Page 32 - 2023-02-中国全科医学

2023年1月 第26卷 第2期 http: //www.chinagp.net E-mail: zgqkyx@chinagp.net.cn ·153·

a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials［J］. Int J Cardiol， ［36］JADAD A R，MOORE R A，CARROLL D，et al. Assessing
2018，252：63-67. DOI：10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.041. the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials：is blinding
［27］LEVETT J Y，WINDLE S B，FILION K B，et al. Meta-analysis of necessary?［J］. Control Clin Trials，1996，17（1）：1-12.
complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST- DOI：10.1016/0197-2456（95）00134-4.
segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary ［37］CADORE J C，FURTADO M V，TUMELERO R，et al. Complete
disease［J］. Am J Cardiol，2020，135：40-49. DOI：10.1016/j. revascularization versus treatment of the culprit artery only in ST
amjcard.2020.08.030. elevation myocardial infarction：a multicenter registry［J］.
［28］OSMAN M，KHAN S U，FARJO P D，et al. Meta-analysis Arq Bras Cardiol，2020，115（2）：229-237. DOI：
comparing complete versus infarct-related artery revascularization 10.36660/abc.20180346.
in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel ［38］NAGARAJA V，KALRA A，PURI R S. When to use intravascular
coronary disease［J］. Am J Cardiol，2020，125（4）：513- ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous
520. DOI：10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.017. coronary intervention? ［J］. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther，2020，10（5）：
［29］SEKERCIOGLU N，SPENCER F A，LOPES L C，et al. Culprit 1429-1444. DOI：10.21037/cdt-20-206.
vessel only vs immediate complete revascularization in patients ［39］BOSSARD M，MEHTA S R. Complete or incomplete
with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction：systematic revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction：
review and meta-analysis［J］. Clin Cardiol，2014，37（12）： the PRAMI trial to COMPLETE［J］. Interv Cardiol Clin，2020，9
765-772. DOI：10.1002/clc.22333. （4）：433-440. DOI：10.1016/j.iccl.2020.06.001.
［30］VILLABLANCA P A，BRICENO D F，MASSERA D，et al. ［40］NEUMANN F J，SOUSA-UVA M. 'Ten commandments' for the
Culprit-lesion only versus complete multivessel percutaneous 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization［J］.
intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction：a systematic Eur Heart J，2018，39（42）：3759. DOI：10.1093/eurheartj/
review and meta-analysis of randomized trials［J］. Int J Cardiol， ehy658.
2016，220：251-259. DOI：10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.098. ［41］任小帅 . STEMI 患者行直接 PCI 治疗是否同期处理多支病变血
［31］VAIDYA S R，DEVARAPALLY S R，ARORA S. Infarct related 管效果对比［J］. 医学理论与实践，2020，33（7）：1085-
artery only versus complete revascularization in ST-segment 1086. DOI：10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2020.07.020.
elevation myocardial infarction and multi vessel disease：a meta- ［42］林苗，赵文涛，张敏霞，等 . 直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时同
analysis［J］. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther，2017，7（1）：16-26. 期干预非梗死相关动脉对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死多支血管病变
DOI：10.21037/cdt.2016.08.06. 患者预后影响［J］. 临床军医杂志，2018，46（5）：552-555.
［32］SALIH M，IBRAHIM A M，AL-AKCHAR M，et al. Complete DOI：10.16680/j.1671-3826.2018.05.12.
versus culprit-only revascularization in patients presenting with LIN M，ZHAO W T，ZHANG M X，et al. Prognostic impact of
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction：a meta-analysis of simultaneous non-IRA intervention in patients with ST-segment
randomized control trials［J］. Cardiovasc Revasc Med，2020，21 elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease［J］.
（12）：1482-1488. DOI：10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.019. Clinical Journal of Medical Officers，2018，46（5）：552-555.
［33］ANANTHA NARAYANAN M，REDDY Y N，SUNDARAM DOI：10.16680/j.1671-3826.2018.05.12.
V，et al. What is the optimal approach to a non- culprit stenosis ［43］《中国冠状动脉血流储备分数测定技术临床路径专家共识》
after ST-elevation myocardial infarction - conservative therapy or 专家组 . 中国冠状动脉血流储备分数测定技术临床路径专家共
upfront revascularization? An updated meta-analysis of randomized 识［J］. 中国介入心脏病学杂志，2019，27（3）：121-133.
trials［J］. Int J Cardiol，2016，216：18-24. DOI：10.1016/j. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2019.03.001.
ijcard.2016.04.054. ［44］PIJLS N H J，VAN SCHAARDENBURGH P，MANOHARAN
［34］XU H Y，ZHANG X W，LI J J，et al. Complete versus culprit-only G，et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally
revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial nonsignificant stenosis：5-year follow-up of the DEFER
infarction and multivessel disease：a meta-analysis of randomized study［J］. J Am Coll Cardiol，2007，49（21）：2105-2111.
trials［J］. BMC Cardiovasc Disord，2019，19（1）：91. DOI： DOI：10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087.
10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8. ［45］TONINO P A，DE BRUYNE B，PIJLS N H，et al. Fractional
［35］WOOD L，EGGER M，GLUUD L L，et al. Empirical evidence flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary
of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with intervention［J］. N Engl J Med，2009，360（3）：213-224.
different interventions and outcomes：meta-epidemiological DOI：10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
study［J］. BMJ，2008，336（7644）：601-605. DOI： （收稿日期：2022-04-25；修回日期：2022-08-02）
10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD. （本文编辑：宋春梅）