Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (06): 706-713.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.104
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Quantitative Assessment of Early Postpartum Pelvic Floor Structure and Function Changes as Well as Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parturients of Advanced Maternal Age
Department of Ultrasound,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital,Tangshan 063000,China
*Corresponding author:KAN Yanmin,Professor,Chief physician;E-mail:wuxiny_2009@163.com
Received:
2021-08-19
Revised:
2021-11-03
Published:
2022-02-20
Online:
2022-01-25
通讯作者:
阚艳敏
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Ning, KAN Yanmin, WANG Yihua, LI Jie, SHI Chaohui, ZHANG Man, ZHANG Shuhua.
Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Quantitative Assessment of Early Postpartum Pelvic Floor Structure and Function Changes as Well as Stress Urinary Incontinence in Parturients of Advanced Maternal Age [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(06): 706-713.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.104
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 孕次(次) | 产次(次) | BMI(kg/m2) | ΔW(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高龄组 | 105 | 38.6±3.2 | 2.1±0.6 | 1.5±0.5 | 24.8±4.7 | 15.3±2.0 |
适龄组 | 89 | 28.3±3.2 | 1.5±0.5 | 1.2±0.4 | 23.0±4.6 | 15.2±1.9 |
t值 | 22.320 | 6.627 | 4.457 | 2.733 | 0.169 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.866 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between parturients of advanced and proper maternal age
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 孕次(次) | 产次(次) | BMI(kg/m2) | ΔW(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高龄组 | 105 | 38.6±3.2 | 2.1±0.6 | 1.5±0.5 | 24.8±4.7 | 15.3±2.0 |
适龄组 | 89 | 28.3±3.2 | 1.5±0.5 | 1.2±0.4 | 23.0±4.6 | 15.2±1.9 |
t值 | 22.320 | 6.627 | 4.457 | 2.733 | 0.169 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.866 |
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 孕次(次) | 产次(次) | BMI(kg/m2) | ΔW(kg) | 分娩方式〔n(%)〕 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经阴道分娩 | 选择性剖宫产 | |||||||
SUI亚组 | 51 | 38.0±3.2 | 2.1±0.7 | 1.5±0.5 | 24.0±4.7 | 16.0±1.9 | 31(60.8) | 20(39.2) |
非SUI亚组 | 54 | 39.2±3.1 | 2.1±0.6 | 1.5±0.6 | 25.5±4.6 | 14.6±1.8 | 25(46.3) | 29(53.7) |
t(χ2)值 | -1.949 | -0.103 | -0.268 | -1.649 | 4.101 | 2.212a | ||
P值 | 0.054 | 0.918 | 0.789 | 0.102 | <0.001 | 0.172 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline data between parturients of advanced maternal age with and without early postpartum stress urinary incontinence
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 孕次(次) | 产次(次) | BMI(kg/m2) | ΔW(kg) | 分娩方式〔n(%)〕 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经阴道分娩 | 选择性剖宫产 | |||||||
SUI亚组 | 51 | 38.0±3.2 | 2.1±0.7 | 1.5±0.5 | 24.0±4.7 | 16.0±1.9 | 31(60.8) | 20(39.2) |
非SUI亚组 | 54 | 39.2±3.1 | 2.1±0.6 | 1.5±0.6 | 25.5±4.6 | 14.6±1.8 | 25(46.3) | 29(53.7) |
t(χ2)值 | -1.949 | -0.103 | -0.268 | -1.649 | 4.101 | 2.212a | ||
P值 | 0.054 | 0.918 | 0.789 | 0.102 | <0.001 | 0.172 |
组别 | 例数 | E1 | E2 | ΔE | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | 左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | 左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | ||
高龄组 | 105 | 21.39±4.23 | 21.27±4.04 | 0.205 | 0.838 | 38.15±7.56 | 38.76±7.92 | -0.574 | 0.567 | 16.76±4.59 | 17.49±5.67 | -1.025 | 0.307 |
适龄组 | 89 | 23.42±5.01 | 22.74±5.20 | 0.900 | 0.369 | 47.43±5.72 | 47.49±5.85 | -0.073 | 0.942 | 24.00±5.43 | 24.75±5.59 | -0.909 | 0.365 |
Table 3 Comparison of elastic parameters of bilateral puborectal muscles in parturients of advanced and proper maternal age
组别 | 例数 | E1 | E2 | ΔE | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | 左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | 左侧 | 右侧 | t值 | P值 | ||
高龄组 | 105 | 21.39±4.23 | 21.27±4.04 | 0.205 | 0.838 | 38.15±7.56 | 38.76±7.92 | -0.574 | 0.567 | 16.76±4.59 | 17.49±5.67 | -1.025 | 0.307 |
适龄组 | 89 | 23.42±5.01 | 22.74±5.20 | 0.900 | 0.369 | 47.43±5.72 | 47.49±5.85 | -0.073 | 0.942 | 24.00±5.43 | 24.75±5.59 | -0.909 | 0.365 |
组别 | 例数 | h1BL(cm) | h2BL(cm) | ΔhBL(cm) | UIA1 | UIA2 | URA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高龄组 | 105 | -2.24±0.56 | -0.51±1.03 | 1.73±0.67 | 17.19°±8.60° | 36.44°±16.60° | 30.23°±15.05° |
适龄组 | 89 | -3.15±0.82 | -1.72±0.68 | 1.43±0.47 | 15.58°±10.15° | 35.88°±15.72° | 28.67°±7.32° |
t值 | 9.915 | 9.702 | 3.467 | 1.170 | 0.242 | 0.937 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.243 | 0.809 | 0.350 |
Table 4 Comparison of multimodal ultrasound parameters of pelvic floor between parturients of advanced and proper maternal age
组别 | 例数 | h1BL(cm) | h2BL(cm) | ΔhBL(cm) | UIA1 | UIA2 | URA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高龄组 | 105 | -2.24±0.56 | -0.51±1.03 | 1.73±0.67 | 17.19°±8.60° | 36.44°±16.60° | 30.23°±15.05° |
适龄组 | 89 | -3.15±0.82 | -1.72±0.68 | 1.43±0.47 | 15.58°±10.15° | 35.88°±15.72° | 28.67°±7.32° |
t值 | 9.915 | 9.702 | 3.467 | 1.170 | 0.242 | 0.937 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.243 | 0.809 | 0.350 |
组别 | 例数 | h1BL(cm) | h2BL(cm) | ΔhBL(cm) | UIA1 | UIA2 | URA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUI亚组 | 51 | -1.84±0.35 | 0.30±0.63 | 2.14±0.45 | 16.71°±6.25° | 39.92°±18.12° | 35.07°±13.66° |
非SUI亚组 | 54 | -2.61±0.45 | -1.27±0.72 | 1.34±0.60 | 17.64°±10.39° | 33.16°±14.44° | 25.65°±14.98° |
t值 | 9.690 | 11.786 | 7.622 | -0.560 | 2.105 | 3.358 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.577 | 0.038 | 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of multimodal ultrasound parameters between parturients of advanced maternal age with and without early postpartum stress urinary incontinence
组别 | 例数 | h1BL(cm) | h2BL(cm) | ΔhBL(cm) | UIA1 | UIA2 | URA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUI亚组 | 51 | -1.84±0.35 | 0.30±0.63 | 2.14±0.45 | 16.71°±6.25° | 39.92°±18.12° | 35.07°±13.66° |
非SUI亚组 | 54 | -2.61±0.45 | -1.27±0.72 | 1.34±0.60 | 17.64°±10.39° | 33.16°±14.44° | 25.65°±14.98° |
t值 | 9.690 | 11.786 | 7.622 | -0.560 | 2.105 | 3.358 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.577 | 0.038 | 0.001 |
Figure 1 ROC curves of h1BL,h2BL,ΔhBL,UIA2,URA,PVUA1,PVUA2,LHA1 and LHA2 in predicting early postpartum stress urinary incontinence in parturients of advanced maternal age
参数 | AUC | 95%CI | 最佳截断值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
h1BL | 0.898 | (0.836,0.959) | -2.28 cm | 82.4 | 83.3 |
h2BL | 0.955 | (0.919,0.991) | -0.50 cm | 94.1 | 88.9 |
ΔhBL | 0.831 | (0.752,0.910) | 1.81 cm | 78.4 | 74.1 |
UIA2 | 0.622 | (0.510,0.733) | - | - | - |
URA | 0.684 | (0.583,0.785) | - | - | - |
PVUA1 | 0.769 | (0.678,0.860) | 117.30 | 74.5 | 66.7 |
PVUA2 | 0.847 | (0.763,0.930) | 138.25 | 80.4 | 88.9 |
LHA1 | 0.893 | (0.825,0.961) | 16.79 cm2 | 90.2 | 85.2 |
LHA2 | 0.736 | (0.638,0.834) | 21.82 cm2 | 70.6 | 72.1 |
E1双侧 | 0.672 | (0.589,0.776) | - | - | - |
E2双侧 | 0.821 | (0.739,0.903) | 38.44 kPa | 76.5 | 74.1 |
ΔE双侧 | 0.887 | (0.814,0.960) | 16.85 kPa | 90.2 | 87.0 |
Table 6 AUC,optimal cutoff value,sensitivity and specificity of multimodal ultrasound parameters in the diagnosis of early postpartum stress urinary incontinence in parturients of advanced maternal age
参数 | AUC | 95%CI | 最佳截断值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
h1BL | 0.898 | (0.836,0.959) | -2.28 cm | 82.4 | 83.3 |
h2BL | 0.955 | (0.919,0.991) | -0.50 cm | 94.1 | 88.9 |
ΔhBL | 0.831 | (0.752,0.910) | 1.81 cm | 78.4 | 74.1 |
UIA2 | 0.622 | (0.510,0.733) | - | - | - |
URA | 0.684 | (0.583,0.785) | - | - | - |
PVUA1 | 0.769 | (0.678,0.860) | 117.30 | 74.5 | 66.7 |
PVUA2 | 0.847 | (0.763,0.930) | 138.25 | 80.4 | 88.9 |
LHA1 | 0.893 | (0.825,0.961) | 16.79 cm2 | 90.2 | 85.2 |
LHA2 | 0.736 | (0.638,0.834) | 21.82 cm2 | 70.6 | 72.1 |
E1双侧 | 0.672 | (0.589,0.776) | - | - | - |
E2双侧 | 0.821 | (0.739,0.903) | 38.44 kPa | 76.5 | 74.1 |
ΔE双侧 | 0.887 | (0.814,0.960) | 16.85 kPa | 90.2 | 87.0 |
Figure 3 ROC curves of the combination of h2BL,LHA1 and bilateral ΔE in predicting early postpartum stress urinary incontinence in parturients of advanced maternal age
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h1BL | -2.475 | 1.799 | 1.893 | 0.169 | 0.084 | (0.002,2.860) |
h2BL | -3.691 | 1.535 | 5.782 | 0.016 | 0.025 | (0.001,0.505) |
LHA1 | -0.952 | 0.314 | 9.203 | 0.002 | 0.386 | (0.209,0.714) |
ΔE双侧 | 0.675 | 0.268 | 6.328 | 0.012 | 1.965 | (1.161,3.325) |
常数 | -2.476 | 6.504 | 0.145 | 0.812 | 0.084 | - |
Table 7 Binary Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of early postpartum stress urinary incontinence in parturients of advanced maternal age
变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h1BL | -2.475 | 1.799 | 1.893 | 0.169 | 0.084 | (0.002,2.860) |
h2BL | -3.691 | 1.535 | 5.782 | 0.016 | 0.025 | (0.001,0.505) |
LHA1 | -0.952 | 0.314 | 9.203 | 0.002 | 0.386 | (0.209,0.714) |
ΔE双侧 | 0.675 | 0.268 | 6.328 | 0.012 | 1.965 | (1.161,3.325) |
常数 | -2.476 | 6.504 | 0.145 | 0.812 | 0.084 | - |
[1] | 丁荣楣,王平,马丽君,等. 高龄初产妇妊娠和分娩情况回顾性分析[J]. 护理研究,2019,33(1):108-111. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.01.024. |
[2] | KHATRI G, CARMEL M E, BAILEY A A,et al. Postoperative imaging after surgical repair for pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Radiographics,2016,36(4):1233-1256. DOI:10.1148/rg.2016150215. |
[3] | 施素娟,俞小英,马银芬,等. 早期康复训练结合电刺激生物反馈治疗产后压力性尿失禁的临床观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2021,36(11):2469-2472. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.11.009. |
[4] | KOSHIDA S, ARIMA H, FUJII T,et al. Impact of advanced maternal age on adverse infant outcomes:a Japanese population-based study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2019,242:178-181. DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.08.011. |
[5] | 杜彦芳,蒋妍,黄向华. 女性尿失禁的分类及诊断标准[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(3):164-167. |
[6] | 罗丹. 基于整体理论孕期压力性尿失禁盆底形态学的超声评估[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2018. |
[7] | YIN Y, XIA Z, FENG X,et al. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography for diagnosis of female occult stress urinary incontinence[J]. Med Sci Monit,2019,25:8078-8083. DOI:10.12659/msm.917086. |
[8] | SZUMILEWICZ A, DORNOWSKI M, PIERNICKA M,et al. High-low impact exercise program including pelvic floor muscle exercises improves pelvic floor muscle function in healthy pregnant women—a randomized control trial[J]. Front Physiol,2018,9:1867. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2018.01867. |
[9] | 喻虹祯. 经会阴三维超声结合应变弹性成像评估前盆腔器官脱垂的临床研究[D]. 南宁:广西中医药大学,2020. |
[10] | GACHON B, NORDEZ A, PIERRE F,et al. In vivo assessment of the levator ani muscles using shear wave elastography:a feasibility study in women[J]. Int Urogynecology J,2019,30(7):1179-1186. DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3693-4. |
[11] | 王瑾,王慧芳,陈华,等. 实时剪切波弹性成像测量女性耻骨直肠肌杨氏模量值[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2015,31(4):586-589. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.04.028. |
[12] | HOLLAND M A, JOYCE J S, BRENNAMAN L M,et al. Intravaginal diazepam for the treatment of pelvic floor hypertonic disorder:a double-blind,randomized,placebo-controlled trial[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg,2019,25(1):76-81. DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000514. |
[13] | 蒋云秀,潘永寿,潘焕贵,等. 经会阴三维超声联合实时剪切波弹性成像评价产后女性盆底功能的研究[J]. 生物医学工程与临床,2020,24(1):45-49. DOI:10.13339/j.cnki.sglc.20200107.009. |
[14] | 孙立倩,王宏桥,付青,等. 经会阴盆底超声在女性压力性尿失禁诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2015,12(2):99-102. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.02.003. |
[15] | HUANG I S, FAN Y H, LIN A T,et al. Correlation between bladder neck mobility and voiding phase urodynamic parameters in female patients with stress urinary incontinence[J]. Low Urin Tract Symptoms,2016,8(1):44-48. DOI:10.1111/luts.12076. |
[16] | BUSH M B, LIEDL B, WAGENLEHNER F,et al. A finite element model validates an external mechanism for opening the urethral tube prior to micturition in the female[J]. World J Urol,2015,33(8):1151-1157. DOI:10.1007/s00345-014-1419-x. |
[17] | 肖汀,张新玲,毛永江,等.盆底超声在压力性尿失禁诊断中的应用研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2017,26(7):618-622. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.07.014. |
[18] | 王丽华,陈军,邱月,等. 经会阴超声对压力性尿失禁的诊断价值分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(1):89-91. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2019.01.030. |
[19] | 张红彬,栗河舟. 肛提肌裂孔面积与盆底功能障碍的相关性研究初探[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2017,28(7):513-515. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2017.07.014. |
[20] | 钟婷婷,王丽,李载红,等. 声触诊组织定量剪切波弹性成像技术评估女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的应用研究[J]. 海南医学院学报,2021,27(1):24-29. DOI:10.13210/j.cnki.jhmu.20200628.003. |
[21] | 郝岩,王丽,张坤,等. 社区综合干预辅助治疗女性轻中度压力性尿失禁患者的临床疗效[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2018,26(4):89-92. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2018.04.021. |
[1] | Huiwen TAN, Yu TANG, Yerong YU, Jianwei LI, Jiaqi LI, Zhenmei AN, Chun WANG, Yi WEI. Interpretation of Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Cushing's Disease: a Guideline Update of the International Pituitary Society——Diagnosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(20): 2435-2442. |
[2] | Wenming ZHUANG, Li ZHANG, Jing ZHANG, Rongmin HU. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Associated Factors in Adolescent Primiparous Women [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(20): 2474-2481. |
[3] | Ling CHEN, Tiantian LI, Wenzhi CAI. The Effect of a Mobile APP-based Pelvic Floor Muscle Training during Pregnancy on the Occurrence of Postpartum Urinary Incontinence: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(12): 1424-1428,1434. |
[4] |
ZHANG Danli, HU Fengxin, WANG Jia, CHEN Ling, LIU Sha, CAI Wenzhi.
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(09): 1088-1092. |
[5] | WANG Jia,LI Tiantian,CHEN Ling,CAI Wenzhi. Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training During Pregnancy on the Morphology of Levator Ani Muscle:a Real-world Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(9): 1088-1094. |
[6] | CAI Wenzhi,LI Tiantian,WANG Jia,JIN Mei,LI Jing,CHEN Ling. Association between Physical Activity Pattern and Levator Ani Muscle Thickness in Pregnant Women [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(3): 330-340. |
[7] | ZHANG Meixi,XI Wei. Postpartum Contraception in China:Status,Problems and Coping Strategies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(27): 3404-3407. |
[8] | CHEN Ying,QIAN Hongyan,ZHU Yuting,WANG Yuanyuan,QIAN Lihua,KONG Xiang. Influencing Factors of Postpartum Post-traumatic Stress Disorder:a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(21): 2729-2733. |
[9] | FANG Kaifeng,DING Guanbao,HAN Lu. The Value of Ultrasound Elastography and Molybdenum Target X-ray in the Diagnosis of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(15): 1959-1961. |
[10] | WEN Ya,LIU Jingjing,LIU Liping,YAN Xiaohui,LI Xiaoyu,XIN Yuwei,BI Yanjing. Differential Analysis of Ultrasonographic and Intraoperative Characteristics between Focal Subacute Granulomatous Thyroiditis and Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(12): 1512-1516. |
[11] | CHEN Xiaomin,HU Yingjie,CHEN Ling,ZHANG Yan,HUANG Shurong,CAI Wenzhi. Development of an Intra-pregnancy Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Program Using Mobile Health Technologies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(30): 3806-3811. |
[12] | YU Caicha,SHUI Xujuan,JIAO Yan,LIN Yuanyuan. Preliminary application of real-time shear wave elastography in evaluating endometrial receptivity [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(21): 2678-2681. |
[13] | WANG Lei,DENG Kexue,SUI Xiufang,ZHANG Jie,ZHANG Hang. Screening and Diagnosis Value of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging Quantification in Combination with Superb Microvascular Imaging in Early Breast Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(18): 2309-2313. |
[14] | CHEN Kangxie,HUANG Yaoguang,LI Hui,YAO Guanjin,SUN Lanchun. Diagnostic Values of Routine Blood Indicators in Patients with AECOPD [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(13): 1663-1665. |
[15] | FANG Chao,WU Tingting,ZHOU Yingying,XUE Jun,YANG Weiwei. Value of a Combination of Ultrasound Examinations in Preoperative Diagnosis of Neck Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(24): 3000-3004. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||