Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (24): 3013-3017.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0238
Special Issue: 呼吸疾病文章合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-15
Revised:
2022-04-08
Published:
2022-08-20
Online:
2022-06-02
Contact:
Ke QIN
About author:
通讯作者:
秦克
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0238
观察时间 | FVC(L) | FEV1(L) | PEF(L/s) | CAT评分(分) | 血清miR-210表达水平 | 血清miR-181a表达水平 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 2.49±0.76 | 1.38±0.44 | 3.61±0.93 | 16.33±4.10 | 22.01±6.17 | 1.38±0.47 |
治疗后 | 2.78±0.81 | 1.60±0.51 | 4.32±1.03 | 11.57±3.27 | 17.41±5.29 | 1.09±0.32 |
t值 | 2.421 | 3.029 | 4.745 | 8.417 | 5.249 | 4.730 |
P值 | 0.017 | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of pulmonary function parameters,CAT score,and serum miR-210 and miR-181a levels before and after four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation treatment in COPD patients
观察时间 | FVC(L) | FEV1(L) | PEF(L/s) | CAT评分(分) | 血清miR-210表达水平 | 血清miR-181a表达水平 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 2.49±0.76 | 1.38±0.44 | 3.61±0.93 | 16.33±4.10 | 22.01±6.17 | 1.38±0.47 |
治疗后 | 2.78±0.81 | 1.60±0.51 | 4.32±1.03 | 11.57±3.27 | 17.41±5.29 | 1.09±0.32 |
t值 | 2.421 | 3.029 | 4.745 | 8.417 | 5.249 | 4.730 |
P值 | 0.017 | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
观察指标 | 治疗前血清miR-210表达水平 | 治疗前血清miR-181a表达水平 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗前FVC | -0.209 | 0.055 | -0.193 | 0.075 |
治疗前FEV1 | -0.177 | 0.103 | -0.181 | 0.095 |
治疗前PEF | -0.169 | 0.120 | -0.172 | 0.113 |
治疗前CAT评分 | 0.584 | <0.001 | 0.604 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Correlations of serum miR-210 and miR-181a levels with lung function parameters and CAT score in COPD patients before four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation
观察指标 | 治疗前血清miR-210表达水平 | 治疗前血清miR-181a表达水平 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗前FVC | -0.209 | 0.055 | -0.193 | 0.075 |
治疗前FEV1 | -0.177 | 0.103 | -0.181 | 0.095 |
治疗前PEF | -0.169 | 0.120 | -0.172 | 0.113 |
治疗前CAT评分 | 0.584 | <0.001 | 0.604 | <0.001 |
观察指标 | 治疗后血清miR-210表达水平 | 治疗后血清miR-181a表达水平 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗后FVC | -0.211 | 0.051 | -0.206 | 0.057 |
治疗后FEV1 | -0.633 | <0.001 | -0.635 | <0.001 |
治疗后PEF | -0.161 | 0.139 | -0.158 | 0.146 |
治疗后CAT评分 | 0.198 | 0.068 | 0.174 | 0.109 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of serum miR-210 and miR-181a levels with lung function parameters and CAT score after four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation treatment
观察指标 | 治疗后血清miR-210表达水平 | 治疗后血清miR-181a表达水平 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗后FVC | -0.211 | 0.051 | -0.206 | 0.057 |
治疗后FEV1 | -0.633 | <0.001 | -0.635 | <0.001 |
治疗后PEF | -0.161 | 0.139 | -0.158 | 0.146 |
治疗后CAT评分 | 0.198 | 0.068 | 0.174 | 0.109 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 男性〔n(%)〕 | BMI( | 病程( | 戒烟时间( | 血清miR-210表达水平( | 血清miR-181a表达水平( | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | |||||||
有效组 | 39 | 59.7±6.9 | 25(64.10) | 22.4±1.6 | 12.89±4.52 | 6.0±1.4 | 18.29±2.21 | 13.96±2.93 | 1.03±0.17 | 0.69±0.13 |
无效组 | 47 | 61.5±7.6 | 33(70.21) | 22.2±1.8 | 14.05±4.34 | 5.5±1.1 | 25.73±4.09 | 20.86±3.22 | 1.73±0.26 | 1.49±0.25 |
t(χ2)值 | 1.172 | 0.361a | 0.611 | 1.211 | 1.595 | 10.733 | 10.396 | 17.002 | 19.065 | |
P值 | 0.245 | 0.547 | 0.543 | 0.229 | 0.114 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 The clinical data in COPD patients with and without responses to four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation treatment
组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 男性〔n(%)〕 | BMI( | 病程( | 戒烟时间( | 血清miR-210表达水平( | 血清miR-181a表达水平( | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | |||||||
有效组 | 39 | 59.7±6.9 | 25(64.10) | 22.4±1.6 | 12.89±4.52 | 6.0±1.4 | 18.29±2.21 | 13.96±2.93 | 1.03±0.17 | 0.69±0.13 |
无效组 | 47 | 61.5±7.6 | 33(70.21) | 22.2±1.8 | 14.05±4.34 | 5.5±1.1 | 25.73±4.09 | 20.86±3.22 | 1.73±0.26 | 1.49±0.25 |
t(χ2)值 | 1.172 | 0.361a | 0.611 | 1.211 | 1.595 | 10.733 | 10.396 | 17.002 | 19.065 | |
P值 | 0.245 | 0.547 | 0.543 | 0.229 | 0.114 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1 ROC curve of pre-treatment serum miR-210 and miR-181a levels in predicting the treatment effect of four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation in COPD patients
指标 | AUC(95%CI) | P值 | 临界值 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-210 | 0.807(0.538,0.929) | 0.032 | 19.65 | 0.733 | 0.767 |
miR-181a | 0.844(0.552,0.960) | 0.011 | 1.29 | 0.779 | 0.802 |
Table 5 Performance of pre-treatment serum miR-210 and miR-181a levels in predicting the treatment effect of four-week budesonide and formoterol inhalation in stable COPD patients
指标 | AUC(95%CI) | P值 | 临界值 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
miR-210 | 0.807(0.538,0.929) | 0.032 | 19.65 | 0.733 | 0.767 |
miR-181a | 0.844(0.552,0.960) | 0.011 | 1.29 | 0.779 | 0.802 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
郑研,王晖,李岚,等. miR-181a诱导慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞周期阻滞及细胞凋亡的分子机制探讨[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2020,28(18):3118-3122. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2020.18.005.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2013,36(4):255-264. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2013.04.007.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
李冰,杨元立,王美霞,等. 巨噬细胞移动抑制因子在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺组织中的表达及意义[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2019,28(9):1123-1127. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.09.012.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
李渊,姜启栋,梅松涛,等. miR-181a靶向SIRT1对脓毒症诱导的小鼠急性肺损伤的影响及作用机制[J]. 西安交通大学学报:医学版,2020,41(4):516-524. DOI:10.7652/jdyxb202004010.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
邢江,杨亚萍. COPD患者血清microRNA-210、HIF-1α水平与心率变异性及肺功能的相关性[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(10):96-101. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2020.10.020.
|
[16] |
李翠娟,唐颖,慕丽娜,等. 稳定期COPD患者血清miR-181a与炎性因子的关系及对急性加重和死亡的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志,2020,21(7):567-571. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2020.07.011.
|
[17] |
李井华,张慧君,王红艳,等. miR-210、miR-155和miR-34a在SLE患者外周血中的表达水平及其与病情严重程度的相关性分析[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2020,21(4):5-7.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
刘灿,龚海东,王伟灿,等. miR-210/VMP1信号传导通路在脑胶质瘤中作用的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2020,28(2):342-345. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2020.02.038.
|
[21] |
粱珍珍,吕燕平,张艳莉,等. miR-181a参与调控香烟提取物诱导的NR8383肺泡巨噬细胞自噬紊乱与促炎因子的生成[J]. 中国病理生理杂志,2019,35(4):710-717. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4718.2019.04.021.
|
[22] |
|
[1] | XU Yanpeng, HUANG Pe, ZHANG Pingping, LUO Yan, SHI Xiaoqi, WU Liusong, CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu. Expression of β-Adrenergic Receptors in Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3391-3398. |
[2] | YANG Chen, CHEN Tong, ZHANG Lifang, ZHANG Hongxu, LI Pengfei, ZHANG Xuejuan. Prognostic Impact of Dapagliflozin in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3053-3058. |
[3] | CHEN Fei, WANG Jinying, YU Haibo, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, ZHANG Tianyu, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Urinary NGAL, TIM-1, VCAM-1 and Activin A in Patients with New Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2740-2749. |
[4] | MA Panpan, WANG Sijing, YOU Na, DING Dafa, LU Yibing. Efficacy and Safety of Danuglipron and Orforglipron in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2679-2685. |
[5] | CAO Gan, DENG Yifan, HE Shenghu, ZHANG Jing. Study on the Correlation between the Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-albumin Ratio and Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Emergency PCI [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1878-1883. |
[6] | ZHU Shengjie, DIAO Huaqiong, HANG Xiaoyi, SUN Wenjun. Network Meta-analysis of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for the Treatment of Posterior Circulatory Ischemic Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1795-1808. |
[7] | ZHANG Shujing, SUN Lixin, CAO Yuqing. Comparative Study on the Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic between HPV-related and Non-HPV-related Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1758-1764. |
[8] | LIU Caiping, ZHANG Yanhua, TANG Jianpin, WANG Chengpeng, XUE Fengfeng, WANG Huijuan, LI Chuanwei, ZHANG Guangya, LI Huafang. Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Risperidone Microspheres in the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1622-1627. |
[9] | WANG Dexiang, YUAN Jiawen, LU Qinyun, HANG Yuhao, LU Jun, CHENG Lu. Influences of Treatment Timing of the TCM prescription Qingfei Huayu Tongfu Formula on the Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis of Sepsis-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1500-1505. |
[10] | LI Qiujing, SHANG Na, GAO Qian, YANG Li, GUO Shubin. Predictive Value of Abdominal CT Based-skeletal Muscle Mass Combined with Critical Illness Score for Prognosis in Older Patients with Intra-abdominal Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1459-1464. |
[11] | ZHANG Pei, YANG Meng, GAO Chunlin, XIA Zhengkun. Study on the Intervention and Prognosis of Modified Lifting Powder on Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Disease in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1376-1382. |
[12] | WANG Yiquan, CHEN Wanjia, LIU Wangyi, ZHANG Luyun, DENG Yueyi. The Prognosis of Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Diseasetreated with Fermented Cordyceps Sinensis Powder: Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(09): 1084-1091. |
[13] | ZHANG Shaotong, WANG Bo, ZHANG Mingrui, MA Guiyan, LIU Shaoguang. Identification of Sepsis Subphenotypes and Risk Stratification Using the Procalcitonin Trajectory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 594-600. |
[14] | ZHU Lu, AI Jun, LIAO Shengwu, HUANG Shuting, GONG Nirong, KONG Yaozhong, LIU Dehui, DOU Xianrui, ZHANG Guangqing. Association of Prognostic Nutritional Index with Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 568-574. |
[15] | DU Huijie, LIU Xingyu, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, ZHANG Huiqin, MO Jiali, LU Yi, KUANG Jie. Advances in the Prognostic Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Using Machine Learning Predictive Models as an Example [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 554-560. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||