
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (26): 3298-3307.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0301
Special Issue: 泌尿系统疾病最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-02-28
Revised:2022-06-10
Published:2022-09-15
Online:2022-07-06
Contact:
Xiangmei CHEN
About author:
通讯作者:
陈香美
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0301
| 组别 | 只数 | 体征量化分值 |
|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | -4.73±1.69a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 5.37±2.04 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 1.46±1.51 |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | -2.13±2.23a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | -0.15±2.49a |
| F值 | 13.96 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of quantitative scores of signs of mice in five groups
| 组别 | 只数 | 体征量化分值 |
|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | -4.73±1.69a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 5.37±2.04 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 1.46±1.51 |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | -2.13±2.23a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | -0.15±2.49a |
| F值 | 13.96 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | 干预第9周 | 干预第10周 | 干预第11周 | 干预第12周 | 干预第13周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.20±0.11a | 0.40±0.02a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.39±0.05a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 0.69±0.26 | 0.88±0.33 | 0.84±0.30 | 0.90±0.12 | 0.90±0.17 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.32±0.02a | 0.46±0.06a | 0.36±0.07a | 0.27±0.10a | 0.45±0.10a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.27±0.03a | 0.43±0.14a | 0.36±0.04a | 0.45±0.25a | 0.43±0.05a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.52±0.24a | 0.33±0.05a | 0.34±0.14a | 0.46±0.09a |
| F值 | 13.58 | 3.13 | 12.80 | 14.54 | 20.97 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.047 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of UPCR among 5 groups at 9,10,11,12 and 13 weeks after intervention
| 组别 | 只数 | 干预第9周 | 干预第10周 | 干预第11周 | 干预第12周 | 干预第13周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.20±0.11a | 0.40±0.02a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.39±0.05a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 0.69±0.26 | 0.88±0.33 | 0.84±0.30 | 0.90±0.12 | 0.90±0.17 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.32±0.02a | 0.46±0.06a | 0.36±0.07a | 0.27±0.10a | 0.45±0.10a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.27±0.03a | 0.43±0.14a | 0.36±0.04a | 0.45±0.25a | 0.43±0.05a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.52±0.24a | 0.33±0.05a | 0.34±0.14a | 0.46±0.09a |
| F值 | 13.58 | 3.13 | 12.80 | 14.54 | 20.97 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.047 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | anti-dsDNA | ANA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.76±0.21a | 0.24±0.02a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 1.53±0.04 | 0.50±0.06 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 1.18±0.06a | 0.34±0.04a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 1.59±0.05 | 0.33±0.04a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 1.19±0.16a | 0.34±0.02a |
| F值 | 25.06 | 23.79 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of serum anti-dsDNA and ANA levels in five groups of mice after 14 weeks of intervention
| 组别 | 只数 | anti-dsDNA | ANA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.76±0.21a | 0.24±0.02a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 1.53±0.04 | 0.50±0.06 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 1.18±0.06a | 0.34±0.04a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 1.59±0.05 | 0.33±0.04a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 1.19±0.16a | 0.34±0.02a |
| F值 | 25.06 | 23.79 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | C3( | IgG〔M(P25,P75)〕 | C5b-9( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 3.65±3.14a | 4.57(3.14,20.06) | 0.00±0.00a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 142.70±87.02 | 69.14(38.18,98.68) | 0.34±0.13 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.41±0.48a | 1.22(0.82,1.51)a | 0.04±0.01a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.36±0.47a | 2.61(1.78,3.81) | 0.13±0.03a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.14±0.04a | 1.10(0.92,1.21)a | 0.17±0.03a |
| F(H)值 | 7.93 | 16.73b | 13.57 | |
| P值 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of immune deposition of C3,IgG and C5b-9 in kidney tissue of 5 groups of mice after 14 weeks of intervention
| 组别 | 只数 | C3( | IgG〔M(P25,P75)〕 | C5b-9( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 3.65±3.14a | 4.57(3.14,20.06) | 0.00±0.00a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 142.70±87.02 | 69.14(38.18,98.68) | 0.34±0.13 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.41±0.48a | 1.22(0.82,1.51)a | 0.04±0.01a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.36±0.47a | 2.61(1.78,3.81) | 0.13±0.03a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.14±0.04a | 1.10(0.92,1.21)a | 0.17±0.03a |
| F(H)值 | 7.93 | 16.73b | 13.57 | |
| P值 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | α-SMA | CollagenⅠ | Fibronectin | C3 | C5 | CD35 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.66±0.32 | 0.59±0.08 | 0.19±0.04a | 0.69±0.30 | 0.82±0.34 | 0.37±0.05a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 1.23±0.71 | 0.96±0.13 | 0.83±0.02 | 0.92±0.19 | 0.84±0.17 | 0.92±0.07 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.66±0.20 | 0.81±0.25 | 0.45±0.02a | 0.28±0.14a | 0.34±0.11a | 0.31±0.01a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.54±0.50 | 0.67±0.23 | 0.24±0.01a | 0.34±0.16a | 0.19±0.13a | 0.65±0.02a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.22±0.16a | 0.20±0.03a | 0.27±0.03a | 0.19±0.08a | 0.18±0.12a | 0.20±0.02a |
| F值 | 2.19 | 8.80 | 281.60 | 7.99 | 8.86 | 156.50 | |
| P值 | 0.144 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of the levels of α-SMA,CollagenⅠ,fibronectin and complement protein in kidney tissue of 5 groups of mice after 14 weeks of intervention
| 组别 | 只数 | α-SMA | CollagenⅠ | Fibronectin | C3 | C5 | CD35 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常对照组 | 6 | 0.66±0.32 | 0.59±0.08 | 0.19±0.04a | 0.69±0.30 | 0.82±0.34 | 0.37±0.05a |
| MRL/lpr组 | 3 | 1.23±0.71 | 0.96±0.13 | 0.83±0.02 | 0.92±0.19 | 0.84±0.17 | 0.92±0.07 |
| SY低剂量组 | 5 | 0.66±0.20 | 0.81±0.25 | 0.45±0.02a | 0.28±0.14a | 0.34±0.11a | 0.31±0.01a |
| SY中剂量组 | 7 | 0.54±0.50 | 0.67±0.23 | 0.24±0.01a | 0.34±0.16a | 0.19±0.13a | 0.65±0.02a |
| SY高剂量组 | 9 | 0.22±0.16a | 0.20±0.03a | 0.27±0.03a | 0.19±0.08a | 0.18±0.12a | 0.20±0.02a |
| F值 | 2.19 | 8.80 | 281.60 | 7.99 | 8.86 | 156.50 | |
| P值 | 0.144 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
Figure 6 Electropherogram of the effect of Fufangshenyi Decoction on α-SMA,CollagenⅠ,fibronectin and complement proteins in the kidney tissue of the mouse model of lupus nephritis
Figure 7 Pathway map of the effect of Fufangshenyi Decoction on the regulation of complement proteins in the kidney tissue of the mouse model of lupus nephritis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
赵淑珍,陈香美,于家菊,等. 莲慈汤对7/8肾切除大鼠转化生长因子β表达及肾小球硬化的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志,1997(S1):96-97,286.
|
| [9] |
李非,白雪源,陈香美,等. 利用基因芯片探讨中药复方对MRL/lpr狼疮小鼠肾脏基因表达及Th1/Th2细胞的调节作用[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志,2003,23(3):198-200,206. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1003-5370.2003.03.011.
|
| [10] |
李非,陈香美,傅博,等. 肾怡对狼疮小鼠免疫器官内Th1/Th2细胞比例的调节作用[J]. 中国免疫学杂志,2003,19(6):393-396.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] | |
| [16] | |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [1] | SHU Ling, GONG Bo, WANG Jing, SU Yanlin. Effects of Complementary and Alternative Therapy of Mindfulness on Blood Sugar and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Adipokines in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(05): 563-568. |
| [2] | Meng HUANG, Cunjun HUANG, Qiujuan OU, Hongbo DAI, Jiede HE, Hang LIANG, Zhe CHEN, Qiubi XU. Effect of Probiotic Intervention on Class Ⅳ andⅤLupus Nephritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(20): 2462-2467. |
| [3] | Yunzhou SHI, Hui ZHENG, Min CHEN, Zhigang LI, Shuguang YU. Review of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1807-1813. |
| [4] | SHI Zhiyi,LU Ying,LIU Weihua,WANG Zhenzhen,ZHANG Hongmei. Latest Developments in the Application of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Pregnancy-related Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(9): 1095-1101. |
| [5] | ZHANG Zongwei,CHEN Cheng,WANG Huiming,DING Guohua. Correlation of Serum β2-microglobulin Level with Disease Activity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Degree of Lupus Nephritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(17): 2058-2063. |
| [6] | LI Hui,MENG Deqian,LIU Yan,LI Ju,LIU Shanshan,WANG Kai,PAN Wenyou. Predicative Value of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio for Disease Activity in Patients with Lupus Nephritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(11): 1307-1311. |
| [7] | GUO Xiao-bin1*,WANG Peng2,TAO Li-yuan3,WU Hua2. Influencing Factors of Carotid Atheromatous Plaque Formation:a Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(17): 2043-2047. |
| [8] | NING Chun-yan, DANG Xi-qiang, SONG Fang, YI Zhu-wen, HE Xiao-jie. Expression of miR-145 and Myocardin in Vascular Injuries of Children with Lupus Nephritis and Their Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(31): 3831-3836. |
| [9] | GUZAILINUER·Sailaiajimu, WANG Mei-hong, MINAWAER·Yunuosi, SANG Xiao-hong. Relationship between Anti-C1q Antibody in Kidney Tissue of Lupus Nephritis Patients and Disease Activity [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(29): 3545-3548. |
| [10] |
.
Influence of Course of Disease and Complement Levels on the Curative Effects of Children with Ocular Myasthenia Gravis
[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(25): 3051-3055.
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||