
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (32): 4768-4776.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0209
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-06-02
Revised:2025-08-20
Published:2026-11-15
Online:2026-10-10
Contact:
HUANG Minghan
About author:LIN Cuili and HE Youcheng are co-first authors
通讯作者:
黄铭涵
作者简介:林翠丽和何友成为共同第一作者
作者贡献:
林翠丽负责实验方案的设计与优化,主导细胞与分子实验的实施,撰写论文;何友成共同负责实验设计与优化,共同撰写论文;王鑫负责中药制剂的制备,协助实验数据整理;林诗锦、郑泽宇负责数据分析;罗邦水、倪艺婧负责论文的修订;黄铭涵负责文章的质量控制与审查,统筹论文的最终定稿。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0209
| 引物名称 | 引物序列(5'-3') | 产物长度(bp) |
|---|---|---|
| TLR4 | 138 | |
| Forward | ACCTGTCCCTGAACCCTATGAA | |
| Reverse | CTTCTAAACCAGCCAGACCTTG | |
| NF-κB | 180 | |
| Forward | AGTGTGGAGGCTGCCTTGCGAATG | |
| Reverse | TGGGCTTTCAAGACTGGAACGGTC | |
| Shh | 211 | |
| Forward | ACCGAGGGCTGGGACGAAGA | |
| Reverse | ATTTGGCCGCCACCGAGTT | |
| NLRP3 | 93 | |
| Forward | GTGGTGACCCTCTGTGAGGT | |
| Reverse | TCTTCCTGGAGCGCTTCTAA | |
| Caspase-1 | 120 | |
| Forward | ACGCCTTGCCCTCATAAT | |
| Reverse | TCTAATACATCTGGGACTTCTT | |
| GAPDH | 240 | |
| Forward | GTTGGAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGA | |
| Reverse | GAGGGATCTCGCTCCTGGAGGA |
Table 1 Primer sequences
| 引物名称 | 引物序列(5'-3') | 产物长度(bp) |
|---|---|---|
| TLR4 | 138 | |
| Forward | ACCTGTCCCTGAACCCTATGAA | |
| Reverse | CTTCTAAACCAGCCAGACCTTG | |
| NF-κB | 180 | |
| Forward | AGTGTGGAGGCTGCCTTGCGAATG | |
| Reverse | TGGGCTTTCAAGACTGGAACGGTC | |
| Shh | 211 | |
| Forward | ACCGAGGGCTGGGACGAAGA | |
| Reverse | ATTTGGCCGCCACCGAGTT | |
| NLRP3 | 93 | |
| Forward | GTGGTGACCCTCTGTGAGGT | |
| Reverse | TCTTCCTGGAGCGCTTCTAA | |
| Caspase-1 | 120 | |
| Forward | ACGCCTTGCCCTCATAAT | |
| Reverse | TCTAATACATCTGGGACTTCTT | |
| GAPDH | 240 | |
| Forward | GTTGGAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGA | |
| Reverse | GAGGGATCTCGCTCCTGGAGGA |
| 乙醇浓度 | 原始吸光度值(OD值) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | |
| 0 | 0.977±0.034 | 0.937±0.036 | 0.957±0.032 | 0.972±0.013 | 0.968±0.013 |
| 200 mmol/L | 0.935±0.029 | 0.795±0.033 | 0.667±0.038a | 0.663±0.049a | 0.532±0.057a |
| 400 mmol/L | 0.889±0.013 | 0.733±0.046 | 0.591±0.039a | 0.561±0.052a | 0.452±0.060a |
| 600 mmol/L | 0.906±0.010 | 0.555±0.042a | 0.499±0.013a | 0.418±0.014a | 0.375±0.044a |
| 800 mmol/L | 0.858±0.037 | 0.509±0.014a | 0.347±0.047a | 0.247±0.047a | 0.171±0.061a |
| 1 000 mmol/L | 0.841±0.034 | 0.493±0.007a | 0.273±0.018a | 0.175±0.039a | 0.096±0.005a |
| F值 | 9.46 | 89.08 | 162.10 | 167.60 | 136.40 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Screening of the cytotoxic effects of different ethanol concentrations on GES-1 cells
| 乙醇浓度 | 原始吸光度值(OD值) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | |
| 0 | 0.977±0.034 | 0.937±0.036 | 0.957±0.032 | 0.972±0.013 | 0.968±0.013 |
| 200 mmol/L | 0.935±0.029 | 0.795±0.033 | 0.667±0.038a | 0.663±0.049a | 0.532±0.057a |
| 400 mmol/L | 0.889±0.013 | 0.733±0.046 | 0.591±0.039a | 0.561±0.052a | 0.452±0.060a |
| 600 mmol/L | 0.906±0.010 | 0.555±0.042a | 0.499±0.013a | 0.418±0.014a | 0.375±0.044a |
| 800 mmol/L | 0.858±0.037 | 0.509±0.014a | 0.347±0.047a | 0.247±0.047a | 0.171±0.061a |
| 1 000 mmol/L | 0.841±0.034 | 0.493±0.007a | 0.273±0.018a | 0.175±0.039a | 0.096±0.005a |
| F值 | 9.46 | 89.08 | 162.10 | 167.60 | 136.40 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| CGM含药血清体积分数 | 细胞活力 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| 0 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 |
| 1% | 95.410±1.121 | 102.810±1.546 | 99.000±2.646 | 98.463±1.253 |
| 5% | 102.217±1.644 | 106.913±1.601 | 112.693±1.943a | 101.593±1.640 |
| 10% | 109.473±2.126a | 114.220±1.194a | 126.733±1.226a | 102.793±1.414 |
| 15% | 106.797±1.569 | 109.133±2.316 | 124.283±1.096a | 103.557±2.338 |
| 20% | 106.557±1.017 | 108.630±3.024 | 119.547±2.050a | 101.777±1.638 |
| F值 | 40.65 | 21.70 | 146.80 | 4.34 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.017 |
Table 3 Screening of optimal concentration and duration of action of CGM drug-containing serum
| CGM含药血清体积分数 | 细胞活力 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| 0 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 | 100.000 |
| 1% | 95.410±1.121 | 102.810±1.546 | 99.000±2.646 | 98.463±1.253 |
| 5% | 102.217±1.644 | 106.913±1.601 | 112.693±1.943a | 101.593±1.640 |
| 10% | 109.473±2.126a | 114.220±1.194a | 126.733±1.226a | 102.793±1.414 |
| 15% | 106.797±1.569 | 109.133±2.316 | 124.283±1.096a | 103.557±2.338 |
| 20% | 106.557±1.017 | 108.630±3.024 | 119.547±2.050a | 101.777±1.638 |
| F值 | 40.65 | 21.70 | 146.80 | 4.34 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.017 |
| 组别 | 细胞活力 |
|---|---|
| 空白组 | 100.000 |
| 空白血清组 | 99.123±0.198 |
| CGM含药血清组 | 115.367±0.153a |
| F值 | 73.50 |
| P值 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Effect of CGM drug-containing serum and blank serum on cell viability
| 组别 | 细胞活力 |
|---|---|
| 空白组 | 100.000 |
| 空白血清组 | 99.123±0.198 |
| CGM含药血清组 | 115.367±0.153a |
| F值 | 73.50 |
| P值 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | TLR4 | NF-κB | Shh | NLRP3 | Caspase-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 模型组 | 1.810±0.036a | 1.783±0.035a | 0.400±0.020a | 1.550±0.030a | 1.500±0.020a |
| CGM组 | 1.200±0.020b | 1.300±0.020b | 0.700±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 1.100±0.020b | 1.200±0.020b | 0.700±0.020b | 1.150±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 0.950±0.020c | 0.900±0.020c | 0.850±0.020c | 0.850±0.020c | 0.750±0.020c |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 1.900±0.020b | 1.850±0.030b | 0.300±0.020b | 1.650±0.030b | 1.600±0.020b |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 1.400±0.020c | 1.500±0.020c | 0.550±0.020c | 1.300±0.020 | 1.450±0.020 |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 1.300±0.020b | 1.400±0.020b | 0.250±0.020b | 1.150±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.150±0.020 | 1.250±0.020 | 0.320±0.020c | 1.100±0.020 | 1.200±0.020 |
| Shh激动剂组 | 1.200±0.020b | 1.300±0.020b | 1.100±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 1.100±0.020c | 1.200±0.020c | 1.050±0.020c | 1.150±0.020 | 1.250±0.020c |
| F值 | 647.80 | 523.00 | 819.60 | 582.00 | 340.80 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of TLR4, NF-κB, Shh, NLRP3, Caspase-1 mRNA levels in cells of each group
| 组别 | TLR4 | NF-κB | Shh | NLRP3 | Caspase-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 模型组 | 1.810±0.036a | 1.783±0.035a | 0.400±0.020a | 1.550±0.030a | 1.500±0.020a |
| CGM组 | 1.200±0.020b | 1.300±0.020b | 0.700±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 1.100±0.020b | 1.200±0.020b | 0.700±0.020b | 1.150±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 0.950±0.020c | 0.900±0.020c | 0.850±0.020c | 0.850±0.020c | 0.750±0.020c |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 1.900±0.020b | 1.850±0.030b | 0.300±0.020b | 1.650±0.030b | 1.600±0.020b |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 1.400±0.020c | 1.500±0.020c | 0.550±0.020c | 1.300±0.020 | 1.450±0.020 |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 1.300±0.020b | 1.400±0.020b | 0.250±0.020b | 1.150±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.150±0.020 | 1.250±0.020 | 0.320±0.020c | 1.100±0.020 | 1.200±0.020 |
| Shh激动剂组 | 1.200±0.020b | 1.300±0.020b | 1.100±0.020b | 1.250±0.020b | 1.350±0.020b |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 1.100±0.020c | 1.200±0.020c | 1.050±0.020c | 1.150±0.020 | 1.250±0.020c |
| F值 | 647.80 | 523.00 | 819.60 | 582.00 | 340.80 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | TLR4 | NF-κB | Shh | NLRP3 | Caspase-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 1.080±0.230 | 0.983±0.015 | 0.993±0.012 | 1.030±0.061 | 0.997±0.006 |
| 模型组 | 1.730±0.208a | 1.797±0.176a | 0.333±0.153a | 1.800±0.100a | 1.863±0.148a |
| CGM组 | 1.500±0.100 | 1.28±0.166b | 0.560±0.122 | 1.333±0.153b | 1.267±0.208b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 0.900±0.200b | 0.693±0.253b | 0.800±0.100b | 0.467±0.115b | 0.567±0.208b |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.300±0.200 | 0.467±0.153c | 1.067±0.058c | 0.500±0.100 | 1.103±0.205c |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 2.333±0.152b | 1.733±0.153 | 0.533±0.153 | 2.067±0.153 | 2.300±0.100 |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 1.500±0.200 | 0.967±0.153 | 0.767±0.153 | 1.533±0.058 | 1.533±0.252 |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 2.333±0.208b | 2.467±0.153b | 0.500±0.100 | 1.867±0.153 | 2.133±0.208 |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.500±0.200 | 1.300±0.200 | 0.767±0.153 | 1.467±0.153 | 1.633±0.208 |
| Shh激动剂组 | 1.233±0.251 | 0.900±0.100b | 1.133±0.208b | 1.033±0.115b | 1.400±0.200b |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 0.800±0.100c | 0.567±0.058c | 1.533±0.058c | 0.433±0.153 | 1.187±0.121c |
| F值 | 20.89 | 44.63 | 22.08 | 27.28 | 66.20 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of TLR4, NF-κB, Shh, NLRP3, Caspase-1 protein expression in cells of each group
| 组别 | TLR4 | NF-κB | Shh | NLRP3 | Caspase-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 1.080±0.230 | 0.983±0.015 | 0.993±0.012 | 1.030±0.061 | 0.997±0.006 |
| 模型组 | 1.730±0.208a | 1.797±0.176a | 0.333±0.153a | 1.800±0.100a | 1.863±0.148a |
| CGM组 | 1.500±0.100 | 1.28±0.166b | 0.560±0.122 | 1.333±0.153b | 1.267±0.208b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 0.900±0.200b | 0.693±0.253b | 0.800±0.100b | 0.467±0.115b | 0.567±0.208b |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.300±0.200 | 0.467±0.153c | 1.067±0.058c | 0.500±0.100 | 1.103±0.205c |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 2.333±0.152b | 1.733±0.153 | 0.533±0.153 | 2.067±0.153 | 2.300±0.100 |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 1.500±0.200 | 0.967±0.153 | 0.767±0.153 | 1.533±0.058 | 1.533±0.252 |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 2.333±0.208b | 2.467±0.153b | 0.500±0.100 | 1.867±0.153 | 2.133±0.208 |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 1.500±0.200 | 1.300±0.200 | 0.767±0.153 | 1.467±0.153 | 1.633±0.208 |
| Shh激动剂组 | 1.233±0.251 | 0.900±0.100b | 1.133±0.208b | 1.033±0.115b | 1.400±0.200b |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 0.800±0.100c | 0.567±0.058c | 1.533±0.058c | 0.433±0.153 | 1.187±0.121c |
| F值 | 20.89 | 44.63 | 22.08 | 27.28 | 66.20 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | IL-18 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 180.000±30.000 | 51.667±7.638 | 53.333±7.638 |
| 模型组 | 718.333±98.784a | 112.667±16.166a | 84.333±10.066a |
| CGM组 | 109.000±11.000b | 31.667±7.638b | 32.000±2.646b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 431.000±32.047b | 79.333±10.504 | 86.000±8.888 |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 263.333±61.101 | 113.333±15.275 | 67.333±11.930 |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 948.333±54.151b | 126.667±20.817 | 102.667±6.429 |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 390.333±36.474c | 103.333±15.275c | 79.000±10.536c |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 1 008.333±85.781b | 126.667±20.817 | 107.333±3.786 |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 668.000±77.485c | 72.667±5.508c | 64.667±7.371c |
| Shh激动剂组 | 403.667±77.087b | 101.000±11.533 | 85.667±9.074 |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 266.333±60.335 | 88.333±16.073 | 54.000±6.245 |
| F值 | 71.49 | 13.69 | 22.89 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 7 Comparison of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18 levels in cells supernatants of each group
| 组别 | IL-1β | IL-6 | IL-18 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 空白组 | 180.000±30.000 | 51.667±7.638 | 53.333±7.638 |
| 模型组 | 718.333±98.784a | 112.667±16.166a | 84.333±10.066a |
| CGM组 | 109.000±11.000b | 31.667±7.638b | 32.000±2.646b |
| TLR4抑制剂组 | 431.000±32.047b | 79.333±10.504 | 86.000±8.888 |
| TLR4抑制剂+CGM组 | 263.333±61.101 | 113.333±15.275 | 67.333±11.930 |
| TLR4激动剂组 | 948.333±54.151b | 126.667±20.817 | 102.667±6.429 |
| TLR4激动剂+CGM组 | 390.333±36.474c | 103.333±15.275c | 79.000±10.536c |
| Shh抑制剂组 | 1 008.333±85.781b | 126.667±20.817 | 107.333±3.786 |
| Shh抑制剂+CGM组 | 668.000±77.485c | 72.667±5.508c | 64.667±7.371c |
| Shh激动剂组 | 403.667±77.087b | 101.000±11.533 | 85.667±9.074 |
| Shh激动剂+CGM组 | 266.333±60.335 | 88.333±16.073 | 54.000±6.245 |
| F值 | 71.49 | 13.69 | 22.89 |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
国家消化系疾病临床医学研究中心(上海),国家消化道早癌防治中心联盟,中华医学会消化病学分会幽门螺杆菌学组, 等. 中国胃黏膜癌前状态和癌前病变的处理策略专家共识(2020年)[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2020, 40(11): 731-741.
|
| [3] |
胡嘉敏,孙宇杰,黄德斌. 半夏泻心汤激活Hippo/YAP信号通路减轻慢性萎缩性胃炎[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2025, 41(8): 1578-1583.
|
| [4] |
袁艳,杨烨,晏娇艳, 等. 基于网络药理学、微阵列数据分析和分子对接探索头花蓼治疗幽门螺杆菌相关性胃炎的分子机制[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2023, 39(5): 961-969.
|
| [5] |
黄铭涵,黄健,李思汉, 等. 复方胃炎合剂逆转胃癌前病变的临床研究[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志, 2016, 23(4): 20-23.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
黄铭涵,李思汉,田琳, 等. 基于Sonic Hedgehog通路探讨复方胃炎合剂干预慢性萎缩性胃炎癌前病变的机制[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2021, 41(2): 230-235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2021.02.013.
|
| [14] |
李思汉,林秀明,田琳, 等. 健脾清化舒络中药对慢性萎缩性胃炎大鼠Sonic Hedgehog信号通路的影响[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2021, 44(2): 143-151.
|
| [15] |
何瑞坤,黄焕迪,戴庆玲, 等. 高良姜、红豆蔻及大高良姜的挥发油对乙醇致GES-1细胞损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2022, 40(6): 81-85, 277.
|
| [16] |
包雨晴. 基于大黄黄连泻心汤逆转GES-1细胞损伤探讨其煎服方法[D]. 南京: 南京中医药大学, 2018.
|
| [17] |
钱荣,安佳鑫,续晓琪, 等. 黑果枸杞多糖结构表征及对乙醇诱导胃黏膜上皮细胞损伤的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2024, 45(9): 109-115.
|
| [18] |
刘晓萌,杨倩,郎晓猛, 等. 基于网络药理学及实验验证探讨加味当归芍药散治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎的机制[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2023, 39(3): 560-568.
|
| [19] |
杨春波,周维湛,张恩平, 等. 中医辨证分型治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎疗效总结[J]. 中医杂志, 1988, 29(10): 34-37.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
黄铭涵,黄健,陈琴, 等. 健脾清化中药复方对大鼠慢性萎缩性胃炎TLR4-MyD88依赖途径蛋白表达及TNF-α的影响[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2016, 32(9): 1321-1325. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1978.2016.09.026.
|
| [23] |
李思汉,黄铭涵,黄健, 等. 健脾清化中药复方对慢性萎缩性胃炎大鼠TLR4/NF-κB/COX-2信号通路的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2016, 24(7): 504-508.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||