Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (01): 89-95.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0907
Special Issue: 安宁疗护专题研究; 家庭医生团队最新文章合集
• Original Research·Focus on County Medical Community • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-12-01
Revised:
2024-04-29
Published:
2025-01-05
Online:
2024-10-30
Contact:
TAO Hongbing
通讯作者:
陶红兵
作者简介:
作者贡献:
丛雅婷、戴遥、鲍欣雨、陶红兵负责文章的构思与设计;丛雅婷、戴遥、鲍欣雨负责数据收集、整理与清洗;丛雅婷负责统计学处理、论文撰写;戴遥、鲍欣雨负责论文的校对、修订;陶红兵负责文章的质量控制,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0907
项目 | 团队数 | 团队知识共享总分 | 团队显性知识共享得分 | 团队隐性知识共享得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
团队成立时间 | ||||
≤4年 | 65 | 28.48±3.98 | 11.22±1.61 | 17.26±2.42 |
5~6年 | 187 | 27.11±4.09 | 10.70±1.64 | 16.41±2.50 |
≥7年 | 129 | 28.59±3.17 | 11.37±1.36 | 17.21±1.87 |
F值 | 6.918 | 8.051 | 6.032 | |
P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | |
团队成员数 | ||||
≤4人 | 59 | 27.62±4.42 | 10.92±1.92 | 16.71±2.57 |
5~6人 | 269 | 27.72±3.84 | 10.97±1.55 | 16.74±2.34 |
≥7人 | 53 | 28.74±3.04 | 11.34±1.24 | 17.40±1.84 |
F值 | 1.695 | 1.357 | 1.873 | |
P值 | 0.185 | 0.259 | 0.155 | |
团队成员组成 | ||||
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生 | 40 | 27.58±5.34 | 11.04±2.11 | 16.54±3.26 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家 | 252 | 28.05±3.57 | 11.08±1.49 | 16.97±2.14 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家+医技/药技/其他专科医师 | 43 | 28.69±1.99 | 11.31±0.82 | 17.39±1.30 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家+社区工作人员 | 9 | 25.73±4.71 | 10.20±1.90 | 15.53±2.81 |
其他 | 37 | 26.29±4.65 | 10.42±1.88 | 15.87±2.78 |
F值 | 3.003 | 2.418 | 3.390 | |
P值 | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.010 | |
管辖居民数 | ||||
<1 000人 | 184 | 28.17±3.79 | 11.15±1.56 | 17.02±2.29 |
1 000~2 000人 | 146 | 27.69±3.89 | 10.96±1.57 | 16.72±2.36 |
>2 000人 | 51 | 27.13±3.87 | 10.67±1.62 | 16.46±2.32 |
F值 | 1.668 | 2.052 | 1.386 | |
P值 | 0.190 | 0.130 | 0.251 | |
近3年有无人员流动 | ||||
无 | 157 | 28.51±3.27 | 11.29±1.34 | 17.23±1.97 |
有 | 224 | 27.38±4.14 | 10.82±1.69 | 16.55±2.50 |
t值 | -2.989 | -2.965 | -2.938 | |
P值 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
团队长作用 | ||||
低 | 40 | 21.63±2.91 | 8.55±1.07 | 13.08±1.91 |
中 | 141 | 26.19±2.37 | 10.33±0.98 | 15.87±1.47 |
高 | 200 | 30.25±2.65 | 11.99±1.15 | 18.26±1.58 |
F值 | 231.682 | 215.158 | 221.438 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队沟通强度 | ||||
低 | 32 | 21.62±3.37 | 8.53±1.26 | 13.09±2.18 |
中 | 163 | 25.99±2.66 | 10.22±1.07 | 15.77±1.67 |
高 | 186 | 30.54±2.28 | 12.14±0.96 | 18.40±1.39 |
F值 | 241.149 | 249.697 | 214.206 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
平台载体使用水平 | ||||
低 | 33 | 22.14±3.28 | 8.77±1.28 | 13.37±2.09 |
中 | 148 | 25.63±2.67 | 10.07±1.06 | 15.55±1.67 |
高 | 200 | 30.43±2.34 | 12.08±1.00 | 18.35±1.41 |
F值 | 239.384 | 238.103 | 218.410 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队活动强度 | ||||
低 | 36 | 21.54±2.93 | 8.44±1.07 | 13.11±1.96 |
中 | 165 | 26.11±2.50 | 10.32±1.03 | 15.80±1.55 |
高 | 180 | 30.69±2.25 | 12.17±0.96 | 18.52±1.36 |
F值 | 286.268 | 277.951 | 262.172 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
合作配合满意度 | ||||
低 | 30 | 21.10±2.75 | 8.30±1.01 | 12.80±1.84 |
中 | 163 | 26.15±2.68 | 10.28±1.07 | 15.87±1.68 |
高 | 188 | 30.39±2.51 | 12.08±1.04 | 18.30±1.54 |
F值 | 224.502 | 236.340 | 198.002 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队管理满意度 | ||||
低 | 16 | 20.08±2.47 | 7.98±0.80 | 12.10±1.79 |
中 | 187 | 26.17±2.98 | 10.30±1.19 | 15.86±1.84 |
高 | 178 | 30.31±2.70 | 12.03±1.17 | 18.27±1.62 |
F值 | 159.892 | 156.609 | 150.008 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
成员学习积极性 | ||||
低 | 24 | 21.23±3.17 | 8.35±1.13 | 12.88±2.15 |
中 | 154 | 25.82±2.60 | 10.17±1.06 | 15.65±1.60 |
高 | 203 | 30.16±2.79 | 11.97±1.16 | 18.19±1.69 |
F值 | 184.488 | 184.534 | 169.428 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
成员学习收获程度 | ||||
低 | 29 | 21.42±3.21 | 8.49±1.27 | 12.93±2.02 |
中 | 164 | 26.02±2.59 | 10.25±1.08 | 15.77±1.59 |
高 | 188 | 30.42±2.57 | 12.07±1.07 | 18.35±1.56 |
F值 | 215.952 | 205.996 | 203.563 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of knowledge sharing scores of family doctor teams with different characteristics
项目 | 团队数 | 团队知识共享总分 | 团队显性知识共享得分 | 团队隐性知识共享得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
团队成立时间 | ||||
≤4年 | 65 | 28.48±3.98 | 11.22±1.61 | 17.26±2.42 |
5~6年 | 187 | 27.11±4.09 | 10.70±1.64 | 16.41±2.50 |
≥7年 | 129 | 28.59±3.17 | 11.37±1.36 | 17.21±1.87 |
F值 | 6.918 | 8.051 | 6.032 | |
P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | |
团队成员数 | ||||
≤4人 | 59 | 27.62±4.42 | 10.92±1.92 | 16.71±2.57 |
5~6人 | 269 | 27.72±3.84 | 10.97±1.55 | 16.74±2.34 |
≥7人 | 53 | 28.74±3.04 | 11.34±1.24 | 17.40±1.84 |
F值 | 1.695 | 1.357 | 1.873 | |
P值 | 0.185 | 0.259 | 0.155 | |
团队成员组成 | ||||
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生 | 40 | 27.58±5.34 | 11.04±2.11 | 16.54±3.26 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家 | 252 | 28.05±3.57 | 11.08±1.49 | 16.97±2.14 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家+医技/药技/其他专科医师 | 43 | 28.69±1.99 | 11.31±0.82 | 17.39±1.30 |
家庭医生+护士+公共卫生医生+乡村医生+固定上级指导专家+社区工作人员 | 9 | 25.73±4.71 | 10.20±1.90 | 15.53±2.81 |
其他 | 37 | 26.29±4.65 | 10.42±1.88 | 15.87±2.78 |
F值 | 3.003 | 2.418 | 3.390 | |
P值 | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.010 | |
管辖居民数 | ||||
<1 000人 | 184 | 28.17±3.79 | 11.15±1.56 | 17.02±2.29 |
1 000~2 000人 | 146 | 27.69±3.89 | 10.96±1.57 | 16.72±2.36 |
>2 000人 | 51 | 27.13±3.87 | 10.67±1.62 | 16.46±2.32 |
F值 | 1.668 | 2.052 | 1.386 | |
P值 | 0.190 | 0.130 | 0.251 | |
近3年有无人员流动 | ||||
无 | 157 | 28.51±3.27 | 11.29±1.34 | 17.23±1.97 |
有 | 224 | 27.38±4.14 | 10.82±1.69 | 16.55±2.50 |
t值 | -2.989 | -2.965 | -2.938 | |
P值 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
团队长作用 | ||||
低 | 40 | 21.63±2.91 | 8.55±1.07 | 13.08±1.91 |
中 | 141 | 26.19±2.37 | 10.33±0.98 | 15.87±1.47 |
高 | 200 | 30.25±2.65 | 11.99±1.15 | 18.26±1.58 |
F值 | 231.682 | 215.158 | 221.438 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队沟通强度 | ||||
低 | 32 | 21.62±3.37 | 8.53±1.26 | 13.09±2.18 |
中 | 163 | 25.99±2.66 | 10.22±1.07 | 15.77±1.67 |
高 | 186 | 30.54±2.28 | 12.14±0.96 | 18.40±1.39 |
F值 | 241.149 | 249.697 | 214.206 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
平台载体使用水平 | ||||
低 | 33 | 22.14±3.28 | 8.77±1.28 | 13.37±2.09 |
中 | 148 | 25.63±2.67 | 10.07±1.06 | 15.55±1.67 |
高 | 200 | 30.43±2.34 | 12.08±1.00 | 18.35±1.41 |
F值 | 239.384 | 238.103 | 218.410 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队活动强度 | ||||
低 | 36 | 21.54±2.93 | 8.44±1.07 | 13.11±1.96 |
中 | 165 | 26.11±2.50 | 10.32±1.03 | 15.80±1.55 |
高 | 180 | 30.69±2.25 | 12.17±0.96 | 18.52±1.36 |
F值 | 286.268 | 277.951 | 262.172 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
合作配合满意度 | ||||
低 | 30 | 21.10±2.75 | 8.30±1.01 | 12.80±1.84 |
中 | 163 | 26.15±2.68 | 10.28±1.07 | 15.87±1.68 |
高 | 188 | 30.39±2.51 | 12.08±1.04 | 18.30±1.54 |
F值 | 224.502 | 236.340 | 198.002 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
团队管理满意度 | ||||
低 | 16 | 20.08±2.47 | 7.98±0.80 | 12.10±1.79 |
中 | 187 | 26.17±2.98 | 10.30±1.19 | 15.86±1.84 |
高 | 178 | 30.31±2.70 | 12.03±1.17 | 18.27±1.62 |
F值 | 159.892 | 156.609 | 150.008 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
成员学习积极性 | ||||
低 | 24 | 21.23±3.17 | 8.35±1.13 | 12.88±2.15 |
中 | 154 | 25.82±2.60 | 10.17±1.06 | 15.65±1.60 |
高 | 203 | 30.16±2.79 | 11.97±1.16 | 18.19±1.69 |
F值 | 184.488 | 184.534 | 169.428 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
成员学习收获程度 | ||||
低 | 29 | 21.42±3.21 | 8.49±1.27 | 12.93±2.02 |
中 | 164 | 26.02±2.59 | 10.25±1.08 | 15.77±1.59 |
高 | 188 | 30.42±2.57 | 12.07±1.07 | 18.35±1.56 |
F值 | 215.952 | 205.996 | 203.563 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
变量 | b(95%CI) | b' | SE | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
因变量:团队知识共享总得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -1.834(-3.214~-0.455) | -0.072 | 0.702 | -2.615 | 0.009 |
团队长作用(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 2.085(1.188~2.982) | 0.262 | 0.456 | 4.571 | <0.001 |
高 | 2.670(1.639~3.701) | 0.347 | 0.524 | 5.091 | <0.001 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.396(0.357~2.434) | 0.180 | 0.528 | 2.643 | 0.009 |
高 | 2.458(1.222~3.694) | 0.320 | 0.629 | 3.910 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.853(0.053~1.652) | 0.111 | 0.407 | 2.097 | 0.037 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.475(0.458~2.491) | 0.190 | 0.517 | 2.852 | 0.005 |
高 | 3.262(2.062~4.463) | 0.424 | 0.611 | 5.343 | <0.001 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.221(0.143~2.299) | 0.156 | 0.548 | 2.228 | 0.027 |
高 | 2.580(1.435~3.726) | 0.335 | 0.583 | 4.430 | <0.001 |
因变量:显性知识共享维度得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -0.715(-1.298~-0.131) | -0.069 | 0.297 | -2.409 | 0.016 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.640(0.208~1.072) | 0.201 | 0.219 | 2.916 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.254(0.739~1.768) | 0.399 | 0.262 | 4.794 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.496(0.166~0.825) | 0.157 | 0.168 | 2.957 | 0.003 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.949(0.537~1.362) | 0.299 | 0.210 | 4.526 | <0.001 |
高 | 1.651(1.160~2.141) | 0.524 | 0.249 | 6.620 | <0.001 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.656(0.205~1.107) | 0.205 | 0.229 | 2.859 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.241(0.763~1.718) | 0.394 | 0.243 | 5.111 | <0.001 |
因变量:隐性知识共享维度得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -1.149(-2.017~-0.282) | -0.075 | 0.441 | -2.604 | 0.010 |
团队长作用(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.313(0.749~1.878) | 0.274 | 0.287 | 4.574 | <0.001 |
高 | 1.854(1.212~2.496) | 0.400 | 0.327 | 5.675 | <0.001 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.953(0.311~1.595) | 0.204 | 0.326 | 2.920 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.475(0.708~2.242) | 0.318 | 0.390 | 3.783 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.557(0.046~1.069) | 0.120 | 0.260 | 2.144 | 0.033 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.793(0.162~1.423) | 0.170 | 0.321 | 2.473 | 0.014 |
高 | 2.029(1.290~2.769) | 0.437 | 0.376 | 5.398 | <0.001 |
合作配合满意度(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.545(0.136~0.953) | 0.116 | 0.208 | 2.622 | 0.009 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.987(0.591~1.383) | 0.213 | 0.201 | 4.901 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of influencing factors of knowledge sharing in family doctor teams
变量 | b(95%CI) | b' | SE | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
因变量:团队知识共享总得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -1.834(-3.214~-0.455) | -0.072 | 0.702 | -2.615 | 0.009 |
团队长作用(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 2.085(1.188~2.982) | 0.262 | 0.456 | 4.571 | <0.001 |
高 | 2.670(1.639~3.701) | 0.347 | 0.524 | 5.091 | <0.001 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.396(0.357~2.434) | 0.180 | 0.528 | 2.643 | 0.009 |
高 | 2.458(1.222~3.694) | 0.320 | 0.629 | 3.910 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.853(0.053~1.652) | 0.111 | 0.407 | 2.097 | 0.037 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.475(0.458~2.491) | 0.190 | 0.517 | 2.852 | 0.005 |
高 | 3.262(2.062~4.463) | 0.424 | 0.611 | 5.343 | <0.001 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.221(0.143~2.299) | 0.156 | 0.548 | 2.228 | 0.027 |
高 | 2.580(1.435~3.726) | 0.335 | 0.583 | 4.430 | <0.001 |
因变量:显性知识共享维度得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -0.715(-1.298~-0.131) | -0.069 | 0.297 | -2.409 | 0.016 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.640(0.208~1.072) | 0.201 | 0.219 | 2.916 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.254(0.739~1.768) | 0.399 | 0.262 | 4.794 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.496(0.166~0.825) | 0.157 | 0.168 | 2.957 | 0.003 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.949(0.537~1.362) | 0.299 | 0.210 | 4.526 | <0.001 |
高 | 1.651(1.160~2.141) | 0.524 | 0.249 | 6.620 | <0.001 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.656(0.205~1.107) | 0.205 | 0.229 | 2.859 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.241(0.763~1.718) | 0.394 | 0.243 | 5.111 | <0.001 |
因变量:隐性知识共享维度得分 | |||||
学历异质性指数(以实际值纳入) | -1.149(-2.017~-0.282) | -0.075 | 0.441 | -2.604 | 0.010 |
团队长作用(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 1.313(0.749~1.878) | 0.274 | 0.287 | 4.574 | <0.001 |
高 | 1.854(1.212~2.496) | 0.400 | 0.327 | 5.675 | <0.001 |
团队沟通强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.953(0.311~1.595) | 0.204 | 0.326 | 2.920 | 0.004 |
高 | 1.475(0.708~2.242) | 0.318 | 0.390 | 3.783 | <0.001 |
平台载体使用水平(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.557(0.046~1.069) | 0.120 | 0.260 | 2.144 | 0.033 |
团队活动强度(以低为参照) | |||||
中 | 0.793(0.162~1.423) | 0.170 | 0.321 | 2.473 | 0.014 |
高 | 2.029(1.290~2.769) | 0.437 | 0.376 | 5.398 | <0.001 |
合作配合满意度(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.545(0.136~0.953) | 0.116 | 0.208 | 2.622 | 0.009 |
成员学习积极性(以低为参照) | |||||
高 | 0.987(0.591~1.383) | 0.213 | 0.201 | 4.901 | <0.001 |
[1] |
李萍,钱巧慧,崔丽,等. 医联体内知识共享的范畴研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2018,21(13):1539-1545. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.13.006.
|
[2] |
潘莎莎,马程乘,崔璐,等. 家庭医生团队动力量表汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学,2023,26(16):2047-2054. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0388.
|
[3] | |
[4] |
|
[5] |
胡佳慧,方安,赵琬清,等. 面向知识发现的中文电子病历标注方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现,2019,3(7):123-132. DOI:10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.1454.
|
[6] |
陈洁. 医院团队知识共享影响因素的编码研究[J]. 中国医院管理,2014,34(2):65-67.
|
[7] |
胡蓉,陈惠芳,徐卫国. 移动医疗服务中医患互动对患者感知价值的影响:以知识共享为中介变量[J]. 管理科学,2018,31(3):75-85. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2018.03.007.
|
[8] |
高晓燕,辛文琳,康敏,等. 医联体内知识共享的互动形式及保障机制研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2018,21(13):1546-1549. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.13.007.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
罗胜强,姜嬿. 管理学问卷调查研究方法[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
谢洪涛,赖应良,孙玉梅. 科研团队社会资本、个体动机对个体知识共享行为的影响:基于多层线性模型的跨层次分析[J]. 技术经济,2016,35(1):30-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2016.01.005.
|
[13] | |
[14] |
马志强,郭乐,李钊,等. 签约服务情境下基于扎根理论的全科医生胜任力模型构建研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2023,26(4):460-466,485. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0376.
|
[15] | |
[16] |
林陵娜,施建刚,唐代中. 考虑知识隐藏的项目团队知识共享激励研究[J]. 科研管理,2015,36(5):162-170. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2015.05.018.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
陈皓阳,付硕雄,莫雯茜,等. 家庭医生团队的优化研究:基于团队效能模型[J]. 卫生经济研究,2022,39(2):54-57. DOI:10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2022.02.015.
|
[19] | |
[20] |
沈旺,王淇,李望宁. 团队知识共享研究综述[J]. 图书馆学研究,2017(18):8-16,82.
|
[21] |
王佳欣,赵亚利. 国内外医疗团队合作评估工具系统综述[J]. 中国全科医学,2023,26(31):3951-3962. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0659.
|
[22] |
景日泽,方海. 基于供需视角的中国家庭医生签约服务研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学,2020,23(25):3131-3138. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.389.
|
[23] |
马跃如,蒋珊珊,张静. 包容性领导对医疗团队绩效影响的实证研究:基于团队认知的视角[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,33(1):78-84.
|
[1] | LIN Xiaoling, QU Kaixiao, LI Xu, CHEN Jingchun, HUANG Qunfang, ZHOU Chi. Evaluation and Improvement Countermeasures Research of the Current Situation of Integrated Outpatient Service for Chronic Diseases in County Medical Community in Zhejiang Province from the Perspective of Medical Prevention Integration [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1649-1654. |
[2] | YU Yuncong, SHAO Jiaxian, GAO Min, LI Xiaona, MA Dongping, YIN Wenqiang, CHEN Zhongming. Study on Village Clinic Doctors' Organization Identification to Family Doctor Team and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(07): 875-879. |
[3] | CONG Yating, DAI Yao, BAO Xinyu, TAO Hongbing. The Perceptions and Related Factors of Family Doctor Team Management under the County Medical Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(01): 96-102. |
[4] | OU Yanchen, XIE Yueying, WANG Zhenbang, ZHAO Yue, ZHANG Xin, ZUO Yanli. Family Doctor Teams' Evaluation for Contracted Family Doctor Services and Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2773-2779. |
[5] | CHEN Lijiang, HU Chuanfeng, TANG Jing, ZHENG Ruini, GUAN Xueling, HUANG Wenhao, QIN Zhaohui. The Patient Satisfaction and Its Influencing Factors in Compact County Medical Community Based on Anderson Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(04): 427-453. |
[6] | HAO Aihua, ZENG Weilin, LI Guanhai, XIA Yinghua, CHEN Liang. Current Situation of the Construction of Family Doctor Team: an Investigation Based on the Perspective of General Practitioners [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4261-4268. |
[7] | LIU Rui, CAO Yu, CHU Aiqun, WU Huanyun. Current Situation of Community Pharmacy Services and the Integration of Pharmacists into Family Doctor Team in Shanghai [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3922-3929. |
[8] | ZHAO Linlin, SHAO Shuang, LUO Qi, CHEN Xiaolei, DU Juan. Practice Strategy of Treatment-prevention Integration of Family Doctor Team in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(22): 2715-2719. |
[9] | PAN Shasha, MA Chengcheng, CUI Lu, LI Chanjiao, NI Ziling. Development, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Primary Care Team Dynamics Scale [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(16): 2047-2054. |
[10] | XU Jiayu, YAN Hua, FANG Junbo, WANG Haiqin, GUO Pei, SHEN Fulai, WANG Xingsong. Standardized Workload-based Analysis of the Services Delivered by a Family Doctor Team in a Community Health Institution [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(13): 1641-1647. |
[11] | MENG Yeqing, LI Sisi, QIN Jiangmei, LIN Chunmei, ZHANG Yanchun, ZHANG Lifang. Changes in the Efficiency of Member Township Hospitals in County-level Medical Communities Constructed in Typical National Pilot Areas [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(10): 1212-1217. |
[12] | Manhua QIAO, Wenhui WU, Zhenwei LIU, Muhan CHEN, Cao WANG, Qi TANG, Jun LYU, Gang CHEN. Community Pharmaceutical Services Implemented in Shanghai [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(28): 3562-3568. |
[13] | Zhenwei LIU, Wenhui WU, Manhua QIAO, Muhan CHEN, Cao WANG, Qi TANG, Jun LYU, Gang CHEN. Needs of Pharmaceutical Care in the Community of Shanghai [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(28): 3556-3561. |
[14] | Yang LIU, Kai WANG, Gexin XIAO, Jujiao XIAO, Jianbo GAO, Ni LIN, Dong CHEN, Huijun WANG, Qingfeng DU. Development of a General Practice plus Compact Regional Practice Consortium-based Chronic Disease Management Model with International Chronic Disease Management Models and Experiences as a Reference [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(16): 1923-1928. |
[15] |
ZHANG Min, ZHANG Shue, SHI Yu, WANG Hongni, JI Keyu, CHENG Siyu, ZHAO Xin, SUN Tao.
Influencing Factors and Path Combination of County Medical Community Innovation by Local Government:a Crisp Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(10): 1254-1260. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||