
Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (14): 1692-1698.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0847
Special Issue: 老年问题最新文章合辑; 老年人群健康最新文章合辑; 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2023-11-26
Revised:2024-01-20
Published:2024-05-15
Online:2024-03-22
Contact:
YANG Yu
通讯作者:
杨玉
作者简介:基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0847
| 变量 | 非复发组(n=210) | 复发组(n=70) |
|---|---|---|
| 年龄( | 71.6±6.2 | 72.8±6.9 |
| 性别[例(%)] | ||
| 男 | 132(62.9) | 44(62.9) |
| 女 | 78(37.1) | 26(37.1) |
| 运动情况[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 104(49.5) | 37(52.9) |
| 是 | 106(50.5) | 33(47.1) |
| 高血压[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 156(74.3) | 39(55.7) |
| 是 | 54(25.7) | 31(44.3) |
| LDL-C[例(%)] | ||
| <4.1 mmol/L | 157(74.8) | 46(65.7) |
| ≥4.1 mmol/L | 53(25.2) | 24(34.3) |
| 肥胖[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 124(59.0) | 34(48.6) |
| 是 | 86(41.0) | 36(51.4) |
| NIHSS评分[例(%)] | ||
| 1分 | 68(32.4) | 18(25.7) |
| 2分 | 71(33.8) | 26(37.1) |
| 3分 | 71(33.8) | 26(37.1) |
| 心房颤动[例(%)] | ||
| 无 | 191(91.0) | 60(85.7) |
| 有 | 19(9.0) | 10(14.3) |
| HbA1c[例(%)] | ||
| <6.5% | 106(50.5) | 31(44.3) |
| ≥6.5% | 104(49.5) | 39(55.7) |
| 应激性血糖[例(%)] | ||
| <10 mmol/L | 142(67.6) | 32(45.7) |
| ≥10 mmol/L | 68(32.4) | 38(54.3) |
| 受教育程度[例(%)] | ||
| 高中以下 | 102(48.6) | 41(58.6) |
| 高中及高中以上 | 108(51.4) | 29(41.4) |
| 家庭月收入[例(%)] | ||
| <10 000元 | 102(48.6) | 40(57.1) |
| ≥10 000元 | 108(51.4) | 30(42.9) |
| SHR[例(%)] | ||
| ≤1.04 | 152(72.4) | 33(47.1) |
| >1.04 | 58(27.6) | 37(52.9) |
| SHR( | 1.11±0.37 | 1.29±0.41 |
Table 1 Analysis of 1-year recurrence in elderly patients with mild AIS with different baseline data
| 变量 | 非复发组(n=210) | 复发组(n=70) |
|---|---|---|
| 年龄( | 71.6±6.2 | 72.8±6.9 |
| 性别[例(%)] | ||
| 男 | 132(62.9) | 44(62.9) |
| 女 | 78(37.1) | 26(37.1) |
| 运动情况[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 104(49.5) | 37(52.9) |
| 是 | 106(50.5) | 33(47.1) |
| 高血压[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 156(74.3) | 39(55.7) |
| 是 | 54(25.7) | 31(44.3) |
| LDL-C[例(%)] | ||
| <4.1 mmol/L | 157(74.8) | 46(65.7) |
| ≥4.1 mmol/L | 53(25.2) | 24(34.3) |
| 肥胖[例(%)] | ||
| 否 | 124(59.0) | 34(48.6) |
| 是 | 86(41.0) | 36(51.4) |
| NIHSS评分[例(%)] | ||
| 1分 | 68(32.4) | 18(25.7) |
| 2分 | 71(33.8) | 26(37.1) |
| 3分 | 71(33.8) | 26(37.1) |
| 心房颤动[例(%)] | ||
| 无 | 191(91.0) | 60(85.7) |
| 有 | 19(9.0) | 10(14.3) |
| HbA1c[例(%)] | ||
| <6.5% | 106(50.5) | 31(44.3) |
| ≥6.5% | 104(49.5) | 39(55.7) |
| 应激性血糖[例(%)] | ||
| <10 mmol/L | 142(67.6) | 32(45.7) |
| ≥10 mmol/L | 68(32.4) | 38(54.3) |
| 受教育程度[例(%)] | ||
| 高中以下 | 102(48.6) | 41(58.6) |
| 高中及高中以上 | 108(51.4) | 29(41.4) |
| 家庭月收入[例(%)] | ||
| <10 000元 | 102(48.6) | 40(57.1) |
| ≥10 000元 | 108(51.4) | 30(42.9) |
| SHR[例(%)] | ||
| ≤1.04 | 152(72.4) | 33(47.1) |
| >1.04 | 58(27.6) | 37(52.9) |
| SHR( | 1.11±0.37 | 1.29±0.41 |
| 变量 | 赋值 |
|---|---|
| 因变量 | 复发=1,非复发=0 |
| 年龄 | 实测值 |
| 性别 | 男性=1,女性=0 |
| 运动情况 | 是=1,否=0 |
| 高血压史 | 是=1,否=0 |
| LDL-C | <4.1 mmol/L=1,≥4.1 mmol/L=2 |
| 肥胖 | 否=1,是=2 |
| 心房颤动 | 有=1,无=0 |
| HbA1c | <6.5%=1,≥6.5%=2 |
| 应激性血糖 | <10 mmol/L=1,≥10 mmol/L=2 |
| 受教育程度 | 高中以下=1,高中及高中以上=2 |
| 家庭月收入 | <10 000元=1,≥10 000元=2 |
| SHR | ≤1.04=1,>1.04=2 |
| SHR | 实测值 |
Table 2 Assignment table for conditional Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors of 1-year relapse in elderly patients with mild AIS
| 变量 | 赋值 |
|---|---|
| 因变量 | 复发=1,非复发=0 |
| 年龄 | 实测值 |
| 性别 | 男性=1,女性=0 |
| 运动情况 | 是=1,否=0 |
| 高血压史 | 是=1,否=0 |
| LDL-C | <4.1 mmol/L=1,≥4.1 mmol/L=2 |
| 肥胖 | 否=1,是=2 |
| 心房颤动 | 有=1,无=0 |
| HbA1c | <6.5%=1,≥6.5%=2 |
| 应激性血糖 | <10 mmol/L=1,≥10 mmol/L=2 |
| 受教育程度 | 高中以下=1,高中及高中以上=2 |
| 家庭月收入 | <10 000元=1,≥10 000元=2 |
| SHR | ≤1.04=1,>1.04=2 |
| SHR | 实测值 |
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | 0.411 | 0.141 | 4.39 | <0.001 | 1.508 | 1.255~1.812 |
| 性别 | — | — | — | — | 1.000 | — |
| 运动情况 | 0.131 | 0.240 | 0.48 | 0.632 | 0.877 | 0.513~1.499 |
| 高血压史 | 0.745 | 0.574 | 2.73 | 0.006 | 2.106 | 1.234~3.594 |
| LDL-C | 0.391 | 0.415 | 1.39 | 0.164 | 1.478 | 0.852~2.564 |
| 肥胖 | 0.379 | 0.385 | 1.44 | 0.150 | 1.461 | 0.872~2.448 |
| NIHSS评分 | 0.163 | 0.208 | 0.92 | 0.357 | 1.177 | 0.832~1.665 |
| 心房颤动 | 0.511 | 0.695 | 1.23 | 0.220 | 1.667 | 0.736~3.772 |
| HbA1c | 0.264 | 0.372 | 0.92 | 0.355 | 1.302 | 0.744~2.279 |
| 应激性血糖 | 0.932 | 0.745 | 3.17 | 0.002 | 2.538 | 1.428~4.512 |
| 受教育程度 | 0.379 | 0.186 | 1.39 | 0.163 | 0.685 | 0.402~1.166 |
| 家庭月收入 | 0.327 | 0.196 | 1.20 | 0.228 | 0.721 | 0.424~1.228 |
| SHR | 1.010 | 0.774 | 3.59 | <0.001 | 2.747 | 1.581~4.771 |
| SHR(连续变量) | 1.242 | 1.280 | 3.34 | 0.001 | 3.460 | 1.668~7.161 |
Table 3 Univariate conditional Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors of 1-year relapse in elderly patients with mild AIS
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | 0.411 | 0.141 | 4.39 | <0.001 | 1.508 | 1.255~1.812 |
| 性别 | — | — | — | — | 1.000 | — |
| 运动情况 | 0.131 | 0.240 | 0.48 | 0.632 | 0.877 | 0.513~1.499 |
| 高血压史 | 0.745 | 0.574 | 2.73 | 0.006 | 2.106 | 1.234~3.594 |
| LDL-C | 0.391 | 0.415 | 1.39 | 0.164 | 1.478 | 0.852~2.564 |
| 肥胖 | 0.379 | 0.385 | 1.44 | 0.150 | 1.461 | 0.872~2.448 |
| NIHSS评分 | 0.163 | 0.208 | 0.92 | 0.357 | 1.177 | 0.832~1.665 |
| 心房颤动 | 0.511 | 0.695 | 1.23 | 0.220 | 1.667 | 0.736~3.772 |
| HbA1c | 0.264 | 0.372 | 0.92 | 0.355 | 1.302 | 0.744~2.279 |
| 应激性血糖 | 0.932 | 0.745 | 3.17 | 0.002 | 2.538 | 1.428~4.512 |
| 受教育程度 | 0.379 | 0.186 | 1.39 | 0.163 | 0.685 | 0.402~1.166 |
| 家庭月收入 | 0.327 | 0.196 | 1.20 | 0.228 | 0.721 | 0.424~1.228 |
| SHR | 1.010 | 0.774 | 3.59 | <0.001 | 2.747 | 1.581~4.771 |
| SHR(连续变量) | 1.242 | 1.280 | 3.34 | 0.001 | 3.460 | 1.668~7.161 |
| 模型 | 指标 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 0.932 | 0.293 | 10.077 | 0.002 | 2.538 | 1.428~4.512 |
| SHR | 1.010 | 0.282 | 12.867 | <0.001 | 2.747 | 1.581~4.771 | |
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.018 | 0.320 | 10.110 | 0.001 | 2.768 | 1.478~5.184 |
| SHR | 1.075 | 0.303 | 12.562 | <0.001 | 2.931 | 1.617~5.312 | |
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.022 | 0.321 | 10.165 | 0.001 | 2.780 | 1.483~5.212 |
| SHR | 1.086 | 0.304 | 12.734 | <0.001 | 2.962 | 1.631~5.378 | |
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.072 | 0.340 | 9.961 | 0.002 | 2.920 | 1.501~5.682 |
| SHR | 1.170 | 0.323 | 13.170 | <0.001 | 3.224 | 1.713~6.066 | |
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.093 | 0.355 | 9.492 | 0.002 | 2.983 | 1.488~5.977 |
| SHR | 1.117 | 0.337 | 10.994 | 0.001 | 3.056 | 1.579~5.914 |
Table 4 Multivariate conditional Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors of 1-year relapse in elderly patients with mild AIS
| 模型 | 指标 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 0.932 | 0.293 | 10.077 | 0.002 | 2.538 | 1.428~4.512 |
| SHR | 1.010 | 0.282 | 12.867 | <0.001 | 2.747 | 1.581~4.771 | |
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.018 | 0.320 | 10.110 | 0.001 | 2.768 | 1.478~5.184 |
| SHR | 1.075 | 0.303 | 12.562 | <0.001 | 2.931 | 1.617~5.312 | |
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.022 | 0.321 | 10.165 | 0.001 | 2.780 | 1.483~5.212 |
| SHR | 1.086 | 0.304 | 12.734 | <0.001 | 2.962 | 1.631~5.378 | |
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.072 | 0.340 | 9.961 | 0.002 | 2.920 | 1.501~5.682 |
| SHR | 1.170 | 0.323 | 13.170 | <0.001 | 3.224 | 1.713~6.066 | |
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.093 | 0.355 | 9.492 | 0.002 | 2.983 | 1.488~5.977 |
| SHR | 1.117 | 0.337 | 10.994 | 0.001 | 3.056 | 1.579~5.914 |
| 分类 | 模型 | 指标 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 糖尿病人群 | 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 1.131 | 0.572 | 3.913 | 0.048 | 3.099 | 1.010~9.503 |
| SHR | 1.073 | 0.507 | 4.484 | 0.034 | 2.924 | 1.083~7.891 | ||
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.136 | 0.571 | 3.961 | 0.047 | 3.113 | 1.017~9.527 | |
| SHR | 1.155 | 0.518 | 4.972 | 0.026 | 3.174 | 1.150~8.761 | ||
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.122 | 0.568 | 3.901 | 0.048 | 3.072 | 1.009~9.359 | |
| SHR | 1.127 | 0.524 | 4.635 | 0.031 | 3.088 | 1.106~8.618 | ||
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.063 | 0.603 | 3.111 | 0.078 | 2.894 | 0.889~9.429 | |
| SHR | 1.097 | 0.542 | 4.090 | 0.043 | 2.995 | 1.034~8.670 | ||
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.290 | 0.708 | 3.327 | 0.068 | 3.634 | 0.908~14.544 | |
| SHR | 1.324 | 0.666 | 3.955 | 0.047 | 3.757 | 1.019~13.845 | ||
| 非糖尿病人群 | 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 0.853 | 0.348 | 6.027 | 0.014 | 2.347 | 1.188~4.639 |
| SHR | 0.982 | 0.340 | 8.346 | 0.004 | 2.670 | 1.371~5.198 | ||
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.037 | 0.427 | 5.895 | 0.015 | 2.821 | 1.221~6.517 | |
| SHR | 0.968 | 0.395 | 6.012 | 0.014 | 2.633 | 1.214~5.708 | ||
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.030 | 0.428 | 5.797 | 0.016 | 2.802 | 1.211~6.482 | |
| SHR | 0.965 | 0.395 | 5.962 | 0.015 | 2.626 | 1.210~5.698 | ||
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.382 | 0.493 | 7.870 | 0.005 | 3.983 | 1.517~10.458 | |
| SHR | 1.433 | 0.463 | 9.575 | 0.002 | 4.193 | 1.691~10.396 | ||
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.210 | 0.517 | 5.476 | 0.019 | 3.355 | 1.217~9.247 | |
| SHR | 1.141 | 0.505 | 5.095 | 0.024 | 3.129 | 1.162~8.427 |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors affecting the 1-year recurrence of mild AIS in elderly patients with or without a history of diabetes
| 分类 | 模型 | 指标 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 糖尿病人群 | 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 1.131 | 0.572 | 3.913 | 0.048 | 3.099 | 1.010~9.503 |
| SHR | 1.073 | 0.507 | 4.484 | 0.034 | 2.924 | 1.083~7.891 | ||
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.136 | 0.571 | 3.961 | 0.047 | 3.113 | 1.017~9.527 | |
| SHR | 1.155 | 0.518 | 4.972 | 0.026 | 3.174 | 1.150~8.761 | ||
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.122 | 0.568 | 3.901 | 0.048 | 3.072 | 1.009~9.359 | |
| SHR | 1.127 | 0.524 | 4.635 | 0.031 | 3.088 | 1.106~8.618 | ||
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.063 | 0.603 | 3.111 | 0.078 | 2.894 | 0.889~9.429 | |
| SHR | 1.097 | 0.542 | 4.090 | 0.043 | 2.995 | 1.034~8.670 | ||
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.290 | 0.708 | 3.327 | 0.068 | 3.634 | 0.908~14.544 | |
| SHR | 1.324 | 0.666 | 3.955 | 0.047 | 3.757 | 1.019~13.845 | ||
| 非糖尿病人群 | 模型1 | 应激性血糖 | 0.853 | 0.348 | 6.027 | 0.014 | 2.347 | 1.188~4.639 |
| SHR | 0.982 | 0.340 | 8.346 | 0.004 | 2.670 | 1.371~5.198 | ||
| 模型2 | 应激性血糖 | 1.037 | 0.427 | 5.895 | 0.015 | 2.821 | 1.221~6.517 | |
| SHR | 0.968 | 0.395 | 6.012 | 0.014 | 2.633 | 1.214~5.708 | ||
| 模型3 | 应激性血糖 | 1.030 | 0.428 | 5.797 | 0.016 | 2.802 | 1.211~6.482 | |
| SHR | 0.965 | 0.395 | 5.962 | 0.015 | 2.626 | 1.210~5.698 | ||
| 模型4 | 应激性血糖 | 1.382 | 0.493 | 7.870 | 0.005 | 3.983 | 1.517~10.458 | |
| SHR | 1.433 | 0.463 | 9.575 | 0.002 | 4.193 | 1.691~10.396 | ||
| 模型5 | 应激性血糖 | 1.210 | 0.517 | 5.476 | 0.019 | 3.355 | 1.217~9.247 | |
| SHR | 1.141 | 0.505 | 5.095 | 0.024 | 3.129 | 1.162~8.427 |
| 项目 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR | ||||||
| ≤1.00 | — | — | — | — | 1.000 | — |
| 1.01~1.40 | 0.860 | 0.479 | 3.216 | 0.073 | 2.362 | 0.923~6.043 |
| 1.41~1.80 | 1.080 | 0.467 | 5.352 | 0.021 | 2.945 | 1.179~7.356 |
| >1.80 | 1.522 | 0.548 | 7.710 | 0.005 | 4.582 | 1.565~13.416 |
| SHR趋势 | 0.487 | 0.162 | 8.995 | 0.003 | 1.627 | 1.184~2.237 |
| 糖尿病史×SHR交互 | 0.452 | 0.344 | 1.723 | 0.189 | 1.571 | 0.800~3.086 |
Table 6 Analysis of factors influencing the relationship between SHR and 1-year recurrence of mild AIS in elderly patients
| 项目 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR | ||||||
| ≤1.00 | — | — | — | — | 1.000 | — |
| 1.01~1.40 | 0.860 | 0.479 | 3.216 | 0.073 | 2.362 | 0.923~6.043 |
| 1.41~1.80 | 1.080 | 0.467 | 5.352 | 0.021 | 2.945 | 1.179~7.356 |
| >1.80 | 1.522 | 0.548 | 7.710 | 0.005 | 4.582 | 1.565~13.416 |
| SHR趋势 | 0.487 | 0.162 | 8.995 | 0.003 | 1.627 | 1.184~2.237 |
| 糖尿病史×SHR交互 | 0.452 | 0.344 | 1.723 | 0.189 | 1.571 | 0.800~3.086 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2020》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2022,19(2):136-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2022.02.011.
|
| [3] | |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):17. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.
|
| [11] |
《中国成人超重和肥胖预防控制指南》修订委员会. 中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南(2021)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2021:2-3.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
程阅凤,林丽,董慧,等. 脑梗死患者复发的影响因素分析[J]. 医学综述,2017,23(21):4352-4355. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2017.21.038.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
夏智丽,高程洁,高亚洁,等. 应激性血糖升高比值对急性心肌梗死患者预后的评估价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报:医学版,2019,39(3):309-315. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2019.03.016.
|
| [31] |
|
| [1] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [2] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [3] | LI Wenping, CHEN Jianhua, XU Jiapei, JIN Xue, PAN Zihan, CHI Chunhua. A Scoping Review on the Empowerment of Community Elderly Health Services by Digital-Intelligent Health Management Platforms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2938-2949. |
| [4] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [5] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [6] | LIU Ying, LIU Shiwei, ZHANG Chi, SHEN Ji, ZHANG Yushan, ZHANG Jie, SANG Yingchen, WANG Youjiao, WANG Lei, ZHOU Houguang, SHI Hong. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Older Stroke Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2829-2835. |
| [7] | ZHAO Huili, LU Lina, ZHUO Ya, WANG Xin. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Recurrence of Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2648-2655. |
| [8] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [9] | PANG Shu, SUN ying, JIANG Chunyan. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Fried's Frailty Phenotype and the FRAIL Scale in Assessing Pre-frailty among Community-dwelling Older Adults Undergoing Health Examinations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2664-2670. |
| [10] | LI Simin, ZHANG Tingting, WANG Kunbo, YANG Jianzhou, PING Weiwei. Effects of Exercise Dosage on Elderly Patients with Sarcopenia: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2400-2409. |
| [11] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [12] | WU Ruining, ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Gongzi, LI Jun, XIE Suhang, LIU Yangxiaoxue, ZHANG Jiali, LIU Maomao, HUANG Liping. Study on Fixed and Mobile Exoskeleton Robots in Improving Lower Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333. |
| [13] | CHEN Yan, SHEN Dequan, SHENG Renlei, CHANG Yujie, YANG Jiaqi, DING Jie, SUN Zhifang, WANG Dahui. Influencing Factors and Importance Ranking of the Utilization of Primary-level Traditional Chinese Medicine Preventive and Health Care Services for the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2182-2189. |
| [14] | YU Shan, CHE Yajie, SUBIYINUER· Maimaiti, GUO Kaiyang, FENG Xingxing, YAN Ping. A Comparative Study on the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Urban and Rural Elderly People in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2227-2233. |
| [15] | YANG Tingting, ZHENG Li, LIANG Daqiang, WU fan, YUAN Xianxian, WEI lai, HU Jin, WANG Junhua, WANG Ziyun. Association between Sleep Fragmentation and Arteriosclerosis among Population Aged 40-65 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2190-2197. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||