
Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (08): 971-977.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0313
Special Issue: 用药最新文章合辑; 骨健康最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2023-05-29
Revised:2023-08-04
Published:2024-03-15
Online:2023-12-19
Contact:
HUANG Zhongxia
通讯作者:
黄仲夏
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0313
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别 | GA评分 | MRP评分 | Mayo评分 | 血小板计数异常 | 白细胞计数异常 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性 | 女性 | ≥3分 | <3分 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | ||||
| 两药治疗组 | 18 | 10(55.6) | 8(44.4) | 15(83.3) | 3(16.7) | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 11(61.1) | 7(38.9) | 3(16.7) | 4(22.2) |
| 三药治疗组 | 11 | 10(90.9) | 1(9.1) | 7(63.6) | 4(36.4) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 2(18.2) | 6(54.5) |
| χ2值 | 3.987 | 1.447 | 2.078 | 0.677 | 0.011 | 3.157 | |||||
| P值 | 0.096 | 0.375 | 0.240 | 0.466 | 1.000 | 0.114 | |||||
| 组别 | 中度以上贫血 | 高钙血症 | 肌酐升高 | 静脉血栓 | 骨痛 | R-ISS分期 | 髓外病变 | 1q21扩增 | 维持治疗 | ||
| Ⅲ期 | Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 | ||||||||||
| 两药治疗组 | 12(66.7) | 3(16.7) | 8(44.4) | 1(5.6) | 15(83.3) | 4(22.2) | 14(77.8) | 8(44.4) | 7(38.9) | 8(44.4) | |
| 三药治疗组 | 7(63.6) | 2(18.2) | 5(45.5) | 3(27.3) | 11(100.0) | 0 | 11(100.0) | 2(18.2) | 2(18.2) | 4(36.4) | |
| χ2值 | 0.028 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 2.708 | 2.045 | 2.836 | 2.084 | 1.368 | 0.184 | ||
| P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.139 | 0.268 | 0.268 | 0.234 | 0.412 | 0.717 | ||
Table 1 Comparison of clinical and genetic characteristics of two groups of newly diagnosed super-aged multiple myeloma patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别 | GA评分 | MRP评分 | Mayo评分 | 血小板计数异常 | 白细胞计数异常 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性 | 女性 | ≥3分 | <3分 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | ||||
| 两药治疗组 | 18 | 10(55.6) | 8(44.4) | 15(83.3) | 3(16.7) | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 11(61.1) | 7(38.9) | 3(16.7) | 4(22.2) |
| 三药治疗组 | 11 | 10(90.9) | 1(9.1) | 7(63.6) | 4(36.4) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 2(18.2) | 6(54.5) |
| χ2值 | 3.987 | 1.447 | 2.078 | 0.677 | 0.011 | 3.157 | |||||
| P值 | 0.096 | 0.375 | 0.240 | 0.466 | 1.000 | 0.114 | |||||
| 组别 | 中度以上贫血 | 高钙血症 | 肌酐升高 | 静脉血栓 | 骨痛 | R-ISS分期 | 髓外病变 | 1q21扩增 | 维持治疗 | ||
| Ⅲ期 | Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 | ||||||||||
| 两药治疗组 | 12(66.7) | 3(16.7) | 8(44.4) | 1(5.6) | 15(83.3) | 4(22.2) | 14(77.8) | 8(44.4) | 7(38.9) | 8(44.4) | |
| 三药治疗组 | 7(63.6) | 2(18.2) | 5(45.5) | 3(27.3) | 11(100.0) | 0 | 11(100.0) | 2(18.2) | 2(18.2) | 4(36.4) | |
| χ2值 | 0.028 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 2.708 | 2.045 | 2.836 | 2.084 | 1.368 | 0.184 | ||
| P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.139 | 0.268 | 0.268 | 0.234 | 0.412 | 0.717 | ||
| 组别 | 例数 | CR | VGPR | PR | ORR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 两药治疗组 | 18 | 1(5.56) | 4(22.22) | 11(61.11) | 16(88.89) |
| 三药治疗组 | 11 | 1(9.10) | 3(27.27) | 4(36.36) | 8(72.73) |
| χ2值 | 0.133 | 0.343 | 0.279 | 1.250 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.677 | 0.710 | 0.339 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups of newly diagnosed super-aged multiple myeloma patients
| 组别 | 例数 | CR | VGPR | PR | ORR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 两药治疗组 | 18 | 1(5.56) | 4(22.22) | 11(61.11) | 16(88.89) |
| 三药治疗组 | 11 | 1(9.10) | 3(27.27) | 4(36.36) | 8(72.73) |
| χ2值 | 0.133 | 0.343 | 0.279 | 1.250 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.677 | 0.710 | 0.339 |
| 变量 | B | SE | Waldχ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | ||||||
| GA评分≥3分 | 0.167 | 0.870 | 0.037 | 0.848 | 1.181 | 0.215~6.499 |
| MRP为衰弱 | -1.546 | 0.749 | 4.266 | 0.039 | 0.213 | 0.049~0.924 |
| 血清校正钙升高 | -1.879 | 0.672 | 7.818 | 0.005 | 0.153 | 0.041~0.570 |
| R-ISS分期Ⅲ期 | -1.052 | 0.663 | 2.517 | 0.113 | 0.349 | 0.095~1.281 |
| 维持治疗 | 1.459 | 0.643 | 5.145 | 0.023 | 4.301 | 1.219~15.169 |
| OS | ||||||
| GA评分≥3分 | -0.644 | 0.865 | 0.554 | 0.457 | 0.525 | 0.096~2.861 |
| MRP为衰弱 | -0.687 | 0.731 | 0.883 | 0.347 | 0.503 | 0.120~2.108 |
| 血清校正钙升高 | -1.039 | 0.632 | 2.703 | 0.100 | 0.354 | 0.102~1.221 |
| DS分期Ⅲ期 | -0.079 | 0.572 | 0.019 | 0.889 | 0.924 | 0.301~2.833 |
| 维持治疗 | 1.475 | 0.728 | 4.104 | 0.043 | 4.372 | 1.049~18.221 |
Table 3 Multivariate Cox hazard risk regression analysis of the influencing factors of PFS and OS in the super-aged newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
| 变量 | B | SE | Waldχ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | ||||||
| GA评分≥3分 | 0.167 | 0.870 | 0.037 | 0.848 | 1.181 | 0.215~6.499 |
| MRP为衰弱 | -1.546 | 0.749 | 4.266 | 0.039 | 0.213 | 0.049~0.924 |
| 血清校正钙升高 | -1.879 | 0.672 | 7.818 | 0.005 | 0.153 | 0.041~0.570 |
| R-ISS分期Ⅲ期 | -1.052 | 0.663 | 2.517 | 0.113 | 0.349 | 0.095~1.281 |
| 维持治疗 | 1.459 | 0.643 | 5.145 | 0.023 | 4.301 | 1.219~15.169 |
| OS | ||||||
| GA评分≥3分 | -0.644 | 0.865 | 0.554 | 0.457 | 0.525 | 0.096~2.861 |
| MRP为衰弱 | -0.687 | 0.731 | 0.883 | 0.347 | 0.503 | 0.120~2.108 |
| 血清校正钙升高 | -1.039 | 0.632 | 2.703 | 0.100 | 0.354 | 0.102~1.221 |
| DS分期Ⅲ期 | -0.079 | 0.572 | 0.019 | 0.889 | 0.924 | 0.301~2.833 |
| 维持治疗 | 1.475 | 0.728 | 4.104 | 0.043 | 4.372 | 1.049~18.221 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
中国医师协会血液科医师分会,中华医学会血液学分会,黄晓军. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2022年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志,2022,61(5):480-487. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220309-00165.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
薛茹,程璐,宋丽敏,等. 不同衰弱评分下老年多发性骨髓瘤患者化疗疗效及安全性的评估[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志,2022,30(1):170-174. DOI:10.19746/j.cnki.issn1009-2137.2022.01.028.
|
| [12] |
李玉军,刘丽洋,肖娟娟. 新诊断老年多发性骨髓瘤的预后分层及治疗进展[J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志,2022,36(1):84-88. DOI:10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2022.01.016.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
赵佳莉,饶琦,罗茜. 老年初治多发性骨髓瘤化疗后感染临床特点及预后的多因素分析[J]. 老年医学与保健,2021,27(4):758-762. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2021.04.019.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
李玉军,徐建梅,张江勃,等. 四种衰弱模型对老年多发性骨髓瘤患者的评估及对患者生存的预测效能[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2023,31(5):921-926. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.05.026.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
季丽莉,陈晨,张雪皎,等. Frailty评分预测老年多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析[J]. 中国临床医学,2016,23(5):586-590. DOI:10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2016.20160734.
|
| [22] |
汤芳,朱霞明,陆茵,等. 老年评分系统(GA)在老年多发性骨髓瘤患者中的应用研究进展[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(19):196-198. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2018.19.158.
|
| [23] |
叶鉴南,马柯娃,曹永芹,等. MRP评分联合IPSI评分对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后的评估价值[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2023,31(9):1726-1731. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.09.027.
|
| [24] |
|
| [1] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [2] | PANG Shu, SUN ying, JIANG Chunyan. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Fried's Frailty Phenotype and the FRAIL Scale in Assessing Pre-frailty among Community-dwelling Older Adults Undergoing Health Examinations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2664-2670. |
| [3] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [4] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [5] | ZHAN Li, HENG Zhaoyang, HE Liangyu, ZHAO Jie, CHEN Jie, XING Jinshan. Efficacy and Safety of CAR-T Therapy Targeting the B Cell Maturation Antigen on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Chinese People: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930. |
| [6] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [7] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [8] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [9] | LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, LIU Zihan, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Primary Sjögren's Disease with Dryness and Blood-stasis Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 718-725. |
| [10] | WANG Lina, LEI Jingshu, LI Kuibao, WANG Ruiying, LI Xinmiao, WANG Fangfang, GUO Xiaorong, NIU Ruihao, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Fangfang, ZHAO Jingjing, LEE CHONGYOU. Review on Inflammatory Response in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 790-801. |
| [11] | ZHANG Zhiwei, HE Panpan, YANG Qianwen, JIN Xueyi, MAO Xueqian, HU Ying, JING Lipeng. The Relationship between Different Obesity Indicators and Frailty among the Elderly in Rural Regions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 699-709. |
| [12] | WANG Xue, YANG Chengming, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Analysis on Prognosis and Influencing Factors in Patients with Post-tuberculosis Bronchiectasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 606-611. |
| [13] | TIAN Ziwei, YANG Zhilan, ZHAO Huimin, ZHAI Yanping, LI Hongyan, DU Miao, JIN Yuanyuan, SONG Zeyu. Frailty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 676-680. |
| [14] | FU Jiyi, ZHENG Boyue, WU Jiafei, WANG Jun, LI Hui. Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Regimen of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(04): 483-489. |
| [15] | ZHENG Huatao, WANG Shiqiang, LI Dan, YANG E, LUO Dan, LAI Yu, MA Rentao. Association between Physical Activity Changes Trajectories and Frailty in Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 316-324. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||