
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (19): 2398-2406.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0919
Special Issue: 数智医疗最新文章合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-07-10
Revised:2025-01-25
Published:2025-07-05
Online:2025-05-28
Contact:
YANG Guoqing
通讯作者:
杨国庆
作者简介:作者贡献:
熊鑫进行论文的构思与设计,数据的收集与整理,论文撰写;李洋、石峰负责论文的修订,统计学处理;李勇、赵林伟、付泉水、范小萍负责数据提供;杨连、段维、陈蓓协助数据的收集;杨国庆负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责,监督管理。
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0919
| 项目 | 训练集(n=426) | 验证集(n=106) | 内部测试集(n=170) | χ2(H)值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 66(57,73) | 65(55,72) | 59(55,69) | 18.424a | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 14.417 | 0.001 | |||
| 男 | 160(37.6) | 31(29.2) | 37(21.8) | ||
| 女 | 266(62.4) | 75(70.8) | 133(78.2) | ||
| 骨密度[例(%)] | 2.614 | 0.624 | |||
| 骨质疏松 | 155(36.4) | 38(35.8) | 56(32.9) | ||
| 骨量减低 | 178(41.8) | 45(42.5) | 83(48.8) | ||
| 正常 | 93(21.8) | 23(21.7) | 31(18.2) |
Table 1 Demographic tables for training,validation,and internal testing sets
| 项目 | 训练集(n=426) | 验证集(n=106) | 内部测试集(n=170) | χ2(H)值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 66(57,73) | 65(55,72) | 59(55,69) | 18.424a | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 14.417 | 0.001 | |||
| 男 | 160(37.6) | 31(29.2) | 37(21.8) | ||
| 女 | 266(62.4) | 75(70.8) | 133(78.2) | ||
| 骨密度[例(%)] | 2.614 | 0.624 | |||
| 骨质疏松 | 155(36.4) | 38(35.8) | 56(32.9) | ||
| 骨量减低 | 178(41.8) | 45(42.5) | 83(48.8) | ||
| 正常 | 93(21.8) | 23(21.7) | 31(18.2) |
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.948(0.929~0.966) | 0.793 | 0.894 | 0.805 | 0.824 | 0.805 |
| 验证集 | 0.948(0.908~0.984) | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.821 | 0.856 | 0.819 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.897(0.866~0.927) | 0.760 | 0.875 | 0.765 | 0.774 | 0.766 | |
| 验证集 | 0.942(0.896~0.985) | 0.830 | 0.909 | 0.830 | 0.839 | 0.834 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.964(0.949~0.978) | 0.851 | 0.920 | 0.852 | 0.862 | 0.856 |
| 验证集 | 0.968(0.935~0.996) | 0.899 | 0.945 | 0.896 | 0.896 | 0.897 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.929(0.904~0.954) | 0.803 | 0.894 | 0.800 | 0.806 | 0.804 | |
| 验证集 | 0.961(0.924~0.993) | 0.876 | 0.934 | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.878 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.915(0.887~0.942) | 0.759 | 0.874 | 0.763 | 0.770 | 0.762 | |
| 验证集 | 0.956(0.917-0.992) | 0.866 | 0.933 | 0.877 | 0.891 | 0.875 | ||
| 胸部分类模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.955(0.937~0.972) | 0.820 | 0.910 | 0.833 | 0.842 | 0.829 |
| 验证集 | 0.967(0.938~0.993) | 0.851 | 0.928 | 0.868 | 0.884 | 0.863 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.948(0.929~0.967) | 0.795 | 0.895 | 0.808 | 0.826 | 0.807 | |
| 验证集 | 0.949(0.910~0.985) | 0.786 | 0.894 | 0.811 | 0.850 | 0.806 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 |
Table 2 Performance index results of osteoporosis classification model established by BDT,LR and RF in training set and validation set
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.948(0.929~0.966) | 0.793 | 0.894 | 0.805 | 0.824 | 0.805 |
| 验证集 | 0.948(0.908~0.984) | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.821 | 0.856 | 0.819 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.897(0.866~0.927) | 0.760 | 0.875 | 0.765 | 0.774 | 0.766 | |
| 验证集 | 0.942(0.896~0.985) | 0.830 | 0.909 | 0.830 | 0.839 | 0.834 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.964(0.949~0.978) | 0.851 | 0.920 | 0.852 | 0.862 | 0.856 |
| 验证集 | 0.968(0.935~0.996) | 0.899 | 0.945 | 0.896 | 0.896 | 0.897 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.929(0.904~0.954) | 0.803 | 0.894 | 0.800 | 0.806 | 0.804 | |
| 验证集 | 0.961(0.924~0.993) | 0.876 | 0.934 | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.878 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.915(0.887~0.942) | 0.759 | 0.874 | 0.763 | 0.770 | 0.762 | |
| 验证集 | 0.956(0.917-0.992) | 0.866 | 0.933 | 0.877 | 0.891 | 0.875 | ||
| 胸部分类模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.955(0.937~0.972) | 0.820 | 0.910 | 0.833 | 0.842 | 0.829 |
| 验证集 | 0.967(0.938~0.993) | 0.851 | 0.928 | 0.868 | 0.884 | 0.863 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.948(0.929~0.967) | 0.795 | 0.895 | 0.808 | 0.826 | 0.807 | |
| 验证集 | 0.949(0.910~0.985) | 0.786 | 0.894 | 0.811 | 0.850 | 0.806 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 |
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.405 | 18.359 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.513 | 15.742 | 0.793 | 0.783 | 0.894 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.385 | 17.460 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.534 | 13.352 | 0.851 | 0.844 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.414 | 18.268 | 0.745 | 0.745 | 0.866 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.632 | 15.984 | 0.788 | 0.776 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 12.463 | 16.835 | 0.784 | 0.784 | 0.891 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 11.985 | 14.884 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.907 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 11.050 | 15.147 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.909 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 9.449 | 11.563 | 0.888 | 0.883 | 0.942 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 12.448 | 16.374 | 0.795 | 0.795 | 0.894 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.633 | 15.837 | 0.796 | 0.780 | 0.892 | <0.001 | ||
| 胸部回归模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.573 | 18.465 | 0.740 | 0.740 | 0.863 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.812 | 16.006 | 0.787 | 0.775 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.354 | 17.471 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.511 | 13.312 | 0.852 | 0.845 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.471 | 18.330 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.864 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.802 | 16.079 | 0.785 | 0.773 | 0.887 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Performance index results of osteoporosis regression model established by BDT,SGD and RF in training set and validation set
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.405 | 18.359 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.513 | 15.742 | 0.793 | 0.783 | 0.894 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.385 | 17.460 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.534 | 13.352 | 0.851 | 0.844 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.414 | 18.268 | 0.745 | 0.745 | 0.866 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.632 | 15.984 | 0.788 | 0.776 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 12.463 | 16.835 | 0.784 | 0.784 | 0.891 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 11.985 | 14.884 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.907 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 11.050 | 15.147 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.909 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 9.449 | 11.563 | 0.888 | 0.883 | 0.942 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 12.448 | 16.374 | 0.795 | 0.795 | 0.894 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.633 | 15.837 | 0.796 | 0.780 | 0.892 | <0.001 | ||
| 胸部回归模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.573 | 18.465 | 0.740 | 0.740 | 0.863 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.812 | 16.006 | 0.787 | 0.775 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.354 | 17.471 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.511 | 13.312 | 0.852 | 0.845 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.471 | 18.330 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.864 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.802 | 16.079 | 0.785 | 0.773 | 0.887 | <0.001 |
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 0.905(0.860~0.947) | 0.713 | 0.869 | 0.782 | 0.794 | 0.734 |
| T12~L2 | 0.926(0.886~0.965) | 0.808 | 0.918 | 0.865 | 0.881 | 0.829 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 0.918(0.878~0.956) | 0.746 | 0.885 | 0.806 | 0.814 | 0.766 |
Table 4 Performance index results of osteoporosis classification model established by BDT in internal testing sets
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 0.905(0.860~0.947) | 0.713 | 0.869 | 0.782 | 0.794 | 0.734 |
| T12~L2 | 0.926(0.886~0.965) | 0.808 | 0.918 | 0.865 | 0.881 | 0.829 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 0.918(0.878~0.956) | 0.746 | 0.885 | 0.806 | 0.814 | 0.766 |
| 项目 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 9.255 | 11.435 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| T12~L2 | 7.294 | 9.293 | 0.883 | 0.880 | 0.940 | <0.001 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 9.248 | 11.429 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Performance index results of osteoporosis regression model established by SGD in internal testing sets
| 项目 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 9.255 | 11.435 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| T12~L2 | 7.294 | 9.293 | 0.883 | 0.880 | 0.940 | <0.001 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 9.248 | 11.429 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
《中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南》工作组,程晓光,王亮,等. 中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志,2019,25(6):733-737. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2019.06.001.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [1] | HU Jian, LIU Min, JIAO Zengtao, JING Wenzhan, LIANG Wannian. Research on the Risk Level Assessment of Respiratory Infectious Disease Transmission: a Case Study of COVID-19-infected Public Places [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(32): 4738-4744. |
| [2] | HUANG Mu, ZHANG Daochun, YANG Wei, ZHONG Liming, YUAN Wenjing, JIA Ziqi, TAN Xiangliang, DUAN Xiaohui, LIU Xian, CHEN Weicui. Automatic Segmentation of Colorectal Cancer Lesions in Abdominal CT Images Using a Deep Learning Network Based on Fused 3D U-Net and Transformer: a Multicenter and Multidevice Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4281-4287. |
| [3] | LIU Yang, FENG Xiaojie, CHEN Jieyu, LUO Ren, ZHAO Xiaoshan, BI Jianlu. Revealing the Relationship between Lifestyle and Sub-health Based on Machine Learning: a Cross-sectional Study in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3829-3837. |
| [4] | FENG Shaohui, ZHU Lingyan, SONG Kexin, ZHU Yan, WU Yanling, WU Wenjing, ZHANG Dandan, RAN Limei. Study on the Relationship between Relevant Indicators in Postmenopausal Women with Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Bone Mineral Density [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3774-3780. |
| [5] | ZHOU Yichun, HAN Yeming, ZHANG Pengfei, SONG Wenwen, WAN Xiaoyu, LI Qimou, LIU Quande, YANG Wei, PAN Jichen, LI Xinhao, LI Dumin, YU Dexin, DONG Mei, LIANG Yongfeng, HU Shanshan, LYU Lijuan, ZHANG Mei. Consistency and Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Based on Different Deep Learning Algorithms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3466-3475. |
| [6] | OUYANG Weina, WANG Lu, ZHANG Xuan, TANG Wei, FAN Yongmei. Research on Atrial Fibrillation Screening Based on Dynamic Multi-scale Feature Fusion and Attention Mechanism [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(23): 3281-3286. |
| [7] | CAO Yixin, LI Yongzhi, WEI Lingxi, ZHOU Yan, GAO Fei, YU Qi. Application Status of Traditional Computational Methods and Machine Learning in Cancer Drug Repositioning [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(22): 3226-3232. |
| [8] | LIN Yanping, HUANG Jiachun, GUO Haiwei, ZHAO Rui, YANG Haolin, WAN Lei, ZHU Genfu, HUANG Hongxing. Study on the Distribution of TCM Syndrome Types and the Relationship between Muscle-bone-lipid in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 3040-3045. |
| [9] | XU Qinghong, WANG Jing, HUANG Yuan, ZHU Ci, CAO Wenbing, LI Ying. A Validation Study on Measuring Colorectal Polyp Size Using a Deep Learning-based Real-time Colorectal Polyp Measurement System [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1873-1877. |
| [10] | HE Xiaoming, HE Mincong, WEI Tengfei, LIN Tianye, LIU Wengang, ZHANG Qingwen, HE Wei, WEI Qiushi. Multidimensional Relationship of "TCM Syndrome Type, Clinical Feature and Molecular Typing" in Postmenopausal Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1588-1598. |
| [11] | ZHANG Hanzhi, JIN Hua, MA Le, SHI Ling, CHEN Chen, HUAN Hongmei, YU Dehua. Analysis of the Quality of Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Shanghai Community Health Service Institutions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1548-1557. |
| [12] | YANG Yang, GAO Xi. Research Progress of Paradoxical Bone Formation in Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1217-1224. |
| [13] | SONG Xinyuan, CHANG Wenxiu, ZHANG Wenyu, YANG Tingting, WANG Kai. Predictive Value of Convolutional Neural Network for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression Based on Chronic Kidney Disease Dataset [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4457-4463. |
| [14] | ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Guanhua, LYU Shanshan, JING Yali. Relationship between Thyroid Hormone Sensitivity Indices and Osteoporosis in Patients with Normal Thyroid Function Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3653-3659. |
| [15] | LUO Yunzhao, JIANG Hongchuan, XU Feng. Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning on Primary Core Needle Biopsy Slides [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2407-2413. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||