Clinical Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy, High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Examination for Hiatal Hernia in Metabolic Syndrome: a Comparative Analysis

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0476

Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (35): 4406-4411.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0476

Special Issue: 消化系统疾病最新文章合辑

• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles

Clinical Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy, High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Examination for Hiatal Hernia in Metabolic Syndrome: a Comparative Analysis

¹Graduate School, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
²Institute of General Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China
³Department of Minimally Invasive, Hernia and Abdominal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China
⁴Clinical Research Center for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2022-05-11 Revised:2022-08-04 Published:2022-12-15 Online:2022-08-18
Contact: KELIMU· Abudureyimu
About author:
LI X, AIKEBAIER A, ALIMUJIANG M, et al. Clinical diagnostic value of gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry and upper gastrointestinal contrast examination for hiatal hernia in metabolic syndrome: a comparative analysis[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25 (35) : 4406-4411.

胃镜检查和高分辨率食管测压及上消化道造影检查对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的临床诊断价值研究

¹830054　新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市，新疆医科大学研究生院
²830011　新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院普外微创研究所
³830011　新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市，新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝与腹壁外科
⁴830011　新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市，新疆维吾尔自治区胃食管反流病及减重代谢外科临床研究中心

通讯作者: 克力木·阿不都热依木
作者简介:
黎鑫，艾克拜尔·艾力，阿力木江·麦斯依提，等.胃镜检查和高分辨率食管测压及上消化道造影检查对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的临床诊断价值研究[J].中国全科医学，2022，25（35）：4406-4411. [www.chinagp.net] 作者贡献：黎鑫提出研究思路，设计研究方案，并且负责论文起草和初步撰写；艾克拜尔·艾力负责研究过程的实施，对研究过程进行质量控制；阿力木江·麦斯依提负责研究过程的实施，对数据进行采集和管理；王志负责数据采集和分析，进行统计学分析方法的制定；蒋媛负责术后患者的随访工作和记录患者术前相关资料；伊比提哈尔·买买提艾力负责安排患者术前相关检查并且收集统计术中和术后相关数据；克力木·阿不都热依木总体负责研究的实施以及论文的修订。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(82060166)

Abstract

Abstract:

Background

There is no a gold standard examination method for the diagnosis of hiatal hernia in patients with metabolic syndrome. Improving the preoperative detection rate of hiatal hernia is of great significance for formulating an appropriate surgical approach and avoiding severe postoperative complications.

Objective

To examine the diagnostic value of gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry and upper gastrointestinal contrast examination for hiatal hernia in metabolic syndrome.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with metabolic syndrome complicated with gastroesophageal reflux who were surgically treated in Department of Minimally Invasive, Hernia and Abdominal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from September 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively selected, including 17 with hiatal hernia found intraoperatively (complex group) and 38 without (simple group) . The results of gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry, acid measurement, upper gastrointestinal contrast tests performed after admission and GERD-Q score were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of these examination methods were plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was compared for estimating their diagnostic performance.

Results

Compared with simple group, complex group had higher diagnostic rates of gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry, greater manometric hiatal hernia diameter and upper gastrointestinal contrast examination, and higher Gerd-Q score (P<0.05) . Complex group also had lower mean resting pressure of lower esophageal sphincter (LESP) and Demeester score (P<0.05) . Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that Demeester score and findings upper gastrointestinal angiography were associated with the diagnosis of hiatus hernia in metabolic syndrome (P<0.05) . ROC analysis indicated that all of gastroscopy (AUC=0.728, P=0.007) , LESP (AUC=0.789, P=0.001) , Demeester score (AUC=0.772, P=0.001) , upper gastrointestinal contrast examination (AUC=0.774, P=0.007) , Gerd-Q score (AUC=0.746, P=0.004) had an AUC greater than 0.7, indicating high clinical diagnostic value.

Conclusion

Gastroscopy, LESP, Demeester score, upper gastrointestinal contrast examination, and Gerd-Q score all had high diagnostic value for hiatus hernia in metabolic syndrome.

Key words: Metabolic syndrome, Hernia, hiatal, Upper gastrointestinal contrast examination, Gastroscope, High-resolution esophageal manometry, Diagnostic value

摘要：

背景

代谢综合征患者合并食管裂孔疝的诊断尚无"金标准"的检查方法，提高术前的检出率，对于制订合理的手术方式并且避免术后严重的并发症有重要意义。

目的

探究胃镜、高分辨率食管测压以及上消化道造影检查对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的临床诊断价值。

方法

回顾性选取2021年9月至2022年4月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝与腹壁外科收治的代谢综合征合并胃食管反流并行手术治疗的患者55例，根据术中所见将患者分为代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝组（复杂组，17例）和代谢综合征未合并食管裂孔疝组（单纯组，38例）。入院后完善胃镜检查、高分辨率食管测压、测酸以及上消化道造影检查，并采用Gerd Q评分量表进行测评。绘制不同检查方法诊断代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线，并比较ROC曲线下面积（AUC）。

结果

复杂组胃镜诊断率、高分辨率食管测压诊断率、测压食管裂孔疝直径、上消化道造影检查诊断率、Gerd Q评分均高于单纯组，食管下括约肌静息压平均值（LESP）、Demeester评分均低于单纯组（P<0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示，Demeester评分和上消化道造影检查是诊断代谢综合征合并食管裂管疝的影响因素（P<0.05）。ROC曲线结果显示，胃镜检查（AUC=0.728，P=0.007）、LESP（AUC=0.789，P=0.001）、Demeester评分（AUC=0.772，P=0.001）、上消化道造影检查（AUC=0.774，P=0.007）、Gerd Q评分（AUC=0.746，P=0.004）的AUC均>0.7，具有较高的临床诊断价值。

结论

胃镜检查、LESP、Demeester评分、上消化道造影检查和Gerd Q评分对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝具有较高的诊断价值。

关键词: 代谢综合征, 疝，食管裂孔, 上消化道造影, 胃镜, 高分辨率食管测压, 诊断价值

LI Xin,AIKEBAIER· Aili,ALIMUJIANG· Maisiyiti, et al. Clinical Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy, High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Examination for Hiatal Hernia in Metabolic Syndrome: a Comparative Analysis[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(35): 4406-4411. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0476.
黎鑫,艾克拜尔·艾力,阿力木江·麦斯依提等. 胃镜检查和高分辨率食管测压及上消化道造影检查对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的临床诊断价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(35): 4406-4411. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0476.

Figures/Tables 5

References 25

[1]	余瑶，徐晓雯，贾玉婷，等. 高分辨率食管测压在老年食管裂孔疝诊断中的临床价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2018，38（4）：841-843. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.04.032.
[2]	RUNKEL N，BRYDNIAK R. Surgical treatment of metabolic syndrome[J]. Visc Med，2016，32（5）：352-356. DOI：10.1159/000449110.
[3]	DUTTA S K，ARORA M，KIREET A，et al. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms and associated disorders in morbidly obese patients：a prospective study[J]. Dig Dis Sci，2009，54（6）：1243-1246. DOI：10.1007/s10620-008-0485-6.
[4]	MANI V R，KALABIN A，NWAKANAMA C，et al. Preoperative versus intraoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia in bariatric population[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis，2019，15（11）：1949-1955. DOI：10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.553.
[5]	赵晶晶，曹亚景，孙纪新，等. 河北省成人跟骨定量超声参数与代谢综合征的相关性[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志，2022，28（7）：966-971.
[6]	中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠动力学组，大中华区消化动力联盟.食管动态反流监测临床操作指南（成人）[J].中华消化杂志，2021，41（3）：149-158. DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20210114-00032.
[7]	王辉，赫娟，艾散江，等. 高分辨率食管测压与X线钡餐造影对食管裂孔疝诊断价值的评价[J]. 医学影像学杂志，2021，31（4）：611-615.
[8]	王志，张成，王俭，等. GerdQ量表在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志，2014，1（1）：36-38.
[9]	SAMAKAR K，MCKENZIE T J，TAVAKKOLI A，et al. The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese[J]. Obes Surg，2016，26（1）：61-66. DOI：10.1007/s11695-015-1737-0.
[10]	凯赛尔·艾则孜，艾克拜尔·艾力，克力木·阿不都热依木. 胃食管反流病与肥胖症及其并发症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志，2016，3（4）：187-189. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.04.013.
[11]	ZE E Y，KIM B J，KANG H，et al. Abdominal visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio is associated with increased risk of erosive esophagitis[J]. Dig Dis Sci，2017，62（5）：1265-1271. DOI：10.1007/s10620-017-4467-4.
[12]	陶凯雄，白洁，帅晓明，等. 合并食管裂孔疝肥胖症患者的减重手术策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志，2019，18（9）：834-837. DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2019.09.005.
[13]	杨建军，宋致成，顾岩. 肥胖合并食管裂孔疝的外科治疗策略[J]. 外科理论与实践，2021，26（5）：394-398. DOI：10.16139/j.1007-9610.2021.05.006.
[14]	BAKHOS C T，PATEL S P，PETROV R V，et al. Management of paraesophageal hernia in the morbidly obese patient[J]. Thorac Surg Clin，2019，29（4）：379-386. DOI：10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.07.003.
[15]	BOULES M，CORCELLES R，GUERRON A D，et al. The incidence of hiatal hernia and technical feasibility of repair during bariatric surgery[J]. Surgery，2015，158（4）：911-918. DOI：10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.036.
[16]	BALLA A，QUARESIMA S，PALMIERI L，et al. Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on quality of life related to gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A，2019，29（12）：1532-1538. DOI：10.1089/lap.2019.0540.
[17]	皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫，艾克拜尔·艾力，买买提·依斯热依力，等. 腹腔镜胃底折叠术联合胃袖状切除术治疗肥胖合并胃食管反流病临床研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2020，40（4）：437-440，443. DOI：10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2020.04.19.
[18]	HEIMGARTNER B，HERZIG M，BORBÉLY Y，et al. Symptoms，endoscopic findings and reflux monitoring results in candidates for bariatric surgery[J]. Dig Liver Dis，2017，49（7）：750-756. DOI：10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.165.
[19]	ORTIZ V，ALVAREZ-SOTOMAYOR D，SÁEZ-GONZÁLEZ E，et al. Decreased esophageal sensitivity to acid in morbidly obese patients：a cause for concern? [J]. Gut Liver，2017，11（3）：358-362. DOI：10.5009/gnl16081.
[20]	LI L N，GAO H Q，ZHANG C J，et al. Diagnostic value of X-ray，endoscopy，and high-resolution manometry for hiatal hernia：a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol，2020，35（1）：13-18. DOI：10.1111/jgh.14758.
[21]	LEE J E，WONG S K，LIU S Y，et al. Is preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery mandatory? An Asian perspective[J]. Obes Surg，2017，27（1）：44-50. DOI：10.1007/s11695-016-2243-8.
[22]	高红雷，徐慧民，徐冬梅，等. 高分辨率食管测压联合24小时pH阻抗技术在胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝中的应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志，2021，8（1）：16-19. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765.2021.01.003.
[23]	WEIJENBORG P W，VAN HOEIJ F B，SMOUT A J，et al. Accuracy of hiatal hernia detection with esophageal high-resolution manometry[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil，2015，27（2）：293-299. DOI：10.1111/nmo.12507.
[24]	吴伟，张艳君，田文. 食管裂孔疝的诊断与治疗研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（1）：27-30. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2017.01.008.
[25]	杜智，张成，克力木，等. 高分辨率食管测压与食管24h pH监测在胃食管反流病中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志，2015，2（3）：147-151.

组别	例数	年龄（±s，岁）	性别（男/女）	BMI（±s，kg/m²）
单纯组	38	33.0±1.3	7/31	41.0±1.0
复杂组	17	35.4±1.7	6/11	38.8±1.2
t（χ²）值		-1.075	1.853^a	1.261
P值		0.287	0.173	0.213

组别	例数	年龄（±s，岁）	性别（男/女）	BMI（±s，kg/m²）
单纯组	38	33.0±1.3	7/31	41.0±1.0
复杂组	17	35.4±1.7	6/11	38.8±1.2
t（χ²）值		-1.075	1.853^a	1.261
P值		0.287	0.173	0.213

组别	例数	胃镜诊断率〔n（%）〕	HRM诊断率〔n（%）〕	测压HH直径（±s，cm）	LESP（±s，mm Hg）	Demeester评分（±s，分）	上消化道造影检查诊断率〔n（%）〕	Gerd Q评分（±s，分）
单纯组	38	5（13.2）	17（44.7）	0.78±0.17	23.56±1.99	11.20±1.58	6（15.8）	6.92±0.20
复杂组	17	10（58.8）	13（76.5）	1.80±0.26	11.88±2.11	5.19±0.87	12（70.6）	9.06±0.60
t（χ²）值		12.349^a	4.771^a	-3.345	3.537	2.461	16.020^a	-4.274
P值		<0.001	0.029	0.002	0.001	0.017	<0.001	<0.001

组别	例数	胃镜诊断率〔n（%）〕	HRM诊断率〔n（%）〕	测压HH直径（±s，cm）	LESP（±s，mm Hg）	Demeester评分（±s，分）	上消化道造影检查诊断率〔n（%）〕	Gerd Q评分（±s，分）
单纯组	38	5（13.2）	17（44.7）	0.78±0.17	23.56±1.99	11.20±1.58	6（15.8）	6.92±0.20
复杂组	17	10（58.8）	13（76.5）	1.80±0.26	11.88±2.11	5.19±0.87	12（70.6）	9.06±0.60
t（χ²）值		12.349^a	4.771^a	-3.345	3.537	2.461	16.020^a	-4.274
P值		<0.001	0.029	0.002	0.001	0.017	<0.001	<0.001

因素	β	SE	Wald χ²值	P值	OR值	95%CI
胃镜检查	1.908	1.392	1.878	0.171	6.737	（0.440，103.125）
HRM检查	0.453	2.388	0.036	0.849	1.574	（0.015，169.670）
测压HH直径	0.852	0.987	0.746	0.388	2.345	（0.339，16.211）
LESP	-0.002	0.051	0.002	0.966	0.998	（0.903，1.102）
Demeester评分	0.093	0.102	5.909	0.015	1.097	（1.018，1.183）
上消化道造影检查	2.322	1.128	4.234	0.040	10.192	（1.117，93.019）
Gerd Q评分	0.165	0.294	0.316	0.574	1.180	（0.663，2.099）

Clinical Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy, High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Examination for Hiatal Hernia in Metabolic Syndrome: a Comparative Analysis

胃镜检查和高分辨率食管测压及上消化道造影检查对代谢综合征合并食管裂孔疝的临床诊断价值研究

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

因素	AUC（95%CI）	P值	截断值	灵敏度（%）	特异度（%）
胃镜检查	0.728（0.571，0.885）	0.007	—	58.8	86.8
HRM检查	0.659（0.505，0.812）	0.062	—	76.5	55.3
LESP	0.789（0.654，0.925）	0.001	16.95 mm Hg	88.2	81.6
Demeester评分	0.772（0.538，0.827）	0.001	8.80分	88.2	57.9
上消化道造影检查	0.774（0.629，0.919）	0.007	—	70.6	84.2
Gerd Q评分^a	0.746（0.579，0.913）	0.004	8.47分	58.8	94.7

[1]	ZHANG Mei, LI Mengqi, LU Shuangyan, PU Huijie, LI Guitao, DIAO Yi, TAO Hui, FAN Luming, YE Aifang, MAO Yong. Association between the Ratio of Uric Acid to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Metabolic Syndrome in the Yi Ethnic Group of Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2532-2537.
[2]	LI Qiuchun, SU Ping, PANG Jinhong, CHEN Qiaoqiao, ZHAO Yingying, HE Ruiyan, WANG Yue, CHEN Xueyu, QIAO Junpeng, CHI Weiwei. Association of Triglyceride Glucose Index with Cardiovascular Disease in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stage 0-3 Population: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1129-1136.
[3]	ZHANG Rui, WANG Weiqiang, LU Hongrun, ZHAO Yu, LI Jiazhen. Correlation between the Continuous Metabolic Syndrome Score and Glomerular Filtration Rate in Individuals Aged 60 and Above [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 879-884.
[4]	LUO Xiu, MA Zhaoli, HUANG Mengyu, REN Qian. A Study of the Causal Effect of Gut Microbiota on Genetic Prediction of Metabolic Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 612-622.
[5]	FENG Zhanpeng, TAN Sijie, GUO Zhen, CAO Liquan. Study on the Isochronous Substitution Effect of 24-hour Activity Behaviors on Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 325-330.
[6]	ZHOU Qibao, LUO Xiao, CHEN Ling, CAO Junda, LI Juxiang, XU Jinsong, SU Hai. Clinical Study on the Diagnostic Value of Circadian Variability of Systolic Blood Pressure Combined with SDNN in Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3760-3765.
[7]	YIN Jiahui, YANG Xinhui, WANG Jingjing, ZHANG Yajing, WANG Lijuan, FU Zuodi, KONG Xiangshuang, GUO Guangxia, LI Yufeng. Predictive Value Waist-to-height Ratio, Waist-to-hip Ratio and Body Mass Index for Metabolic Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3258-3263.
[8]	LI Chunxian, LIU Annuo. Study on the Effect and Predictive Value of Obesity and Lipid-related Indices on Metabolic Syndrome in Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2595-2603.
[9]	ZHANG Luyi, YU Ruihong, WANG Qi, ZHANG Xiaoyu, LI Xiang, WANG Zhongxuan, ZHU Dongshan. The Impact of Circadian Syndrome and Metabolic Syndrome on Subjective and Objective Cognitive Functions: a Cross-sectional Analysis from the Pingyin Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2481-2490.
[10]	JIANG Xiaoman, XU Xinyi, DING Lingyu, GUO Yinning, MIAO Xueyi, CHEN Li, XU Qin. Clinical Characteristics and Correlation between Preoperative Frailty and Metabolic Syndrome among Older Patients with Gastric Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2134-2141.
[11]	JIA Shuo, CHENG Gong, GUAN Lei, FENG Panpan, XU Bailing, FANG Wei, ZHANG Ji. Diagnostic Performance of SPECT in Patients with Coronary Microcirculation Disturbance after PCI [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(09): 1122-1127.
[12]	GU Keyi, PAN Yaojia, HAN Zheng, FU Xiaoya, GU Handong, YANG Fei, WANG Weiqiang. Correlation between Different Obesity Metabolic Phenotypes and Atherosclerosis in a Young Population: Uric Acid as Its Potential Factor [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(07): 831-837.
[13]	HAN Zheng, WANG Weiqiang, PAN Yaojia, FU Fanglin, SUN Meng. A Cross-sectional Study of the Association of cMetS and Other Obesity Indicators with Cardiometabolic Co-morbidities in People over 35 Years of Age in Anhui Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(27): 3344-3350.
[14]	WANG Wenjuan, WANG Rui, ZENG Hongji, LIU Yahui, WEI Shufan, TIAN Qingfeng. Relationship between Serum Liver Transaminase and Metabolic Syndrome in the Aged Based on Restrictive Cubic Spline Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1337-1342.
[15]	ZHENG Rong, LIU Zhidong, WANG Miao, ZHANG Xiao, CHEN Junlan, ZHOU Shigao. A Randomized Controlled Study on Gehu Tiaozhi Decoction Intervening Patients with Metabolic Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(03): 343-347.