Page 31 - 2023-02-中国全科医学
P. 31
·152· http: //www.chinagp.net E-mail: zgqkyx@chinagp.net.cn January 2023, Vol.26 No.2
[8]SHEA B J,REEVES B C,WELLS G,et al. AMSTAR 2:a critical disease[J]. Coron Artery Dis,2019,30(6):393-397.
appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non- DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000740.
randomised studies of healthcare interventions,or both[J]. BMJ, [18]WANG L J,HAN S,ZHANG X H,et al. Fractional flow
2017,358:j4008. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j4008. reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only
[9]BALSHEM H,HELFAND M,SCHÜNEMANN H J,et al. revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial
GRADE guidelines:3. Rating the quality of evidence[J]. J infarction and multi-vessel disease patients:a meta-analysis and
Clin Epidemiol,2011,64(4):401-406. DOI:10.1016/j. systematic review[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2019,19(1):
jclinepi.2010.07.015. 49. DOI:10.1186/s12872-019-1022-6.
[10]SPENCER F A,SEKERCIOGLU N,PRASAD M,et al. Culprit [19]PANDIT A,ARYAL M R,ARYAL PANDIT A,et al. Preventive
vessel versus immediate complete revascularization in patients PCI versus culprit lesion stenting during primary PCI in acute
with ST-segment myocardial infarction-a systematic review[J]. STEMI:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Open Heart,
Am Heart J,2015,170(6):1133-1139. DOI:10.1016/j. 2014,1(1):e000012. DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2013-000012.
ahj.2015.09.002. [20]CHATTERJEE S,KUNDU A,MUKHERJEE D,et al. Risk of
[11]PASCERI V,PATTI G,PELLICCIA F,et al. Complete contrast-induced acute kidney injury in ST-elevation myocardial
revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention infarction patients undergoing multi-vessel intervention-meta-
reduces death and myocardial infarction in patients with multivessel analysis of randomized trials and risk prediction modeling study
disease:meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized using observational data[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2017,
trials[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2018,11(9):833-843. 90(2):205-212. DOI:10.1002/ccd.26928.
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.028. [21]BANGALORE S,TOKLU B,WETTERSLEV J. Complete versus
[12]ELGENDY I Y,WEN X R,MAHMOUD A,et al. Complete versus culprit-only revascularization for ST-segment-elevation myocardial
culprit-only revascularization for patients with multi-vessel disease infarction and multivessel disease:a meta-analysis and trial
undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention:an updated sequential analysis of randomized trials[J]. Circ Cardiovasc
meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2015,8(4):e002142. DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVE
Interv,2016,88(4):501-505. DOI:10.1002/ccd.26322. NTIONS.114.002142.
[13]MUKETE B N,RIEHL R A,ALONSO A,et al. Multivessel [22]BRAVO C A,HIRJI S A,BHATT D L,et al. Complete versus
revascularization does not increase contrast-induced acute culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction
kidney injury incidence in acute myocardial infarction:a meta- with multi-vessel disease[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,
analysis[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs,2016,16(6):419- 2017,5(5):CD011986. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011986.
426. DOI:10.1007/s40256-016-0184-1. pub2.
[14]WANG C H,ZHANG S Y,JIN X F. Complete revascularization [23]AHMAD Y,HOWARD J P,ARNOLD A,et al. Complete
versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-segment elevation revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention for patients
myocardial infarction and multivessel disease patients undergoing with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel
primary percutaneous coronary intervention:a meta-analysis and coronary artery disease:an updated meta-analysis of randomized
trial sequential analysis[J]. Int J Cardiol,2017,228:844- trials[J]. J Am Heart Assoc,2020,9(12):e015263. DOI:
852. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.186. 10.1161/JAHA.119.015263.
[15]BAINEY K R,WELSH R C,TOKLU B,et al. Complete vs [24]EL-HAYEK G E,GERSHLICK A H,HONG M K,et al. Meta-
culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI with analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing multivessel versus
multivessel disease:a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of culprit-only revascularization for patients with ST-segment elevation
randomized trials[J]. Can J Cardiol,2016,32(12):1542- myocardial infarction and multivessel disease undergoing primary
1551. DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.077. percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol,2015,
[16]AL-ABDOUH A,BARBARAWI M,BIZANTI A,et al. Complete 115(11):1481-1486. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.046.
revascularization in patients with STEMI and multi-vessel disease: [25]FORTUNI F,CRIMI G,ANGELINI F,et al. Early complete
a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Cardiovasc revascularization in hemodynamically stable patients with
Revasc Med,2020,21(5):684-691. DOI:10.1016/j. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel
carrev.2020.01.020. disease[J]. Can J Cardiol,2019,35(8):1047-1057. DOI:
[17]NEUPANE S,SINGH H,EDLA S,et al. Meta-analysis of 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.03.006.
fractional flow reserve guided complete revascularization versus [26]GUPTA A,BAJAJ N S,ARORA P,et al. FFR-guided multivessel
infarct related artery only revascularization in patients with ST- stenting reduces urgent revascularization compared with infarct-
elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery related artery only stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: