
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (19): 2398-2406.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0919
Special Issue: 数智医疗最新文章合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-07-10
Revised:2025-01-25
Published:2025-07-05
Online:2025-05-28
Contact:
YANG Guoqing
通讯作者:
杨国庆
作者简介:作者贡献:
熊鑫进行论文的构思与设计,数据的收集与整理,论文撰写;李洋、石峰负责论文的修订,统计学处理;李勇、赵林伟、付泉水、范小萍负责数据提供;杨连、段维、陈蓓协助数据的收集;杨国庆负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责,监督管理。
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0919
| 项目 | 训练集(n=426) | 验证集(n=106) | 内部测试集(n=170) | χ2(H)值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 66(57,73) | 65(55,72) | 59(55,69) | 18.424a | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 14.417 | 0.001 | |||
| 男 | 160(37.6) | 31(29.2) | 37(21.8) | ||
| 女 | 266(62.4) | 75(70.8) | 133(78.2) | ||
| 骨密度[例(%)] | 2.614 | 0.624 | |||
| 骨质疏松 | 155(36.4) | 38(35.8) | 56(32.9) | ||
| 骨量减低 | 178(41.8) | 45(42.5) | 83(48.8) | ||
| 正常 | 93(21.8) | 23(21.7) | 31(18.2) |
Table 1 Demographic tables for training,validation,and internal testing sets
| 项目 | 训练集(n=426) | 验证集(n=106) | 内部测试集(n=170) | χ2(H)值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 66(57,73) | 65(55,72) | 59(55,69) | 18.424a | <0.001 |
| 性别[例(%)] | 14.417 | 0.001 | |||
| 男 | 160(37.6) | 31(29.2) | 37(21.8) | ||
| 女 | 266(62.4) | 75(70.8) | 133(78.2) | ||
| 骨密度[例(%)] | 2.614 | 0.624 | |||
| 骨质疏松 | 155(36.4) | 38(35.8) | 56(32.9) | ||
| 骨量减低 | 178(41.8) | 45(42.5) | 83(48.8) | ||
| 正常 | 93(21.8) | 23(21.7) | 31(18.2) |
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.948(0.929~0.966) | 0.793 | 0.894 | 0.805 | 0.824 | 0.805 |
| 验证集 | 0.948(0.908~0.984) | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.821 | 0.856 | 0.819 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.897(0.866~0.927) | 0.760 | 0.875 | 0.765 | 0.774 | 0.766 | |
| 验证集 | 0.942(0.896~0.985) | 0.830 | 0.909 | 0.830 | 0.839 | 0.834 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.964(0.949~0.978) | 0.851 | 0.920 | 0.852 | 0.862 | 0.856 |
| 验证集 | 0.968(0.935~0.996) | 0.899 | 0.945 | 0.896 | 0.896 | 0.897 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.929(0.904~0.954) | 0.803 | 0.894 | 0.800 | 0.806 | 0.804 | |
| 验证集 | 0.961(0.924~0.993) | 0.876 | 0.934 | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.878 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.915(0.887~0.942) | 0.759 | 0.874 | 0.763 | 0.770 | 0.762 | |
| 验证集 | 0.956(0.917-0.992) | 0.866 | 0.933 | 0.877 | 0.891 | 0.875 | ||
| 胸部分类模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.955(0.937~0.972) | 0.820 | 0.910 | 0.833 | 0.842 | 0.829 |
| 验证集 | 0.967(0.938~0.993) | 0.851 | 0.928 | 0.868 | 0.884 | 0.863 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.948(0.929~0.967) | 0.795 | 0.895 | 0.808 | 0.826 | 0.807 | |
| 验证集 | 0.949(0.910~0.985) | 0.786 | 0.894 | 0.811 | 0.850 | 0.806 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 |
Table 2 Performance index results of osteoporosis classification model established by BDT,LR and RF in training set and validation set
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.948(0.929~0.966) | 0.793 | 0.894 | 0.805 | 0.824 | 0.805 |
| 验证集 | 0.948(0.908~0.984) | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.821 | 0.856 | 0.819 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.897(0.866~0.927) | 0.760 | 0.875 | 0.765 | 0.774 | 0.766 | |
| 验证集 | 0.942(0.896~0.985) | 0.830 | 0.909 | 0.830 | 0.839 | 0.834 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.964(0.949~0.978) | 0.851 | 0.920 | 0.852 | 0.862 | 0.856 |
| 验证集 | 0.968(0.935~0.996) | 0.899 | 0.945 | 0.896 | 0.896 | 0.897 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.929(0.904~0.954) | 0.803 | 0.894 | 0.800 | 0.806 | 0.804 | |
| 验证集 | 0.961(0.924~0.993) | 0.876 | 0.934 | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.878 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.915(0.887~0.942) | 0.759 | 0.874 | 0.763 | 0.770 | 0.762 | |
| 验证集 | 0.956(0.917-0.992) | 0.866 | 0.933 | 0.877 | 0.891 | 0.875 | ||
| 胸部分类模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 0.955(0.937~0.972) | 0.820 | 0.910 | 0.833 | 0.842 | 0.829 |
| 验证集 | 0.967(0.938~0.993) | 0.851 | 0.928 | 0.868 | 0.884 | 0.863 | ||
| 训练集 | LR | 0.948(0.929~0.967) | 0.795 | 0.895 | 0.808 | 0.826 | 0.807 | |
| 验证集 | 0.949(0.910~0.985) | 0.786 | 0.894 | 0.811 | 0.850 | 0.806 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 0.891(0.860~0.922) | 0.734 | 0.860 | 0.735 | 0.737 | 0.734 | |
| 验证集 | 0.947(0.909~0.983) | 0.801 | 0.900 | 0.811 | 0.817 | 0.803 |
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.405 | 18.359 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.513 | 15.742 | 0.793 | 0.783 | 0.894 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.385 | 17.460 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.534 | 13.352 | 0.851 | 0.844 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.414 | 18.268 | 0.745 | 0.745 | 0.866 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.632 | 15.984 | 0.788 | 0.776 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 12.463 | 16.835 | 0.784 | 0.784 | 0.891 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 11.985 | 14.884 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.907 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 11.050 | 15.147 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.909 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 9.449 | 11.563 | 0.888 | 0.883 | 0.942 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 12.448 | 16.374 | 0.795 | 0.795 | 0.894 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.633 | 15.837 | 0.796 | 0.780 | 0.892 | <0.001 | ||
| 胸部回归模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.573 | 18.465 | 0.740 | 0.740 | 0.863 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.812 | 16.006 | 0.787 | 0.775 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.354 | 17.471 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.511 | 13.312 | 0.852 | 0.845 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.471 | 18.330 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.864 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.802 | 16.079 | 0.785 | 0.773 | 0.887 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Performance index results of osteoporosis regression model established by BDT,SGD and RF in training set and validation set
| 项目 | 数据集 | 方法 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胸部(T5~T10) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.405 | 18.359 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.868 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.513 | 15.742 | 0.793 | 0.783 | 0.894 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.385 | 17.460 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.534 | 13.352 | 0.851 | 0.844 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.414 | 18.268 | 0.745 | 0.745 | 0.866 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.632 | 15.984 | 0.788 | 0.776 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 腹部(T12~L2) | 训练集 | BDT | 12.463 | 16.835 | 0.784 | 0.784 | 0.891 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 11.985 | 14.884 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.907 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 11.050 | 15.147 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.909 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 9.449 | 11.563 | 0.888 | 0.883 | 0.942 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 12.448 | 16.374 | 0.795 | 0.795 | 0.894 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.633 | 15.837 | 0.796 | 0.780 | 0.892 | <0.001 | ||
| 胸部回归模型经校准后(T5~T10-Cal) | 训练集 | BDT | 13.573 | 18.465 | 0.740 | 0.740 | 0.863 | <0.001 |
| 验证集 | 12.812 | 16.006 | 0.787 | 0.775 | 0.888 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | SGD | 12.354 | 17.471 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.876 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 10.511 | 13.312 | 0.852 | 0.845 | 0.923 | <0.001 | ||
| 训练集 | RF | 13.471 | 18.330 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.864 | <0.001 | |
| 验证集 | 12.802 | 16.079 | 0.785 | 0.773 | 0.887 | <0.001 |
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 0.905(0.860~0.947) | 0.713 | 0.869 | 0.782 | 0.794 | 0.734 |
| T12~L2 | 0.926(0.886~0.965) | 0.808 | 0.918 | 0.865 | 0.881 | 0.829 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 0.918(0.878~0.956) | 0.746 | 0.885 | 0.806 | 0.814 | 0.766 |
Table 4 Performance index results of osteoporosis classification model established by BDT in internal testing sets
| 项目 | AUC(95%CI) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 准确率 | 精确率 | F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 0.905(0.860~0.947) | 0.713 | 0.869 | 0.782 | 0.794 | 0.734 |
| T12~L2 | 0.926(0.886~0.965) | 0.808 | 0.918 | 0.865 | 0.881 | 0.829 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 0.918(0.878~0.956) | 0.746 | 0.885 | 0.806 | 0.814 | 0.766 |
| 项目 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 9.255 | 11.435 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| T12~L2 | 7.294 | 9.293 | 0.883 | 0.880 | 0.940 | <0.001 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 9.248 | 11.429 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Performance index results of osteoporosis regression model established by SGD in internal testing sets
| 项目 | MAE | RMSE | EVS | R-Squared | ρ值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T5~T10 | 9.255 | 11.435 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| T12~L2 | 7.294 | 9.293 | 0.883 | 0.880 | 0.940 | <0.001 |
| T5~T10-Cal | 9.248 | 11.429 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.905 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
《中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南》工作组,程晓光,王亮,等. 中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志,2019,25(6):733-737. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2019.06.001.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [1] | LIN Yanping, HUANG Jiachun, GUO Haiwei, ZHAO Rui, YANG Haolin, WAN Lei, ZHU Genfu, HUANG Hongxing. Study on the Distribution of TCM Syndrome Types and the Relationship between Muscle-bone-lipid in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 3040-3045. |
| [2] | XU Qinghong, WANG Jing, HUANG Yuan, ZHU Ci, CAO Wenbing, LI Ying. A Validation Study on Measuring Colorectal Polyp Size Using a Deep Learning-based Real-time Colorectal Polyp Measurement System [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1873-1877. |
| [3] | HE Xiaoming, HE Mincong, WEI Tengfei, LIN Tianye, LIU Wengang, ZHANG Qingwen, HE Wei, WEI Qiushi. Multidimensional Relationship of "TCM Syndrome Type, Clinical Feature and Molecular Typing" in Postmenopausal Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1588-1598. |
| [4] | ZHANG Hanzhi, JIN Hua, MA Le, SHI Ling, CHEN Chen, HUAN Hongmei, YU Dehua. Analysis of the Quality of Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Shanghai Community Health Service Institutions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1548-1557. |
| [5] | YANG Yang, GAO Xi. Research Progress of Paradoxical Bone Formation in Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1217-1224. |
| [6] | SONG Xinyuan, CHANG Wenxiu, ZHANG Wenyu, YANG Tingting, WANG Kai. Predictive Value of Convolutional Neural Network for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression Based on Chronic Kidney Disease Dataset [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4457-4463. |
| [7] | ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Guanhua, LYU Shanshan, JING Yali. Relationship between Thyroid Hormone Sensitivity Indices and Osteoporosis in Patients with Normal Thyroid Function Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3653-3659. |
| [8] | LUO Yunzhao, JIANG Hongchuan, XU Feng. Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning on Primary Core Needle Biopsy Slides [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2407-2413. |
| [9] | TAN Wenbin, LI Jia, LIU Mingyu, LU Yongxin, CHENG Yaxin. Research Progress on the Influence of Nervous System Diseases and Related Therapeutic Drugs on Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2092-2100. |
| [10] | HE Ting, LI Jia, TAN Wenbin. Research Progress of Circulatory System Diseases and Secondary Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2101-2112. |
| [11] | CHEN Beibei, LI Jia, TAN Wenbin. Progress in the Research of Endocrine and Metabolic System Diseases and Secondary Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2082-2091. |
| [12] | LI Jia, TAN Wenbin. The Dilemma of Prevention and Treatment of Secondary Osteoporosis and Its Countermeasures [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2075-2081. |
| [13] | SUN Qing, WU Yuxiao, CUI Limin. The Prevalence of Osteosarcopenia in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1520-1526. |
| [14] | DU Huijie, LIU Xingyu, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, ZHANG Huiqin, MO Jiali, LU Yi, KUANG Jie. Advances in the Prognostic Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Using Machine Learning Predictive Models as an Example [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 554-560. |
| [15] | YUE Haitao, HE Chanchan, CHENG Yuyou, ZHANG Sencheng, WU You, MA Jing. Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(04): 499-509. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||