中文版晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表的信效度研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.35.017

中国全科医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (35): 4375-4378.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.35.017

中文版晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表的信效度研究

毛盼，Lily Dongxia Xiao，张孟喜，等

410013 湖南省长沙市，中南大学湘雅护理学院（毛盼，谢菲婷，冯辉）；澳大利亚弗林德斯大学护理与助产学院（Lily Dongxia Xiao）；中南大学湘雅二医院老年病科（张孟喜）通信作者：冯辉，410013 湖南省长沙市，中南大学湘雅护理学院；E-mail：feng.hui@csu.edu.cn

出版日期:2016-12-15 发布日期:2026-01-28
基金资助:
基金项目：国家社会科学基金资助项目（16BSH055）

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale (QUALIDS)

MAO P, Xiao LD, ZHANG MX, et al

School of Nursing, Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China (MAO Pan, XIE Fei-ting, FENG Hui); School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Australia (Lily Dongxia Xiao); Department of Geriatrics, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China (ZHANG Meng-xi) Corresponding author: FENG Hui, School of Nursing, Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China; E-mail: feng.hui@csu.edu.cn

Published:2016-12-15 Online:2026-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的翻译晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表（QUALIDS）并检验其信效度，探讨其在我国的适用性。方法于 2015 年 12 月 —2016 年 1 月，采用多阶段整群抽样方法，选取湖南省养老机构特别照护单元的晚期痴呆患者 205 例为研究对象。将英文版 QUALIDS 翻译成中文，再次回译成英文，发给原作者进行审核，经反复对照比较形成中文版 QUALIDS。由患者的照护者自行填写量表，当场发放和收回。由长沙市两所大型养老机构 23 例患者的两位不同班次的照护者重复填写中文版 QUALIDS，两周后再次进行中文版 QUALIDS 评价。采用内部一致性、评分者间信度、重测信度、分半信度评价量表信度；采用内容效度、关联效度、结构效度评价量表效度。结果中文版 QUALIDS 的 Cronbach′s α 系数为 0.738，各条目与总分的相关系数（r 值）为 0.354～0.755。两位不同班次的照护者针对 23 例患者再次填写中文版 QUALIDS，各条目组内相关系数（ICC）为 0.783～0.964，总分 ICC 为 0.892。两周后再次对 23 例患者进行中文版 QUALIDS 评价，各条目重测相关系数为 0.575～0.878，总分重测相关系数为 0.819，分半信度为 0.874。根据专家反馈结果，内容效度指数（CVI）为 0.910。中文版 QUALIDS 与全面衰退量表（GDS）、神经精神症状调查问卷（NPI-Q）严重程度分量表、NPI-Q 痛苦程度分量表、躯体生活自理量表（PSMS）评分相关系数（r 值）为 - 0.270、0.598、0.576、0.267（P＜0.01）。因子分析得到 3 个公因子，公因子 1 包括条目 2、3、4，公因子 2 包括条目 6、7、11，公因子 3 包括条目 1、9、10。结论中文版 QUALIDS 具有较好的信度和效度，可用来评价晚期痴呆患者的生活质量。

关键词: 痴呆, 晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表, 生活质量, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale (QUALIDS) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity, so as to explore its applicability in China. Methods From December 2015 to January 2016, 205 patients with late-stage dementia from special care units of elderly care institutions in Hunan Province were selected as research subjects by multi-stage cluster sampling. The English version of QUALIDS was translated into Chinese and then back-translated into English. The back-translated version was sent to the original authors for review, and the Chinese version of QUALIDS was formed after repeated comparison and revision. The caregivers of the patients filled out the scale independently, which was distributed and collected on-site. Two caregivers on different shifts from two large elderly care institutions in Changsha filled out the Chinese version of QUALIDS repeatedly for 23 patients, and the Chinese version of QUALIDS was re-evaluated two weeks later. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability; the validity was evaluated by content validity, criterion-related validity and construct validity. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of QUALIDS was 0.738, and the correlation coefficients (r values) between each item and the total score ranged from 0.354 to 0.755. For the 23 patients, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of each item filled out by two caregivers on different shifts were 0.783-0.964, and the total score ICC was 0.892. After two weeks, the Chinese version of QUALIDS was re-evaluated for the 23 patients. The test-retest correlation coefficients of each item were 0.575-0.878, the total score test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.819, and the split-half reliability was 0.874. According to expert feedback, the content validity index (CVI) was 0.910. The correlation coefficients between the Chinese version of QUALIDS and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), the severity subscale of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q), the distress subscale of the NPI-Q, and the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) scores were -0.270, 0.598, 0.576, and 0.267, respectively (P<0.01). Factor analysis yielded 3 common factors: common factor 1 included items 2, 3, and 4; common factor 2 included items 6, 7, and 11; common factor 3 included items 1, 9, and 10. Conclusion The Chinese version of QUALIDS has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the quality of life of patients with late-stage dementia.

Key words: Dementia, Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale, Quality of life, Reliability, Validity

毛盼, Lily Dongxia Xiao, 张孟喜, 谢菲婷, 冯辉. 中文版晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表的信效度研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(35): 4375-4378.

MAO Pan, Lily Dongxia Xiao, ZHANG Meng-xi, XIE Fei-ting, FENG Hui. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale (QUALIDS)[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(35): 4375-4378.

参考文献

［1］LEVI L.Population，environment and quality of life［M］.Norwalk:AMS Press,1980. ［2］World Health Organization.A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons［EB/OL］.［2016-01-15］.http://whqlibdoc.who.int/wkc/2004/ WHO_WKC_Tech.Ser._04.2.pdf. ［3］LEPLGE A,HUNT S.The problem of quality of life in medicine［J］.JAMA,1997,278（1）:47-50. ［4］Dementia warning for the Asia-Pacific region［J］.Lancet Neurol,2015,14（1）:1. ［5］胡号应,苗国栋,唐牟尼,等.痴呆患者生活质量评估的研究进展［J］.国际精神病学杂志,2006,33（2）:73-76. HU H Y,MIAO G D,TANG M N,et al. Research progress on quality of life of patients with dementia［J］.Journal of International Psychiatry，2006,33（2）:73-76. ［6］WEINER M F,MARTIN-COOK K,SVETLIK D A,et al.The quality of life in late-stage dementia（QUALID） scale［J］.J Am Med Dir Assoc,2000,1（3）:114-116. ［7］LLTN D O.American psychiatric association diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders［M］.4th ed.Washington,DC:American Psychiatric Association,1994. ［8］ALBERT S M,DEL CASTILLO-CASTANEDA C,SANO M,et al.Quality of life in patients with Alzheimer’s disease as reported by patient proxies［J］.J Am Geriatr Soc,1996,44（11）:1342-1347. ［9］GARRE-OLMO J,PLANAS-PUJOL X,LPEZ-POUSA S,et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale［J］.Qual Life Res,2010,19（3）:445-453. ［10］FALK H,PERSSON L O,WIJK H.A psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia（QUALID） scale［J］.Int Psychogeriatr,2007,19（6）:1040-1050. ［11］DE VREESE L P,UBERTI M,MANTESSO U,et al.Dementia with the Italian version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia（QUALID） Scale［J］.J Alzheimers Dis,2012,2（1）:1-5. ［12］JONES P S,LEE J W,PHILLIPS L R,et al.An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research［J］.Nurs Res,2001,50（5）:300-304. ［13］安胜利,陈平雁.量表的信度及其影响因素［J］.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9（4）:315-318. AN S L,CHEN P Y.Measurement scales:reliability and affecting factors［J］.Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology,2001,9（4）:315-318. ［14］POLIT D F,BECK C T.Nursing research:principle and methods［M］.7th ed.Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2003:423.

[1]	孙松朋, 许方方, 龙俊红, 王占军, 曹俏蓉, 万伟萍, 李天煜, 林梅, 田颖, 石斌, 吴瑶, 王建国, 李新建, 霍兴霄, 梁隆雨, 褚洪川, 周阳洋, 张志云, 张书信, 贾山. 痔病严重度和手术风险预测评分的构建及临床指导价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(20): 2879-2886.
[2]	吴瑞宁, 周明, 张攻孜, 李军, 谢苏杭, 刘杨晓雪, 张佳丽, 刘毛毛, 黄丽萍. 固定式与移动式外骨骼机器人改善脑卒中患者下肢功能及生活质量：一项随机对照试验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333.
[3]	胡琦, 徐宁, 马喜民, 贺嘉慧, 乔慧. 宁夏回族自治区南部山区农村女性健康相关生命质量及其对卫生服务利用的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(08): 988-996.
[4]	黄文静, 邱珊娇, 陈章, 李安春, 何智光. RACGP《全科医学的预防活动指南》解读与讨论：阿尔茨海默病早期识别路径与基层实践[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(07): 823-829.
[5]	聂倩倩, 程桂荣, 宋丹, 李景耀, 许浪, 张丽娟. 中国社区老年人患高血压及其共病与痴呆的关联性研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(01): 76-83.
[6]	王瓅珠, 李思涵, 王心怡, 冒孙汐, 邱杨, 王中华. 基于ITHBC模型的糖尿病知识、自我效能对农村2型糖尿病患者自我管理和生存质量的影响路径研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(34): 4351-4358.
[7]	张曦, 管成果, 王婧, 许丁昕, 张博. 痴呆症患者预立医疗照护计划干预策略的研究新进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(32): 4109-4116.
[8]	徐扬, 江帆, 王晓旭, 冯玫. 全科医学师资培训效果评价量表的编制与信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(28): 3483-3488.
[9]	韩笑, 李奇遇, 葛蒲, 范思园, 刘迪玥, 吴一波, 张清霜. 高血压患者行为生活方式对生命质量的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(26): 3248-3258.
[10]	于文华, 李建国, 段文燕, 高旭妍, 李夏夏, 张子龙, 张丽, 马丽娜. 老年人功能受损评估量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(24): 3000-3004.
[11]	吴越, 王雪彤, 柯碧莲. 近视性黄斑病变低视力患者视觉相关生活质量评估及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(23): 2908-2914.
[12]	文敏, 周永玲, 刘静静, 蒋苛晴, 刘娟, 朱晓丹. 基于移动医疗APP的认知补偿训练对稳定期精神分裂症患者的干预效果与机制研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(22): 2819-2825.
[13]	唐笑睿, 徐晶晶, 顾子君, 王清玉, 林征, 朱秋瑞, 雷阳. 糖尿病自我护理指数量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(21): 2643-2651.
[14]	刘青芳, 韦有仕, 肖斐, 周春香, 刘群, 袁慧, 曹天然. 麦角硫因激活核因子E2相关因子2/血红素加氧酶1信号通路改善血管性痴呆大鼠认知功能障碍研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(17): 2156-2162.
[15]	邓洁, 陶立元, 刘楠, 李俊, 闫温馨, 秦宸媛, 刘巧, 杜敏, 汪亚萍, 刘珏. 约克郡新冠康复量表改良版（C19-YRSm）的汉化及信效度检验研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(13): 1642-1648.

中文版晚期痴呆患者生活质量量表的信效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale (QUALIDS)

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

留言