Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (17): 2108-2113.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0696
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-09-25
Revised:
2022-12-25
Published:
2023-06-15
Online:
2023-02-03
Contact:
JING Mingxia
通讯作者:
井明霞
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0696
FACT-G | ΔSF-36-10D | ΔUI | ΔEQ-VAS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs | P值 | rs | P值 | rs | P值 | |
Δ总分 | -0.30 | 0.017 | 0.51 | <0.001 | 0.38 | 0.002 |
Δ生理状况 | -0.43 | <0.001 | 0.44 | <0.001 | 0.28 | 0.021 |
Δ社会/家庭状况 | -0.02 | 0.870 | 0.06 | 0.607 | 0.05 | 0.702 |
Δ情感状况 | -0.22 | 0.072 | 0.48 | <0.001 | 0.33 | 0.007 |
Δ功能状况 | -0.20 | 0.111 | 0.40 | 0.001 | 0.32 | 0.009 |
Table 1 Correlation analysis of the amount of change in anchor and FACT-G score
FACT-G | ΔSF-36-10D | ΔUI | ΔEQ-VAS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs | P值 | rs | P值 | rs | P值 | |
Δ总分 | -0.30 | 0.017 | 0.51 | <0.001 | 0.38 | 0.002 |
Δ生理状况 | -0.43 | <0.001 | 0.44 | <0.001 | 0.28 | 0.021 |
Δ社会/家庭状况 | -0.02 | 0.870 | 0.06 | 0.607 | 0.05 | 0.702 |
Δ情感状况 | -0.22 | 0.072 | 0.48 | <0.001 | 0.33 | 0.007 |
Δ功能状况 | -0.20 | 0.111 | 0.40 | 0.001 | 0.32 | 0.009 |
维度 | GRCQ | ΔSF-36-10D | ΔUI | ΔEQ-VAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | |
FACT-G总分 | 34 | 9.632 | 31 | 7.048 | 37 | 12.932 | 19 | 12.237 |
生理状况 | 34 | 1.441 | 31 | 0.968 | 37 | 2.649 | — | — |
社会/家庭状况 | 34 | 2.515 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
情感状况 | 34 | 3.353 | — | — | 37 | 4.973 | 19 | 5.000 |
功能状况 | 34 | 2.324 | — | — | 37 | 2.919 | 19 | 2.474 |
Table 2 MCID estimation of the FACT-G scale based on different anchors
维度 | GRCQ | ΔSF-36-10D | ΔUI | ΔEQ-VAS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | 例数(例) | MCID | |
FACT-G总分 | 34 | 9.632 | 31 | 7.048 | 37 | 12.932 | 19 | 12.237 |
生理状况 | 34 | 1.441 | 31 | 0.968 | 37 | 2.649 | — | — |
社会/家庭状况 | 34 | 2.515 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
情感状况 | 34 | 3.353 | — | — | 37 | 4.973 | 19 | 5.000 |
功能状况 | 34 | 2.324 | — | — | 37 | 2.919 | 19 | 2.474 |
维度 | 0.5SD | SEM | RCI | MDC90% | MDC95% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACT-G总分 | 6.060 | 3.696 | 5.226 | 8.571 | 10.243 |
生理状况 | 1.603 | 1.049 | 1.483 | 2.432 | 2.906 |
社会/家庭状况 | 2.328 | 1.626 | 2.299 | 3.771 | 4.506 |
情感状况 | 2.123 | 1.395 | 1.973 | 3.236 | 3.867 |
功能状况 | 2.143 | 1.557 | 2.202 | 3.611 | 4.316 |
Table 3 MCID estimation of the FACT-G scale based on the distribution method
维度 | 0.5SD | SEM | RCI | MDC90% | MDC95% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACT-G总分 | 6.060 | 3.696 | 5.226 | 8.571 | 10.243 |
生理状况 | 1.603 | 1.049 | 1.483 | 2.432 | 2.906 |
社会/家庭状况 | 2.328 | 1.626 | 2.299 | 3.771 | 4.506 |
情感状况 | 2.123 | 1.395 | 1.973 | 3.236 | 3.867 |
功能状况 | 2.143 | 1.557 | 2.202 | 3.611 | 4.316 |
特征 | 例数 | 差值(T1-T0) | 检验统计量值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | -0.514a | 0.611 | ||
≤46岁 | 14 | 8.63±10.50 | ||
>46岁 | 20 | 10.33±8.77 | ||
婚姻状况〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -2.941b | 0.003 | ||
在婚 | 30 | 5.83(2.17,10.08) | ||
单身 | 4 | 29.17(20.58,30.25) | ||
文化程度〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -1.970b | 0.049 | ||
初中及以下 | 11 | 3.67(2.17,9.67) | ||
高中及以上 | 23 | 9.50(4.83,19.00) | ||
职业 | -1.424a | 0.164 | ||
在职 | 12 | 12.69±10.36 | ||
无业 | 22 | 7.96±8.63 | ||
家庭人均月收入 | -0.238a | 0.813 | ||
≤4 000元 | 16 | 9.22±8.05 | ||
>4 000元 | 18 | 10.00±10.68 | ||
医保类型〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -0.945b | 0.345 | ||
城乡居民医保 | 10 | 7.33(3.58,23.21) | ||
城镇职工医保 | 24 | 7.83(2.04,12.83) | ||
家庭同住人口数 | 1.214a | 0.234 | ||
≤2人 | 20 | 11.26±9.30 | ||
≥3人 | 14 | 7.31±9.39 | ||
BMI | 1.365a | 0.182 | ||
正常 | 24 | 11.03±8.56 | ||
肥胖 | 10 | 6.27±10.91 | ||
自评性格 | -3.015a | 0.003 | ||
乐观 | 17 | 4.58±5.98 | ||
一般/悲观 | 17 | 14.69±9.61 | ||
病程〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -0.577b | 0.564 | ||
≤30 d | 22 | 9.25(2.29,18.63) | ||
>30 d | 12 | 5.83(2.42,12.83) | ||
病理分期 | 0.879 | 0.425 | ||
Ⅰ级 | 5 | 14.57±11.27 | ||
Ⅱ级 | 11 | 9.67±6.69 | ||
Ⅲ级 | 18 | 8.24±10.30 | ||
治疗方式 | -1.323a | 0.195 | ||
宫颈环形电切术 | 10 | 12.90±9.03 | ||
冷刀锥切/全子宫切除 | 24 | 8.27±9.40 | ||
高危HPV感染 | 0.891a | 0.448 | ||
是 | 22 | 10.55±9.42 | ||
否 | 12 | 7.94±9.55 | ||
基线FACT-G总分 | -3.209a | 0.001 | ||
≤89.50分 | 19 | 14.30±9.74 | ||
>89.50分 | 15 | 3.72±4.41 |
Table 4 Univariate analysis of the effect of patient characteristics on the changes of the FACT-G scale in the slight improvement after operation
特征 | 例数 | 差值(T1-T0) | 检验统计量值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | -0.514a | 0.611 | ||
≤46岁 | 14 | 8.63±10.50 | ||
>46岁 | 20 | 10.33±8.77 | ||
婚姻状况〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -2.941b | 0.003 | ||
在婚 | 30 | 5.83(2.17,10.08) | ||
单身 | 4 | 29.17(20.58,30.25) | ||
文化程度〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -1.970b | 0.049 | ||
初中及以下 | 11 | 3.67(2.17,9.67) | ||
高中及以上 | 23 | 9.50(4.83,19.00) | ||
职业 | -1.424a | 0.164 | ||
在职 | 12 | 12.69±10.36 | ||
无业 | 22 | 7.96±8.63 | ||
家庭人均月收入 | -0.238a | 0.813 | ||
≤4 000元 | 16 | 9.22±8.05 | ||
>4 000元 | 18 | 10.00±10.68 | ||
医保类型〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -0.945b | 0.345 | ||
城乡居民医保 | 10 | 7.33(3.58,23.21) | ||
城镇职工医保 | 24 | 7.83(2.04,12.83) | ||
家庭同住人口数 | 1.214a | 0.234 | ||
≤2人 | 20 | 11.26±9.30 | ||
≥3人 | 14 | 7.31±9.39 | ||
BMI | 1.365a | 0.182 | ||
正常 | 24 | 11.03±8.56 | ||
肥胖 | 10 | 6.27±10.91 | ||
自评性格 | -3.015a | 0.003 | ||
乐观 | 17 | 4.58±5.98 | ||
一般/悲观 | 17 | 14.69±9.61 | ||
病程〔M(P25,P75)〕 | -0.577b | 0.564 | ||
≤30 d | 22 | 9.25(2.29,18.63) | ||
>30 d | 12 | 5.83(2.42,12.83) | ||
病理分期 | 0.879 | 0.425 | ||
Ⅰ级 | 5 | 14.57±11.27 | ||
Ⅱ级 | 11 | 9.67±6.69 | ||
Ⅲ级 | 18 | 8.24±10.30 | ||
治疗方式 | -1.323a | 0.195 | ||
宫颈环形电切术 | 10 | 12.90±9.03 | ||
冷刀锥切/全子宫切除 | 24 | 8.27±9.40 | ||
高危HPV感染 | 0.891a | 0.448 | ||
是 | 22 | 10.55±9.42 | ||
否 | 12 | 7.94±9.55 | ||
基线FACT-G总分 | -3.209a | 0.001 | ||
≤89.50分 | 19 | 14.30±9.74 | ||
>89.50分 | 15 | 3.72±4.41 |
变量 | 赋值 |
---|---|
年龄 | ≤46岁=1;>46岁=2 |
婚姻状况 | 在婚=1;单身=2 |
文化程度 | 初中及以下=1;高中及以上=2 |
职业 | 在职=1;无业=2 |
家庭人均月收入 | ≤4 000元=1;>4 000元=2 |
医保类型 | 城乡居民医保=1;城镇职工医保=2 |
家庭同住人口 | ≤2人=1;≥3人=2 |
BMI | 正常=1;肥胖=2 |
自评性格 | 乐观=1;一般/悲观=2 |
病程 | ≤30 d=1;>30 d=2 |
病理分期 | Ⅰ级=1;Ⅱ级=2;Ⅲ级=3 |
治疗方式 | 宫颈环形电切术=1;冷刀锥切/全子宫切除=2 |
高危HPV感染 | 是=1;否=2 |
基线FACT-G总分 | ≤89.50分=1;>89.50分=2 |
Table 5 Assignment table of categorical variables of multiple linear regression analysis of the effect of patient characteristics on the changes of the FACT-G scale
变量 | 赋值 |
---|---|
年龄 | ≤46岁=1;>46岁=2 |
婚姻状况 | 在婚=1;单身=2 |
文化程度 | 初中及以下=1;高中及以上=2 |
职业 | 在职=1;无业=2 |
家庭人均月收入 | ≤4 000元=1;>4 000元=2 |
医保类型 | 城乡居民医保=1;城镇职工医保=2 |
家庭同住人口 | ≤2人=1;≥3人=2 |
BMI | 正常=1;肥胖=2 |
自评性格 | 乐观=1;一般/悲观=2 |
病程 | ≤30 d=1;>30 d=2 |
病理分期 | Ⅰ级=1;Ⅱ级=2;Ⅲ级=3 |
治疗方式 | 宫颈环形电切术=1;冷刀锥切/全子宫切除=2 |
高危HPV感染 | 是=1;否=2 |
基线FACT-G总分 | ≤89.50分=1;>89.50分=2 |
自变量 | β | 95%CI | SE | B | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常量 | 9.775 | (-3.569,23.119) | 6.534 | — | 1.496 | 0.145 |
婚姻状况(以在婚参照组) | ||||||
单身 | 15.264 | (8.483,22.045) | 3.320 | 0.531 | 4.597 | <0.001 |
BMI(以正常为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | -4.830 | (-9.372,-0.288) | 2.224 | -0.238 | -2.172 | 0.038 |
基线FACT-G总分(以≤89.50分为参照) | ||||||
>89.50分 | -7.600 | (-12.003,-3.196) | 2.156 | -0.407 | -3.525 | 0.001 |
Table 6 Multiple linear regression analysis of the effect of patient characteristics on the changes of the FACT-G scale
自变量 | β | 95%CI | SE | B | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常量 | 9.775 | (-3.569,23.119) | 6.534 | — | 1.496 | 0.145 |
婚姻状况(以在婚参照组) | ||||||
单身 | 15.264 | (8.483,22.045) | 3.320 | 0.531 | 4.597 | <0.001 |
BMI(以正常为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | -4.830 | (-9.372,-0.288) | 2.224 | -0.238 | -2.172 | 0.038 |
基线FACT-G总分(以≤89.50分为参照) | ||||||
>89.50分 | -7.600 | (-12.003,-3.196) | 2.156 | -0.407 | -3.525 | 0.001 |
[1] |
WHO. WHO Guidelines for Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2–3 and Adenocarcinoma in situ:Cryotherapy,Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone,and Cold Knife Conization [M]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2014:1-2.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
刘艳萍. 普通电刀锥切术与环形电切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的效果比较[J]. 中国实用医药,2021,16(23):67-69. DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2021.23.021.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
姚丹霓,卢传坚,何泽慧,等. 基于中医临床研究的皮肤病生活质量指数临床最小重要差值研究[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志,2016,30(6):625-628,645. DOI:10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201509027.
|
[9] |
罗健. 脑卒中患者QOL研究及其MCID制定[D]. 昆明:昆明医科大学,2017.
|
[10] |
杨铮. 癌症患者生命质量测定量表共性模块(V2.0)研制及最小临床有意义差异制定[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2015.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
杨学,江桥,徐驰,等. 膝骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换术后HSS评分最小临床重要差异的研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2020,41(12):1188-1192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.12.005.
|
[13] |
FACIT.Org. FACIT [EB/OL].[2022-04-25].
|
[14] |
万崇华,孟琼,汤学良,等. 癌症患者生命质量测定量表FACT-G中文版评介[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志,2006,21(1):77-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1692.2006.01.027.
|
[15] |
胡欣. EQ-5D-5L量表应用于宫颈癌前病变患者的测量学特性及MCID研究[D]. 石河子:石河子大学,2020.
|
[16] |
李晓静. COPD患者QOL研究及其MCID的制定[D]. 昆明:昆明医科大学,2019.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
杨丽虹,刘少南,吴大嵘,等. 最小临床意义差值的概念及其估算方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2020,20(11):1345-1352.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
刘静云,刘艳秋,吕志红. CIN2、CIN3患者LEEP术后残留与复发的高危因素研究[J]. 重庆医学,2021,50(8):1323-1327. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.08.013.
|
[28] | |
[29] |
李桐. 体质指数对健康相关生命质量的影响——不同运动水平的分层分析[D]. 北京:北京中医药大学,2018.
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[1] | BAI Haiwei, MI Xiaokun, LIU Qingrui, ZHU Lin, WANG Yingnan, LIU Junyan, HAN Ying. Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid in Perioperative Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4545-4551. |
[2] | CHU Xiaojing, LI Jun, FU Yanqin, LIU Danqing, LIU Aiping, ZHANG Yuanyuan. Effect of Human Body Composition and Serum Biochemical Indicators on the Accuracy of Flash Glucose Monitoring System [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4433-4438. |
[3] | XIE Xuemei, GAO Jing, BAI Dingxi, LU Xianying, HE Jiali, LI Yue. Current Status of Polypharmacy in the Elderly and Its Influencing Factors: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4394-4403. |
[4] | WANG Yue, CHEN Qing, LIU Lurong. Detection Rate of Depression and Its Influencing Factors in Chinese Elderly: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4329-4335. |
[5] | HAO Aihua, ZENG Weilin, LI Guanhai, XIA Yinghua, CHEN Liang. Current Situation of the Construction of Family Doctor Team: an Investigation Based on the Perspective of General Practitioners [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4261-4268. |
[6] | LI Dianjiang, PAN Enchun, SUN Zhongming, WEN Jinbo, WANG Miaomiao, WU Ming, SHEN Chong. The Current Status and Influencing Factors of Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4296-4301. |
[7] | QIN Fengyin, ZHANG Qishan, LAI Jinjia, HUANG Yimin, HAN Guoyin, SUN Xinglan, WANG Fen, TAN Yibing. Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Intention to Screen for High-risk Stroke among Community Residents in Guangdong [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4283-4289. |
[8] | LIANG Xuan, NA Feiyang, QIN Mengyao, YANG Hui, GUO Li, GUO Qi, REN Lei, CHEN De, LIU Donghai, ZHANG Rongfang. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Bronchial Asthma Combined with Obstructive Sleep Apnea-hypopnea Syndrome in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4225-4230. |
[9] | LI Qianqian, CHEN Xunrui, ZHANG Wenying, YUAN Haihua, ZHANG Yanjie, JIANG Bin, LIU Feng. Demand and Influencing Factors for Community Health Services during Chemotherapy of Patients with Advanced Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4173-4180. |
[10] | WANG Lina, GAO Pengfei, CAO Fan, GE Ying, YAN Wei, HE Daikun. Analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Different Gender Groups [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4143-4151. |
[11] | ZHOU Yuyu, GAO Chuan, CUI Puan, WANG Yaping, HE Zhong. Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making between Doctors and Patients in Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Patients with Menopausal Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4181-4186. |
[12] | ZHANG Jin, DING Zhiguo, QI Shuo, LI Ying, LI Weiqiang, ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHOU Tong. Relationship between Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels and Prognosis during Hospitalization in Heart Failure Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4125-4129. |
[13] | GAO Dekang, WEI Shaohua, MA Xiaoming, DU Peng, XING Chungen, CAO Chun. Risk Factors for Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Its Correlation with Complications after Major Hepatectomy for Liver Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4031-4037. |
[14] | ZHANG Juan, LI Haifen, LI Xiaoman, YAO Miao, MA Huizhen, MA Qiang. Construction of Recurrence Risk Prediction Model for Diabetic Foot Ulcer on the Basis of Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine and BP Neural Network Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4013-4019. |
[15] | GAO Jing, ZHOU Shangcheng, GAO Sande, ZOU Guanyang, CHEN Yingyao. Health-related Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Prevention of Disease in Traditionnal Chinese Medicine based on EQ-5D-5L Scale [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4043-4050. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||