
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 1459-1464.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0118
Special Issue: 老年问题最新文章合辑; 老年人群健康最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-25
Revised:2024-06-19
Published:2025-04-20
Online:2025-02-06
Contact:
GUO Shubin
通讯作者:
郭树彬
作者简介:作者贡献:
李秋敬负责研究设计、数据收集、统计分析、论文撰写;商娜进行数据收集与整理、论文修订;高倩、杨黎进行数据收集、统计分析指导;郭树彬负责论文审校、质量控制,对文章整体负责。所有作者确认了论文的最终稿。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0118
| 项目 | 生存组(n=250) | 死亡组(n=85) | 检验统计量值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 76(69,84) | 82(75,88) | 3.745 | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 0.010a | 0.979 | ||
| 男 | 121(48.4) | 41(48.2) | ||
| 女 | 129(51.6) | 44(51.8) | ||
| BMI(kg/m2) | 23.4±3.6 | 22.0±3.8 | -3.179b | 0.002 |
| 基础疾病[例(%)] | ||||
| 高血压 | 123(49.2) | 52(61.2) | 3.647a | 0.056 |
| 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 | 76(30.4) | 25(29.4) | 0.029a | 0.864 |
| 2型糖尿病 | 94(37.6) | 29(34.1) | 0.331a | 0.565 |
| 恶性肿瘤 | 40(16.0) | 21(24.7) | 3.228a | 0.072 |
| 慢性肾脏病 | 33(13.2) | 17(20.0) | 2.310a | 0.129 |
| 慢性肺部疾病 | 21(8.4) | 8(9.4) | 0.082a | 0.774 |
| 慢性肝脏疾病 | 11(4.4) | 4(4.7) | 0.014a | 0.906 |
| 实验室检查指标[M(P25,P75)] | ||||
| 白细胞计数(×109/L) | 10.88(7.11,14.30) | 10.37(7.39,16.63) | 0.943 | 0.346 |
| 中性粒细胞计数(×109/L) | 8.76(5.06,12.81) | 9.19(6.25,14.77) | 1.169 | 0.243 |
| 血红蛋白(g/L) | 121(103,138) | 116(84,137) | -1.959 | 0.050 |
| 血小板计数(×109/L) | 189(137,240) | 181(119,257) | -0.561 | 0.575 |
| 白蛋白(g/L) | 37.3(33.3,41.5) | 33.5(29.5,39.2) | -4.283 | <0.001 |
| 肌酐(μmol/L) | 83.6(63.2,129.6) | 140.3(74.5,244.4) | 3.730 | <0.001 |
| D-二聚体(mg/L) | 2.11(1.21,3.82) | 2.11(1.60,6.52) | 1.757 | 0.079 |
| 降钙素原(ng/mL) | 0.81(0.16,2.22) | 0.81(0.36,7.23) | 2.123 | 0.034 |
| L3 SMI[M(P25,P75),cm2/m2] | 34.82(30.19,41.26) | 30.38(24.78,32.87) | -5.817 | <0.001 |
| NRS2002评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 3(2,4) | 4(4,6) | 6.526 | <0.001 |
| 脓毒性休克[例(%)] | 70(28.0) | 46(54.1) | 19.115a | <0.001 |
| SOFA评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 3(2,5) | 6(4,9) | 6.820 | <0.001 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 11(6,15) | 17(11,24) | 6.688 | <0.001 |
| 住院时间[M(P25,P75),d] | 10(6,14) | 8(3,18) | -1.053 | 0.293 |
Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between survival and non-survival group among older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
| 项目 | 生存组(n=250) | 死亡组(n=85) | 检验统计量值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 76(69,84) | 82(75,88) | 3.745 | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 0.010a | 0.979 | ||
| 男 | 121(48.4) | 41(48.2) | ||
| 女 | 129(51.6) | 44(51.8) | ||
| BMI(kg/m2) | 23.4±3.6 | 22.0±3.8 | -3.179b | 0.002 |
| 基础疾病[例(%)] | ||||
| 高血压 | 123(49.2) | 52(61.2) | 3.647a | 0.056 |
| 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 | 76(30.4) | 25(29.4) | 0.029a | 0.864 |
| 2型糖尿病 | 94(37.6) | 29(34.1) | 0.331a | 0.565 |
| 恶性肿瘤 | 40(16.0) | 21(24.7) | 3.228a | 0.072 |
| 慢性肾脏病 | 33(13.2) | 17(20.0) | 2.310a | 0.129 |
| 慢性肺部疾病 | 21(8.4) | 8(9.4) | 0.082a | 0.774 |
| 慢性肝脏疾病 | 11(4.4) | 4(4.7) | 0.014a | 0.906 |
| 实验室检查指标[M(P25,P75)] | ||||
| 白细胞计数(×109/L) | 10.88(7.11,14.30) | 10.37(7.39,16.63) | 0.943 | 0.346 |
| 中性粒细胞计数(×109/L) | 8.76(5.06,12.81) | 9.19(6.25,14.77) | 1.169 | 0.243 |
| 血红蛋白(g/L) | 121(103,138) | 116(84,137) | -1.959 | 0.050 |
| 血小板计数(×109/L) | 189(137,240) | 181(119,257) | -0.561 | 0.575 |
| 白蛋白(g/L) | 37.3(33.3,41.5) | 33.5(29.5,39.2) | -4.283 | <0.001 |
| 肌酐(μmol/L) | 83.6(63.2,129.6) | 140.3(74.5,244.4) | 3.730 | <0.001 |
| D-二聚体(mg/L) | 2.11(1.21,3.82) | 2.11(1.60,6.52) | 1.757 | 0.079 |
| 降钙素原(ng/mL) | 0.81(0.16,2.22) | 0.81(0.36,7.23) | 2.123 | 0.034 |
| L3 SMI[M(P25,P75),cm2/m2] | 34.82(30.19,41.26) | 30.38(24.78,32.87) | -5.817 | <0.001 |
| NRS2002评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 3(2,4) | 4(4,6) | 6.526 | <0.001 |
| 脓毒性休克[例(%)] | 70(28.0) | 46(54.1) | 19.115a | <0.001 |
| SOFA评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 3(2,5) | 6(4,9) | 6.820 | <0.001 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分[M(P25,P75),分] | 11(6,15) | 17(11,24) | 6.688 | <0.001 |
| 住院时间[M(P25,P75),d] | 10(6,14) | 8(3,18) | -1.053 | 0.293 |
| 变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 SMI | -0.079 | 0.021 | 13.569 | 0.924 | 0.886~0.964 | <0.001 |
| NRS2002评分 | 0.271 | 0.097 | 7.898 | 1.312 | 1.086~1.585 | 0.005 |
| SOFA评分 | 0.157 | 0.054 | 8.516 | 1.170 | 1.053~1.300 | 0.004 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.051 | 0.024 | 4.305 | 1.052 | 1.003~1.103 | 0.038 |
| 常数项 | -1.129 | 0.875 | 1.663 | 0.323 | 0.197 |
Table 2 Multivariable Logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality among older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
| 变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 SMI | -0.079 | 0.021 | 13.569 | 0.924 | 0.886~0.964 | <0.001 |
| NRS2002评分 | 0.271 | 0.097 | 7.898 | 1.312 | 1.086~1.585 | 0.005 |
| SOFA评分 | 0.157 | 0.054 | 8.516 | 1.170 | 1.053~1.300 | 0.004 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.051 | 0.024 | 4.305 | 1.052 | 1.003~1.103 | 0.038 |
| 常数项 | -1.129 | 0.875 | 1.663 | 0.323 | 0.197 |
Figure 2 The ROC curves of L3 SMI,SOFA score,APACHE Ⅱ score and combined variables on the risk of in-hospital mortality in older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
| 变量 | AUC(95%CI) | 最佳截断值 | 约登指数 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 SMI | 0.711(0.650~0.772) | 33.30 cm2/m2 | 0.364 | 0.788 | 0.576 | <0.001 |
| SOFA评分 | 0.740(0.675~0.806) | 5.5分 | 0.455 | 0.647 | 0.808 | <0.001 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.742(0.684~0.801) | 12.5分 | 0.346 | 0.718 | 0.628 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分 | 0.795(0.742~0.847) | 0.336 | 0.468 | 0.600 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.792(0.741~0.844) | 0.221 | 0.452 | 0.776 | 0.676 | <0.001 |
Table 3 The predictive value of L3 SMI,SOFA score,APACHEⅡ score and combined variables on the risk of in-hospital mortality in older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
| 变量 | AUC(95%CI) | 最佳截断值 | 约登指数 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 SMI | 0.711(0.650~0.772) | 33.30 cm2/m2 | 0.364 | 0.788 | 0.576 | <0.001 |
| SOFA评分 | 0.740(0.675~0.806) | 5.5分 | 0.455 | 0.647 | 0.808 | <0.001 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.742(0.684~0.801) | 12.5分 | 0.346 | 0.718 | 0.628 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分 | 0.795(0.742~0.847) | 0.336 | 0.468 | 0.600 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.792(0.741~0.844) | 0.221 | 0.452 | 0.776 | 0.676 | <0.001 |
| 指标 | 差异 | Z值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOFA评分比L3 SMI | 0.029 | 0.651 | 0.515 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比L3 SMI | 0.084 | 3.587 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比SOFA评分 | 0.054 | 2.114 | 0.035 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.052 | 1.577 | 0.115 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分联合L3 SMI | 0.002 | 0.131 | 0.895 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分比L3 SMI | 0.031 | 0.722 | 0.470 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分比SOFA评分 | 0.002 | 0.058 | 0.954 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比L3 SMI | 0.081 | 3.634 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.050 | 2.075 | 0.038 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比SOFA评分 | 0.052 | 1.442 | 0.149 |
Table 4 Comparison of the predictive value of L3 SMI,SOFA score,APACHEⅡ score and combined variables on the risk of in-hospital mortality in older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis
| 指标 | 差异 | Z值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOFA评分比L3 SMI | 0.029 | 0.651 | 0.515 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比L3 SMI | 0.084 | 3.587 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比SOFA评分 | 0.054 | 2.114 | 0.035 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.052 | 1.577 | 0.115 |
| L3 SMI联合SOFA评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分联合L3 SMI | 0.002 | 0.131 | 0.895 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分比L3 SMI | 0.031 | 0.722 | 0.470 |
| APACHE Ⅱ评分比SOFA评分 | 0.002 | 0.058 | 0.954 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比L3 SMI | 0.081 | 3.634 | <0.001 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比APACHE Ⅱ评分 | 0.050 | 2.075 | 0.038 |
| L3 SMI联合APACHE Ⅱ评分比SOFA评分 | 0.052 | 1.442 | 0.149 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
中华医学会外科学分会外科感染与重症医学学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会肠瘘外科医师专业委员会. 中国腹腔感染诊治指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(1):1-16. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2020.01.01.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
中国急诊危重症患者肠内营养治疗专家共识组. 中国急诊危重症患者肠内营养治疗专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2022,31(3):281-290. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.03.004.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
汪颖,王迪芬,付江泉,等. SOFA、qSOFA评分和传统指标对脓毒症预后的判断价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2017,29(8):700-704. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.08.006.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
李平娜,杨宏富,崔秋敏,等. 脓毒症患者细胞因子表达水平及其对预后的影响[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2023,35(12):1250-1254. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230818-00660.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] | |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [1] | LI Wenping, CHEN Jianhua, XU Jiapei, JIN Xue, PAN Zihan, CHI Chunhua. A Scoping Review on the Empowerment of Community Elderly Health Services by Digital-Intelligent Health Management Platforms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2938-2949. |
| [2] | AN Yanhong, WANG Shidong, LI Xiaoran, GUO Jiayang, WANG Zhe, SHA Peilin, MENG Yijun, LI Xiaoxuan, SHI Xue, YU Zexing, XIAO Yonghua. Study on Risk Factors and Nomogram Prediction Model for Diabetic Kidney Disease: Based on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Technology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2995-3003. |
| [3] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [4] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [5] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [6] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [7] | SONG Zhenzhen, CHEN Yang, WANG Jiwen, LIU Huishan, SHEN Simeng, SUN Ying, CHEN Xing. Study of Maternal Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Asphyxia in Late Preterm and Term Infants [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2874-2878. |
| [8] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [9] | PANG Shu, SUN ying, JIANG Chunyan. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Fried's Frailty Phenotype and the FRAIL Scale in Assessing Pre-frailty among Community-dwelling Older Adults Undergoing Health Examinations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2664-2670. |
| [10] | ZHAO Huili, LU Lina, ZHUO Ya, WANG Xin. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Recurrence of Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2648-2655. |
| [11] | YUAN Yujuan, TAO Jing, WANG Ying, PENG Hui, YANG Yining. Elevated Neutrophil Percentage to Albumin Ratio is Associated with In-hospital Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2489-2497. |
| [12] | LI Simin, ZHANG Tingting, WANG Kunbo, YANG Jianzhou, PING Weiwei. Effects of Exercise Dosage on Elderly Patients with Sarcopenia: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2400-2409. |
| [13] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [14] | YU Shan, CHE Yajie, SUBIYINUER· Maimaiti, GUO Kaiyang, FENG Xingxing, YAN Ping. A Comparative Study on the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Urban and Rural Elderly People in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2227-2233. |
| [15] | YANG Tingting, ZHENG Li, LIANG Daqiang, WU fan, YUAN Xianxian, WEI lai, HU Jin, WANG Junhua, WANG Ziyun. Association between Sleep Fragmentation and Arteriosclerosis among Population Aged 40-65 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2190-2197. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||