Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (32): 4055-4061.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0704
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2025-02-10
Revised:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-11-15
Online:
2025-09-23
Contact:
LI Xiaohong, GUO Ying
通讯作者:
励晓红, 郭莺
作者简介:
作者贡献:
张磊负责资料收集、整理、分析和论文撰写;张环宇负责论文的修订;陈凯悦负责资料整理和绘制图表;励晓红、郭莺负责提出研究目标、文章的构思和设计,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0704
类别 | 例数 | 性别 | 年龄 | FPG | HbA1c | 2 hPG | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
女 | 男 | 35~44岁 | 45~54岁 | 55~64岁 | 65~74岁 | 正常 | 异常 | 正常 | 异常 | 正常 | 异常 | ||
正常血糖 | 312 | 246(78.9) | 66(21.1) | 111(35.6) | 106(34.0) | 60(19.2) | 35(11.2) | 312(100.0) | 0 | 168(53.8) | 144(46.2) | 312(100.0) | 0 |
糖尿病前期 | 141 | 95(67.4) | 46(32.6) | 21(14.9) | 45(31.9) | 30(21.3) | 45(31.9) | 129(91.5) | 12(8.5) | 39(27.7) | 102(72.3) | 2(1.4) | 139(98.6) |
2型糖尿病 | 74 | 44(59.5) | 30(40.5) | 8(10.8) | 15(20.3) | 28(37.8) | 23(31.1) | 24(32.4) | 50(67.6) | 2(2.7) | 72(97.3) | 1(1.4) | 73(98.6) |
χ2值 | 14.57 | 63.76 | 265.02 | 76.96 | 514.70 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Glucose metabolism screening results of 527 participants
类别 | 例数 | 性别 | 年龄 | FPG | HbA1c | 2 hPG | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
女 | 男 | 35~44岁 | 45~54岁 | 55~64岁 | 65~74岁 | 正常 | 异常 | 正常 | 异常 | 正常 | 异常 | ||
正常血糖 | 312 | 246(78.9) | 66(21.1) | 111(35.6) | 106(34.0) | 60(19.2) | 35(11.2) | 312(100.0) | 0 | 168(53.8) | 144(46.2) | 312(100.0) | 0 |
糖尿病前期 | 141 | 95(67.4) | 46(32.6) | 21(14.9) | 45(31.9) | 30(21.3) | 45(31.9) | 129(91.5) | 12(8.5) | 39(27.7) | 102(72.3) | 2(1.4) | 139(98.6) |
2型糖尿病 | 74 | 44(59.5) | 30(40.5) | 8(10.8) | 15(20.3) | 28(37.8) | 23(31.1) | 24(32.4) | 50(67.6) | 2(2.7) | 72(97.3) | 1(1.4) | 73(98.6) |
χ2值 | 14.57 | 63.76 | 265.02 | 76.96 | 514.70 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
FPG筛查界值(mmol/L) | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 阳性预测值(%) | 阴性预测值(%) | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 74.42 | 66.99 | 60.84 | 79.17 | 0.414 |
5.1 | 65.12 | 79.81 | 68.97 | 76.85 | 0.449 |
5.2 | 59.07 | 86.54 | 75.15 | 75.42 | 0.456 |
5.3 | 59.07 | 86.54 | 75.15 | 75.42 | 0.456 |
5.4 | 54.42 | 91.67 | 81.82 | 74.48 | 0.461 |
5.5 | 49.77 | 93.27 | 83.59 | 72.93 | 0.430 |
5.6 | 41.40 | 97.12 | 90.82 | 70.63 | 0.385 |
5.7 | 35.81 | 98.40 | 93.90 | 68.99 | 0.342 |
5.8 | 35.81 | 98.40 | 93.90 | 68.99 | 0.342 |
5.9 | 33.02 | 99.68 | 98.61 | 68.35 | 0.327 |
6.0 | 31.16 | 99.68 | 98.53 | 67.76 | 0.308 |
6.1 | 28.84 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 67.10 | 0.288 |
Table 2 Comparison of screening effects using fasting plasma glucose as a detection indicator
FPG筛查界值(mmol/L) | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 阳性预测值(%) | 阴性预测值(%) | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 74.42 | 66.99 | 60.84 | 79.17 | 0.414 |
5.1 | 65.12 | 79.81 | 68.97 | 76.85 | 0.449 |
5.2 | 59.07 | 86.54 | 75.15 | 75.42 | 0.456 |
5.3 | 59.07 | 86.54 | 75.15 | 75.42 | 0.456 |
5.4 | 54.42 | 91.67 | 81.82 | 74.48 | 0.461 |
5.5 | 49.77 | 93.27 | 83.59 | 72.93 | 0.430 |
5.6 | 41.40 | 97.12 | 90.82 | 70.63 | 0.385 |
5.7 | 35.81 | 98.40 | 93.90 | 68.99 | 0.342 |
5.8 | 35.81 | 98.40 | 93.90 | 68.99 | 0.342 |
5.9 | 33.02 | 99.68 | 98.61 | 68.35 | 0.327 |
6.0 | 31.16 | 99.68 | 98.53 | 67.76 | 0.308 |
6.1 | 28.84 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 67.10 | 0.288 |
HbA1c筛查界值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 阳性预测值(%) | 阴性预测值(%) | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 100.00 | 1.28 | 41.11 | 100.00 | 0.013 |
5.1 | 99.53 | 5.45 | 42.04 | 94.44 | 0.050 |
5.2 | 99.07 | 7.37 | 42.43 | 92.00 | 0.064 |
5.3 | 99.07 | 7.37 | 42.43 | 92.00 | 0.064 |
5.4 | 98.14 | 13.14 | 43.78 | 91.11 | 0.113 |
5.5 | 97.21 | 20.51 | 45.73 | 91.43 | 0.177 |
5.6 | 88.84 | 40.71 | 50.80 | 84.11 | 0.295 |
5.7 | 82.33 | 53.85 | 55.14 | 81.55 | 0.362 |
5.8 | 82.33 | 53.85 | 55.14 | 81.55 | 0.362 |
5.9 | 73.95 | 65.71 | 59.77 | 78.54 | 0.370 |
6.0 | 66.05 | 75.00 | 64.55 | 76.22 | 0.411 |
6.1 | 51.63 | 91.67 | 81.02 | 73.33 | 0.433 |
6.2 | 46.98 | 94.87 | 86.32 | 72.20 | 0.419 |
6.3 | 46.98 | 94.87 | 86.32 | 72.20 | 0.419 |
6.4 | 43.72 | 97.12 | 91.26 | 71.46 | 0.408 |
6.5 | 39.07 | 98.08 | 93.33 | 70.02 | 0.372 |
Table 3 Comparison of screening effects using fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin as detection indicators
HbA1c筛查界值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 阳性预测值(%) | 阴性预测值(%) | 约登指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 100.00 | 1.28 | 41.11 | 100.00 | 0.013 |
5.1 | 99.53 | 5.45 | 42.04 | 94.44 | 0.050 |
5.2 | 99.07 | 7.37 | 42.43 | 92.00 | 0.064 |
5.3 | 99.07 | 7.37 | 42.43 | 92.00 | 0.064 |
5.4 | 98.14 | 13.14 | 43.78 | 91.11 | 0.113 |
5.5 | 97.21 | 20.51 | 45.73 | 91.43 | 0.177 |
5.6 | 88.84 | 40.71 | 50.80 | 84.11 | 0.295 |
5.7 | 82.33 | 53.85 | 55.14 | 81.55 | 0.362 |
5.8 | 82.33 | 53.85 | 55.14 | 81.55 | 0.362 |
5.9 | 73.95 | 65.71 | 59.77 | 78.54 | 0.370 |
6.0 | 66.05 | 75.00 | 64.55 | 76.22 | 0.411 |
6.1 | 51.63 | 91.67 | 81.02 | 73.33 | 0.433 |
6.2 | 46.98 | 94.87 | 86.32 | 72.20 | 0.419 |
6.3 | 46.98 | 94.87 | 86.32 | 72.20 | 0.419 |
6.4 | 43.72 | 97.12 | 91.26 | 71.46 | 0.408 |
6.5 | 39.07 | 98.08 | 93.33 | 70.02 | 0.372 |
FPG筛查界值(mmo/L) | 正确发现糖代谢异常人数(例) | 需口服糖耐量试验人数(例) | 口服糖耐量试验阳性率(%) | 检测成本(元) | 时间机会成本(元) | 筛查成本(元) | 成本效果比(元/人) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 160 | 263 | 60.84 | 11 314 | 36 820 | 48 134 | 300.84 |
5.1 | 140 | 203 | 68.97 | 9 334 | 28 420 | 37 754 | 269.67 |
5.2 | 127 | 169 | 75.15 | 8 212 | 23 660 | 31 872 | 250.96 |
5.3 | 127 | 169 | 75.15 | 8 212 | 23 660 | 31 872 | 250.96 |
5.4 | 117 | 143 | 81.82 | 7 354 | 20 020 | 27 374 | 233.97 |
5.5 | 107 | 128 | 83.59 | 6 859 | 17 920 | 24 779 | 231.58 |
5.6 | 89 | 98 | 90.82 | 5 869 | 13 720 | 19 589 | 220.10 |
5.7 | 77 | 82 | 93.90 | 5 341 | 11 480 | 16 821 | 218.45 |
5.8 | 77 | 82 | 93.90 | 5 341 | 11 480 | 16 821 | 218.45 |
5.9 | 71 | 72 | 98.61 | 5 011 | 10 080 | 15 091 | 212.55 |
6.0 | 67 | 68 | 98.53 | 4 879 | 9 520 | 14 399 | 214.91 |
6.1 | 62 | 62 | 100.00 | 4 681 | 8 680 | 13 361 | 215.50 |
Table 4 Cost effectiveness comparison of fasting plasma glucose as a detection indicator
FPG筛查界值(mmo/L) | 正确发现糖代谢异常人数(例) | 需口服糖耐量试验人数(例) | 口服糖耐量试验阳性率(%) | 检测成本(元) | 时间机会成本(元) | 筛查成本(元) | 成本效果比(元/人) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 160 | 263 | 60.84 | 11 314 | 36 820 | 48 134 | 300.84 |
5.1 | 140 | 203 | 68.97 | 9 334 | 28 420 | 37 754 | 269.67 |
5.2 | 127 | 169 | 75.15 | 8 212 | 23 660 | 31 872 | 250.96 |
5.3 | 127 | 169 | 75.15 | 8 212 | 23 660 | 31 872 | 250.96 |
5.4 | 117 | 143 | 81.82 | 7 354 | 20 020 | 27 374 | 233.97 |
5.5 | 107 | 128 | 83.59 | 6 859 | 17 920 | 24 779 | 231.58 |
5.6 | 89 | 98 | 90.82 | 5 869 | 13 720 | 19 589 | 220.10 |
5.7 | 77 | 82 | 93.90 | 5 341 | 11 480 | 16 821 | 218.45 |
5.8 | 77 | 82 | 93.90 | 5 341 | 11 480 | 16 821 | 218.45 |
5.9 | 71 | 72 | 98.61 | 5 011 | 10 080 | 15 091 | 212.55 |
6.0 | 67 | 68 | 98.53 | 4 879 | 9 520 | 14 399 | 214.91 |
6.1 | 62 | 62 | 100.00 | 4 681 | 8 680 | 13 361 | 215.50 |
HbA1c筛查界值(%) | 正确发现糖代谢异常人数(例) | 需口服糖耐量试验人数(例) | 口服糖耐量试验阳性率(%) | 检测成本(元) | 时间机会成本(元) | 筛查成本(元) | 成本效果比(元/人) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 215 | 523 | 41.11 | 46 864 | 73 220 | 120 084 | 558.53 |
5.1 | 214 | 509 | 42.04 | 46 402 | 71 260 | 117 662 | 549.82 |
5.2 | 213 | 502 | 42.43 | 46 171 | 70 280 | 116 451 | 546.72 |
5.3 | 213 | 502 | 42.43 | 46 171 | 70 280 | 116 451 | 546.72 |
5.4 | 211 | 482 | 43.78 | 45 511 | 67 480 | 112 991 | 535.50 |
5.5 | 209 | 457 | 45.73 | 44 686 | 63 980 | 108 666 | 519.93 |
5.6 | 191 | 376 | 50.80 | 42 013 | 52 640 | 94 653 | 495.57 |
5.7 | 177 | 321 | 55.14 | 40 198 | 44 940 | 85 138 | 481.01 |
5.8 | 177 | 321 | 55.14 | 40 198 | 44 940 | 85 138 | 481.01 |
5.9 | 159 | 266 | 59.77 | 38 383 | 37 240 | 75 623 | 475.62 |
6.0 | 142 | 220 | 64.55 | 36 865 | 30 800 | 67 665 | 476.51 |
6.1 | 111 | 137 | 81.02 | 34 126 | 19 180 | 53 306 | 480.23 |
6.2 | 101 | 117 | 86.32 | 33 466 | 16 380 | 49 846 | 493.52 |
6.3 | 101 | 117 | 86.32 | 33 466 | 16 380 | 49 846 | 493.52 |
6.4 | 94 | 103 | 91.26 | 33 004 | 14 420 | 47 424 | 504.51 |
6.5 | 84 | 90 | 93.33 | 32 575 | 12 600 | 45 175 | 537.80 |
Table 5 Cost effectiveness comparison of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin as detection indicators
HbA1c筛查界值(%) | 正确发现糖代谢异常人数(例) | 需口服糖耐量试验人数(例) | 口服糖耐量试验阳性率(%) | 检测成本(元) | 时间机会成本(元) | 筛查成本(元) | 成本效果比(元/人) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 | 215 | 523 | 41.11 | 46 864 | 73 220 | 120 084 | 558.53 |
5.1 | 214 | 509 | 42.04 | 46 402 | 71 260 | 117 662 | 549.82 |
5.2 | 213 | 502 | 42.43 | 46 171 | 70 280 | 116 451 | 546.72 |
5.3 | 213 | 502 | 42.43 | 46 171 | 70 280 | 116 451 | 546.72 |
5.4 | 211 | 482 | 43.78 | 45 511 | 67 480 | 112 991 | 535.50 |
5.5 | 209 | 457 | 45.73 | 44 686 | 63 980 | 108 666 | 519.93 |
5.6 | 191 | 376 | 50.80 | 42 013 | 52 640 | 94 653 | 495.57 |
5.7 | 177 | 321 | 55.14 | 40 198 | 44 940 | 85 138 | 481.01 |
5.8 | 177 | 321 | 55.14 | 40 198 | 44 940 | 85 138 | 481.01 |
5.9 | 159 | 266 | 59.77 | 38 383 | 37 240 | 75 623 | 475.62 |
6.0 | 142 | 220 | 64.55 | 36 865 | 30 800 | 67 665 | 476.51 |
6.1 | 111 | 137 | 81.02 | 34 126 | 19 180 | 53 306 | 480.23 |
6.2 | 101 | 117 | 86.32 | 33 466 | 16 380 | 49 846 | 493.52 |
6.3 | 101 | 117 | 86.32 | 33 466 | 16 380 | 49 846 | 493.52 |
6.4 | 94 | 103 | 91.26 | 33 004 | 14 420 | 47 424 | 504.51 |
6.5 | 84 | 90 | 93.33 | 32 575 | 12 600 | 45 175 | 537.80 |
[1] |
葛均波,王辰,王建安. 内科学[M]. 10版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2024.
|
[2] |
中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会糖尿病学分会,中国医师协会内分泌代谢科医师分会,等. 中国成人糖尿病前期干预的专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2023,15(6):484-494. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20230509-00188.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
黎衍云,杨沁平,吴菲,等. 上海市35岁及以上居民2型糖尿病流行现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(10):729-734. DOI:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2021.10.003.
|
[6] |
刘雪婷,石金霞,李海燕,等. 深圳社区糖尿病高危人群主动筛查方法探讨[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志,2022,32(11):21-25. DOI:10.16458/j.cnki.1007-0893.2022.11.006.
|
[7] |
王莉,黄翰宇,沈娟,等. 糖化血红蛋白检测在糖尿病诊断中的应用进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(2):33,35. DOI:10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2018.02.018.
|
[8] |
卢琦,杨进,乐云逸,等. 糖调节受损与糖化血红蛋白定义的糖尿病前期之间的临床特征比较[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2020,12(11):904-909. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20200316-00095.
|
[9] |
周翔海,纪立农. 空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白用于筛查糖尿病的研究[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2005,13(3):203-205. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1006-6187.2005.03.018.
|
[10] |
张景义,郭静,董钊,等. 糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖早期诊断糖尿病的截点研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2017,20(7):808-811,822. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.07.010.
|
[11] |
中华医学会糖尿病学分会,朱大龙. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2021,13(4):315-409. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] | |
[16] |
马辰星,许颖,康向辉,等. 空腹血糖诊断糖尿病截点的探讨与评价[J]. 中国全科医学,2014,17(17):1943-1945.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2014.17.005.
|
[17] |
张洁,梁明斌,何青芳,等. 农村社区门诊糖尿病筛查效果与成本效果分析[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理,2015,35(1):69-71. DOI:10.19955/j.cnki.1005-5916.2015.01.025.
|
[18] |
赵春艳,张盼,石春雷,等. 糖化血红蛋白检测在我国糖尿病前期筛检中的应用进展[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2017,25(12):1147-1149. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2017.12.019.
|
[19] |
陈桥英. 空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白联合检测对体检人群中糖尿病早期筛查诊断的价值[J]. 黑龙江医药,2023,36(2):428-431. DOI:10.14035/j.cnki.hljyy.2023.02.063.
|
[20] |
谭枝微. 空腹血糖联合糖化血红蛋白检测对糖尿病筛查的临床价值分析[J]. 糖尿病新世界,2022,25(15):61-63,67. DOI:10.16658/j.cnki.1672-4062.2022.15.061.
|
[21] |
|
[1] | WANG Mengqi, LIANG Moxuan, LI Zeyuan, GUO Yuting, CHENG Jingmin. Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4234-4240. |
[2] | LI Shunan, ZHANG Shiyan, DENG Yanan, HU Danqing, ZHENG Yuxin, LI Danyang, LI Candong. An Analysis of Trends and Prediction of Disease Burden for Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy from 1990 to 2021 in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4214-4226. |
[3] | YANG Bingqing, YANG Tianyuan, HOU Chenxue, WANG Qi. Comparative Study on the Potential of Non-invasive Models in Evaluating Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Combined with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4067-4074. |
[4] | LIU Chunyan, DENG Zhaohui, SONG Yingbo, YANG Fang, SHI Qian, LI Yongxin, ZHANG Xin. Comparison of Prevalence and Comorbidity of Hypertension, Diabetes and Dyslipidemia in Xinjiang Residents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4031-4037. |
[5] | YANG Jian, WU Chuan'an, ZHOU Hairong, TIAN Feng, CHI Chunhua. Diagnostic Value of the Triglyceride Glucose-body Mass Index for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4075-4081. |
[6] | ZHANG Jia, WANG Hairong, ZHAO Jing, SU Yifan. Influencing Factors of Screening Behavior of First-degree Relatives of Lung Cancer Patients Based on Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3961-3967. |
[7] | ZHANG Ji, ZHOU Jie, LI Ling, WU Yanli, JI Wei, LIU Tao. Associations of Fasting Blood Glucose with All-cause Mortality and Specific-cause Mortality in a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3924-3931. |
[8] | TU Kunkun, ZHAO Jie, SHI Xiuyuan, XIE Pei, HAN Xinxin. The Impact of Generalist-Specialist Collaborative Care Models on Health Outcomes in Hypertension and Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3912-3923. |
[9] | XU Baichuan, WANG Yan, ZHANG Peng, LI Yiting, LIU Feilai, XIE Yang. Research and Analysis of Screening Tools for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Comorbidity Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3847-3852. |
[10] | ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Guanhua, LYU Shanshan, JING Yali. Relationship between Thyroid Hormone Sensitivity Indices and Osteoporosis in Patients with Normal Thyroid Function Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3653-3659. |
[11] | MA Wenyuan, QI Shuo, SHANG Jianwei, CHEN Xiaoheng, LI Zhe, LI Huilong, HU Rui, LI Lu, SI Xinying, DING Zhiguo. Preliminary Development of a TCM Syndrome Evaluation Scale for Hashimoto's Thyroiditis with Normal Thyroid Function: Based on Expert Consultation and Clinical Survey [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(28): 3590-3600. |
[12] | ZHANG Yunuo, LI Ruibin, WANG Wei. Correlation Analysis of Serum Nesfatin-1 and Ghrelin Levels with Glycolipid Metabolism and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3264-3270. |
[13] | ZHANG Ruimin, DONG Zheyi, LI Shuang, WANG Qian, CHEN Xiangmei. Traditional Chinese Medicine Factors Associated with Diabetic Nephropathy Diagnosed by Renal Biopsy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3307-3313. |
[14] | TANG Shangfeng, HUANG Yangzhen, ZHENG Yanxi, PAN Yangyang, XIONG Zhongbao, QING Hua, SONG Jia, WEI Yilin, DONG Heng, WANG Chunying, CHEN Manwei, ZHANG Kangkang. Specification for the Integration of Healthcare and Prevention Services in Diabetes at the Primary Level [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3096-3103. |
[15] | YU Wenhua, LI Jianguo, DUAN Wenyan, GAO Xuyan, LI Xiaxia, ZHANG Zilong, ZHANG Li, MA Lina. Reliability and Validity of the Function Impairment Screening Tool among Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3000-3004. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||