
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (04): 483-489.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0270
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-07-09
Revised:2025-10-27
Published:2026-02-05
Online:2026-01-15
Contact:
LI Hui
通讯作者:
李慧
作者简介:付积艺、郑博月、吴佳霏、王珺负责数据收集;付积艺、郑博月负责数据分析;付积艺负责论文初稿撰写;郑博月、吴佳霏、王珺负责患者随访;李慧主导研究课题设计,审阅并修订文章,对研究完整性承担最终责任。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0270
| 项目 | 数值 |
|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 39.5(26.0,54.2) |
| 性别(男/女) | 10/2 |
| WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 2.94(2.53,7.55) |
| ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 1.30(0.45,4.21) |
| HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | 103.50(80.50,140.25) |
| PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 95.00(45.25,191.00) |
| 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 2.45(0,44.55) |
| 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 64.50(26.00,81.50) |
| 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 50.45(28.10,80.46) |
| 髓外浸润[例(%)] | 12(100.0) |
| 既往化疗[例(%)] | 2(16.7) |
Table 1 Clinical baseline characteristics of 12 T-ALL patients
| 项目 | 数值 |
|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 39.5(26.0,54.2) |
| 性别(男/女) | 10/2 |
| WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 2.94(2.53,7.55) |
| ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 1.30(0.45,4.21) |
| HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | 103.50(80.50,140.25) |
| PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 95.00(45.25,191.00) |
| 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 2.45(0,44.55) |
| 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 64.50(26.00,81.50) |
| 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 50.45(28.10,80.46) |
| 髓外浸润[例(%)] | 12(100.0) |
| 既往化疗[例(%)] | 2(16.7) |
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别(男/女) | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 38.5(24.2,61.2) | 4/2 | 2.74(1.99,2.85) | 0.95(0.13,1.33) | 82.00(72.50,116.25) | 102.00(37.75,230.00) | 7.05(1.43,33.65) | 63.75(28.00,80.75) | 57.12(31.86,77.90) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 39.5(27.2,52.7) | 6/0 | 7.09(2.98,138.29) | 4.06(0.87,8.86) | 124.00(83.50,161.00) | 91.50(46.50,169.00) | 0.00(0.00,86.73) | 64.50(14.00,84.00) | 50.45(14.05,91.37) |
| 检验统计量值 | 18.000 | — | 5.000 | 7.000 | 10.000 | 17.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.455 | 0.057 | 0.078 | 0.199 | 0.873 | 0.507 | 0.855 | 0.855 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline data between ETP and non-ETP patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别(男/女) | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 38.5(24.2,61.2) | 4/2 | 2.74(1.99,2.85) | 0.95(0.13,1.33) | 82.00(72.50,116.25) | 102.00(37.75,230.00) | 7.05(1.43,33.65) | 63.75(28.00,80.75) | 57.12(31.86,77.90) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 39.5(27.2,52.7) | 6/0 | 7.09(2.98,138.29) | 4.06(0.87,8.86) | 124.00(83.50,161.00) | 91.50(46.50,169.00) | 0.00(0.00,86.73) | 64.50(14.00,84.00) | 50.45(14.05,91.37) |
| 检验统计量值 | 18.000 | — | 5.000 | 7.000 | 10.000 | 17.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.455 | 0.057 | 0.078 | 0.199 | 0.873 | 0.507 | 0.855 | 0.855 |
| 患者编号 | 融合基因 | 预后基因 | 染色体 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALM-AF10 | NRAS/NOTCH1/WT1/KIT/MYB/TET1/DNM2 | 46,XY,del(5)(q31),t(10;11)(p13;q23)[11]/46,XY[9] |
| 2 | 阴性 | BCOR/IDH2/NOTCH1/NRAS/DNMT3A/FAT1/ERCC5/BCOR | 46,XY[20] |
| 3 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 4 | 阴性 | IDH2/DNMT3A/FOXO3/HDAC9/KMT2D | 46,XX[20] |
| 5 | 未查 | NCOR2/PIK3CD/RETSAT | 46,XY[20] |
| 6 | 未查 | JAK3/GATA3/MGA/NOTCH2/PCLO/SH2B3 | 46,XY[20] |
| 7 | 未查 | SUZ12/ETV6/FAT1/MYB/NCOR2/NPM1 | 46,XX[20] |
| 8 | 阴性 | CNOT3/CSMD1/ARID1B/ATM/NCOR2/TET3/TP63 | 未查 |
| 9 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 10 | PHF6 | PHF6/FAT3/HOXA10/SETD2/TP53/USH2A/BRCA2/EED/FANCN/JARID2/NCOR1/SF3B1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 11 | 阴性 | HDAC9/KMT2B/NCOR2/VAV1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 12 | 阴性 | IL7R/DNM2/NOTCH1/USH2A | 46,XY,inv(9)(p12q13)[20] |
Table 3 Genetic and molecular biological characteristics of 12 T-ALL patients
| 患者编号 | 融合基因 | 预后基因 | 染色体 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALM-AF10 | NRAS/NOTCH1/WT1/KIT/MYB/TET1/DNM2 | 46,XY,del(5)(q31),t(10;11)(p13;q23)[11]/46,XY[9] |
| 2 | 阴性 | BCOR/IDH2/NOTCH1/NRAS/DNMT3A/FAT1/ERCC5/BCOR | 46,XY[20] |
| 3 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 4 | 阴性 | IDH2/DNMT3A/FOXO3/HDAC9/KMT2D | 46,XX[20] |
| 5 | 未查 | NCOR2/PIK3CD/RETSAT | 46,XY[20] |
| 6 | 未查 | JAK3/GATA3/MGA/NOTCH2/PCLO/SH2B3 | 46,XY[20] |
| 7 | 未查 | SUZ12/ETV6/FAT1/MYB/NCOR2/NPM1 | 46,XX[20] |
| 8 | 阴性 | CNOT3/CSMD1/ARID1B/ATM/NCOR2/TET3/TP63 | 未查 |
| 9 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 10 | PHF6 | PHF6/FAT3/HOXA10/SETD2/TP53/USH2A/BRCA2/EED/FANCN/JARID2/NCOR1/SF3B1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 11 | 阴性 | HDAC9/KMT2B/NCOR2/VAV1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 12 | 阴性 | IL7R/DNM2/NOTCH1/USH2A | 46,XY,inv(9)(p12q13)[20] |
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 66.7 | 3(50.0) | 1(16.7) | 1(16.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) |
Table 4 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the ETP and non-ETP groups after a course of treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 66.7 | 3(50.0) | 1(16.7) | 1(16.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) |
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 83.3 | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) | 4(66.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 4(66.7) | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) |
Table 5 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the ETP and non-ETP groups after two courses of treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 83.3 | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) | 4(66.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 4(66.7) | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) |
| 变量 | β | SE | HR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 1.253 | 1.414 | 3.500(0.219~5.956) | 0.376 |
| 年龄 | 2.449 | 1.438 | 11.578(0.691~14.097) | 0.089 |
| T-ALL类型 | 4.656 | 4.908 | 10.192(0.007~15.097) | 0.343 |
| 染色体核型 | -3.452 | 6.564 | 0.032(0.000~1.896) | 0.599 |
| 突变基因数量 | -0.864 | 1.290 | 0.422(0.034~5.282) | 0.503 |
| 1个疗程后疗效 | -0.322 | 1.231 | 0.725(0.065~8.092) | 0.794 |
| 1个疗程后MRD阴性 | -3.392 | 7.280 | 0.034(0.000~5.170) | 0.641 |
| 2个疗程后疗效 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 2个疗程后MRD阴性 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 移植 | -5.133 | 5.377 | 0.006(0.000~2.944) | 0.340 |
Table 6 Single factor Cox regression analysis of influencing factors of patients' OS
| 变量 | β | SE | HR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 1.253 | 1.414 | 3.500(0.219~5.956) | 0.376 |
| 年龄 | 2.449 | 1.438 | 11.578(0.691~14.097) | 0.089 |
| T-ALL类型 | 4.656 | 4.908 | 10.192(0.007~15.097) | 0.343 |
| 染色体核型 | -3.452 | 6.564 | 0.032(0.000~1.896) | 0.599 |
| 突变基因数量 | -0.864 | 1.290 | 0.422(0.034~5.282) | 0.503 |
| 1个疗程后疗效 | -0.322 | 1.231 | 0.725(0.065~8.092) | 0.794 |
| 1个疗程后MRD阴性 | -3.392 | 7.280 | 0.034(0.000~5.170) | 0.641 |
| 2个疗程后疗效 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 2个疗程后MRD阴性 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 移植 | -5.133 | 5.377 | 0.006(0.000~2.944) | 0.340 |
| [1] |
中国抗癌协会血液肿瘤专业委员会, 中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 中国成人急性淋巴细胞白血病诊断与治疗指南(2024年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2024, 45(5):417-429.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [1] | ZENG Ling, XIE Leyun, YU Renhe, SONG Lin, ZENG Saizhen. Age-stratified Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Lobar Pneumonia in Children with Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(32): 4752-4758. |
| [2] | LI Jiao, ZHOU Jianjie, PENG Lang, MEI Yingbing, TAN Zihu. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Poor Prognosis in Alzheimer's Disease Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4248-4257. |
| [3] | ZHANG Tianyu, CHEN Fei, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Levels of Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptor B1, CD36, and Lymphatic Enhancer Factor 1 in Patients with Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4272-4280. |
| [4] | YAN Yi, JIANG Yu, CHEN Bi, ZHANG Cantang, WANG Jing. Study on the Predictive Value of a Multi-parameter Model Based on Lymphocyte Count for the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease Complicated with Pulmonary Infection [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3760-3766. |
| [5] | ZHAO Sinan, LIN Shan, KANG Xi, WANG Chunyan, WANG Shunxiang. Impact of Immune Inhibitory Factors Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 and T Cell Immunoglobulin Mucin-3 on the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3461-3465. |
| [6] | WANG Xinliang, ZOU Nannan, CHEN Nana, WANG Xin. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Risk Factors in Patients with Pulmonary Mucormycosis Complicated with Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(22): 3154-3161. |
| [7] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [8] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [9] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [10] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [11] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [12] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [13] | LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, LIU Zihan, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Primary Sjögren's Disease with Dryness and Blood-stasis Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 718-725. |
| [14] | WANG Lina, LEI Jingshu, LI Kuibao, WANG Ruiying, LI Xinmiao, WANG Fangfang, GUO Xiaorong, NIU Ruihao, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Fangfang, ZHAO Jingjing, LEE CHONGYOU. Review on Inflammatory Response in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 790-801. |
| [15] | WANG Xue, YANG Chengming, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Analysis on Prognosis and Influencing Factors in Patients with Post-tuberculosis Bronchiectasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 606-611. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||