
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (04): 483-489.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0270
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-07-09
Revised:2025-10-27
Published:2026-02-05
Online:2026-01-15
Contact:
LI Hui
通讯作者:
李慧
作者简介:付积艺、郑博月、吴佳霏、王珺负责数据收集;付积艺、郑博月负责数据分析;付积艺负责论文初稿撰写;郑博月、吴佳霏、王珺负责患者随访;李慧主导研究课题设计,审阅并修订文章,对研究完整性承担最终责任。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0270
| 项目 | 数值 |
|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 39.5(26.0,54.2) |
| 性别(男/女) | 10/2 |
| WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 2.94(2.53,7.55) |
| ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 1.30(0.45,4.21) |
| HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | 103.50(80.50,140.25) |
| PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 95.00(45.25,191.00) |
| 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 2.45(0,44.55) |
| 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 64.50(26.00,81.50) |
| 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 50.45(28.10,80.46) |
| 髓外浸润[例(%)] | 12(100.0) |
| 既往化疗[例(%)] | 2(16.7) |
Table 1 Clinical baseline characteristics of 12 T-ALL patients
| 项目 | 数值 |
|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 39.5(26.0,54.2) |
| 性别(男/女) | 10/2 |
| WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 2.94(2.53,7.55) |
| ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 1.30(0.45,4.21) |
| HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | 103.50(80.50,140.25) |
| PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 95.00(45.25,191.00) |
| 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 2.45(0,44.55) |
| 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 64.50(26.00,81.50) |
| 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 50.45(28.10,80.46) |
| 髓外浸润[例(%)] | 12(100.0) |
| 既往化疗[例(%)] | 2(16.7) |
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别(男/女) | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 38.5(24.2,61.2) | 4/2 | 2.74(1.99,2.85) | 0.95(0.13,1.33) | 82.00(72.50,116.25) | 102.00(37.75,230.00) | 7.05(1.43,33.65) | 63.75(28.00,80.75) | 57.12(31.86,77.90) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 39.5(27.2,52.7) | 6/0 | 7.09(2.98,138.29) | 4.06(0.87,8.86) | 124.00(83.50,161.00) | 91.50(46.50,169.00) | 0.00(0.00,86.73) | 64.50(14.00,84.00) | 50.45(14.05,91.37) |
| 检验统计量值 | 18.000 | — | 5.000 | 7.000 | 10.000 | 17.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.455 | 0.057 | 0.078 | 0.199 | 0.873 | 0.507 | 0.855 | 0.855 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline data between ETP and non-ETP patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别(男/女) | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | ANC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 外周血原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | 骨髓原始幼稚细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] | 流式中异常表型细胞比[M(P25,P75),%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 38.5(24.2,61.2) | 4/2 | 2.74(1.99,2.85) | 0.95(0.13,1.33) | 82.00(72.50,116.25) | 102.00(37.75,230.00) | 7.05(1.43,33.65) | 63.75(28.00,80.75) | 57.12(31.86,77.90) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 39.5(27.2,52.7) | 6/0 | 7.09(2.98,138.29) | 4.06(0.87,8.86) | 124.00(83.50,161.00) | 91.50(46.50,169.00) | 0.00(0.00,86.73) | 64.50(14.00,84.00) | 50.45(14.05,91.37) |
| 检验统计量值 | 18.000 | — | 5.000 | 7.000 | 10.000 | 17.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | 14.000 | |
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.455 | 0.057 | 0.078 | 0.199 | 0.873 | 0.507 | 0.855 | 0.855 |
| 患者编号 | 融合基因 | 预后基因 | 染色体 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALM-AF10 | NRAS/NOTCH1/WT1/KIT/MYB/TET1/DNM2 | 46,XY,del(5)(q31),t(10;11)(p13;q23)[11]/46,XY[9] |
| 2 | 阴性 | BCOR/IDH2/NOTCH1/NRAS/DNMT3A/FAT1/ERCC5/BCOR | 46,XY[20] |
| 3 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 4 | 阴性 | IDH2/DNMT3A/FOXO3/HDAC9/KMT2D | 46,XX[20] |
| 5 | 未查 | NCOR2/PIK3CD/RETSAT | 46,XY[20] |
| 6 | 未查 | JAK3/GATA3/MGA/NOTCH2/PCLO/SH2B3 | 46,XY[20] |
| 7 | 未查 | SUZ12/ETV6/FAT1/MYB/NCOR2/NPM1 | 46,XX[20] |
| 8 | 阴性 | CNOT3/CSMD1/ARID1B/ATM/NCOR2/TET3/TP63 | 未查 |
| 9 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 10 | PHF6 | PHF6/FAT3/HOXA10/SETD2/TP53/USH2A/BRCA2/EED/FANCN/JARID2/NCOR1/SF3B1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 11 | 阴性 | HDAC9/KMT2B/NCOR2/VAV1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 12 | 阴性 | IL7R/DNM2/NOTCH1/USH2A | 46,XY,inv(9)(p12q13)[20] |
Table 3 Genetic and molecular biological characteristics of 12 T-ALL patients
| 患者编号 | 融合基因 | 预后基因 | 染色体 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALM-AF10 | NRAS/NOTCH1/WT1/KIT/MYB/TET1/DNM2 | 46,XY,del(5)(q31),t(10;11)(p13;q23)[11]/46,XY[9] |
| 2 | 阴性 | BCOR/IDH2/NOTCH1/NRAS/DNMT3A/FAT1/ERCC5/BCOR | 46,XY[20] |
| 3 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 4 | 阴性 | IDH2/DNMT3A/FOXO3/HDAC9/KMT2D | 46,XX[20] |
| 5 | 未查 | NCOR2/PIK3CD/RETSAT | 46,XY[20] |
| 6 | 未查 | JAK3/GATA3/MGA/NOTCH2/PCLO/SH2B3 | 46,XY[20] |
| 7 | 未查 | SUZ12/ETV6/FAT1/MYB/NCOR2/NPM1 | 46,XX[20] |
| 8 | 阴性 | CNOT3/CSMD1/ARID1B/ATM/NCOR2/TET3/TP63 | 未查 |
| 9 | 阴性 | 未查 | 46,XY[20] |
| 10 | PHF6 | PHF6/FAT3/HOXA10/SETD2/TP53/USH2A/BRCA2/EED/FANCN/JARID2/NCOR1/SF3B1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 11 | 阴性 | HDAC9/KMT2B/NCOR2/VAV1 | 46,XY[20] |
| 12 | 阴性 | IL7R/DNM2/NOTCH1/USH2A | 46,XY,inv(9)(p12q13)[20] |
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 66.7 | 3(50.0) | 1(16.7) | 1(16.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) |
Table 4 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the ETP and non-ETP groups after a course of treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 66.7 | 3(50.0) | 1(16.7) | 1(16.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) |
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 83.3 | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) | 4(66.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 4(66.7) | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) |
Table 5 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the ETP and non-ETP groups after two courses of treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | O R R(%) | CR[例(%)] | CRi[例(%)] | MRD阴性[例(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETP组 | 6 | 83.3 | 4(66.7) | 1(16.7) | 4(66.7) |
| non-ETP组 | 6 | 100.0 | 4(66.7) | 2(33.3) | 4(66.7) |
| 变量 | β | SE | HR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 1.253 | 1.414 | 3.500(0.219~5.956) | 0.376 |
| 年龄 | 2.449 | 1.438 | 11.578(0.691~14.097) | 0.089 |
| T-ALL类型 | 4.656 | 4.908 | 10.192(0.007~15.097) | 0.343 |
| 染色体核型 | -3.452 | 6.564 | 0.032(0.000~1.896) | 0.599 |
| 突变基因数量 | -0.864 | 1.290 | 0.422(0.034~5.282) | 0.503 |
| 1个疗程后疗效 | -0.322 | 1.231 | 0.725(0.065~8.092) | 0.794 |
| 1个疗程后MRD阴性 | -3.392 | 7.280 | 0.034(0.000~5.170) | 0.641 |
| 2个疗程后疗效 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 2个疗程后MRD阴性 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 移植 | -5.133 | 5.377 | 0.006(0.000~2.944) | 0.340 |
Table 6 Single factor Cox regression analysis of influencing factors of patients' OS
| 变量 | β | SE | HR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 1.253 | 1.414 | 3.500(0.219~5.956) | 0.376 |
| 年龄 | 2.449 | 1.438 | 11.578(0.691~14.097) | 0.089 |
| T-ALL类型 | 4.656 | 4.908 | 10.192(0.007~15.097) | 0.343 |
| 染色体核型 | -3.452 | 6.564 | 0.032(0.000~1.896) | 0.599 |
| 突变基因数量 | -0.864 | 1.290 | 0.422(0.034~5.282) | 0.503 |
| 1个疗程后疗效 | -0.322 | 1.231 | 0.725(0.065~8.092) | 0.794 |
| 1个疗程后MRD阴性 | -3.392 | 7.280 | 0.034(0.000~5.170) | 0.641 |
| 2个疗程后疗效 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 2个疗程后MRD阴性 | -5.133 | 6.586 | 0.006(0.000~2.905) | 0.436 |
| 移植 | -5.133 | 5.377 | 0.006(0.000~2.944) | 0.340 |
| [1] |
中国抗癌协会血液肿瘤专业委员会, 中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组. 中国成人急性淋巴细胞白血病诊断与治疗指南(2024年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2024, 45(5):417-429.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [1] | WANG Lina, LEI Jingshu, LI Kuibao, WANG Ruiying, LI Xinmiao, WANG Fangfang, GUO Xiaorong, NIU Ruihao, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Fangfang, ZHAO Jingjing, LEE CHONGYOU. Review on Inflammatory Response in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 790-801. |
| [2] | LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, LIU Zihan, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Primary Sjögren's Disease with Dryness and Blood-stasis Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 718-725. |
| [3] | WANG Xue, YANG Chengming, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Analysis on Prognosis and Influencing Factors in Patients with Post-tuberculosis Bronchiectasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 606-611. |
| [4] | ZHOU Qianmei, MIAO Kali, ZHONG Yongming, ZHANG Fuman, ZHANG Zhe, LI Chengyi. Gas6 Expression in Breast Cancer and Correlation with Clinical Pathological Features and Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4449-4456. |
| [5] | NONG Jingtang, YANG Chengmin, MO Shenglong, LU Zhicheng, TANG Lina, JIAN Chongdong, SHANG Jingwei. Research Progress on Prognostic Biomarkers after Cerebral Infarction: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3711-3720. |
| [6] | LI Yibing, JIA Hongbo, FAN Xiaonong, ZHAO Wenjun, LIU Wei, GE Wenyi, LI Songjiao, LEI Kangchen, ZHANG Menglong, ZHANG Weiwei, CHEN Yang, LI Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Prognostic Factors Affecting Dysphagia after Stroke: an Umbrella Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3631-3637. |
| [7] | XU Yanpeng, HUANG Pe, ZHANG Pingping, LUO Yan, SHI Xiaoqi, WU Liusong, CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu. Expression of β-Adrenergic Receptors in Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3391-3398. |
| [8] | YANG Chen, CHEN Tong, ZHANG Lifang, ZHANG Hongxu, LI Pengfei, ZHANG Xuejuan. Prognostic Impact of Dapagliflozin in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3053-3058. |
| [9] | CHEN Fei, WANG Jinying, YU Haibo, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, ZHANG Tianyu, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Urinary NGAL, TIM-1, VCAM-1 and Activin A in Patients with New Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2740-2749. |
| [10] | CAO Gan, DENG Yifan, HE Shenghu, ZHANG Jing. Study on the Correlation between the Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-albumin Ratio and Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Emergency PCI [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1878-1883. |
| [11] | ZHANG Shujing, SUN Lixin, CAO Yuqing. Comparative Study on the Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic between HPV-related and Non-HPV-related Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1758-1764. |
| [12] | WANG Dexiang, YUAN Jiawen, LU Qinyun, HANG Yuhao, LU Jun, CHENG Lu. Influences of Treatment Timing of the TCM prescription Qingfei Huayu Tongfu Formula on the Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis of Sepsis-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1500-1505. |
| [13] | LI Qiujing, SHANG Na, GAO Qian, YANG Li, GUO Shubin. Predictive Value of Abdominal CT Based-skeletal Muscle Mass Combined with Critical Illness Score for Prognosis in Older Patients with Intra-abdominal Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1459-1464. |
| [14] | ZHANG Pei, YANG Meng, GAO Chunlin, XIA Zhengkun. Study on the Intervention and Prognosis of Modified Lifting Powder on Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Disease in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1376-1382. |
| [15] | WANG Yiquan, CHEN Wanjia, LIU Wangyi, ZHANG Luyun, DENG Yueyi. The Prognosis of Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Diseasetreated with Fermented Cordyceps Sinensis Powder: Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(09): 1084-1091. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||