Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (08): 971-977.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0313
Special Issue: 骨健康最新文章合辑; 用药最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-05-29
Revised:
2023-08-04
Published:
2024-03-15
Online:
2023-12-19
Contact:
HUANG Zhongxia
通讯作者:
黄仲夏
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0313
组别 | 例数 | 性别 | GA评分 | MRP评分 | Mayo评分 | 血小板计数异常 | 白细胞计数异常 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 | 女性 | ≥3分 | <3分 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | ||||
两药治疗组 | 18 | 10(55.6) | 8(44.4) | 15(83.3) | 3(16.7) | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 11(61.1) | 7(38.9) | 3(16.7) | 4(22.2) |
三药治疗组 | 11 | 10(90.9) | 1(9.1) | 7(63.6) | 4(36.4) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 2(18.2) | 6(54.5) |
χ2值 | 3.987 | 1.447 | 2.078 | 0.677 | 0.011 | 3.157 | |||||
P值 | 0.096 | 0.375 | 0.240 | 0.466 | 1.000 | 0.114 | |||||
组别 | 中度以上贫血 | 高钙血症 | 肌酐升高 | 静脉血栓 | 骨痛 | R-ISS分期 | 髓外病变 | 1q21扩增 | 维持治疗 | ||
Ⅲ期 | Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 | ||||||||||
两药治疗组 | 12(66.7) | 3(16.7) | 8(44.4) | 1(5.6) | 15(83.3) | 4(22.2) | 14(77.8) | 8(44.4) | 7(38.9) | 8(44.4) | |
三药治疗组 | 7(63.6) | 2(18.2) | 5(45.5) | 3(27.3) | 11(100.0) | 0 | 11(100.0) | 2(18.2) | 2(18.2) | 4(36.4) | |
χ2值 | 0.028 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 2.708 | 2.045 | 2.836 | 2.084 | 1.368 | 0.184 | ||
P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.139 | 0.268 | 0.268 | 0.234 | 0.412 | 0.717 |
Table 1 Comparison of clinical and genetic characteristics of two groups of newly diagnosed super-aged multiple myeloma patients
组别 | 例数 | 性别 | GA评分 | MRP评分 | Mayo评分 | 血小板计数异常 | 白细胞计数异常 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性 | 女性 | ≥3分 | <3分 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | 衰弱 | 非衰弱 | ||||
两药治疗组 | 18 | 10(55.6) | 8(44.4) | 15(83.3) | 3(16.7) | 13(72.2) | 5(27.8) | 11(61.1) | 7(38.9) | 3(16.7) | 4(22.2) |
三药治疗组 | 11 | 10(90.9) | 1(9.1) | 7(63.6) | 4(36.4) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 5(45.5) | 6(54.5) | 2(18.2) | 6(54.5) |
χ2值 | 3.987 | 1.447 | 2.078 | 0.677 | 0.011 | 3.157 | |||||
P值 | 0.096 | 0.375 | 0.240 | 0.466 | 1.000 | 0.114 | |||||
组别 | 中度以上贫血 | 高钙血症 | 肌酐升高 | 静脉血栓 | 骨痛 | R-ISS分期 | 髓外病变 | 1q21扩增 | 维持治疗 | ||
Ⅲ期 | Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 | ||||||||||
两药治疗组 | 12(66.7) | 3(16.7) | 8(44.4) | 1(5.6) | 15(83.3) | 4(22.2) | 14(77.8) | 8(44.4) | 7(38.9) | 8(44.4) | |
三药治疗组 | 7(63.6) | 2(18.2) | 5(45.5) | 3(27.3) | 11(100.0) | 0 | 11(100.0) | 2(18.2) | 2(18.2) | 4(36.4) | |
χ2值 | 0.028 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 2.708 | 2.045 | 2.836 | 2.084 | 1.368 | 0.184 | ||
P值 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.139 | 0.268 | 0.268 | 0.234 | 0.412 | 0.717 |
组别 | 例数 | CR | VGPR | PR | ORR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
两药治疗组 | 18 | 1(5.56) | 4(22.22) | 11(61.11) | 16(88.89) |
三药治疗组 | 11 | 1(9.10) | 3(27.27) | 4(36.36) | 8(72.73) |
χ2值 | 0.133 | 0.343 | 0.279 | 1.250 | |
P值 | 1.000 | 0.677 | 0.710 | 0.339 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups of newly diagnosed super-aged multiple myeloma patients
组别 | 例数 | CR | VGPR | PR | ORR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
两药治疗组 | 18 | 1(5.56) | 4(22.22) | 11(61.11) | 16(88.89) |
三药治疗组 | 11 | 1(9.10) | 3(27.27) | 4(36.36) | 8(72.73) |
χ2值 | 0.133 | 0.343 | 0.279 | 1.250 | |
P值 | 1.000 | 0.677 | 0.710 | 0.339 |
变量 | B | SE | Waldχ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFS | ||||||
GA评分≥3分 | 0.167 | 0.870 | 0.037 | 0.848 | 1.181 | 0.215~6.499 |
MRP为衰弱 | -1.546 | 0.749 | 4.266 | 0.039 | 0.213 | 0.049~0.924 |
血清校正钙升高 | -1.879 | 0.672 | 7.818 | 0.005 | 0.153 | 0.041~0.570 |
R-ISS分期Ⅲ期 | -1.052 | 0.663 | 2.517 | 0.113 | 0.349 | 0.095~1.281 |
维持治疗 | 1.459 | 0.643 | 5.145 | 0.023 | 4.301 | 1.219~15.169 |
OS | ||||||
GA评分≥3分 | -0.644 | 0.865 | 0.554 | 0.457 | 0.525 | 0.096~2.861 |
MRP为衰弱 | -0.687 | 0.731 | 0.883 | 0.347 | 0.503 | 0.120~2.108 |
血清校正钙升高 | -1.039 | 0.632 | 2.703 | 0.100 | 0.354 | 0.102~1.221 |
DS分期Ⅲ期 | -0.079 | 0.572 | 0.019 | 0.889 | 0.924 | 0.301~2.833 |
维持治疗 | 1.475 | 0.728 | 4.104 | 0.043 | 4.372 | 1.049~18.221 |
Table 3 Multivariate Cox hazard risk regression analysis of the influencing factors of PFS and OS in the super-aged newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
变量 | B | SE | Waldχ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFS | ||||||
GA评分≥3分 | 0.167 | 0.870 | 0.037 | 0.848 | 1.181 | 0.215~6.499 |
MRP为衰弱 | -1.546 | 0.749 | 4.266 | 0.039 | 0.213 | 0.049~0.924 |
血清校正钙升高 | -1.879 | 0.672 | 7.818 | 0.005 | 0.153 | 0.041~0.570 |
R-ISS分期Ⅲ期 | -1.052 | 0.663 | 2.517 | 0.113 | 0.349 | 0.095~1.281 |
维持治疗 | 1.459 | 0.643 | 5.145 | 0.023 | 4.301 | 1.219~15.169 |
OS | ||||||
GA评分≥3分 | -0.644 | 0.865 | 0.554 | 0.457 | 0.525 | 0.096~2.861 |
MRP为衰弱 | -0.687 | 0.731 | 0.883 | 0.347 | 0.503 | 0.120~2.108 |
血清校正钙升高 | -1.039 | 0.632 | 2.703 | 0.100 | 0.354 | 0.102~1.221 |
DS分期Ⅲ期 | -0.079 | 0.572 | 0.019 | 0.889 | 0.924 | 0.301~2.833 |
维持治疗 | 1.475 | 0.728 | 4.104 | 0.043 | 4.372 | 1.049~18.221 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
中国医师协会血液科医师分会,中华医学会血液学分会,黄晓军. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2022年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志,2022,61(5):480-487. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220309-00165.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
薛茹,程璐,宋丽敏,等. 不同衰弱评分下老年多发性骨髓瘤患者化疗疗效及安全性的评估[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志,2022,30(1):170-174. DOI:10.19746/j.cnki.issn1009-2137.2022.01.028.
|
[12] |
李玉军,刘丽洋,肖娟娟. 新诊断老年多发性骨髓瘤的预后分层及治疗进展[J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志,2022,36(1):84-88. DOI:10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2022.01.016.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
赵佳莉,饶琦,罗茜. 老年初治多发性骨髓瘤化疗后感染临床特点及预后的多因素分析[J]. 老年医学与保健,2021,27(4):758-762. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2021.04.019.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
李玉军,徐建梅,张江勃,等. 四种衰弱模型对老年多发性骨髓瘤患者的评估及对患者生存的预测效能[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2023,31(5):921-926. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.05.026.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
季丽莉,陈晨,张雪皎,等. Frailty评分预测老年多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析[J]. 中国临床医学,2016,23(5):586-590. DOI:10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2016.20160734.
|
[22] |
汤芳,朱霞明,陆茵,等. 老年评分系统(GA)在老年多发性骨髓瘤患者中的应用研究进展[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(19):196-198. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2018.19.158.
|
[23] |
叶鉴南,马柯娃,曹永芹,等. MRP评分联合IPSI评分对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后的评估价值[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2023,31(9):1726-1731. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2023.09.027.
|
[24] |
|
[1] | ZHENG Boyue, FU Jiyi, WU Jiafei, WANG Jun, LI Hui. Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Carfilzomib in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3806-3814. |
[2] | XU Yanpeng, HUANG Pe, ZHANG Pingping, LUO Yan, SHI Xiaoqi, WU Liusong, CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu. Expression of β-Adrenergic Receptors in Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3391-3398. |
[3] | CHENG Yuxin, FANG Jiamin, LIANG Hao, WANG Zhiling, WEI Li, LIAO Huilian, XU Mingming, CHEN Yumei, LI Yanfen, DONG Lijuan, GUO Yingui. Preoperative Platelet-to-albumin Ratio in Elective Geriatric Surgery Patients and Its Correlation with Postoperative Incidental Frailty: a Multicenter Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3359-3367. |
[4] | HU Jieman, TAN Feixiang, YUAN Anxin, CHEN Shiyu, TANG Chulei, YIN Yueheng, BA Lei, XU Qin. Analysis of the Trajectory of Postoperative Frailty and Influencing Factors in Patients with Colorectal Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3276-3282. |
[5] | YANG Chen, CHEN Tong, ZHANG Lifang, ZHANG Hongxu, LI Pengfei, ZHANG Xuejuan. Prognostic Impact of Dapagliflozin in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3053-3058. |
[6] | CHEN Fei, WANG Jinying, YU Haibo, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, ZHANG Tianyu, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Urinary NGAL, TIM-1, VCAM-1 and Activin A in Patients with New Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2740-2749. |
[7] | LIU Yuting, QIU Lixia, LI Yuling. Impact of Frailty on Cognitive Function in Chinese Older Adults: a Moderated Chain-mediated Effect [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2119-2126. |
[8] | JIANG Xiaoman, XU Xinyi, DING Lingyu, GUO Yinning, MIAO Xueyi, CHEN Li, XU Qin. Clinical Characteristics and Correlation between Preoperative Frailty and Metabolic Syndrome among Older Patients with Gastric Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2134-2141. |
[9] | CAO Gan, DENG Yifan, HE Shenghu, ZHANG Jing. Study on the Correlation between the Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-albumin Ratio and Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Emergency PCI [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1878-1883. |
[10] | ZHANG Shujing, SUN Lixin, CAO Yuqing. Comparative Study on the Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic between HPV-related and Non-HPV-related Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1758-1764. |
[11] | LI Qiujing, SHANG Na, GAO Qian, YANG Li, GUO Shubin. Predictive Value of Abdominal CT Based-skeletal Muscle Mass Combined with Critical Illness Score for Prognosis in Older Patients with Intra-abdominal Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1459-1464. |
[12] | WANG Dexiang, YUAN Jiawen, LU Qinyun, HANG Yuhao, LU Jun, CHENG Lu. Influences of Treatment Timing of the TCM prescription Qingfei Huayu Tongfu Formula on the Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis of Sepsis-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1500-1505. |
[13] | ZHANG Pei, YANG Meng, GAO Chunlin, XIA Zhengkun. Study on the Intervention and Prognosis of Modified Lifting Powder on Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Disease in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1376-1382. |
[14] | ZHAO Linlin, LUO Qi, HU Qinghua, CHEN Xiaolei, DU Juan, SHAO Shuang. Research on the Multidimensional Frailty in Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1281-1288. |
[15] | WANG Yiquan, CHEN Wanjia, LIU Wangyi, ZHANG Luyun, DENG Yueyi. The Prognosis of Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Diseasetreated with Fermented Cordyceps Sinensis Powder: Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(09): 1084-1091. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||