Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (32): 4065-4071.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0418
Special Issue: 儿科最新文章合辑; 远程医疗最新文章合辑; 数智医疗最新文章合辑; 疾病康复与健康最新文章合辑
• Article·Focus on Special Population·Adolescents • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-20
Revised:
2022-07-18
Published:
2022-11-15
Online:
2022-08-25
Contact:
WANG Liancheng
About author:
通讯作者:
王连成
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0418
组别 | 例数 | 主弯Cobb角 | CBD(mm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 20.11°±0.94° | 16.69°±1.34° | 2.088 | 0.044 | 5.31±2.70 | 4.81±3.81 | 0.107 | 0.915 |
结合组 | 20 | 18.58°±0.69° | 12.05°±1.30°a | 4.434 | <0.001 | 8.74±2.88 | 7.53±3.23 | 0.281 | 0.781 |
线下组 | 20 | 18.12°±0.95° | 14.91°±1.21°b | 2.077 | 0.045 | 7.93±2.52 | 6.94±3.03 | 0.250 | 0.804 |
F值 | 1.399 | 3.520 | 0.425 | 0.177 | |||||
P值 | 0.255 | 0.036 | 0.656 | 0.838 |
Table 1 Comparison of coronal indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 主弯Cobb角 | CBD(mm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 20.11°±0.94° | 16.69°±1.34° | 2.088 | 0.044 | 5.31±2.70 | 4.81±3.81 | 0.107 | 0.915 |
结合组 | 20 | 18.58°±0.69° | 12.05°±1.30°a | 4.434 | <0.001 | 8.74±2.88 | 7.53±3.23 | 0.281 | 0.781 |
线下组 | 20 | 18.12°±0.95° | 14.91°±1.21°b | 2.077 | 0.045 | 7.93±2.52 | 6.94±3.03 | 0.250 | 0.804 |
F值 | 1.399 | 3.520 | 0.425 | 0.177 | |||||
P值 | 0.255 | 0.036 | 0.656 | 0.838 |
组别 | 例数 | TK | LL | SVA(mm) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 23.67°±3.21° | 32.14°±2.63° | -2.045 | 0.049 | 49.89°±2.11° | 45.77°±3.59° | 0.993 | 0.328 | 25.54°±6.43° | 15.17°±4.73° | 5.512 | <0.001 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.78°±2.50° | 30.69°±2.37° | -2.294 | 0.027 | 52.75°±2.48° | 52.27°±2.80° | 0.128 | 0.899 | 27.48°±6.20° | 16.15°±7.90° | 5.043 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 24.44°±3.22° | 33.81°±13.68° | -2.109 | 0.042 | 53.86°±2.42° | 50.04°±2.93° | 1.004 | 0.322 | 25.82°±5.90° | 12.00°±5.97° | 7.369 | <0.001 |
F值 | 0.080 | 0.343 | 0.714 | 1.106 | 0.560 | 2.296 | |||||||
P值 | 0.923 | 0.711 | 0.494 | 0.338 | 0.574 | 0.110 |
Table 2 Comparison of sagittal plane indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | TK | LL | SVA(mm) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 23.67°±3.21° | 32.14°±2.63° | -2.045 | 0.049 | 49.89°±2.11° | 45.77°±3.59° | 0.993 | 0.328 | 25.54°±6.43° | 15.17°±4.73° | 5.512 | <0.001 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.78°±2.50° | 30.69°±2.37° | -2.294 | 0.027 | 52.75°±2.48° | 52.27°±2.80° | 0.128 | 0.899 | 27.48°±6.20° | 16.15°±7.90° | 5.043 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 24.44°±3.22° | 33.81°±13.68° | -2.109 | 0.042 | 53.86°±2.42° | 50.04°±2.93° | 1.004 | 0.322 | 25.82°±5.90° | 12.00°±5.97° | 7.369 | <0.001 |
F值 | 0.080 | 0.343 | 0.714 | 1.106 | 0.560 | 2.296 | |||||||
P值 | 0.923 | 0.711 | 0.494 | 0.338 | 0.574 | 0.110 |
组别 | 例数 | ATR | Raimondi值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 7.94°±0.37° | 4.94°±0.26° | 6.566 | <0.001 | 16.44°±1.54° | 10.33°±0.48° | 2.967 | 0.007 |
结合组 | 20 | 7.65°±0.24° | 3.85°±0.22°a | 11.555 | <0.001 | 13.90°±1.17° | 8.20°±0.84° | 3.941 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 7.80°±0.26° | 5.55°±1.90°b | 8.621 | <0.001 | 15.70°±1.61° | 11.30°±1.50° | 2.407 | 0.021 |
F值 | 0.249 | 7.224 | 0.852 | 1.537 | |||||
P值 | 0.780 | 0.002 | 0.432 | 0.224 |
Table 3 Comparison of horizontal indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | ATR | Raimondi值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 7.94°±0.37° | 4.94°±0.26° | 6.566 | <0.001 | 16.44°±1.54° | 10.33°±0.48° | 2.967 | 0.007 |
结合组 | 20 | 7.65°±0.24° | 3.85°±0.22°a | 11.555 | <0.001 | 13.90°±1.17° | 8.20°±0.84° | 3.941 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 7.80°±0.26° | 5.55°±1.90°b | 8.621 | <0.001 | 15.70°±1.61° | 11.30°±1.50° | 2.407 | 0.021 |
F值 | 0.249 | 7.224 | 0.852 | 1.537 | |||||
P值 | 0.780 | 0.002 | 0.432 | 0.224 |
组别 | 例数 | PI | PT | SS | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 42.53°±2.43° | 38.91°±9.39° | 1.101 | 0.279 | 5.13°±1.42° | 7.70°±6.15° | -0.677 | 0.503 | 37.40°±2.07° | 30.59°±2.14° | 2.284 | 0.029 |
结合组 | 20 | 39.43°±10.33° | 38.20°±7.95° | 0.515 | 0.610 | 2.37°±1.85° | 6.15°±2.04° | -1.375 | 0.177 | 37.36°±1.24° | 31.53°±1.93° | 2.097 | 0.043 |
线下组 | 20 | 45.68°±10.17° | 44.39°±10.92° | 0.387 | 0.701 | 5.65°±1.75° | 10.23°±2.13° | -1.664 | 0.104 | 40.03°±1.51° | 34.15°±1.55° | 2.718 | 0.010 |
F值 | 2.261 | 2.513 | 1.101 | 2.096 | 0.921 | 0.889 | |||||||
P值 | 0.114 | 0.090 | 0.340 | 0.113 | 0.404 | 0.417 |
Table 4 Comparison of pelvic parameters among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | PI | PT | SS | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 42.53°±2.43° | 38.91°±9.39° | 1.101 | 0.279 | 5.13°±1.42° | 7.70°±6.15° | -0.677 | 0.503 | 37.40°±2.07° | 30.59°±2.14° | 2.284 | 0.029 |
结合组 | 20 | 39.43°±10.33° | 38.20°±7.95° | 0.515 | 0.610 | 2.37°±1.85° | 6.15°±2.04° | -1.375 | 0.177 | 37.36°±1.24° | 31.53°±1.93° | 2.097 | 0.043 |
线下组 | 20 | 45.68°±10.17° | 44.39°±10.92° | 0.387 | 0.701 | 5.65°±1.75° | 10.23°±2.13° | -1.664 | 0.104 | 40.03°±1.51° | 34.15°±1.55° | 2.718 | 0.010 |
F值 | 2.261 | 2.513 | 1.101 | 2.096 | 0.921 | 0.889 | |||||||
P值 | 0.114 | 0.090 | 0.340 | 0.113 | 0.404 | 0.417 |
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧MAR | 凹侧MAR | 双侧RMSR(100%MVIC) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 6.08±0.46 | 6.48±0.37 | -0.680 | 0.501 | 4.77±0.55 | 6.20±0.43 | -2.047 | 0.048 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.08±0.08 | 2.069 | 0.046 |
结合组 | 20 | 6.42±0.74 | 6.98±0.57 | -0.595 | 0.555 | 3.99±0.47 | 7.87±0.46a | -3.611 | 0.001 | 1.50±0.12 | 1.11±0.06 | 2.826 | 0.007 |
线下组 | 20 | 5.59±0.40 | 6.06±0.34 | -0.891 | 0.378 | 4.38±0.28 | 7.50±0.35a | -2.510 | 0.016 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.05±0.07 | 2.348 | 0.024 |
F值 | 0.582 | 1.119 | 0.777 | 4.354 | 0.376 | 0.185 | |||||||
P值 | 0.562 | 0.334 | 0.465 | 0.018 | 0.688 | 0.831 |
Table 5 Comparison of electromyographic indices of paravertebral muscle surface of parietal vertebra between three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧MAR | 凹侧MAR | 双侧RMSR(100%MVIC) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 6.08±0.46 | 6.48±0.37 | -0.680 | 0.501 | 4.77±0.55 | 6.20±0.43 | -2.047 | 0.048 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.08±0.08 | 2.069 | 0.046 |
结合组 | 20 | 6.42±0.74 | 6.98±0.57 | -0.595 | 0.555 | 3.99±0.47 | 7.87±0.46a | -3.611 | 0.001 | 1.50±0.12 | 1.11±0.06 | 2.826 | 0.007 |
线下组 | 20 | 5.59±0.40 | 6.06±0.34 | -0.891 | 0.378 | 4.38±0.28 | 7.50±0.35a | -2.510 | 0.016 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.05±0.07 | 2.348 | 0.024 |
F值 | 0.582 | 1.119 | 0.777 | 4.354 | 0.376 | 0.185 | |||||||
P值 | 0.562 | 0.334 | 0.465 | 0.018 | 0.688 | 0.831 |
组别 | 例数 | 功能活动 | 疼痛 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 22.67±0.42 | 22.94±0.34 | -0.515 | 0.610 | 22.94±0.25 | 23.11±0.27 | -.457 | 0.651 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.05±0.29 | 22.15±0.33 | -0.224 | 0.824 | 23.15±0.2 | 23.35±0.24 | -0.556 | 0.581 |
线下组 | 20 | 22.25±0.47 | 22.85±2.13 | -1.085 | 0.285 | 23.10±0.27 | 23.20±0.27 | -0.263 | 0.794 |
F值 | 0.598 | 1.837 | 0.161 | 0.215 | |||||
P值 | 0.553 | 0.169 | 0.852 | 0.807 | |||||
组别 | 自我形象 | 心理健康 | 治疗满意度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 19.94±0.46 | 21.50±0.47 | -2.373 | 0.023 | 21.00±0.28 | 22.50±0.32 | -3.554 | 0.001 | 7.28±1.02 |
结合组 | 19.45±0.32 | 21.10±0.23 | -4.196 | 0.000 | 20.60±0.44 | 22.15±0.29 | -2.944 | 0.006 | 8.05±1.10a |
线下组 | 20.50±0.44 | 21.75±0.39a | -2.115 | 0.041 | 21.70±0.29 | 23.00±0.25 | -3.380 | 0.002 | 6.90±0.97b |
F值 | 1.697 | 0.820 | 2.639 | 2.305 | 6.459 | ||||
P值 | 0.193 | 0.446 | 0.080 | 0.109 | 0.003 |
Table 6 Comparison of SRS-22 scores among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 功能活动 | 疼痛 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 22.67±0.42 | 22.94±0.34 | -0.515 | 0.610 | 22.94±0.25 | 23.11±0.27 | -.457 | 0.651 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.05±0.29 | 22.15±0.33 | -0.224 | 0.824 | 23.15±0.2 | 23.35±0.24 | -0.556 | 0.581 |
线下组 | 20 | 22.25±0.47 | 22.85±2.13 | -1.085 | 0.285 | 23.10±0.27 | 23.20±0.27 | -0.263 | 0.794 |
F值 | 0.598 | 1.837 | 0.161 | 0.215 | |||||
P值 | 0.553 | 0.169 | 0.852 | 0.807 | |||||
组别 | 自我形象 | 心理健康 | 治疗满意度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 19.94±0.46 | 21.50±0.47 | -2.373 | 0.023 | 21.00±0.28 | 22.50±0.32 | -3.554 | 0.001 | 7.28±1.02 |
结合组 | 19.45±0.32 | 21.10±0.23 | -4.196 | 0.000 | 20.60±0.44 | 22.15±0.29 | -2.944 | 0.006 | 8.05±1.10a |
线下组 | 20.50±0.44 | 21.75±0.39a | -2.115 | 0.041 | 21.70±0.29 | 23.00±0.25 | -3.380 | 0.002 | 6.90±0.97b |
F值 | 1.697 | 0.820 | 2.639 | 2.305 | 6.459 | ||||
P值 | 0.193 | 0.446 | 0.080 | 0.109 | 0.003 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
邱勇. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸基因学研究和临床治疗的发展现状及前景[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(8):578-582. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.08.005.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
方积乾,陆盈. 现代医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
陈峰,沈建雄,邱贵兴. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸骨盆参数与脊柱矢状面参数的相关性[J]. 中华医学杂志,2013,93(7):487-490. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.07.003.
|
[16] |
杜青,周璇,励建安,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸腰腹部肌群表面肌电信号特征研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2013,35(8):612-616. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2013.08.005.
|
[17] |
袁望舒,陈丽霞,沈建雄,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者顶椎椎旁肌表面肌电信号与Cobb角及轴向躯干旋转角的相关性[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2019,23(24):3824-3828. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1223.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
胡攀攀,于淼,刘晓光,等. Lenke 1型青少年特发性脊柱侧弯脊柱-骨盆矢状位与冠状位参数的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版),2015,47(2):248-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.02.011.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
吴亮,邱勇,王斌,等. 脊柱侧凸椎旁肌肌纤维不对称性分布的研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(5):276-279. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2004.05.007.
|
[24] |
贾惊宇,孙英伟,张立军. 特发性脊柱侧凸患者两侧椎旁肌横截面积的CT测量[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(3):208-211. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2009.03.08.
|
[1] | HAN Xiao, LI Qiyu, GE Pu, FAN Siyuan, LIU Diyue, WU Yibo, ZHANG Qingshuang. The Impact of Behavioral Lifestyle on Quality of Life in Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3248-3258. |
[2] | NIE Daning, SHI Shusheng, TAO Yuru. Clinical Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Combined with Spiral Stabilizing Muscle Chain Training in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3032-3042. |
[3] | LI Miaoxiu, ZHU Bowen, KONG Lingjun, FANG Min. Progress in Research on Clinical Assessment Tools for Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3079-3088. |
[4] | WU Yue, WANG Xuetong, KE Bilian. Evaluation of Vision-related Quality of Life in Myopic Macular Degeneration Patients with Low Vision and Associated Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2908-2914. |
[5] | WEN Min, ZHOU Yongling, LIU Jingjing, JIANG Keqing, LIU Juan, ZHU Xiaodan. The Effect and Mechanism of Compensatory Cognitive Training Based on mHealth APP on Stable Schizophrenia Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2819-2825. |
[6] | CHEN Qiaoqiao, SU Ping, ZHAO Yingying, PANG Jinhong, SHI Jie, WANG Yaqian, LI Qiuchun, HE Ruiyan, WANG Yue, CHEN Xueyu, QIAO Junpeng, CHI Weiwei. Association between Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Incident Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in the Elderly: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2270-2277. |
[7] | YU Yuemin, MO Feifei, LI Lesi, PAN Jiyang. The Assessment Tools and Influencing Factors of Insomnia in Chinese Adolescents: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1213-1219. |
[8] | FAN Jianing, CHEN Jieting, WANG Ziqi, FAN Jinhe, JING Mingxia. Analysis of the Development Trajectory of Health-related Quality of Life in Middle-aged and Elderly Patients with Cardiometabolic Diseases and the Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(08): 923-932. |
[9] | YAO Dingye, LUO Guiping, SUN Junsheng, REN Jingjing. Diagnosis and Treatment of Halitosis: a General Practice Perspective [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(07): 900-904. |
[10] | ZHU Ling, ZHAO Fouxi, WANG Jiangtao, DU Yu, WU Yanli, ZHANG Ji, LIU Tao. Hypertriglyceridemic-waist Phenotype and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 681-687. |
[11] | LI Hongmei, ZHANG Yimin, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yurong, JIA Xiao, YU Jingjing, SANG Die. Aerobic Exercise Improves Physique and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients During Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(03): 285-292. |
[12] | REN Xiaoqiao, WANG Pan, WU Hao, JI Yong, SHI Zhihong. Correlation of Serum Uric Acid to Serum Creatinine Ratio with the Recurrence of Cerebrovascular Events and Mortality in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 175-182. |
[13] | QI Mingrui, WANG Wenjuan, TIAN Limin. Health-related Quality of Life of Elderly Hypertensive Population in Northwest China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 199-207. |
[14] | FENG Caixia, WANG Zengshuai, MU Hailin, YANG Hanxuan, TAMIR. Effect of Parkinson's Disease Management Model Dominated by Movement Disorder Specialists and Centered on Community Doctors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(34): 4280-4285. |
[15] | RAN Zhuorui, SUN Ruixin, JIA Jingyi, CHE Zhaoyu, LI Ruixi, HE Yaping, CHU Qiao. Advances in Life Goal Adjustment Ability of Cancer Patients and Its Effect on Physical and Mental Health [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(23): 2822-2828. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||