Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (06): 714-718.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.091
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Overall and Sex-specific Associations between Ratio of Monocyte to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Hyperuricemia Prevalence
1.Department of General Practice,Shanghai Pudong New Area Laogang Community Health Center,Shanghai 201302,China
2.Cardiovascular Department,the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200233,China
*Corresponding author:CHEN Zhong,Chief physician;E-mail:zhongchen7498@hotmail.com
Received:
2021-07-03
Revised:
2021-10-12
Published:
2022-02-20
Online:
2022-01-25
通讯作者:
陈忠
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Yanping, WU Meihua, YANG Sheng, CHEN Zhong.
Overall and Sex-specific Associations between Ratio of Monocyte to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Hyperuricemia Prevalence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(06): 714-718.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.091
一般资料 | 男性(n=5 498) | 女性(n=6 807) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非HUA者(n=4 524) | HUA患者(n=974) | 检验统计量值 | P值 | 非HUA者(n=5 833) | HUA患者(n=974) | 检验统计量值 | P值 | |
年龄(![]() | 64.8±9.0 | 65.4±9.6 | 1.865a | 0.066 | 64.7±9.3 | 68.5±10.4 | 11.599a | <0.001 |
SBP(![]() | 147±20 | 149±20 | 2.879a | 0.004 | 150±20 | 155±21 | 6.179a | <0.001 |
DBP(![]() | 84±11 | 85±11 | 2.843a | 0.004 | 82±11 | 83±11 | 3.164a | 0.002 |
BMI(![]() | 24.1±3.2 | 25.7±3.2 | 14.155a | <0.001 | 24.3±3.5 | 26.2±3.7 | 15.211a | <0.001 |
MONO〔M(QR),×109/L〕 | 0.43(0.20) | 0.45(0.19) | 4.073b | <0.001 | 0.36(0.15) | 0.41(0.17) | 11.574b | <0.001 |
WBC(![]() | 6.10±1.51 | 6.59±1.55 | 9.143a | <0.001 | 6.01±1.47 | 6.55±1.61 | 10.464a | <0.001 |
FPG(![]() | 5.18±1.66 | 5.12±1.26 | 1.064a | 0.287 | 5.21±1.58 | 5.50±1.63 | 5.278a | <0.001 |
ALT〔M(QR),U/L〕 | 22.10(16.50) | 27.35(19.93) | 9.968b | <0.001 | 20.9(15.20) | 25.7(20.30) | 10.401b | <0.001 |
AST〔M(QR),U/L〕 | 24.60(10.20) | 26.60(11.75) | 7.703b | <0.001 | 24.8(10.10) | 26.9(12.95) | 7.753b | <0.001 |
BUN(![]() | 5.84±1.57 | 6.20±1.88 | 6.256a | <0.001 | 5.67±1.59 | 6.44±2.11 | 13.286a | <0.001 |
eGFR〔![]() | 112.08±26.45 | 94.29±24.16 | 19.326a | <0.001 | 107.90±23.22 | 88.51±25.33 | 23.804a | <0.001 |
LDL-C〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 2.82(0.92) | 2.88(1.04) | 2.840b | 0.004 | 3.06(0.96) | 3.19(1.17) | 3.858b | <0.001 |
TG〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 1.17(6.96) | 1.69(1.44) | 17.096b | <0.001 | 1.32(0.98) | 1.85(1.37) | 18.923b | <0.001 |
HDL-C〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 1.52(0.49) | 1.46(0.46) | 6.087b | <0.001 | 1.64(0.51) | 1.57(0.47) | 5.649b | <0.001 |
TC〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 5.00(1.30) | 5.07(1.39) | 1.485b | 0.136 | 5.38(1.35) | 5.53(1.61) | 4.034b | <0.001 |
脂肪肝〔n(%)〕 | 1 247(27.6) | 406(41.7) | 75.992 | <0.001 | 2 534(43.4) | 637(65.4) | 161.722 | <0.001 |
T2DM〔n(%)〕 | 703(15.5) | 114(11.7) | 9.317 | 0.003 | 974(16.7) | 224(23.0) | 22.842 | <0.001 |
高血压〔n(%)〕 | 1 817(40.2) | 561(57.6) | 99.246 | <0.001 | 2 499(42.8) | 642(65.9) | 178.768 | <0.001 |
MHR〔M(QR)〕 | 0.28(0.16) | 0.32(0.17) | 7.539b | <0.001 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.26(0.15) | 11.856b | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of general characteristics in physical examinees with and without HUA by sex
一般资料 | 男性(n=5 498) | 女性(n=6 807) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非HUA者(n=4 524) | HUA患者(n=974) | 检验统计量值 | P值 | 非HUA者(n=5 833) | HUA患者(n=974) | 检验统计量值 | P值 | |
年龄(![]() | 64.8±9.0 | 65.4±9.6 | 1.865a | 0.066 | 64.7±9.3 | 68.5±10.4 | 11.599a | <0.001 |
SBP(![]() | 147±20 | 149±20 | 2.879a | 0.004 | 150±20 | 155±21 | 6.179a | <0.001 |
DBP(![]() | 84±11 | 85±11 | 2.843a | 0.004 | 82±11 | 83±11 | 3.164a | 0.002 |
BMI(![]() | 24.1±3.2 | 25.7±3.2 | 14.155a | <0.001 | 24.3±3.5 | 26.2±3.7 | 15.211a | <0.001 |
MONO〔M(QR),×109/L〕 | 0.43(0.20) | 0.45(0.19) | 4.073b | <0.001 | 0.36(0.15) | 0.41(0.17) | 11.574b | <0.001 |
WBC(![]() | 6.10±1.51 | 6.59±1.55 | 9.143a | <0.001 | 6.01±1.47 | 6.55±1.61 | 10.464a | <0.001 |
FPG(![]() | 5.18±1.66 | 5.12±1.26 | 1.064a | 0.287 | 5.21±1.58 | 5.50±1.63 | 5.278a | <0.001 |
ALT〔M(QR),U/L〕 | 22.10(16.50) | 27.35(19.93) | 9.968b | <0.001 | 20.9(15.20) | 25.7(20.30) | 10.401b | <0.001 |
AST〔M(QR),U/L〕 | 24.60(10.20) | 26.60(11.75) | 7.703b | <0.001 | 24.8(10.10) | 26.9(12.95) | 7.753b | <0.001 |
BUN(![]() | 5.84±1.57 | 6.20±1.88 | 6.256a | <0.001 | 5.67±1.59 | 6.44±2.11 | 13.286a | <0.001 |
eGFR〔![]() | 112.08±26.45 | 94.29±24.16 | 19.326a | <0.001 | 107.90±23.22 | 88.51±25.33 | 23.804a | <0.001 |
LDL-C〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 2.82(0.92) | 2.88(1.04) | 2.840b | 0.004 | 3.06(0.96) | 3.19(1.17) | 3.858b | <0.001 |
TG〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 1.17(6.96) | 1.69(1.44) | 17.096b | <0.001 | 1.32(0.98) | 1.85(1.37) | 18.923b | <0.001 |
HDL-C〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 1.52(0.49) | 1.46(0.46) | 6.087b | <0.001 | 1.64(0.51) | 1.57(0.47) | 5.649b | <0.001 |
TC〔M(QR),mmol/L〕 | 5.00(1.30) | 5.07(1.39) | 1.485b | 0.136 | 5.38(1.35) | 5.53(1.61) | 4.034b | <0.001 |
脂肪肝〔n(%)〕 | 1 247(27.6) | 406(41.7) | 75.992 | <0.001 | 2 534(43.4) | 637(65.4) | 161.722 | <0.001 |
T2DM〔n(%)〕 | 703(15.5) | 114(11.7) | 9.317 | 0.003 | 974(16.7) | 224(23.0) | 22.842 | <0.001 |
高血压〔n(%)〕 | 1 817(40.2) | 561(57.6) | 99.246 | <0.001 | 2 499(42.8) | 642(65.9) | 178.768 | <0.001 |
MHR〔M(QR)〕 | 0.28(0.16) | 0.32(0.17) | 7.539b | <0.001 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.26(0.15) | 11.856b | <0.001 |
因素 | 男性(n=5 498) | 女性(n=6 807) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | |
年龄 | 0.011 | 0.395 | 0.163 | <0.001 |
SBP | 0.052 | <0.001 | 0.092 | <0.001 |
DBP | 0.071 | <0.001 | 0.046 | <0.001 |
BMI | 0.210 | <0.001 | 0.260 | <0.001 |
MONO | 0.098a | <0.001 | 0.182a | <0.001 |
WBC | 0.073 | <0.001 | 0.160 | <0.001 |
FPG | -0.032 | 0.018 | 0.094 | <0.001 |
ALT | 0.160a | <0.001 | 0.198a | <0.001 |
AST | 0.129a | <0.001 | 0.163a | <0.001 |
BUN | 0.119 | <0.001 | 0.217 | <0.001 |
eGFR | -0.382 | <0.001 | -0.371 | <0.001 |
LDL-C | 0.091a | <0.001 | 0.090a | <0.001 |
TG | 0.221a | <0.001 | 0.276a | <0.001 |
HDL-C | -0.092a | <0.001 | -0.082a | <0.001 |
TC | 0.062a | <0.001 | 0.072a | <0.001 |
MHR | 0.122a | <0.001 | 0.185a | <0.001 |
Table 2 Correlation analysis of serum uric acid and other factors in physical examinees by sex
因素 | 男性(n=5 498) | 女性(n=6 807) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | |
年龄 | 0.011 | 0.395 | 0.163 | <0.001 |
SBP | 0.052 | <0.001 | 0.092 | <0.001 |
DBP | 0.071 | <0.001 | 0.046 | <0.001 |
BMI | 0.210 | <0.001 | 0.260 | <0.001 |
MONO | 0.098a | <0.001 | 0.182a | <0.001 |
WBC | 0.073 | <0.001 | 0.160 | <0.001 |
FPG | -0.032 | 0.018 | 0.094 | <0.001 |
ALT | 0.160a | <0.001 | 0.198a | <0.001 |
AST | 0.129a | <0.001 | 0.163a | <0.001 |
BUN | 0.119 | <0.001 | 0.217 | <0.001 |
eGFR | -0.382 | <0.001 | -0.371 | <0.001 |
LDL-C | 0.091a | <0.001 | 0.090a | <0.001 |
TG | 0.221a | <0.001 | 0.276a | <0.001 |
HDL-C | -0.092a | <0.001 | -0.082a | <0.001 |
TC | 0.062a | <0.001 | 0.072a | <0.001 |
MHR | 0.122a | <0.001 | 0.185a | <0.001 |
变量 | 赋值 |
---|---|
HUA | 否=0,是=1 |
MONO | 连续变量 |
MHR | 连续变量 |
MHR四分位数(男性) | Q1=1,Q2=2,Q3=3,Q4=4 |
MHR四分位数(女性) | Q1=1,Q2=2,Q3=3,Q4=4 |
年龄 | 连续变量 |
BMI | 连续变量 |
eGFR | 连续变量 |
LDL-C | 连续变量 |
TG | 连续变量 |
脂肪肝 | 否=0,是=1 |
T2DM | 否=0,是=1 |
高血压 | 否=0,是=1 |
Table 3 Assignment for monocytes,MHR and other factors possibly associated with HUA in physical examinees analyzed using multivariate Logistic regression analysis
变量 | 赋值 |
---|---|
HUA | 否=0,是=1 |
MONO | 连续变量 |
MHR | 连续变量 |
MHR四分位数(男性) | Q1=1,Q2=2,Q3=3,Q4=4 |
MHR四分位数(女性) | Q1=1,Q2=2,Q3=3,Q4=4 |
年龄 | 连续变量 |
BMI | 连续变量 |
eGFR | 连续变量 |
LDL-C | 连续变量 |
TG | 连续变量 |
脂肪肝 | 否=0,是=1 |
T2DM | 否=0,是=1 |
高血压 | 否=0,是=1 |
变量 | 男性 | 女性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | |
模型1 | 2.841(1.859,4.341) | <0.001 | 11.479(6.924,19.030) | <0.001 |
模型2 | 2.207(1.429,3.410) | <0.001 | 6.711(3.990,11.287) | <0.001 |
模型3 | 2.010(1.265,3.194) | 0.003 | 5.427(3.059,9.627) | <0.001 |
Table 4 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of association of monocytes and HUA in male and female physical examinees
变量 | 男性 | 女性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | |
模型1 | 2.841(1.859,4.341) | <0.001 | 11.479(6.924,19.030) | <0.001 |
模型2 | 2.207(1.429,3.410) | <0.001 | 6.711(3.990,11.287) | <0.001 |
模型3 | 2.010(1.265,3.194) | 0.003 | 5.427(3.059,9.627) | <0.001 |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | |||
男性 | ||||||||
MHR | 5.319(3.374,8.383) | <0.001 | 3.495(2.164,5.646) | <0.001 | 1.918(1.111,3.313) | 0.019 | ||
MHR四分位数 | ||||||||
Q1 | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | ||
Q2 | 1.154(0.927,1.435) | 0.200 | 1.114(0.892,1.391) | 0.341 | 1.016(0.804,1.283) | 0.896 | ||
Q3 | 1.535(1.247,1.890) | <0.001 | 1.366(1.103,1.690) | 0.004 | 1.121(0.892,1.409) | 0.326 | ||
Q4 | 2.010(1.644,2.458) | <0.001 | 1.668(1.353,2.057) | <0.001 | 1.306(1.037,1.645) | 0.023 | ||
女性 | ||||||||
MHR | 36.791(20.816,65.025) | <0.001 | 9.120(4.976,16.714) | <0.001 | 6.073(2.984,12.358) | <0.001 | ||
MHR四分位数 | ||||||||
Q1 | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | ||
Q2 | 1.401(1.119,1.753) | 0.003 | 1.234(0.981,1.552) | 0.072 | 1.206(0.946,1.537) | 0.130 | ||
Q3 | 1.792(1.457,2.203) | <0.001 | 1.344(1.085,1.664) | 0.007 | 1.297(1.032,1.631) | 0.026 | ||
Q4 | 2.954(2.418,3.610) | <0.001 | 1.903(1.542,2.348) | <0.001 | 1.683(1.329,2.130) | <0.001 |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the association of MHR and HUA in male and female physical examinees
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | |||
男性 | ||||||||
MHR | 5.319(3.374,8.383) | <0.001 | 3.495(2.164,5.646) | <0.001 | 1.918(1.111,3.313) | 0.019 | ||
MHR四分位数 | ||||||||
Q1 | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | ||
Q2 | 1.154(0.927,1.435) | 0.200 | 1.114(0.892,1.391) | 0.341 | 1.016(0.804,1.283) | 0.896 | ||
Q3 | 1.535(1.247,1.890) | <0.001 | 1.366(1.103,1.690) | 0.004 | 1.121(0.892,1.409) | 0.326 | ||
Q4 | 2.010(1.644,2.458) | <0.001 | 1.668(1.353,2.057) | <0.001 | 1.306(1.037,1.645) | 0.023 | ||
女性 | ||||||||
MHR | 36.791(20.816,65.025) | <0.001 | 9.120(4.976,16.714) | <0.001 | 6.073(2.984,12.358) | <0.001 | ||
MHR四分位数 | ||||||||
Q1 | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | 1.000 | - | ||
Q2 | 1.401(1.119,1.753) | 0.003 | 1.234(0.981,1.552) | 0.072 | 1.206(0.946,1.537) | 0.130 | ||
Q3 | 1.792(1.457,2.203) | <0.001 | 1.344(1.085,1.664) | 0.007 | 1.297(1.032,1.631) | 0.026 | ||
Q4 | 2.954(2.418,3.610) | <0.001 | 1.903(1.542,2.348) | <0.001 | 1.683(1.329,2.130) | <0.001 |
[1] | 王靖宇,常宝成. 高尿酸血症/痛风流行病学特点及危险因素[J]. 国际内分泌代谢杂志,2016,36(2):78-81,88. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4157.2016.02.002. |
[2] | LIU R, HAN C, WU D,et al. Prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout in mainland China from 2000 to 2014:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int,2015,2015:762820. DOI:10.1155/2015/762820. |
[3] | 中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志,2020,36(1):1-13. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2020.01.001. |
[4] | 高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科共识专家组. 中国高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志,2017,56(3):235-248. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.03.021. |
[5] | LUIS-RODRÍGUEZ D, DONATE-CORREA J, MARTÍN-NÚÑEZ E,et al. Serum urate is related to subclinical inflammation in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia[J]. Rheumatology:Oxford,2021,60(1):371-379. DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa425. |
[6] | WANG H Y, SHI W R, YI X,et al. Assessing the performance of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio for predicting ischemic stroke:insights from a population-based Chinese cohort[J]. Lipids Heal Dis,2019,18(1):127. DOI:10.1186/s12944-019-1076-6. |
[7] | SHI W R, WANG H Y, CHEN S,et al. The impact of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio on reduced renal function:insights from a large population[J]. Biomark Med,2019,13(9):773-783. DOI:10.2217/bmm-2018-0406. |
[8] | ZHANG Y, LI S, GUO Y L,et al. Is monocyte to HDL ratio superior to monocyte count in predicting the cardiovascular outcomes:evidence from a large cohort of Chinese patients undergoing coronary angiography[J]. Ann Med,2016,48(5):305-312. DOI:10.3109/07853890.2016.1168935. |
[9] | FAN J G, WEI L, ZHUANG H,et al. Guidelines of prevention and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (2018,China)[J]. J Dig Dis,2019,20(4):163-173. DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.12685. |
[10] | ZHANG W Z. Intensified,optimized and standardized management of Chinese patients with hypertension:comments on "2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension" [J]. J Geriatr Cardiol,2019,16(3):178-181. DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.013. |
[11] | JUNG S W, KIM S M, KIM Y G,et al. Uric acid and inflammation in kidney disease[J]. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol,2020,318(6):F1327-1340. DOI:10.1152/ajprenal.00272.2019. |
[12] | LU W J, XU Y Z, SHAO X N,et al. Uric acid produces an inflammatory response through activation of NF-κB in the hypothalamus:implications for the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders[J]. Sci Rep,2015,5:12144. DOI:10.1038/srep12144. |
[13] | TOMIYAMA H, SHIINA K, VLACHOPOULOS C,et al. Involvement of arterial stiffness and inflammation in hyperuricemia-related development of hypertension[J]. Hypertension,2018,72(3):739-745. DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11390. |
[14] | KUNDI, GOK M, KIZILTUNC E,et al. Relation between monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with presence and severity of isolated coronary artery ectasia[J]. Am J Cardiol,2015,116(11):1685-1689. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.036. |
[15] | AÇIKGÖZ S K, AÇIKGÖZ E, SENSOY B,et al. Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is predictive of in-hospital and five-year mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Cardiol J,2016,23(5):505-512. DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2016.0026. |
[16] | MURPHY A J, WOOLLARD K J, HOANG A,et al. High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2008,28(11):2071-2077. DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.168690. |
[17] | GHATTAS A, GRIFFITHS H R, DEVITT A,et al. Monocytes in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis:where are we now?[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,62(17):1541-1551. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.043. |
[18] | KRYCHTIUK K A, KASTL S P, HOFBAUER S L,et al. Monocyte subset distribution in patients with stable atherosclerosis and elevated levels of lipoprotein(a)[J]. J Clin Lipidol,2015,9(4):533-541. DOI:10.1016/j.jacl.2015.04.005. |
[19] | MURPHY A J, WOOLLARD K J, HOANG A,et al. High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2008,28(11):2071-2077. DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.168690. |
[20] | PARTHASARATHY S, BARNETT J, FONG L G. High-density lipoprotein inhibits the oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta,1990,1044(2):275-283. DOI:10.1016/0005-2760(90)90314-n. |
[21] | ZHANG L, WAN Q L, ZHOU Y M,et al. Age-related and gender-stratified differences in the association between high triglyceride and risk of hyperuricemia[J]. Lipids Health Dis,2019,18(1):147. DOI:10.1186/s12944-019-1077-5. |
[22] | YU X L, SHU L, SHEN X M,et al. Gender difference on the relationship between hyperuricemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among Chinese:an observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(39):e8164. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000008164. |
[23] | WALLACE I R, MCKINLEY M C, BELL P M,et al. Sex hormone binding globulin and insulin resistance[J]. Clin Endocrinol:Oxf,2013,78(3):321-329. DOI:10.1111/cen.12086. |
[1] | WANG Lina, GAO Pengfei, CAO Fan, GE Ying, YAN Wei, HE Daikun. Analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Different Gender Groups [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4143-4151. |
[2] | LIU Weina, GE Haiyan, MA Jing, CAO Qinying, BAI Xingyu, CUI Shifang, QIAO Yanxia. A Study on the Relationship of Vitamin A and E Levels in Umbilical Cord Blood with Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4152-4158. |
[3] | LI Jixin, QIU Linjie, REN Yan, WANG Wenru, LI Meijie, ZHANG Jin. The Correlation of Dietary Inflammatory Index with Overweight, Obesity and Abdominal Obesity: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4089-4097. |
[4] | MA Liyuan, WANG Zengwu, FAN Jing, HU Shengshou. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 3975-3994. |
[5] | LI Yujing, JIN Yichao, CHEN Xing, JI Mengying, DAI Huihua. Risk Factors for Endometrial Lesions Detected by Hysteroscopy in Breast Cancer Patients Taking Tamoxifen [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4026-4030. |
[6] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[7] | ZHANG Peng, GAO Ying, YANG Hongxi, WAN Chunxiao. Association between Serum Uric Acid Level and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease among the Elderly in Longevity Areas of China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3884-3889. |
[8] | HE Yingmei, JIA Xue, ZHU Guojun, LIU Bing. Effect of Serum Uric Acid Longitudinal Trajectory on New-onset Hypertriglyceridemia: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3636-3639. |
[9] | HE Li, ZHANG Yifan, SHEN Xuechun, SUN Yan, ZHAO Yang. Prevalence Trends of Multimorbidity among Residents in Mainland China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3599-3607. |
[10] | TIAN Meiling, MA Guojuan, DU Liyan, XIAO Yuange, ZHANG Sai, ZHANG Cui, TANG Zengjun. Prevalence and Epidemiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus from 2014 to 2021 in Hebei Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3320-3324. |
[11] | YANG Lu, ZONG Zhanhong, YI Yingying. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Depression among Rural Middle-aged and Elderly Women in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3091-3095. |
[12] | LIN Yang, WANG Fang, WANG Han, WU Rong, WANG Yao, XU Ziyao, WANG Xu, WANG Yanding. Prevalence of Frailty in Elderly Patients with Comorbidity: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3185-3193. |
[13] | REN Yuanyuan, CHENG Gong, JIANG Hongying, WANG Yiyang, CHEN Liang, ZHAO Hui, LIANG Chenyuan. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Coronary Artery Calcification and Its Severity in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2980-2985. |
[14] | HE Manlan, YUAN Ping, HE Lei, CHEN Lu. Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Neurogenic Bladder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2659-2665. |
[15] | SUN Xuhai, SHI Xiuxiu, ZHAO Zhengzheng, HAN Jinxiang. Characteristics of Newly Increased and Deceased Patients with Severe Mental Illness in a Community in Beijing from 2011 to 2021 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2402-2407. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||