度重测信度为0.775~0.985。量表各维度内容效度指数(CVI)为0.821~0.949,平均CVI为0.870。Spearman秩相关结果显示,各维度得分间均呈正相关(rs值为0.412~0.877,P<0.05),总量表得分与各维度得分间均呈正相关(rs值为0.652~0.943,P<0.05)。经主成分因子分析共提取出8个公因子,累计贡献率为59.74%。结论 中文版CES的信效度良好,可用于评估慢性病患者的赋权水平。

关键词: 患者赋权量表, 慢性病, 信度, 效度