
Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (29): 3587-3594.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0191
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑; 孕产妇健康研究最新文章合辑
• Original Research·Research of Specific Population·Female Health • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-10
Revised:2024-06-11
Published:2024-10-15
Online:2024-07-16
Contact:
MA Xiuhua
通讯作者:
马秀华
作者简介:作者贡献:
马秀华提出主要研究目标,负责文章的质量控制与审查,监督管理;杨昕晖负责研究方案设计、实施,撰写报告;赵国玉、郭晶负责数据收集和统计学分析;彭笑笑、马丽丽进行论文修订。
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0191
| 项目 | 数据 | 项目 | 数据 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 30(27,33) | 学历[例(%)] | |
| 孕前BMI[M(P25,P75),kg/m2] | 22.0(20.0,24.2) | 高中/中专及以下 | 62(14.6) |
| 孕次[例(%)] | 大专 | 116(27.2) | |
| 0 | 207(48.6) | 本科 | 211(49.5) |
| ≥1次 | 219(51.4) | 研究生 | 37(8.7) |
| 产次[例(%)] | 其他基础疾病(除GDM外)[例(%)] | ||
| 0 | 301(70.7) | 无 | 347(81.5) |
| ≥1次 | 125(29.3) | 甲状腺功能减退 | 26(6.1) |
| 职业[例(%)] | 甲状腺功能亢进 | 2(0.5) | |
| 职员 | 325(76.3) | 甲状腺结节 | 4(0.9) |
| 无业人员 | 40(9.4) | 桥本甲状腺炎 | 2(0.5) |
| 专业技术人员 | 35(8.2) | 子宫肌瘤 | 25(5.9) |
| 自由职业者 | 11(2.6) | 卵巢囊肿 | 9(2.1) |
| 工人 | 8(1.9) | 脂肪肝 | 13(3.1) |
| 国家公务员 | 5(1.2) | 胆囊息肉 | 9(2.1) |
| 农民 | 2(0.5) | 哮喘病史 | 6(1.4) |
| GDM[例(%)] | 141(33.1) | 宫腹腔镜术史 | 7(1.6) |
Table 1 Basic information of 426 pregnant women
| 项目 | 数据 | 项目 | 数据 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 30(27,33) | 学历[例(%)] | |
| 孕前BMI[M(P25,P75),kg/m2] | 22.0(20.0,24.2) | 高中/中专及以下 | 62(14.6) |
| 孕次[例(%)] | 大专 | 116(27.2) | |
| 0 | 207(48.6) | 本科 | 211(49.5) |
| ≥1次 | 219(51.4) | 研究生 | 37(8.7) |
| 产次[例(%)] | 其他基础疾病(除GDM外)[例(%)] | ||
| 0 | 301(70.7) | 无 | 347(81.5) |
| ≥1次 | 125(29.3) | 甲状腺功能减退 | 26(6.1) |
| 职业[例(%)] | 甲状腺功能亢进 | 2(0.5) | |
| 职员 | 325(76.3) | 甲状腺结节 | 4(0.9) |
| 无业人员 | 40(9.4) | 桥本甲状腺炎 | 2(0.5) |
| 专业技术人员 | 35(8.2) | 子宫肌瘤 | 25(5.9) |
| 自由职业者 | 11(2.6) | 卵巢囊肿 | 9(2.1) |
| 工人 | 8(1.9) | 脂肪肝 | 13(3.1) |
| 国家公务员 | 5(1.2) | 胆囊息肉 | 9(2.1) |
| 农民 | 2(0.5) | 哮喘病史 | 6(1.4) |
| GDM[例(%)] | 141(33.1) | 宫腹腔镜术史 | 7(1.6) |
| 组别 | 例数 | 菌群密集度[M(P25,P75),级] | 菌群多样性[M(P25,P75),级] | Nugent评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 优势菌为乳杆菌[例(%)] | pH值[M(P25,P75)] | H2O2阳性[例(%)] | LE阳性[例(%)] | SNA阳性[例(%)] | NAG阳性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | 122 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 107(87.7) | 4.6(4.4,4.6) | 95(77.9) | 41(33.6) | 10(8.2) | 8(6.6) |
| B阶段 | 122 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 100(82.0) | 4.6(4.6,4.8) | 111(91.0) | 42(34.4) | 15(12.3) | 16(13.1) |
| C阶段 | 113 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 88(77.9) | 4.8(4.6,5.0) | 107(94.7) | 54(47.8) | 20(17.7) | 17(15.0) |
| H(χ2)值 | 5.597 | 0.500 | 10.713 | 6.171a | 50.955 | 17.862a | 8.500a | 7.185a | 6.333a | |
| P值 | 0.061 | 0.779 | 0.005 | 0.046 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.028 | 0.042 |
Table 2 Comparison of vaginal microecological detection indexes at different gestational weeks in GDM group
| 组别 | 例数 | 菌群密集度[M(P25,P75),级] | 菌群多样性[M(P25,P75),级] | Nugent评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 优势菌为乳杆菌[例(%)] | pH值[M(P25,P75)] | H2O2阳性[例(%)] | LE阳性[例(%)] | SNA阳性[例(%)] | NAG阳性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | 122 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 107(87.7) | 4.6(4.4,4.6) | 95(77.9) | 41(33.6) | 10(8.2) | 8(6.6) |
| B阶段 | 122 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 100(82.0) | 4.6(4.6,4.8) | 111(91.0) | 42(34.4) | 15(12.3) | 16(13.1) |
| C阶段 | 113 | 3(3,3) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 88(77.9) | 4.8(4.6,5.0) | 107(94.7) | 54(47.8) | 20(17.7) | 17(15.0) |
| H(χ2)值 | 5.597 | 0.500 | 10.713 | 6.171a | 50.955 | 17.862a | 8.500a | 7.185a | 6.333a | |
| P值 | 0.061 | 0.779 | 0.005 | 0.046 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.028 | 0.042 |
| 指标 | pH值 | 优势菌为乳杆菌比例 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | B阶段 | C阶段 | A阶段 | B阶段 | |
| pH值 | |||||
| B阶段 | 0.322a | ||||
| C阶段 | 0.262a | 0.267a | |||
| 优势菌为乳杆菌 | |||||
| A阶段 | -0.395a | -0.246a | -0.121 | ||
| B阶段 | -0.206a | -0.484a | -0.171 | 0.279a | |
| C阶段 | -0.179 | -0.328a | -0.414a | 0.142 | 0.387a |
Table 3 Correlation between vaginal pH and the proportion of Lactobacillus dominant bacteria in GDM group at different gestational weeks
| 指标 | pH值 | 优势菌为乳杆菌比例 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | B阶段 | C阶段 | A阶段 | B阶段 | |
| pH值 | |||||
| B阶段 | 0.322a | ||||
| C阶段 | 0.262a | 0.267a | |||
| 优势菌为乳杆菌 | |||||
| A阶段 | -0.395a | -0.246a | -0.121 | ||
| B阶段 | -0.206a | -0.484a | -0.171 | 0.279a | |
| C阶段 | -0.179 | -0.328a | -0.414a | 0.142 | 0.387a |
| 组别 | 例数 | BV中间型 | BV | VVC | BV+VVC | 阴道菌群异常 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | 122 | 4(3.3) | 1(0.8) | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | 21(17.2) |
| B阶段 | 122 | 9(7.4) | 3(2.5) | 13(10.7) | 3(2.5) | 31(25.4) |
| C阶段 | 113 | 5(4.4) | 11(9.7) | 13(11.5) | 4(3.5) | 37(32.7) |
| χ2值 | 1.000 | 12.000 | 7.238 | 1.143 | 10.157 | |
| P值 | 0.607 | 0.002 | 0.027 | 0.565 | 0.006 |
Table 4 Comparison of vaginal microecological detection results at different gestational weeks in GDM group
| 组别 | 例数 | BV中间型 | BV | VVC | BV+VVC | 阴道菌群异常 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A阶段 | 122 | 4(3.3) | 1(0.8) | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | 21(17.2) |
| B阶段 | 122 | 9(7.4) | 3(2.5) | 13(10.7) | 3(2.5) | 31(25.4) |
| C阶段 | 113 | 5(4.4) | 11(9.7) | 13(11.5) | 4(3.5) | 37(32.7) |
| χ2值 | 1.000 | 12.000 | 7.238 | 1.143 | 10.157 | |
| P值 | 0.607 | 0.002 | 0.027 | 0.565 | 0.006 |
| 检测结果 | A阶段 | B阶段 | C阶段 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM组(n=122) | 非GDM组(n=122) | χ2值 | P值 | GDM组(n=122) | 非GDM组(n=122) | χ2值 | P值 | GDM组(n=113) | 非GDM组(n=113) | χ2值 | P值 | |
| 优势菌为乳杆菌 | 107(87.7) | 95(77.9) | 4.141 | 0.042 | 100(82.0) | 103(84.4) | 0.264 | 0.607 | 88(77.9) | 103(91.1) | 4.212 | 0.040 |
| H2O2阳性 | 95(77.9) | 106(86.9) | 3.416 | 0.065 | 111(91.0) | 113(92.6) | 0.218 | 0.641 | 107(94.7) | 101(89.4) | 4.650 | 0.031 |
| LE阳性 | 41(33.6) | 59(48.4) | 5.490 | 0.019 | 42(34.4) | 46(37.7) | 0.284 | 0.594 | 54(47.8) | 48(42.5) | 1.065 | 0.302 |
| SNA阳性 | 10(8.2) | 21(17.2) | 4.471 | 0.034 | 15(12.3) | 15(12.3) | 0 | 1.000 | 20(17.7) | 14(12.4) | 1.500 | 0.221 |
| NAG阳性 | 8(6.6) | 17(13.9) | 3.610 | 0.057 | 16(13.1) | 15(12.3) | 0.037 | 0.848 | 17(15.0) | 8(7.1) | 3.996 | 0.046 |
| BV | 1(0.8) | 3(2.5) | — | 0.622 | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | — | 0.722 | 11(9.7) | 6(5.3) | 1.782 | 0.182 |
| VVC | 3(2.5) | 13(10.7) | 6.689 | 0.010 | 13(10.7) | 10(8.2) | 0.432 | 0.511 | 13(11.5) | 6(5.3) | 3.084 | 0.079 |
| BV+VVC | 5(4.1) | 4(3.3) | — | 1.000 | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | — | 0.722 | 4(3.5) | 2(1.8) | — | 0.440 |
| 阴道菌群异常 | 21(17.2) | 36(29.5) | 5.151 | 0.023 | 31(25.4) | 28(23.0) | 0.201 | 0.654 | 37(32.7) | 19(16.8) | 8.500 | 0.004 |
Table 5 Comparison of vaginal microecological detection results at different gestational weeks between GDM and non-GDM group
| 检测结果 | A阶段 | B阶段 | C阶段 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM组(n=122) | 非GDM组(n=122) | χ2值 | P值 | GDM组(n=122) | 非GDM组(n=122) | χ2值 | P值 | GDM组(n=113) | 非GDM组(n=113) | χ2值 | P值 | |
| 优势菌为乳杆菌 | 107(87.7) | 95(77.9) | 4.141 | 0.042 | 100(82.0) | 103(84.4) | 0.264 | 0.607 | 88(77.9) | 103(91.1) | 4.212 | 0.040 |
| H2O2阳性 | 95(77.9) | 106(86.9) | 3.416 | 0.065 | 111(91.0) | 113(92.6) | 0.218 | 0.641 | 107(94.7) | 101(89.4) | 4.650 | 0.031 |
| LE阳性 | 41(33.6) | 59(48.4) | 5.490 | 0.019 | 42(34.4) | 46(37.7) | 0.284 | 0.594 | 54(47.8) | 48(42.5) | 1.065 | 0.302 |
| SNA阳性 | 10(8.2) | 21(17.2) | 4.471 | 0.034 | 15(12.3) | 15(12.3) | 0 | 1.000 | 20(17.7) | 14(12.4) | 1.500 | 0.221 |
| NAG阳性 | 8(6.6) | 17(13.9) | 3.610 | 0.057 | 16(13.1) | 15(12.3) | 0.037 | 0.848 | 17(15.0) | 8(7.1) | 3.996 | 0.046 |
| BV | 1(0.8) | 3(2.5) | — | 0.622 | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | — | 0.722 | 11(9.7) | 6(5.3) | 1.782 | 0.182 |
| VVC | 3(2.5) | 13(10.7) | 6.689 | 0.010 | 13(10.7) | 10(8.2) | 0.432 | 0.511 | 13(11.5) | 6(5.3) | 3.084 | 0.079 |
| BV+VVC | 5(4.1) | 4(3.3) | — | 1.000 | 3(2.5) | 5(4.1) | — | 0.722 | 4(3.5) | 2(1.8) | — | 0.440 |
| 阴道菌群异常 | 21(17.2) | 36(29.5) | 5.151 | 0.023 | 31(25.4) | 28(23.0) | 0.201 | 0.654 | 37(32.7) | 19(16.8) | 8.500 | 0.004 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 早产 | 胎膜早破 | 绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 产后出血 | 胎儿窘迫 | 产后贫血 | 不良妊娠结局 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM阴道菌群异常组 | 65 | 8(12.3) | 22(33.8) | 7(10.8) | 8(12.3) | 4(6.2) | 23(35.4) | 48(73.8) |
| GDM阴道菌群正常组 | 57 | 1(1.8) | 8(14.0) | 2(3.5) | 7(12.3) | 2(3.5) | 14(24.6) | 23(40.4) |
| χ2值 | — | 6.428 | — | <0.001 | — | 1.684 | 14.005 | |
| P值 | 0.036 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.996 | 0.684 | 0.194 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of adverse pregnancy outcomes between normal and abnormal vaginal flora subgroup in GDM women
| 组别 | 例数 | 早产 | 胎膜早破 | 绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 产后出血 | 胎儿窘迫 | 产后贫血 | 不良妊娠结局 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM阴道菌群异常组 | 65 | 8(12.3) | 22(33.8) | 7(10.8) | 8(12.3) | 4(6.2) | 23(35.4) | 48(73.8) |
| GDM阴道菌群正常组 | 57 | 1(1.8) | 8(14.0) | 2(3.5) | 7(12.3) | 2(3.5) | 14(24.6) | 23(40.4) |
| χ2值 | — | 6.428 | — | <0.001 | — | 1.684 | 14.005 | |
| P值 | 0.036 | 0.011 | 0.172 | 0.996 | 0.684 | 0.194 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 早产 | 胎膜早破 | 绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 产后出血 | 胎儿窘迫 | 产后贫血 | 不良妊娠结局 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 非GDM阴道菌群异常组 | 60 | 5(8.3) | 18(30.0) | 11(18.3) | 6(10.0) | 4(6.7) | 27(45.0) | 37(61.7) |
| 非GDM阴道菌群正常组 | 62 | 0 | 9(14.5) | 3(4.8) | 2(3.2) | 1(1.6) | 17(27.4) | 28(45.2) |
| χ2值 | — | 4.242 | 5.466 | — | — | 4.087 | 3.337 | |
| P值 | 0.026 | 0.039 | 0.019 | 0.160 | 0.203 | 0.043 | 0.068 |
Table 7 Comparison of adverse pregnancy outcomes between normal and abnormal vaginal flora subgroup in non-GDM women
| 组别 | 例数 | 早产 | 胎膜早破 | 绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 产后出血 | 胎儿窘迫 | 产后贫血 | 不良妊娠结局 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 非GDM阴道菌群异常组 | 60 | 5(8.3) | 18(30.0) | 11(18.3) | 6(10.0) | 4(6.7) | 27(45.0) | 37(61.7) |
| 非GDM阴道菌群正常组 | 62 | 0 | 9(14.5) | 3(4.8) | 2(3.2) | 1(1.6) | 17(27.4) | 28(45.2) |
| χ2值 | — | 4.242 | 5.466 | — | — | 4.087 | 3.337 | |
| P值 | 0.026 | 0.039 | 0.019 | 0.160 | 0.203 | 0.043 | 0.068 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
朱艳宾. 妊娠期需氧菌性阴道炎与妊娠结局及母婴B族链球菌感染的相关性研究[D]. 天津:天津医科大学,2013.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会,中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会. 妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第一部分][J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2022,57(1):3-12. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210917-00528.
|
| [8] |
中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组. 阴道微生态评价的临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(10):721-723. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2016.10.001.
|
| [9] |
廖秦平. 女性阴道微生态图谱[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
杨昕晖,马秀华,张琦. 妊娠期女性阴道菌群变化与妊娠结局相关性的研究进展[J]. 中国医刊,2022,57(11):1184-1188. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2022.11.007.
|
| [13] |
王艳. 妊娠期阴道微生物群落的分布特点与GDM孕妇妊娠结局的相关性分析[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2016.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
林小能,唐袁婷,于凡,等. 妊娠期妇女阴道微生态状况和生殖道感染特征分析[J]. 现代临床医学,2021,47(3):199-201. DOI:10.11851/j.issn.1673-1557.2021.03.012.
|
| [17] |
唐超人,韩宇春,马双凤,等. 妊娠妇女不同孕周的外周血雌二醇动态水平分析[J]. 海南医学,2016,27(7):1067-1069. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.07.013.
|
| [18] |
黄嘉昱,杜伯涛. 联合雌、孕激素、β-hCG水平对早期妊娠结局的预测及治疗指导[J]. 中国生育健康杂志,2018,29(3):274-276. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2018.03.023.
|
| [19] |
张镇松,刘秀卿,陈昌龄. 妊娠期外阴阴道假丝酵母菌感染对妊娠结果影响分析[J]. 河北医学,2011,17(4):498-500. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2011.04.033.
|
| [20] |
肖冰冰,杨慧霞. 妊娠晚期阴道微生态的改变与围产结局的关系[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(10):725-726.
|
| [21] |
马云燕,钟梅,曹虹,等. 妊娠期阴道乳杆菌含量变化的研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2009,25(12):727-729. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2009.12.011.
|
| [22] |
陈进萍,吴开锋,邹晶晶. 产前阴道乳酸杆菌变化及其对早产儿早期肠道菌群的影响分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(16):2825-2827.
|
| [23] |
周玉彬,李超,乔炳龙,等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者胎盘组织中雌激素与雌激素受体α水平变化及相关因素分析[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2017,9(11):688-692. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2017.11.005.
|
| [24] |
谭晶,蒋双玲. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清性激素水平变化及对糖代谢和胰岛功能的影响[J]. 贵州医药,2019,43(7):1127-1129. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.07.052.
|
| [25] |
范书红. 妊娠期糖尿病对孕妇及新生儿免疫系统的影响[J]. 实用糖尿病杂志,2017,13(3):28-29.
|
| [26] |
翁科娜,李璐,张洁琼,等. 妊娠期糖尿病合并生殖道感染危险因素及其免疫状态[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2021,31(6):910-914. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2021-201928.
|
| [27] |
陆静尔,王苏华,庞林荣. 2型糖尿病合并感染患者机体免疫功能的变化研究[J]. 现代实用医学,2018,30(11):1473-1475. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2018.11.024.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
刘丹,李敏. 妊娠期糖尿病产妇妊娠晚期阴道微生态改变与围产结局的相关性分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2021,33(5):577-580. DOI:10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.202105017.
|
| [32] |
周芳芳,史娜娜. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇阴道微生态变化及其对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2020,16(6):714-719. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.014.
|
| [33] |
徐进芳,冯鑫,徐艺,等. 妊娠晚期糖尿病患者的血清25-羟维生素D3水平和胰岛素抵抗及骨代谢指标的相关性[J]. 医学临床研究,2017,34(5):993-995. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2017.05.056.
|
| [34] |
韩云,郑艳莉,吴爱民,等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者胎盘超微结构改变及其影响因素[J]. 山东医药,2016,56(35):59-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2016.35.019.
|
| [35] |
李亚妮,肖景华,计静,等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者孕晚期阴道微生态状况、血清网膜素、促代谢因子水平变化及临床意义[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2022,51(11):1372-1375,1380. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.012.
|
| [36] |
李丽红,肖泽兰,莫培晖,等. 糖尿病患者妊娠期感染及免疫状态变化观察[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(17):4047-4049. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2016-160796.
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
李娜,李娇,朱敏玲,等. 孕妇早产与妊娠期阴道微生态环境变化的关系研究[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2020,12(12):130-134. DOI:10.12037/YXQY.2020.12-27.
|
| [39] |
刘楼,许涵洁,陈道桢,等. 阴道微生态在早产中的研究进展[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2020,32(5):598-600,605. DOI:10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.202005023.
|
| [40] |
丁燕玲,傅锦坚,吴宇碧,等. 阴道微生态失衡对胎膜早破影响的调查研究[J]. 现代预防医学,2018,45(19):3533-3536,3540.
|
| [41] |
王彬苏,周秋明,盛望望,等. 中国妊娠期糖尿病危险因素及妊娠结局的调查分析[J]. 中国医刊,2019,54(9):1014-1019. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2019.09.028.
|
| [1] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [2] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [3] | LIU Shuai, YUAN Shizhao, LIU Yan, JIA Shuoxian, ZHAO Yan, WANG Ziyi, ZHOU Chunhua, YU Jing. Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safetyand Economy of Different Amphotericin B Formulationsin Invasive Fungal Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2967-2974. |
| [4] | REYILAI· Maimaiti, ZHOU Yiran, WU Yun, LIU Zhencheng, LU Yaoqin, WU Haiyan. Association between Novel Obesity Indicators and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2836-2845. |
| [5] | QIU Xinyu, ZHAO Qian, CHEN Yufei, JIAMULE· Maimaitiyiming, HAN Congcong, AIKEDAN· Aierken, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining. Weight Status and Metabolic Characteristics on the Longitudinal Trajectory of Systolic Blood Pressure: a Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2006-2013. |
| [6] | LIU Xiang, CHEN Hong, CUI Rui, GUO Zhichao, LI Panpan, CAO Zilong, JI Yiqing, YU Wenya. Consistencies and Differences in Early Childhood Development Characteristics in Megacities: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1411-1421. |
| [7] | LI Qiuchun, SU Ping, PANG Jinhong, CHEN Qiaoqiao, ZHAO Yingying, HE Ruiyan, WANG Yue, CHEN Xueyu, QIAO Junpeng, CHI Weiwei. Association of Triglyceride Glucose Index with Cardiovascular Disease in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stage 0-3 Population: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1129-1136. |
| [8] | ZHAO Qianqian, ZHANG Mei, LI Yanying, ZHANG Yanhong, YAN Wenhua, PAN Hui, BAN Bo. Clinical Characteristics of Growth Hormone Deficiency and Analysis of the Efficacy of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone: a Ten-year Longitudinal Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 733-740. |
| [9] | LU Yanqiu, WU Yuntao, LIU Shaopeng, LIN Haiying, DENG Huiyou, WU Ying, HUANG Zhe, YANG Peng, WU Shouling, LI Yun. Effect of Blood Pressure Trajectory on Cardiovascular Disease in Population with High-normal Blood Pressure: a Study Based on the Kailuan Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 299-310. |
| [10] | DIJI Zhuoma, ZOU Yanqiu, ZHENG Dixin, HU Mengjie, LIU Xiaoxue, JIANG Xia, FAN Mengyu, LI Jiayuan. Association of Social Isolation, Loneliness, with Incidence Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: a Prospective Chinese Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(01): 122-128. |
| [11] | LIU Ruiyue, YANG Xuemei, ZHAO Naihui, WEN Xinran, CAI Xi, LIANG Yajing, MA Jiajia, WU Shouling, CUI Liufu. The Impact of the Ratio of High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein to Albumin on Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Different Age Groups: a Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(36): 4566-4577. |
| [12] | CHEN Huilong, LIAO Yunchu, LIU Yuwei, KONG Zhenghui, HUANG Xinghui, XU Jiahui, QI Na, WANG Yuanping, LIANG Wenjian. Association between Relative Fat Mass and Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-aged and Elderly Population: a Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study Based on CHARLS [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4047-4054. |
| [13] | LIAO Jiaojiao, WANG Zhaoyu, LI Zhaoji, ZHAO Wei, ZHAN Siyan, WANG Peng, TAO Liyuan. Predictive Value of Dynamic Changes in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol for Carotid Intima-media Thickening: an Ambidirectional Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3932-3941. |
| [14] | ZHANG Ji, ZHOU Jie, LI Ling, WU Yanli, JI Wei, LIU Tao. Associations of Fasting Blood Glucose with All-cause Mortality and Specific-cause Mortality in a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3924-3931. |
| [15] | MEI Jingyan, CHEN Min, ZHANG Lieqiang, PAN Yunxi, WANG Xin, ZHAO Xiaodeng, ZHAN Wei, LIU Tao, WANG Yiying. Association between Cumulative Lipid Accumulation Index and Hypertension: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2205-2211. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||