Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (30): 3806-3814.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0477
• Original Research·Drug Use Guide • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-08-29
Revised:
2024-10-18
Published:
2025-10-20
Online:
2025-08-18
Contact:
LI Hui
通讯作者:
李慧
作者简介:
作者贡献:
郑博月、付积艺、吴佳霏、王珺负责数据收集;郑博月、付积艺负责数据分析;郑博月负责论文撰写;付积艺、吴佳霏、王珺负责患者随访;李慧负责研究课题的提出,文章的审查和修订,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0477
联合用药方案 | 例数(例) |
---|---|
卡非佐米+来那度胺+地塞米松(KRd) | 26 |
卡非佐米+泊马度胺+地塞米松(KPd) | 14 |
卡非佐米+环磷酰胺+地塞米松(KCd) | 3 |
达雷妥尤单抗+卡非佐米+地塞米松(DKd) | 3 |
卡非佐米+地塞米松(Kd) | 3 |
卡非佐米+地塞米松+顺铂+多柔比星脂质体+依托泊苷+环磷酰胺(Kd-PACE) | 2 |
卡非佐米+苯达莫司汀+地塞米松(KBd) | 1 |
达雷妥尤单抗+卡非佐米+来那度胺+地塞米松(DKRd) | 1 |
Table 1 Combination regimen for patients
联合用药方案 | 例数(例) |
---|---|
卡非佐米+来那度胺+地塞米松(KRd) | 26 |
卡非佐米+泊马度胺+地塞米松(KPd) | 14 |
卡非佐米+环磷酰胺+地塞米松(KCd) | 3 |
达雷妥尤单抗+卡非佐米+地塞米松(DKd) | 3 |
卡非佐米+地塞米松(Kd) | 3 |
卡非佐米+地塞米松+顺铂+多柔比星脂质体+依托泊苷+环磷酰胺(Kd-PACE) | 2 |
卡非佐米+苯达莫司汀+地塞米松(KBd) | 1 |
达雷妥尤单抗+卡非佐米+来那度胺+地塞米松(DKRd) | 1 |
分组 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
治疗线数 | 1.385 | 0.709 | ||
一线用药 | 14 | 6/8 | ||
首次复发用药 | 20 | 7/13 | ||
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 6/8 | ||
髓外病变 | 0.050 | 0.823 | ||
有 | 17 | 7/10 | ||
无 | 36 | 16/20 | ||
DS分期 | 0.618 | 0.734 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 5/6 | ||
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 5/5 | ||
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 13/19 | ||
ISS分期 | 0.686 | 0.101 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 10/4 | ||
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 2/9 | ||
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 11/17 | ||
mSMART | 0.325 | 0.561 | ||
标危型 | 23 | 11/12 | ||
高危型 | 30 | 12/18 | ||
肾功能 | 0.091 | 0.763 | ||
正常 | 15 | 7/8 | ||
异常 | 38 | 16/22 | ||
心血管疾病 | 0.484 | 0.487 | ||
无 | 35 | 14/21 | ||
有 | 18 | 9/9 |
Table 2 Comparison of sex of patients with different treatment lines,extramedullary disease,stage and basic diseases
分组 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
治疗线数 | 1.385 | 0.709 | ||
一线用药 | 14 | 6/8 | ||
首次复发用药 | 20 | 7/13 | ||
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 6/8 | ||
髓外病变 | 0.050 | 0.823 | ||
有 | 17 | 7/10 | ||
无 | 36 | 16/20 | ||
DS分期 | 0.618 | 0.734 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 5/6 | ||
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 5/5 | ||
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 13/19 | ||
ISS分期 | 0.686 | 0.101 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 10/4 | ||
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 2/9 | ||
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 11/17 | ||
mSMART | 0.325 | 0.561 | ||
标危型 | 23 | 11/12 | ||
高危型 | 30 | 12/18 | ||
肾功能 | 0.091 | 0.763 | ||
正常 | 15 | 7/8 | ||
异常 | 38 | 16/22 | ||
心血管疾病 | 0.484 | 0.487 | ||
无 | 35 | 14/21 | ||
有 | 18 | 9/9 |
分组 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | Z(F)值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
治疗线数( | 0.37a | 0.105 | ||
一线用药 | 14 | 56.9±14.3 | ||
首次复发用药 | 20 | 6.8±8.2 | ||
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 64.7±9.4 | ||
髓外病变[M(P25,P75)] | -1.41 | 0.158 | ||
有 | 17 | 66.0(59.0,71.2) | ||
无 | 36 | 60.0(55.0,69.0) | ||
DS分期[M(P25,P75)] | 5.68 | 0.058 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 69.0(6.0,76.0) | ||
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 57.0(56.0,62.0) | ||
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 65.0(58.0,70.0) | ||
ISS分期[M(P25,P75)] | 1.21 | 0.545 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 67.0(56.0,70.0) | ||
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 68.0(60.0,75.5) | ||
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 6.5(57.8,68.2) | ||
mSMART[M(P25,P75)] | 0.96 | 0.337 | ||
标危型 | 23 | 69.0(61.0,71.0) | ||
高危型 | 30 | 60.5(57.0,69.8) | ||
肾功能[M(P25,P75)] | 0.38 | 0.707 | ||
正常 | 38 | 60.0(58.0,69.0) | ||
异常 | 15 | 66.0(57.5,70.0) | ||
心血管疾病[M(P25,P75)] | 1.61 | 0.108 | ||
无 | 35 | 59.5(55.5,67.8) | ||
有 | 18 | 66.0(60.0,70.5) |
Table 3 Comparison age of patients with different treatment lines,extramedullary disease,stage and basic diseases
分组 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | Z(F)值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
治疗线数( | 0.37a | 0.105 | ||
一线用药 | 14 | 56.9±14.3 | ||
首次复发用药 | 20 | 6.8±8.2 | ||
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 64.7±9.4 | ||
髓外病变[M(P25,P75)] | -1.41 | 0.158 | ||
有 | 17 | 66.0(59.0,71.2) | ||
无 | 36 | 60.0(55.0,69.0) | ||
DS分期[M(P25,P75)] | 5.68 | 0.058 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 69.0(6.0,76.0) | ||
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 57.0(56.0,62.0) | ||
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 65.0(58.0,70.0) | ||
ISS分期[M(P25,P75)] | 1.21 | 0.545 | ||
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 67.0(56.0,70.0) | ||
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 68.0(60.0,75.5) | ||
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 6.5(57.8,68.2) | ||
mSMART[M(P25,P75)] | 0.96 | 0.337 | ||
标危型 | 23 | 69.0(61.0,71.0) | ||
高危型 | 30 | 60.5(57.0,69.8) | ||
肾功能[M(P25,P75)] | 0.38 | 0.707 | ||
正常 | 38 | 60.0(58.0,69.0) | ||
异常 | 15 | 66.0(57.5,70.0) | ||
心血管疾病[M(P25,P75)] | 1.61 | 0.108 | ||
无 | 35 | 59.5(55.5,67.8) | ||
有 | 18 | 66.0(60.0,70.5) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一线用药 | 14 | 5(35.7) | 3(21.4) | 2(14.3) | 2(14.3) | 50.0(7/14) | 85.7(12/14) |
首次复发用药 | 20 | 4(20.0) | 5(25.0) | 1(5.0) | 6(30.0) | 60.0(12/20) | 80.0(16/20) |
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 4(28.6) | 3(21.4) | 1(7.1) | 0(0.0) | 28.6(4/14) | 57.1(8/14) |
Table 4 Clinical efficacy of different treatment lines
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一线用药 | 14 | 5(35.7) | 3(21.4) | 2(14.3) | 2(14.3) | 50.0(7/14) | 85.7(12/14) |
首次复发用药 | 20 | 4(20.0) | 5(25.0) | 1(5.0) | 6(30.0) | 60.0(12/20) | 80.0(16/20) |
三线及以上用药 | 14 | 4(28.6) | 3(21.4) | 1(7.1) | 0(0.0) | 28.6(4/14) | 57.1(8/14) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无髓外病变 | 36 | 12(0.3) | 9(25.0) | 1(0.8) | 5(1.9) | 41.7(15/36) | 75.0(27/36) |
有髓外病变 | 17 | 5(29.4) | 2(11.8) | 3(17.6) | 3(17.6) | 47.1(8/17) | 76.4(13/17) |
Table 5 Clinical efficacy of patients with and without extramedullary disease
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无髓外病变 | 36 | 12(0.3) | 9(25.0) | 1(0.8) | 5(1.9) | 41.7(15/36) | 75.0(27/36) |
有髓外病变 | 17 | 5(29.4) | 2(11.8) | 3(17.6) | 3(17.6) | 47.1(8/17) | 76.4(13/17) |
mSMART分期 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标危型 | 12 | 0 | 3(25.0) | 1(8.3) | 6(50.0) | 83.3(10/12) | 83.3(10/12) |
高危型 | 41 | 17(41.5) | 8(19.5) | 3(7.3) | 2(4.9) | 31.7(13/41) | 73.2(30/41) |
Table 6 Clinical efficacy of high risk and standard riskof mSMART types
mSMART分期 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
标危型 | 12 | 0 | 3(25.0) | 1(8.3) | 6(50.0) | 83.3(10/12) | 83.3(10/12) |
高危型 | 41 | 17(41.5) | 8(19.5) | 3(7.3) | 2(4.9) | 31.7(13/41) | 73.2(30/41) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 3(27.3) | 2(18.2) | 1(9.1) | 3(27.3) | 54.5(6/11) | 81.8(9/11) |
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 2(20.0) | 4(40.0) | 1(10.0) | 0 | 50.0(5/10) | 70.0(7/10) |
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 12(37.5) | 5(15.6) | 2(6.3) | 5(15.6) | 37.5(12/32) | 75.0(24/32) |
Table 7 Clinical efficacy of patients with DS stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ期 | 11 | 3(27.3) | 2(18.2) | 1(9.1) | 3(27.3) | 54.5(6/11) | 81.8(9/11) |
Ⅱ期 | 10 | 2(20.0) | 4(40.0) | 1(10.0) | 0 | 50.0(5/10) | 70.0(7/10) |
Ⅲ期 | 32 | 12(37.5) | 5(15.6) | 2(6.3) | 5(15.6) | 37.5(12/32) | 75.0(24/32) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 4(28.6) | 1(7.1) | 1(7.1) | 3(21.4) | 35.7(5/14) | 64.2(9/14) |
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 5(45.5) | 2(18.2) | 0 | 3(27.3) | 45.5(5/11) | 90.9(10/11) |
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 8(28.6) | 8(28.6) | 3(10.7) | 2(7.1) | 46.4(13/28) | 75.0(21/28) |
Table 8 Clinical efficacy among patients with different ISS stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ期 | 14 | 4(28.6) | 1(7.1) | 1(7.1) | 3(21.4) | 35.7(5/14) | 64.2(9/14) |
Ⅱ期 | 11 | 5(45.5) | 2(18.2) | 0 | 3(27.3) | 45.5(5/11) | 90.9(10/11) |
Ⅲ期 | 28 | 8(28.6) | 8(28.6) | 3(10.7) | 2(7.1) | 46.4(13/28) | 75.0(21/28) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无心血管疾病 | 35 | 10(28.6) | 10(28.6) | 2(5.7) | 5(14.3) | 48.6(17/35) | 77.1(27/35) |
有心血管疾病 | 18 | 7(38.9) | 1(5.6) | 2(11.1) | 3(16.7) | 27.8(5/18) | 66.6(12/18) |
Table 9 Clinical efficacy analysis between patients with and without cardiovascular disease
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无心血管疾病 | 35 | 10(28.6) | 10(28.6) | 2(5.7) | 5(14.3) | 48.6(17/35) | 77.1(27/35) |
有心血管疾病 | 18 | 7(38.9) | 1(5.6) | 2(11.1) | 3(16.7) | 27.8(5/18) | 66.6(12/18) |
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肾功能正常组 | 38 | 14(35.8) | 7(18.4) | 3(7.9) | 7(18.4) | 44.7(17/38) | 81.6(31/38) |
肾功能异常组 | 15 | 3(20.0) | 4(26.7) | 1(6.7) | 1(66.7) | 40.0(6/15) | 60%(9/15) |
Table 10 Clinical efficacy analysis between the normal renal function group and the abnormal renal function group
组别 | 例数 | PR[例(%)] | VGPR[例(%)] | CR[例(%)] | sCR[例(%)] | ≥VGPR率[%(n/n)] | ORR[%(n/n)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肾功能正常组 | 38 | 14(35.8) | 7(18.4) | 3(7.9) | 7(18.4) | 44.7(17/38) | 81.6(31/38) |
肾功能异常组 | 15 | 3(20.0) | 4(26.7) | 1(6.7) | 1(66.7) | 40.0(6/15) | 60%(9/15) |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
中国医师协会血液科医师分会,中华医学会血液学分会,黄晓军. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2022年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志,2022,61(5):480-487. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220309-00165.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[1] | WU Xiangpeng, LI Enjun, LI Xiongwei, WANG Haihong, CUI Wei, WU Xiangli, QI Weihua, HOU Senlin. Timing of Administration and Combination Therapy of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for the Prevention of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3823-3830. |
[2] | ZHANG Tianyu, YU Haibo, CHEN Fei, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, ZHAN Xiaokai, SHEN Man, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, HUANG Zhongxia. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatment for POEMS Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3447-3455. |
[3] | CHEN Fei, WANG Jinying, YU Haibo, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, ZHANG Tianyu, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Urinary NGAL, TIM-1, VCAM-1 and Activin A in Patients with New Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2740-2749. |
[4] | ZHAO Hui, LI Wenhao, CHENG Gong, CHEN Liang, LIANG Chenyuan, WANG Yiyang, JIANG Hongying, JIANG Ruijia. Analysis of Adverse Reactions in the Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Disease by Adenosine Load and Adenosine Disodium Triphosphate Load [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2109-2112. |
[5] | YU Haibo, ZHANG Tianyu, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, HUANG Zhongxia. Efficacy and Safety of Dual-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy in Patients with Refractory-relapsed Multiple Myeloma: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 985-994. |
[6] | ZHAO Fengyi, LI Xin, ZHAN Xiaokai, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, HUANG Zhongxia. Survival and Prognosis Analysis of Bortezomib Based Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Super-aged Multiple Myeloma Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 971-977. |
[7] | PENG Yilun, LI Yang, WANG Xiaotao. Study on the Mechanisms of Multiple Myeloma Cells Promoting M2 Macrophage Polarization through PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 978-984. |
[8] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yunshu, YAN Baoping, WANG Jian, MA Yanjuan, WANG Yuan, QIN Yingjie, NA Long, REN Zhiyong, SUN Junwei, DENG Huaili, MA Hongjun, QU Xuehui, ZHOU Nan, SI Tianmei. Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Microspheres for Injection (Ⅱ) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4007-4012. |
[9] | WANG Jun, WU Jiafei, WANG Yijing, ZHENG Boyue, WANG Yu, JIANG Chuanyan, LI Hui. Efficacy and Prognostic Effect of Daratumumab-based Chemotherapy Regimen in Multiple Myeloma: a Real-world Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2256-2262. |
[10] | CHANG Junpei, CHEN Lu, WU Tong, ZHAO Xiaoli, DUAN Fangfang, LIU Danna, KONG Tiandong. Occurrence and Treatment of Endocrinologic Adverse Reactions Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: a Single-center Real-world Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2095-2101. |
[11] | ZHOU Qinfei, GONG Liyan. Clinical Observation of the Effectiveness of Methadone in Refractory Carcinous Pain Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(32): 4023-4028. |
[12] | Ke LI, Zheng LI, Hui GENG, Jie MA. Efficacy and Safety of CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(21): 2661-2669. |
[13] |
SU Peng, LIU Yukun, LIANG Xiaohua, LIU Xin, YU Yaohui, HUANG Pengfei, BAI Yuru, HE Xiaoyan, SHEN Zhihong, MA Dong.
Reducing the Risk of Adverse Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Who are Poorly Treated with Metformin Combined with Acarbose:Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor is Better Than Insulin [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(09): 1054-1061. |
[14] | PEI Xiaojiao,PAN Zhenyu,LIAN Yufei,SHEN Man,JIANG Tao,HUANG Zhongxia. Predictive Value of Fat Fraction Quantification of Lumbar Spine for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(20): 2601-2606. |
[15] | XIANG Qiuqing,LU Minqiu,CHU Bin,WANG Yutong,SHI Lei,GAO Shan,FANG Lijuan,LIU Xi,DING Yuehua,BAO Li. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(2): 237-242. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||