Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (09): 1044-1051.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0102
• Reflection and Debate: Focusing on Traditional Medicin • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-05-10
Revised:
2024-09-10
Published:
2025-03-20
Online:
2025-01-02
Contact:
LI Dan
通讯作者:
李丹
作者简介:
作者贡献:
张敏睿、李丹提出研究思路,设计研究方案;张敏睿负责调查、收集样本,进行数据的收集与整理,论文起草;李丹进行论文的修订,对文章整体负责,监督管理;何美慧、高瑞翔负责数据清洗和统计学分析、绘制图表。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0102
维度 | Cronbach'sα系数 | 合成信度 | 平均方差萃取值 | 均值 | 标准差 | 效果期望 | 社会影响 | 便利条件 | 风险认知 | 使用意向 | 使用行为 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
效果期望 | 0.896 | 0.902 | 0.699 | 4.680 | 0.981 | 0.836a | |||||
社会影响 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 0.735 | 4.416 | 1.020 | 0.756b | 0.857a | ||||
便利条件 | 0.902 | 0.905 | 0.705 | 4.067 | 1.104 | 0.633b | 0.739b | 0.840a | |||
风险认知 | 0.885 | 0.888 | 0.665 | 3.099 | 1.101 | -0.386b | -0.342b | -0.304b | 0.816a | ||
使用意向 | 0.922 | 0.925 | 0.756 | 4.404 | 1.066 | 0.723b | 0.822b | 0.702b | -0.405b | 0.870a | |
使用行为 | 0.925 | 0.926 | 0.758 | 3.984 | 1.216 | 0.623b | 0.760b | 0.708b | -0.315b | 0.836b | 0.871a |
Table 1 Descriptive statistics,reliability,and validity of the UTAUT variables
维度 | Cronbach'sα系数 | 合成信度 | 平均方差萃取值 | 均值 | 标准差 | 效果期望 | 社会影响 | 便利条件 | 风险认知 | 使用意向 | 使用行为 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
效果期望 | 0.896 | 0.902 | 0.699 | 4.680 | 0.981 | 0.836a | |||||
社会影响 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 0.735 | 4.416 | 1.020 | 0.756b | 0.857a | ||||
便利条件 | 0.902 | 0.905 | 0.705 | 4.067 | 1.104 | 0.633b | 0.739b | 0.840a | |||
风险认知 | 0.885 | 0.888 | 0.665 | 3.099 | 1.101 | -0.386b | -0.342b | -0.304b | 0.816a | ||
使用意向 | 0.922 | 0.925 | 0.756 | 4.404 | 1.066 | 0.723b | 0.822b | 0.702b | -0.405b | 0.870a | |
使用行为 | 0.925 | 0.926 | 0.758 | 3.984 | 1.216 | 0.623b | 0.760b | 0.708b | -0.315b | 0.836b | 0.871a |
变量 | 赋值 | 效果期望(R2=20.4%) | 社会影响(R2=25.4%) | 便利条件(R2=23.9%) | 风险认知(R2=7.1%) | 使用意向(R2=25.0%) | 使用行为(R2=22.2%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 1.773±0.419 | 0.173a | 0.117 | 0.060 | -0.151 | 0.114 | 0.133 |
年龄 | 39.916±6.279 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.017a | 0.006 | 0.005 |
学历 | 4.102±1.396 | -0.005 | -0.012 | 0.014 | 0.012 | -0.024 | -0.034 |
职业 | 1.467±0.499 | 0.014 | -0.025 | 0.028 | 0.033 | 0.042 | -0.013 |
户籍 | 1.888±0.315 | 0.050 | 0.046 | -0.004 | -0.137 | 0.035 | 0.016 |
患慢性疾病 | 1.226±0.418 | -0.077 | -0.029 | -0.037 | -0.008 | -0.012 | -0.006 |
健康素养 | 4.748±0.657 | 0.068 | 0.260a | 0.356a | -0.099 | 0.237a | 0.355a |
传统文化认同 | 5.363±0.705 | 0.431a | 0.262a | 0.100 | -0.287a | 0.304a | 0.122a |
科学思维 | 4.086±0.647 | 0.309a | 0.430a | 0.452a | 0.117 | 0.408a | 0.398a |
Table 2 Descriptive Statistics of influencing factor variables
变量 | 赋值 | 效果期望(R2=20.4%) | 社会影响(R2=25.4%) | 便利条件(R2=23.9%) | 风险认知(R2=7.1%) | 使用意向(R2=25.0%) | 使用行为(R2=22.2%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 1.773±0.419 | 0.173a | 0.117 | 0.060 | -0.151 | 0.114 | 0.133 |
年龄 | 39.916±6.279 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.017a | 0.006 | 0.005 |
学历 | 4.102±1.396 | -0.005 | -0.012 | 0.014 | 0.012 | -0.024 | -0.034 |
职业 | 1.467±0.499 | 0.014 | -0.025 | 0.028 | 0.033 | 0.042 | -0.013 |
户籍 | 1.888±0.315 | 0.050 | 0.046 | -0.004 | -0.137 | 0.035 | 0.016 |
患慢性疾病 | 1.226±0.418 | -0.077 | -0.029 | -0.037 | -0.008 | -0.012 | -0.006 |
健康素养 | 4.748±0.657 | 0.068 | 0.260a | 0.356a | -0.099 | 0.237a | 0.355a |
传统文化认同 | 5.363±0.705 | 0.431a | 0.262a | 0.100 | -0.287a | 0.304a | 0.122a |
科学思维 | 4.086±0.647 | 0.309a | 0.430a | 0.452a | 0.117 | 0.408a | 0.398a |
亚组数 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | P(LMR-LRT) | P(BLRT) | 组别1 | 组别2 | 组别3 | 组别4 | 组别5 | 组别6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 12 226.543 | 12 281.444 | 12 243.341 | 717 | ||||||||
2 | 10 682.417 | 10 769.344 | 10 709.014 | 0.860 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 373 | 344 | ||||
3 | 9 782.876 | 9 901.828 | 9 819.271 | 0.927 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 47 | 377 | 293 | |||
4a | 9 339.758 | 9 490.735 | 9 385.951 | 0.897 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 37 | 122 | 295 | 263 | ||
5 | 9 098.325 | 9 281.328 | 9 154.318 | 0.888 | 0.0024 | <0.001 | 106 | 28 | 261 | 206 | 116 | |
6 | 9 022.403 | 9 237.431 | 9 088.193 | 0.898 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 28 | 106 | 104 | 261 | 209 | 9 |
Table 3 Results of latent profile analysis
亚组数 | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | P(LMR-LRT) | P(BLRT) | 组别1 | 组别2 | 组别3 | 组别4 | 组别5 | 组别6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 12 226.543 | 12 281.444 | 12 243.341 | 717 | ||||||||
2 | 10 682.417 | 10 769.344 | 10 709.014 | 0.860 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 373 | 344 | ||||
3 | 9 782.876 | 9 901.828 | 9 819.271 | 0.927 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 47 | 377 | 293 | |||
4a | 9 339.758 | 9 490.735 | 9 385.951 | 0.897 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 37 | 122 | 295 | 263 | ||
5 | 9 098.325 | 9 281.328 | 9 154.318 | 0.888 | 0.0024 | <0.001 | 106 | 28 | 261 | 206 | 116 | |
6 | 9 022.403 | 9 237.431 | 9 088.193 | 0.898 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 28 | 106 | 104 | 261 | 209 | 9 |
组别 | 例数 | 效果期望 | 社会影响 | 便利条件 | 风险认知 | 使用意向 | 使用行为 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抵制组 | 37 | 2.500±0.968 | 2.020±0.713 | 1.831±0.687 | 4.405±1.332 | 2.020±0.877 | 1.628±0.644 |
坚信组 | 122 | 5.691±0.490 | 5.686±0.407 | 5.449±0.682 | 2.113±1.299 | 5.852±0.251 | 5.648±0.475 |
持疑组 | 295 | 4.204±0.708 | 3.813±0.525 | 3.493±0.668 | 3.308±0.773 | 3.745±0.526 | 3.214±0.678 |
认同组 | 263 | 5.052±0.535 | 4.841±0.484 | 4.383±0.694 | 3.138±0.936 | 4.807±0.479 | 4.408±0.667 |
F值 | 336.489 | 741.807 | 388.727 | 68.884 | 857.707 | 619.071 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
多重比较 | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① | ②<④<③<① | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① |
Table 4 Analysis of variance on levels of UTAUT variables by subgroups
组别 | 例数 | 效果期望 | 社会影响 | 便利条件 | 风险认知 | 使用意向 | 使用行为 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抵制组 | 37 | 2.500±0.968 | 2.020±0.713 | 1.831±0.687 | 4.405±1.332 | 2.020±0.877 | 1.628±0.644 |
坚信组 | 122 | 5.691±0.490 | 5.686±0.407 | 5.449±0.682 | 2.113±1.299 | 5.852±0.251 | 5.648±0.475 |
持疑组 | 295 | 4.204±0.708 | 3.813±0.525 | 3.493±0.668 | 3.308±0.773 | 3.745±0.526 | 3.214±0.678 |
认同组 | 263 | 5.052±0.535 | 4.841±0.484 | 4.383±0.694 | 3.138±0.936 | 4.807±0.479 | 4.408±0.667 |
F值 | 336.489 | 741.807 | 388.727 | 68.884 | 857.707 | 619.071 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
多重比较 | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① | ②<④<③<① | ②>④>③>① | ②>④>③>① |
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
持疑组 | |||||
性别 | 0.320 | 0.401 | 0.635 | 0.426 | 1.376(0.627 ~ 3.021) |
年龄 | 0.071 | 0.038 | 3.447 | 0.063 | 1.073(0.996 ~ 1.156) |
学历 | -0.093 | 0.181 | 0.266 | 0.606 | 0.911(0.639 ~ 1.298) |
职业 | -0.137 | 0.443 | 0.096 | 0.756 | 0.872(0.366 ~ 2.075) |
户籍 | 0.076 | 0.651 | 0.013 | 0.908 | 1.079(0.301 ~ 3.866) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.961 | 0.390 | 6.073 | 0.014 | 0.382(0.178 ~ 0.821) |
健康素养 | -0.873 | 0.357 | 5.997 | 0.014 | 0.418(0.208 ~ 0.840) |
传统文化认同 | 0.599 | 0.276 | 4.694 | 0.030 | 1.820(1.059 ~ 3.128) |
科学思维 | 0.718 | 0.313 | 5.254 | 0.022 | 2.050(1.110 ~ 3.789) |
认同组 | |||||
性别 | 0.473 | 0.418 | 1.283 | 0.257 | 1.605(0.708 ~ 3.641) |
年龄 | 0.076 | 0.039 | 3.822 | 0.051 | 1.079(1.000 ~ 1.163) |
学历 | -0.190 | 0.185 | 1.050 | 0.306 | 0.827(0.575 ~ 1.189) |
职业 | -0.034 | 0.454 | 0.006 | 0.940 | 0.966(0.397 ~ 2.353) |
户籍 | 0.221 | 0.669 | 0.109 | 0.741 | 1.248(0.336 ~ 4.632) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.961 | 0.405 | 5.637 | 0.018 | 0.382(0.173 ~ 0.846) |
健康素养 | -0.409 | 0.367 | 1.240 | 0.266 | 0.664(0.323 ~ 1.365) |
传统文化认同 | 1.127 | 0.293 | 14.745 | <0.001 | 3.085(1.736 ~ 5.483) |
科学思维 | 1.516 | 0.332 | 20.800 | <0.001 | 4.553(2.373 ~ 8.733) |
坚信组 | |||||
性别 | 0.953 | 0.510 | 3.488 | 0.062 | 2.593(0.954 ~ 7.045) |
年龄 | 0.094 | 0.042 | 5.057 | 0.025 | 1.098(1.012 ~ 1.192) |
学历 | -0.053 | 0.209 | 0.065 | 0.798 | 0.948(0.630 ~ 1.427) |
职业 | -0.343 | 0.508 | 0.457 | 0.499 | 0.709(0.262 ~ 1.919) |
户籍 | 0.451 | 0.780 | 0.334 | 0.563 | 1.570(0.340 ~ 7.240) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.704 | 0.464 | 2.303 | 0.129 | 0.495(0.199 ~ 1.228) |
健康素养 | 1.006 | 0.425 | 5.592 | 0.018 | 2.734(1.188 ~ 6.294) |
传统文化认同 | 2.566 | 0.451 | 32.360 | <0.001 | 13.014(5.376 ~ 31.505) |
科学思维 | 2.046 | 0.367 | 31.125 | <0.001 | 7.737(3.770 ~ 15.875) |
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of the nine influential factors on subgroups of TCM acceptance
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
持疑组 | |||||
性别 | 0.320 | 0.401 | 0.635 | 0.426 | 1.376(0.627 ~ 3.021) |
年龄 | 0.071 | 0.038 | 3.447 | 0.063 | 1.073(0.996 ~ 1.156) |
学历 | -0.093 | 0.181 | 0.266 | 0.606 | 0.911(0.639 ~ 1.298) |
职业 | -0.137 | 0.443 | 0.096 | 0.756 | 0.872(0.366 ~ 2.075) |
户籍 | 0.076 | 0.651 | 0.013 | 0.908 | 1.079(0.301 ~ 3.866) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.961 | 0.390 | 6.073 | 0.014 | 0.382(0.178 ~ 0.821) |
健康素养 | -0.873 | 0.357 | 5.997 | 0.014 | 0.418(0.208 ~ 0.840) |
传统文化认同 | 0.599 | 0.276 | 4.694 | 0.030 | 1.820(1.059 ~ 3.128) |
科学思维 | 0.718 | 0.313 | 5.254 | 0.022 | 2.050(1.110 ~ 3.789) |
认同组 | |||||
性别 | 0.473 | 0.418 | 1.283 | 0.257 | 1.605(0.708 ~ 3.641) |
年龄 | 0.076 | 0.039 | 3.822 | 0.051 | 1.079(1.000 ~ 1.163) |
学历 | -0.190 | 0.185 | 1.050 | 0.306 | 0.827(0.575 ~ 1.189) |
职业 | -0.034 | 0.454 | 0.006 | 0.940 | 0.966(0.397 ~ 2.353) |
户籍 | 0.221 | 0.669 | 0.109 | 0.741 | 1.248(0.336 ~ 4.632) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.961 | 0.405 | 5.637 | 0.018 | 0.382(0.173 ~ 0.846) |
健康素养 | -0.409 | 0.367 | 1.240 | 0.266 | 0.664(0.323 ~ 1.365) |
传统文化认同 | 1.127 | 0.293 | 14.745 | <0.001 | 3.085(1.736 ~ 5.483) |
科学思维 | 1.516 | 0.332 | 20.800 | <0.001 | 4.553(2.373 ~ 8.733) |
坚信组 | |||||
性别 | 0.953 | 0.510 | 3.488 | 0.062 | 2.593(0.954 ~ 7.045) |
年龄 | 0.094 | 0.042 | 5.057 | 0.025 | 1.098(1.012 ~ 1.192) |
学历 | -0.053 | 0.209 | 0.065 | 0.798 | 0.948(0.630 ~ 1.427) |
职业 | -0.343 | 0.508 | 0.457 | 0.499 | 0.709(0.262 ~ 1.919) |
户籍 | 0.451 | 0.780 | 0.334 | 0.563 | 1.570(0.340 ~ 7.240) |
患慢性疾病 | -0.704 | 0.464 | 2.303 | 0.129 | 0.495(0.199 ~ 1.228) |
健康素养 | 1.006 | 0.425 | 5.592 | 0.018 | 2.734(1.188 ~ 6.294) |
传统文化认同 | 2.566 | 0.451 | 32.360 | <0.001 | 13.014(5.376 ~ 31.505) |
科学思维 | 2.046 | 0.367 | 31.125 | <0.001 | 7.737(3.770 ~ 15.875) |
[1] | |
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
杨泽华,田侃,杨毅,等. 江苏与甘肃地区中医药服务接受度影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2018,35(1):32-35.
|
[5] |
万梦婷,吴晓,钟敏玲,等. 百姓对针灸的接受度调查和针灸传承展望[J]. 中医药管理杂志,2023,31(7):26-30.
|
[6] |
赵玉洋,王然禹,杜毅蓉,等. 基于互联网的中医药知识获取行为分析[J]. 中国中药杂志,2019,44(11):2416-2420. DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20190324.102.
|
[7] |
赵玉洋,谭巍,钱思妍,等. 2017年全国中医药健康文化知识普及情况调查数据分析[J]. 中国中药杂志,2020,45(8):1953-1959. DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20190917.501.
|
[8] |
谭巍,靳琦,赵玉洋,等. 2017年中国公民中医药健康文化素养水平及影响因素分析[J]. 中国中药杂志,2019,44(13):2865-2870. DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20190606.504.
|
[9] |
黄梅银,郭颖,谭巍. 基于社会认知理论的中医使用行为研究[J]. 中医药导报,2019,25(12):77-79.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
翟慧霞,付云清. 中医药文化国际传播的机遇、挑战与对策[J]. 国际传播,2023(4):69-78.
|
[18] |
徐晟. 社会赞许性的争议、应用与展望[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(3):152-160.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
刘晨曦. 中国人群健康素养概念模型及其测量研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2018.
|
[21] | |
[22] |
简臻锐. 大学生对中华优秀传统文化认同的结构与结果探析——基于北京市9所高校大学生的实证调查[J]. 中国青年社会科学,2020,39(5):75-80.
|
[23] | |
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
姚建欣,刘奕轩,孟丹宁. PISA 2025科学素养测评愿景展望与启示[J]. 上海教育科研,2023(7):35-40. DOI:10.16619/j.cnki.cn10-1264/d.2016.03.006.
|
[29] |
温忠麟,谢晋艳,王惠惠. 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,41(1):1-15.
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[1] | LYU Baopu, LIU Liang, XIAO Hao, GONG Yu, MENG Qingbing, GAO Hengbo, TIAN Yingping, YAO Dongqi. The Cognitive Differences between the Teachers and Students in the Emergency Professional Skills Training Program of Standardized Residency Training [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(04): 432-442. |
[2] | Phillips William R., Sturgiss Elizabeth, Glasziou Paul, olde Hartman Tim C., Orkin Aaron M., Prathivadi Pallavi, Reeve Joanne, Russell Grant M., van Weel Chris. Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(04): 385-392. |
[3] | LU Na, LIU Huaqing, JI Yunxin, GUO Rongjuan, HE Danjun, JIAO Zhian, LIN Yuerui, TIAN Feng, ZHANG Guiqing, XU Zhi, AN Ganghui, ZHANG Yan, YUAN Yonggui. Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Test Anxiety Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(34): 4225-4233. |
[4] | ZHEN Qian, ZHU Rong, WANG Zhongrui, CUI Weifeng, YAN Shuxun, SHAO Mingyi, YU Haibin, FU Yu. Core Problems and Solving Strategies of the Research on the Law of TCM Syndrome and Treatment Based on Data Driven [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(32): 4029-4032. |
[5] | XIE Liying, MAI Tong, ZHOU Gengbiao, LAI Fang, HAN Yun. Analysis and Reflection on the Outcome Indicators in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sepsis-induced Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(27): 3418-3427. |
[6] | LI Songjiao, LEI Kangchen, HUANG Hongwen, SONG Jiali, CHANG Yinghui, FAN Xiaonong, LI Li, DU Yuzheng, LIU Jian, CAI Xinru, BIAN Lina, MENG Lina, SONG Qian, SHEN Yan, GE Wenyi, LIU Wei, LI Yibing, JIA Hongbo, GAO Ying, MA Congcong. Investigation on Risk Factors and Main Symptoms of Long COVID and Their Influences on the Follow-up Research [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(26): 3240-3248. |
[7] | HU Meili, ZHANG Qian, SHEN Dou, LI Hongli, LIU Yuehua, YANG Wen, YANG Jinlan, GU Fang. Research on Implementation Mechanism of Treatment-prevention Integration Under the Background of Constructing Integrated Service System [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2706-2713. |
[8] | LAI Qingling, XU Chuanchuan, FENG Yuanyuan, LIANG Peifeng, LI Yinshan. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Implementation of Medical Defense Integration Based on the Horn-mitte Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2700-2705. |
[9] | LIANG Wannian. How to Build a Quality, Efficient and Integrated Health System [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(19): 2301-2304. |
[10] | ZHOU Yingda, QU Yiqian, LI Xiaofei, ZHUO Shuxiong, YANG Xi, JIN Hua, YU Dehua. Implementation Status and Optimization Strategy of Primary Care Diagnostic Coding in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(16): 1935-1941. |
[11] | ZHONG Ailin, LIU Ailing, ZHOU Shangcheng, GAO Sande, GAO Jing, ZOU Guanyang, CHEN Yingyao. Analysis of Knowledge-attitude-practice Behavior and Influencing Factors for Prevention of Disease in TCM in Community Residents in Guangzhou [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(15): 1886-1892. |
[12] | JIA Liyan, ZHAO Nengjiang, YAN Bing, ZHANG Zhihai, ZHAN Na, LIN Yuanbing, LIU Jianping, YANG Shuyu. Analysis of the Factors Impacting the Awareness and Utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guidelines for Diabetes among Primary Care Practitioners [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(05): 589-596. |
[13] | NING Lin, SUN Jianguang. Qizhuhuaji Formula in the Treatment of Precancerous Lesion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(03): 335-342. |
[14] | ZHOU Yuyu, GAO Chuan, CUI Puan, WANG Yaping, HE Zhong. Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making between Doctors and Patients in Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Patients with Menopausal Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4181-4186. |
[15] | YAO Junjie, SHANG Qiangqiang, WANG Yufeng, LI Jiahui, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting. Wearable Inertial Sensors-based Efficacy Evaluation of Comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Due to Qi-stagnation and Blood-stasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3450-3455. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||