Comparison of Medium and Long Term Efficacy and Complications of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence:a Network Meta-analysis

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.579

Abstract

Abstract: Background　Female stress urinary incontinence（SUI） is a common urological disease that causes enormous life and financial burden on female patients.SUI patients usually choose surgical treatment when conservative treatment is not ideal.Since Kelly has been used to treat SUI，a variety of new surgical procedures has achieved significant progress in clinical practice.There is still lack of direct or indirect comparison in terms with medium and long-term efficacy and safety between new surgical procedures.Objective　To compare the efficacy and safety of Burch，tension-free vaginal tape（TVT），outside-in transobturator tape（TOT），inside-out tension-free vaginal tape-obturator（TVT-O），tension-free vaginal tape -sling（TVT-S） and adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings（Ajust） in the treatment of SUI by using network meta-analysis，and screen out the most optimal surgical approach for SUI.Methods　All studies of randomized controlled trials（RCTs） were searched in the PubMed，the Cochrane Library，Medline，EMBase database to compare the efficacy and safety of Burch，TVT，TOT，TVT-O，TVT-S and Ajust from database building to July 2018.Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included RCT and extracted the data，including the first author，publication time，intervention measures，sample size，age，follow-up time and objective cure rate，subjective cure rate，dysuria，vaginal mucosal perforation，lower urinary tract infection，sling exposure，new emergent symptoms after operation/urgent urinary incontinence，thigh pain/inguinal pain after operation.We used RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 to analyse the data involved.Results　A total of 42 RCTs and 6，065 patients were included.The network meta-analysis showed that the objective cure rate of TOT was lower than that of TVT 〔OR=0.96，95%CI（0.91，1.00），P<0.05〕.Subjective cure rate of Ajust was higher than Burch，TOT，TVT-O，TVT-S〔OR=1.27，95%CI（1.01，1.61）；OR=1.14，95%CI（1.01，1.27）；OR=1.05，95%CI（1.00，1.10）；OR=1.12，95%CI（1.04，1.22），P<0.05〕，and subjective cure rate of TOT was lower than that of TVT 〔OR=0.93，95%CI（0.86，1.00），P<0.05〕.Dysuria incidence of TVT-O was lower than that of TVT 〔OR=0.57，95%CI（ 0.34，0.95），P<0.05〕.The incidence of vaginal epithelial perforation in TOT was higher than that in TVT 〔OR=4.17，95%CI（1.37，12.74），P<0.05〕，and incidence of vaginal epithelial perforation in TVT-O was lower than that in TOT 〔OR=0.20，95 %CI（0.06，0.66），P<0.05〕.The incidence of urinary tract infection in TOT was lower than that in TVT〔OR=0.62，95%CI（0.42，0.91），P<0.05〕.The incidence of groin or thigh pain in TVT-O was higher than that in Burch 〔OR=12.89，95%CI（1.22，135.66），P<0.05〕；incidence of groin or thigh pain in TOT and TVT-O was higher than that in TVT 〔OR=2.37，95%CI（1.00，5.58）；OR=3.07，95%CI（1.50，6.27），P<0.05〕；incidence of groin or thigh pain in TVT-S and Ajust was lower than that in TVT-O 〔OR=0.25，95%CI（0.10，0.63）；OR=0.18，95%CI（0.04，0.84），P<0.05〕.The surface under the cumulative ranking curves（SUCRA） value ranking results showed that TVT had better objective cure rate，sling exposure and fewer new emergent symptoms/urgent urinary incontinence after operation；Ajust had significantly better subjective cure rate，fewer dysuria and vaginal perforation；TOT had a better superiority in urinary tract infection；Burch had a better superiority in groin or thigh pain.Conclusion　Ajust is probably associated with better efficacy and safety in the medium and long term study of SUI treatment.

Key words: Stress urinary incontinence, Network meta-analysis, Surgical treatment, Treatment outcome, Postoperative complications

摘要： 背景　女性压力性尿失禁（SUI）是一种泌尿外科常见疾病，给女性患者造成了巨大的生活及经济负担。SUI患者通常在保守治疗不理想时选择手术治疗，自Kelly术运用于治疗SUI后，多种新型术式相继发展并在疗效上取得了重大进展，目前仍缺乏新型术式之间中长期疗效及安全性的直接或间接比较。目的　运用网状Meta分析比较经耻骨后尿道固定悬吊术（Burch）、经耻骨后无张力尿道中段吊带术（TVT）、由外向内经闭孔吊带术（TOT）、由内向外无张力尿道中段吊带术（TVT-O）、无张力经阴道尿道中段吊带术（TVT-S）、单切口可调节吊带术（Ajust）治疗女性SUI的有效性及安全性，筛选治疗SUI的最佳手术方式。方法　基于计算机系统检索PubMed，the Cochrane Library，Medline，EMBase数据库中关于比较Burch、TVT、TOT、TVT-O、TVT-S、Ajust术式治疗SUI的随机对照试验（RCT），检索时间从建库至2018年7月。两名研究者对纳入的RCT进行数据提取及质量评价，提取信息包括：第一作者、发表时间、干预措施、样本量、年龄、随访时间和客观治愈率、主观治愈率、排尿困难、阴道黏膜穿孔、下尿路感染、吊带暴露、术后新发急迫症状/急迫性尿失禁、术后大腿疼痛/腹股沟疼痛。采用RevMan 5.3和Stata 14.0进行数据处理。结果　共纳入42篇RCT，6 065例患者。网状Meta分析结果显示，TOT客观治愈率低于TVT〔OR=0.96，95%CI（0.91，1.00），P<0.05〕；Ajust主观治愈率高于Burch、TOT、TVT-O、TVT-S〔OR=1.27，95%CI（1.01，1.61）；OR=1.14，95%CI（1.01，1.27）；OR=1.05，95%CI（1.00，1.10）；OR=1.12，95%CI（1.04，1.22），P<0.05〕，TOT低于TVT〔OR=0.93，95%CI（0.86，1.00），P<0.05〕；TVT-O排尿困难发生率低于TVT〔OR=0.57，95%CI（0.34，0.95），P<0.05〕；TOT阴道黏膜穿孔发生率高于TVT〔OR=4.17，95%CI（1.37，12.74），P<0.05〕，TVT-O阴道黏膜穿孔发生率低于TOT〔OR=0.20，95%CI（0.06，0.66），P<0.05〕；TOT术后下尿路感染发生率低于TVT〔OR=0.62，95%CI（0.42，0.91），P<0.05〕；TVT-O术后大腿/腹股沟疼痛发生率高于Burch〔OR=12.89，95%CI（1.22，135.66），P<0.05〕，TOT、TVT-O术后大腿/腹股沟疼痛发生率高于TVT〔OR=2.37，95%CI（1.00，5.58）；OR=3.07，95%CI（1.50，6.27），P<0.05〕，TVT-S、Ajust术后大腿/腹股沟疼痛发生率低于TVT-O〔OR=0.25，95%CI（0.10，0.63）；OR=0.18，95%CI（0.04，0.84），P<0.05〕。曲线下面积（SUCRA）排序结果显示，在客观治愈率、吊带暴露和术后新发急迫症状/急迫性尿失禁方面，TVT效果较好；在主观治愈率、排尿困难、阴道黏膜穿孔方面，Ajust效果较好；在下尿路感染方面，TOT效果较好；在术后大腿疼痛/腹股沟疼痛方面，Burch效果较好。结论　Ajust在治疗SUI的中长期研究中可能具有较好的疗效和安全性。

关键词: 压力性尿失禁, 网状Meta分析, 外科治疗, 治疗结果, 手术后并发症

LIANG Yunxiao,HE Tianji,WEI Erdong, et al. Comparison of Medium and Long Term Efficacy and Complications of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence:a Network Meta-analysis　[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(8): 949-958. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.579.
梁云霄,何天基,韦尔东等. 不同手术方式治疗女性压力性尿失禁中长期疗效和并发症的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(8): 949-958. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.579.

References

［1］ROGERS R G.Clinical practice.Urinary stress incontinence in women［J］．N Engl J Med，2008，358（10）：1029-1036．DOI：10.1056/NEJMcp0707023.
［2］Urogynocology Subgroup，Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynocology，Chinese Medical Association.Update of guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of female stress urinary incontinence（2017）［J］．Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi，2017，52（5）：289-293．DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.05.001.
［3］NAMBIAR A K，BOSCH R，CRUZ F，et al．EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence［J］．Eur Urol，2018，73（4）：596-609．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.031.
［4］KOBASHI K C，ALBO M E，DMOCHOWSKI R R，et al．Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：AUA/SUFU guideline［J］．J Urol，2017，198（4）：875-883．DOI：10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061.
［5］HOLROYD-LEDUC J M，TANNENBAUM C，THORPE K E，et al．What type of urinary incontinence does this woman have?［J］．JAMA，2008，299（12）：1446-1456．DOI：10.1001/jama.299.12.1446.
［6］HANDA V L，BLOMQUIST J L，KNOEPP L R，et al．Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth［J］．Obstet Gynecol，2011，118（4）：777-784．DOI：10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f.
［7］朱灵平，迟春花.绝经后女性激素替代治疗与尿失禁关系的Meta分析［J］．中国全科医学，2016，19（11）：1318-1321．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.11.019.
ZHU L P，CHI C H.Relationship between hormonal replacement treatment and urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women：a meta analysis［J］．Chinese General Practice，2016，19（11）：1318-1321．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.11.019.
［8］TEPE N B，BAYRAK O，OZCAN H C，et al．Comparison of the Kelly's plication and TOT simultaneously with vaginal hysterectomy，on the incontinence，and sexual functions［J］．Int Braz J Urol，2018，44（4）：779-784．DOI：10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0019.
［9］SOHBATI S，SALARI Z，EFTEKHARI N.Comparison between the transobturator tape procedure and anterior colporrhaphy with the kelly's plication in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence：a randomized clinical trial［J］．Nephrourol Mon，2015，7（5）：e32046．DOI：10.5812/numonthly.32046.
［10］CHANG C P，CHANG W H，HSU Y M，et al．Comparison of single-incision mini-slings（Ajust） and standard transobturator midurethral slings（Align） in the management of female stress urinary incontinence：a 1-year follow-up［J］．Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol，2015，54（6）：726-730．DOI：10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.007.
［11］SHAMOUT S，CAMPEAU L.Stress urinary incontinence in women：current and emerging therapeutic options［J］．J De L'association Des Urol Du Can，2017，11（6 Suppl 2）：S155-158．DOI：10.5489/cuaj.4613.
［12］JANSEN J P，FLEURENCE R，DEVINE B，et al．Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making：report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices：part 1［J］．Value Health，2011，14（4）：417-428．DOI：10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002.
［13］HIGGINS J P T，GREEN S.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions，version 5.1.0［M］.USA：Wiley-Blackwell，2011：102-108.
［14］ALBO M E，LITMAN H J，RICHTER H E，et al．Treatment success of retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings at 24 months［J］．J Urol，2012，188（6）：2281-2287．DOI：10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.103.
［15］BIANCHI-FERRARO A M，JARMY-DI BELLA Z I，CASTRO R D E A，et al．Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence：a randomized controlled trial［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2013，24（9）：1459-1465．DOI：10.1007/s00192-012-1998-2.
［16］BIANCHI-FERRARO A M，JARMY-DIBELLA Z I，DE AQUINO CASTRO R，et al．Randomized controlled trial comparing TVT-O and TVT-S for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence：2-year results［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2014，25（10）：1343-1348．DOI：10.1007/s00192-014-2352-7.
［17］COSTANTINI E，KOCJANCIC E，LAZZERI M，et al．Long-term efficacy of the trans-obturator and retropubic mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence：update from a randomized clinical trial［J］．World J Urol，2016，34（4）：585-593．DOI：10.1007/s00345-015-1651-z.
［18］DETAYRAC R，DEFFIEUX X，DROUPY S，et al．A prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator suburethral tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence［J］．Am J Obstet Gynecol，2004，190（3）：602-608．DOI：10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.070.
［19］LAURIKAINEN E，VALPAS A，AUKEE P，et al．Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence［J］．Eur Urol，2014，65（6）：1109-1114．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.031.
［20］LIAPIS A，BAKAS P，CREATSAS G.Monarc vs TVT-O for the treatment of primary stress incontinence：a randomized study［J］．Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct，2008，19（2）：185-190．DOI：10.1007/s00192-007-0432-7.
［21］MASATA J，SVABIK K，ZVARA K，et al．Randomized trial of a comparison of the efficacy of TVT-O and single-incision tape TVT SECUR systems in the treatment of stress urinary incontinent women——2-year follow-up［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2012，23（10）：1403-1412．DOI：10.1007/s00192-012-1662-x.
［22］MASATA J，SVABIK K，ZVARA K，et al．Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator（TVT-O） and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape（AjustTM） in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：a 1-year follow-up randomized trial［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2016，27（10）：1497-1505．DOI：10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x.
［23］MASLOW K，GUPTA C，KLIPPENSTEIN P，et al．Randomized clinical trial comparing TVT Secur system and trans vaginal obturator tape for the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2014，25（7）：909-914．DOI：10.1007/s00192-013-2312-7.
［24］MESCHIA M，BERTOZZI R，PIFAROTTI P，et al．Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing TVT and TVT-O［J］．Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct，2007，18（11）：1257-1261．DOI：10.1007/s00192-007-0334-8.
［25］PALOMBA S，FALBO A，OPPEDISANO R，et al．A randomized controlled trial comparing three single-incision minislings for stress urinary incontinence［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2014，25（10）：1333-1341．DOI：10.1007/s00192-014-2383-0.
［26］PARAISO M F，WALTERS M D，KARRAM M M，et al．Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape：a randomized trial［J］．Obstet Gynecol，2004，104（6）：1249-1258．DOI：10.1097/01.AOG.0000146290.10472.b3.
［27］PERSSON J，TELEMAN P，ETéN-BERGQUIST C，et al．Cost-analyzes based on a prospective，randomized study comparing laparoscopic colposuspension with a tension-free vaginal tape procedure［J］．Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand，2002，81（11）：1066-1073.
［28］PORENA M，COSTANTINI E，FREA B，et al．Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence：results of a multicentre randomised trial［J］．Eur Urol，2007，52（5）：1481-1490．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.059.
［29］ROSS S，TANG S，SCHULZ J，et al．Single incision device（TVT Secur） versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape device（TVT） for the management of stress urinary incontinence in women：a randomized clinical trial［J］．BMC Res Notes，2014，7：941．DOI：10.1186/1756-0500-7-941.
［30］SCHEINER D A，BETSCHART C，WIEDERKEHR S，et al．Twelve months effect on voiding function of retropubic compared with outside-in and inside-out transobturator midurethral slings［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2012，23（2）：197-206．DOI：10.1007/s00192-011-1543-8.
［31］SCHWEITZER K J，MILANI A L，VAN EIJNDHOVEN H W，et al．Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for incontinence：a randomized controlled trial［J］．Obstet Gynecol，2015，125（1）：27-34．DOI：10.1097/AOG.0000000000000604.
［32］SERDIN?EK T，BUT I.Long-term results of two different trans-obturator techniques for surgical treatment of women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence：a 10-year randomised controlled study follow-up［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2019，30（2）：257-263．DOI：10.1007/s00192-018-3694-3.
［33］SIVASLIOGLU A A，CALISKAN E，DOLEN I，et al．A randomized comparison of transobturator tape and Burch colposuspension in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence［J］．Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct，2007，18（9）：1015-1019．DOI：10.1007/s00192-006-0279-3.
［34］TAMMAA A，AIGMüLLER T，HANZAL E，et al．Retropubic versus transobturator tension-free vaginal tape（TVT vs TVT-O）：five-year results of the Austrian randomized trial［J］．Neurourol Urodyn，2018，37（1）：331-338．DOI：10.1002/nau.23298.
［35］TOMMASELLI G A，D'AFIERO A，DI CARLO C，et al．Tension-free vaginal tape-obturator and tension-free vaginal tape-secur for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence：a 5-year follow-up randomized study［J］．Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol，2015，185：151-155．DOI：10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.012.
［36］XIN X，SONG Y，XIA Z J.A comparison between adjustable single-incision sling and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in treating stress urinary incontinence［J］．Arch Gynecol Obstet，2016，293（2）：457-463．DOI：10.1007/s00404-015-3949-x.
［37］ZHANG Z B，ZHU L，XU T，et al．Retropubic tension-free vaginal tape and inside-out transobturator tape：a long-term randomized trial［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2016，27（1）：103-111．DOI：10.1007/s00192-015-2798-2.
［38］ANGIOLI R，PLOTTI F，MUZII L，et al．Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator suburethral tape：five-year follow-up results of a prospective，randomised trial［J］．Eur Urol，2010，58（5）：671-677．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.004.
［39］ANIULIENE R.Tension-free vaginal tape versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator（inside-outside） in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence［J］．Medicina（Kaunas），2009，45（8）：639-643.
［40］BANDARIAN M，GHANBARI Z，ASGARI A.Comparison of transobturator tape（TOT） vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence［J］．J Obstet Gynaecol，2011，31（6）：518-520．DOI：10.3109/01443615.2011.578776.
［41］KARATEKE A，HALILOGLU B，CAM C，et al．Comparison of TVT and TVT-O in patients with stress urinary incontinence：short-term cure rates and factors influencing the outcome.A prospective randomised study［J］．Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol，2009，49（1）：99-105．DOI：10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00957.x.
［42］SABADELL J，PALAU-GENé M，HUGUET E，et al．Multicentre randomized trial of the AjustTM single-incision sling compared to the AlignTM transobturator tape sling［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2017，28（7）：1041-1047．DOI：10.1007/s00192-016-3221-3.
［43］TANG X，ZHU L，LIANG S，et al．Outcome and sexual function after transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape SECUR：a randomized controlled trial［J］．Menopause，2014，21（6）：641-645．DOI：10.1097/GME.0000000000000119.
［44］üSTüN Y，ENGIN-üSTüN Y，GüNG?R M，et al．Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic burch urethropexy［J］．J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists，2003，10（3）：386-389．DOI：10.1016/s1074-3804（05）60268-x.
［45］WANG Y J，LI F P，WANG Q，et al．Comparison of three mid-urethral tension-free tapes（TVT，TVT-O，and TVT-Secur） in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：1-year follow-up［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2011，22（11）：1369-1374．DOI：10.1007/s00192-011-1445-9.
［46］ZULLO M A，PLOTTI F，CALCAGNO M，et al．One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape（TVT） and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside（TVT-O） for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：a prospective randomised trial［J］．Eur Urol，2007，51（5）：1376-1384．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.066.
［47］EL-HEFNAWY A S，WADIE B S，EL MEKRESH M，et al．TOT for treatment of stress urinary incontinence：how should we assess its equivalence with TVT?［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2010，21（8）：947-953．DOI：10.1007/s00192-010-1138-9.
［48］OLIVEIRA R，BOTELHO F，SILVA P，et al．Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O，TVT-Secur，and Mini-Arc：results at 12-month follow-up［J］．Eur Urol，2011，59（6）：940-944．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.018.
［49］FREEMAN R，HOLMES D，HILLARD T，et al．What patients think：patient-reported outcomes of retropubic versus trans-obturator mid-urethral slings for urodynamic stress incontinence——a multi-centre randomised controlled trial［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2011，22（3）：279-286．DOI：10.1007/s00192-010-1343-6.
［50］RINNE K，LAURIKAINEN E，KIVEL? A，et al．A randomized trial comparing TVT with TVT-O：12-month results［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2008，19（8）：1049-1054．DOI：10.1007/s00192-008-0581-3．
［51］WANG W Y，ZHU L，LANG J H.Transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence［J］．Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2009，104（2）：113-116．DOI：10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.09.013.
［52］WADIE B S，ELHEFNAWY A S.TVT versus TOT，2-year prospective randomized study［J］．World J Urol，2013，31（3）：645-649．DOI：10.1007/s00345-012-0956-4.
［53］HINOUL P，VERVEST H A，DEN BOON J，et al．A randomized，controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence［J］．J Urol，2011，185（4）：1356-1362．DOI：10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.083.
［54］PARK Y J，KIM D Y.Randomized controlled study of MONARC? vs.tension-free vaginal tape obturator（TVT-O?） in the treatment of female urinary incontinence：comparison of 3-year cure rates［J］．Korean J Urol，2012，53（4）：258-262．DOI：10.4111/kju.2012.53.4.258.
［55］HOTA L S，HANAWAY K，HACKER M R，et al．TVT-Secur（Hammock） versus TVT-Obturator：a randomized trial of suburethral sling operative procedures［J］．Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg，2012，18（1）：41-45．DOI：10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bdbcf.
［56］NAMBIAR A K，BOSCH R，CRUZ F，et al．EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence［J］．Eur Urol，2018，73（4）：596-609．DOI：10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.031.
［57］MEDINA C A，COSTANTINI E，PETRI E，et al．Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence：a FIGO working group report［J］．Neurourol Urodyn，2017，36（2）：518-528．DOI：10.1002/nau.22960.
［58］NORTON P，BRUBAKER L.Urinary incontinence in women［J］．Lancet，2006，367（9504）：57-67．DOI：10.1016/s0140-6736（06）67925-7．
［59］VALPAS A，KIVEL? A，PENTTINEN J，et al．Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence：immediate outcome and complications——a randomized clinical trial［J］．Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand，2003，82（7）：665-671.
［60］NEUMAN M，SOSNOVSKI V，KAIS M，et al．Transobturator vs single-incision suburethral mini-slings for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：early postoperative pain and 3-year follow-up［J］．J Minim Invasive Gynecol，2011，18（6）：769-773．DOI：10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.718.
［61］PRADHAN A，JAIN P，LATTHE P M.Effectiveness of midurethral slings in recurrent stress urinary incontinence：a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2012，23（7）：831-841．DOI：10.1007/s00192-012-1803-2.
［62］TOMMASELLI G A，DI CARLO C，GARGANO V，et al．Efficacy and safety of TVT-O and TVT-Secur in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence：1-year follow-up［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2010，21（10）：1211-1217．DOI：10.1007/s00192-010-1181-6.
［63］ABDEL-FATTAH M，AGUR W，ABDEL-ALL M，et al．Prospective multi-centre study of adjustable single-incision mini-sling（Ajust（?）） in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women：1-year follow-up study［J］．BJU Int，2012，109（6）：880-886．DOI：10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10471.x.
［64］ZHANG P，FAN B H，ZHANG P，et al．Meta-analysis of female stress urinary incontinence treatments with adjustable single-incision mini-slings and transobturator tension-free vaginal tape surgeries［J］．BMC Urol，2015，15：64．DOI：10.1186/s12894-015-0060-3.
［65］XIN X，SONG Y，XIA Z J.A comparison between adjustable single-incision sling and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in treating stress urinary incontinence［J］．Arch Gynecol Obstet，2016，293（2）：457-463．DOI：10.1007/s00404-015-3949-x.
［66］MAT I TARDIU L，MARTíNEZ FRANCO E，LA?LLA VICENS J M.Contasure-Needleless? compared with transobturator-TVT? for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2011，22（7）：827-833．DOI：10.1007/s00192-011-1380-9.
［67］PALOS C C，MATURANA A P，GHERSEL F R，et al．Prospective and randomized clinical trial comparing transobturator versus retropubic sling in terms of efficacy and safety［J］．Int Urogynecol J，2018，29（1）：29-35．DOI：10.1007/s00192-017-3495-0.
［68］AWANG A C，CHEN M C.Randomized comparison of local versus epidural anesthesia for tension-free vaginal tape operation［J］．J Urol，2001，165（4）：1177-1180.
［69］RUDNICKI M，VON BOTHMER-OSTLING K，HOLSTAD A，
et al．Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence.A randomized controlled trial［J］．Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand，2017，96（11）：1347-1356．DOI：10.1111/aogs.13205.
［70］KIM A，KIM M S，PARK Y J，et al．Clinical outcome of single-incision slings，excluding TVT-Secur，vs standard slings in the surgical management of stress incontinence：an updated systematic review and meta-analysis［J］．BJU Int，2019，123（4）：566-584．DOI：10.1111/bju.14447.

[1]	QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431.
[2]	LI Hao, LI Jiangtao, LIU Dan, WANG Jianjun. Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab, Anifrolumab, and Telitacicept on the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2924-2933.
[3]	MA Panpan, WANG Sijing, YOU Na, DING Dafa, LU Yibing. Efficacy and Safety of Danuglipron and Orforglipron in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2679-2685.
[4]	ZHU Shengjie, DIAO Huaqiong, HANG Xiaoyi, SUN Wenjun. Network Meta-analysis of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for the Treatment of Posterior Circulatory Ischemic Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1795-1808.
[5]	LIU Caiping, ZHANG Yanhua, TANG Jianpin, WANG Chengpeng, XUE Fengfeng, WANG Huijuan, LI Chuanwei, ZHANG Guangya, LI Huafang. Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Risperidone Microspheres in the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1622-1627.
[6]	CHI Xun, LIU Sisi, CHEN Qiao, HU Yue, WANG Weixian. The Suitability of Four Nutritional Screening Tools for Nutritional Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1395-1402.
[7]	GU Mingyu, QIN Tingting, QIAO Kun, BAI Xinyuan, WANG Yao, YANG Yutong, LI Xingming. A Network Meta-analysis of Primary Hypertension Management Patterns in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1265-1272.
[8]	MA Huping, REN Rong, HOU Mei, YUAN Aiyun. Clinical Observation of the New Antiepileptic Drug Perampanel in the Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy in Children Aged 0-18 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 250-256.
[9]	GUO Jia, CAO Chunmei, LIU Guochun, ZHENG Man, ZHU Ruihan, LONG Wei. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Sleep in Insomnia Patients: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(35): 4376-4387.
[10]	YANG Can, LI Ning, LI Xuefei, ZHAO Li, XU Hao, SHI Qi, WANG Yongjun, LIANG Qianqian. Efficacy of Zang Bi Formula in Treating Arthritis and Its Pulmonary Complications in Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Disease Mice [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(24): 3015-3022.
[11]	GAO Shuaiying, YANG Mukun, SUN Mingli, BAI Wenpei. Effects of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Combined with Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Pelvic Floor Structure in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(23): 2875-2882.
[12]	HUANG Tengjia, CAO Xi, CHEN Lei, LI Ziying, QIN Lihua. The Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Treatment for Post-stroke Shoulder-hand Syndrome: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(23): 2921-2930.
[13]	WANG Ting, WANG Haiyan, FU Wenjun. Effect of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis Treated with Different Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(23): 2913-2920.
[14]	TAN Shufa, ZHANG Leichang, GAO Qiangqiang, OU Yan, HUANG Shuilan. Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Small Molecule Drugs in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2155-2166.
[15]	PANG Lan, LI Peifan, ZHU Xiaogang, YANG Zaihong, ZHENG Lei. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Escitalopram Oxalate in the Treatment of Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2098-2103.