
Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (34): 4315-4321.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0544
Special Issue: 医患沟通最新文章合辑; 数智医疗最新文章合辑
• Article·Focus on General Practice Education • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-10
Revised:2024-08-12
Published:2024-12-05
Online:2024-09-13
Contact:
WANG Jinfan
通讯作者:
王锦帆
作者简介:作者贡献:
邵建文负责软件系统运行管理、教学数据收集与整理、论文撰写;刘欢、张玥、郑爱明参与课题各环节的研究与实施;陈松宇负责软件系统的技术设计、实施、运行维护及数据提供;王锦帆为课题主持人,全面负责实施系统构建、教学实验和论文撰写及审定,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0544
| 项目 | 构成比[名(%)] |
|---|---|
| 人员类别 | |
| 医生 | 10(66.7) |
| 护士 | 5(33.3) |
| 性别 | |
| 男 | 8(53.3) |
| 女 | 7(46.7) |
| 地区 | |
| 北京市 | 3(20.0) |
| 上海市 | 3(20.0) |
| 南京市 | 5(33.3) |
| 武汉市 | 3(20.0) |
| 重庆市 | 1(6.7) |
| 工作医院等级 | |
| 三级甲等医院 | 15(100.0) |
| 职称 | |
| 正高级 | 12(80.0) |
| 副高级 | 3(20.0) |
| 工龄 | |
| 21年及以上 | 11(73.3) |
| 10~20年 | 4(26.7) |
Table 1 Medical experts basic information
| 项目 | 构成比[名(%)] |
|---|---|
| 人员类别 | |
| 医生 | 10(66.7) |
| 护士 | 5(33.3) |
| 性别 | |
| 男 | 8(53.3) |
| 女 | 7(46.7) |
| 地区 | |
| 北京市 | 3(20.0) |
| 上海市 | 3(20.0) |
| 南京市 | 5(33.3) |
| 武汉市 | 3(20.0) |
| 重庆市 | 1(6.7) |
| 工作医院等级 | |
| 三级甲等医院 | 15(100.0) |
| 职称 | |
| 正高级 | 12(80.0) |
| 副高级 | 3(20.0) |
| 工龄 | |
| 21年及以上 | 11(73.3) |
| 10~20年 | 4(26.7) |
| 项目 | 构成比[名(%)] |
|---|---|
| 性别 | |
| 男 | 5(46.7) |
| 女 | 10(53.3) |
| 年龄 | |
| 50岁及以上 | 15(100.0) |
| 标准化病人教学经历 | |
| 5年及以上 | 15(100.0) |
| 近1年就诊经历 | |
| 1~3次 | 13(86.7) |
| 4次及以上 | 2(13.3) |
Table 2 Standardized patient basic information
| 项目 | 构成比[名(%)] |
|---|---|
| 性别 | |
| 男 | 5(46.7) |
| 女 | 10(53.3) |
| 年龄 | |
| 50岁及以上 | 15(100.0) |
| 标准化病人教学经历 | |
| 5年及以上 | 15(100.0) |
| 近1年就诊经历 | |
| 1~3次 | 13(86.7) |
| 4次及以上 | 2(13.3) |
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 完全掌握 | 掌握程度较高 | 掌握程度一般 | 掌握程度较低 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 77(15.0) | 255(49.5) | 173(33.6) | 10(1.9) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 82(24.6) | 233(70.0) | 18(5.4) | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 8(7.8) | 68(66.67) | 24(23.5) | 2(2.0) |
| H值 | 84.136 | ||||
| P值 | <0.001 | ||||
Table 3 Comparison of the mastery of empathic language connotation among undergraduates,clinicians and medical doctoral students
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 完全掌握 | 掌握程度较高 | 掌握程度一般 | 掌握程度较低 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 77(15.0) | 255(49.5) | 173(33.6) | 10(1.9) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 82(24.6) | 233(70.0) | 18(5.4) | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 8(7.8) | 68(66.67) | 24(23.5) | 2(2.0) |
| H值 | 84.136 | ||||
| P值 | <0.001 | ||||
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 显著增强 | 有些增强 | 一般 | 增强不显 | 无增强 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 162(31.5) | 300(58.3) | 48(9.3) | 4(0.8) | 1(0.2) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 244(73.3) | 88(26.4) | 1(0.3) | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 63(61.8) | 34(33.3) | 5(4.9) | 0 | 0 |
| H值 | 156.672 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
Table 4 Comparison of empathic language skills enhancement among undergraduates,clinicians,and medical doctoral students
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 显著增强 | 有些增强 | 一般 | 增强不显 | 无增强 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 162(31.5) | 300(58.3) | 48(9.3) | 4(0.8) | 1(0.2) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 244(73.3) | 88(26.4) | 1(0.3) | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 63(61.8) | 34(33.3) | 5(4.9) | 0 | 0 |
| H值 | 156.672 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 非常便捷 | 比较便捷 | 一般 | 不太便捷 | 非常不便捷 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 186(36.1) | 238(46.2) | 65(12.6) | 18(3.5) | 8(1.6) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 286(85.9) | 44(13.2) | 3(0.9) | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 67(65.7) | 29(28.4) | 5(4.9) | 1(1.0) | 0 |
| H值 | 212.800 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
Table 5 Comparison of the cognitive degree of system convenience among undergraduates,clinicians and medical doctoral students
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 非常便捷 | 比较便捷 | 一般 | 不太便捷 | 非常不便捷 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 186(36.1) | 238(46.2) | 65(12.6) | 18(3.5) | 8(1.6) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 286(85.9) | 44(13.2) | 3(0.9) | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 67(65.7) | 29(28.4) | 5(4.9) | 1(1.0) | 0 |
| H值 | 212.800 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 非常合理 | 比较合理 | 一般 | 不太合理 | 很不合理 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 213(41.4) | 256(49.7) | 39(7.6) | 4(0.8) | 3(0.6) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 298(89.5) | 35(10.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 86(84.3) | 15(14.7) | 1(1.0) | 0 | 0 |
| H值 | 225.994 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
Table 6 Comparison of the rationality of systems integration into teaching and learning among undergraduates,clinicians and medical doctoral students
| 人员类别 | 人数 | 非常合理 | 比较合理 | 一般 | 不太合理 | 很不合理 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 本科生 | 515 | 213(41.4) | 256(49.7) | 39(7.6) | 4(0.8) | 3(0.6) |
| 临床医生 | 333 | 298(89.5) | 35(10.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 医学博士生 | 102 | 86(84.3) | 15(14.7) | 1(1.0) | 0 | 0 |
| H值 | 225.994 | |||||
| P值 | <0.001 | |||||
| 序号 | 关键词 | 聚义 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 沟通 | 希望在年轻医生中普及,提供医患沟通进步平台 |
| 2 | 语音 | 希望可以有一些示范类的语音或者视频供参考,同时语音解析需要改进 |
| 3 | 教学 | 可以适当增加医患矛盾调解方面内容,设置更丰富复杂的场景进行教学培训 |
| 4 | 程序 | 总体很棒,解析有时会失败,服务器尚不够强大。解析效果以及正确率可以再提高,一直希望能相关医患沟通的模拟程序可以供学生使用 |
| 5 | 标准 | 软件的语速评判标准需要改进,用正常偏慢的语速,软件也觉得语速过快,但真正到医院临床,这种语速过慢,效率特别低 |
Table 7 Summary of students' feedback after using the system
| 序号 | 关键词 | 聚义 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 沟通 | 希望在年轻医生中普及,提供医患沟通进步平台 |
| 2 | 语音 | 希望可以有一些示范类的语音或者视频供参考,同时语音解析需要改进 |
| 3 | 教学 | 可以适当增加医患矛盾调解方面内容,设置更丰富复杂的场景进行教学培训 |
| 4 | 程序 | 总体很棒,解析有时会失败,服务器尚不够强大。解析效果以及正确率可以再提高,一直希望能相关医患沟通的模拟程序可以供学生使用 |
| 5 | 标准 | 软件的语速评判标准需要改进,用正常偏慢的语速,软件也觉得语速过快,但真正到医院临床,这种语速过慢,效率特别低 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
邵建文,杨君洁,张玥,等. "课程思政"背景下某大学医患沟通课程学习满意度调查分析[J]. 现代医学,2021,49(s1):48-53.
|
| [1] |
Institute For International Medical Education Core Committee. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education[J]. Med Teach,2002,24(2):130-135. DOI:10.1080/01421590220120731.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
中华人民共和国教育部. 关于加强医教协同实施卓越医生教育培养计划2.0的意见[A/OL].(2018-09-17)[2023-04-25].
|
| [4] |
国务院办公厅.关于加快医学教育创新发展的指导意见[A/OL].(2020-09-17)[2023-04-25].
|
| [5] |
刘杰,王学霞,刘晶玉,等. 同理心培训方案对手术室实习护士影响的研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2020,36(25):1984-1987. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20190528-01494.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [1] | TIAN Xiangyang, ZHOU Yingsheng, GAO Ying. Prospects of Behavioral and Lifestyle Interventions for Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4513-4520. |
| [2] | WEI Xuejuan, WANG Lihua, WANG Li, REN Jinglin, YAN Haiqing, YU Haiyang, LIU Jingfeng. Effectiveness of an Intelligent Voice Outbound Call System as an Adjunct to Usual Care for Health Management in Older Community-dwelling Patients with "Three Highs" Multimorbidity: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4635-4640. |
| [3] | XIE Yuanling, CHENG Li, LONG Xiangyu, SU Zhengxin, SU Yiyi, ZHANG Renyue, SUN Guoqiang, CHEN Xuxia, ZHOU Jilan. Effectiveness of an AI-powered Ophthalmic Telemedicine Diagnostic Platform in Community Eye Health Screening [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4641-4649. |
| [4] | HUANG Mu, ZHANG Daochun, YANG Wei, ZHONG Liming, YUAN Wenjing, JIA Ziqi, TAN Xiangliang, DUAN Xiaohui, LIU Xian, CHEN Weicui. Automatic Segmentation of Colorectal Cancer Lesions in Abdominal CT Images Using a Deep Learning Network Based on Fused 3D U-Net and Transformer: a Multicenter and Multidevice Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4281-4287. |
| [5] | CHEN Yujing, WANG Yan, LI Guang, DONG Benchao, YANG Peichuan, MA Jianxiong. Digital Technologies in the Management of Sarcopenia among Older Adults in Asia: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4200-4210. |
| [6] | MU Hongyu, LI Qianqian, LIU Lu, SUN Xinru, ZHANG Jiaqi, DUAN Yeqing, LI Bin. Research Progress and Challenges of Cognitive Digital Therapeutics in the Intervention of Mild Cognitive Impairment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4211-4216. |
| [7] | CHEN Cheng, CHEN Kaiyuan, SUN Nailing, ZENG Huatang, LEI Suwen, LIANG Wannian. Status and Suggestions on Standardization Construction of Artificial Intelligence-enabled Disease Prevention and Control [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4193-4199. |
| [8] | DENG Wei, HUANG Mengting, YI Shengli, LIN Yang, XU Lidan, REN Zhexue, ZHU Xiuqiong, LI Yesha, REN Mengge, KE Dazhi, LI Guiqiong, WU Zhiqin, LUO Aoran, HE Fapei. Training and Effectiveness of AI-enabled Clinical Reasoning in General Practice [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(28): 4078-4085. |
| [9] | XIE Xiaoyun, LIU Chenxi, LIU Yushu, ZHOU Yihan. Artificial Intelligence Research Practices in Primary Healthcare Institutions in China and the Potential Issue of Data Poverty: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(28): 4067-4077. |
| [10] | ZHOU Yuhan, MIN Yuqi, GUO Zhou, YANG Min, YUE Lu, HE Meichen, ZHOU Hairong, WANG Yongchen. Opportunities and Challenges for General Practitioners in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(25): 3563-3568. |
| [11] | WANG Hongchuan, ZHANG Jianbo, MA Wei, ZHAO Sidi. Governance Logic and Ecosystem Construction of Healthcare Data Space Led by Digital Policies: an Analytical Framework Based on "Technology-Management-Law" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3416-3422. |
| [12] | OUYANG Weina, WANG Lu, ZHANG Xuan, TANG Wei, FAN Yongmei. Research on Atrial Fibrillation Screening Based on Dynamic Multi-scale Feature Fusion and Attention Mechanism [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(23): 3281-3286. |
| [13] | CHEN Kaiyuan, WANG Hongchuan, GE Yi, SUN Nailing, CHEN Cheng, WANG Tianran, ZENG Huatang, LEI Suwen, LIANG Wannian. The Current Situation and Challenges of Building a Standards System for High-quality Development of Health Care Empowered by Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(22): 3073-3078. |
| [14] | WANG Yang, ZOU Chuan, GUO Mengruo, HE Liuhua, LU Xuhang, GUI Xianzhong, XU Zhijie, LIN Kai, JIN Hua, YAO Mi, YANG Hui, YU Dehua. A Five-stage Approach for Primary Care Practitioners to Refine High-quality Research Questions with Artificial Intelligence Assistance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(22): 3094-3102. |
| [15] | HU Min, LYU Xiangdong. Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Remote Electrocardiography Diagnosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2498-2503. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||