Chinese General Practice ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (21): 2607-2614.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.350

• Monographic Research •     Next Articles

Current status of real world study for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

  

  1. 1.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050011,China 2.College of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine,Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050017,China *Corresponding author:LI Jing,Chief physician,Professor,Doctoral supervisor;E-mail:lijingtiger@163.com
  • Published:2020-07-20 Online:2020-07-20

晚期非小细胞肺癌真实世界研究现状

  

  1. 1.050011河北省石家庄市,河北医科大学第四医院中医科 2.050017河北省石家庄市,河北医科大学中西医结合学院 *通信作者:李晶,主任医师,教授,博士生导师; E-mail:lijingtiger@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划子课题(2018YFC1705103)

Abstract: Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality,of which non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 80%-85%.Current clinical research on drugs for non-small cell lung cancer is in full swing.Drugs whose effectiveness has been evaluated by randomized controlled trials,the gold standard,still have limitations in clinical use,and their effectiveness can not reach the most "ideal" level in clinical practice generally.In recent years,evidence from real world practice has gradually been adopted by medical products administrative agencies.The purpose of this paper was to explore the differences between the real world study and randomized controlled trials regarding the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer,and put forward relevant suggestions for real world study,so as to provide a reference for clinical evidence-based study of lung cancer.

Key words: Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung;Real world study;Randomized controlled trial;Comparative analysis

摘要: 肺癌是发病率及死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤,其中非小细胞肺癌占80%~85%,所以针对非小细胞肺癌治疗药物的临床研究开展得如火如荼。随机对照试验被认为是评价药物有效性的金标准,但也存在一定的局限性,其应用于实际临床时,常无法达到最“理想”的效果。近年来,基于真实诊疗环境下的真实世界证据逐渐被药品监管机构采纳。本文旨在探究晚期非小细胞肺癌真实世界研究与临床随机对照试验研究的差异,并对晚期非小细胞肺癌真实世界研究提出相关建议,以期为肺癌临床循证研究提供参考依据。

关键词: 癌, 非小细胞肺;真实世界研究;随机对照试验;对比分析