
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (24): 3050-3060.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
Special Issue: 中医最新文章合辑; 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-12-20
Revised:2023-03-10
Published:2023-08-20
Online:2023-03-28
Contact:
HAN Wei
通讯作者:
韩为
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
| 基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
| U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
| Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
| GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
| Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
| Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
| miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
| miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
Table 1 Primer sequence of target gene and internal reference gene
| 基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
| U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
| Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
| GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
| Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
| Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
| miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
| miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
| 组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
| 模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
| 电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
| 抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
| F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of mNSS score and infarct volume of brain tissue of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
| 模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
| 电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
| 抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
| F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
| 模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
| 电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
| 抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
| F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of AI,GSK-3β,p-GSK-3β,Cyp-D protein positive expression in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
| 模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
| 电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
| 抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
| F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
| 电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
| 抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
| F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of miR-124-3p,GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 mRNA expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
| 电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
| 抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
| F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
| 电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
| 抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
| F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
| 模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
| 电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
| 抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
| F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
| 模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
| 电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
| 抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
| F值 | 313.385 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of openness degree of MPTP in cerebral cortex neurons of rats in each group
| 组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
|---|---|---|
| 假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
| 模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
| 电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
| 抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
| 电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
| F值 | 313.385 | |
| P值 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
余曙光,徐斌. 实验针灸学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2021.
|
| [18] |
包新杰,赵浩,魏俊吉,等. 线栓法建立大鼠局灶性脑缺血模型的改进[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2011,8(5):248-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2011.05.006.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
郑仕平,韩为,储浩然,等. 通督调神针灸预处理对脑缺血再灌注大鼠相关微小RNA调控机制的研究[J]. 针刺研究,2015,40(2):99-103. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.2015.02.003.
|
| [22] |
彭静,陈曦. "补肾通督,醒脑益智"法电针治疗血管性痴呆80例[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(6):623-624. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210413-0005.
|
| [23] |
刘燕,王陈妮,兰崴,等. 通督调神针刺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经功能及VEGF、NGF、MBP表达的影响[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2022,28(2):218-223. DOI:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2022.02.020.
|
| [24] |
谷诗浓,刘毓佳,王振杰,等. 基于细胞自噬探讨通督调神针法对缺血再灌注大鼠神经功能及Beclin-1蛋白表达的影响[J]. 针灸临床杂志,2020,36(10):64-68.
|
| [25] |
黄亚光,杨松柏,杜利鹏,等. 电针预处理通过调控皮层区自噬改善大鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤[J]. 针刺研究,2019,44(12):867-872. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.190307.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
李杰,马跃文,康楠,等. 体外放散式冲击波促进脑梗死大鼠海马区神经干细胞增殖并抑制miR-124的表达[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(31):4981-4987.
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
张利达,韩为,高志波,等. "通督调神"法针刺联合颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄:随机对照研究[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(2):121-125. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210202-k0007.
|
| [41] |
罗佛赐,韩为,张利达,等. 通督调神针刺联合西药对短暂性脑缺血发作合并高尿酸血症患者颈动脉斑块的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2021,40(7):789-794. DOI:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2021.07.0789.
|
| [1] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [2] | LIU Ying, LIU Shiwei, ZHANG Chi, SHEN Ji, ZHANG Yushan, ZHANG Jie, SANG Yingchen, WANG Youjiao, WANG Lei, ZHOU Houguang, SHI Hong. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Older Stroke Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2829-2835. |
| [3] | WU Ruining, ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Gongzi, LI Jun, XIE Suhang, LIU Yangxiaoxue, ZHANG Jiali, LIU Maomao, HUANG Liping. Study on Fixed and Mobile Exoskeleton Robots in Improving Lower Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333. |
| [4] | JI Ying, GUO Chuan, ZHU Shizhe, JI Panpan, WANG Tong, KAN Chaojie, WANG Qinglei. Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Cerebellum on Different Balance Abilities in Patients with Supratentorial Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2022-2028. |
| [5] | HAN Yue, BIAN Zhe, GU Haochen, WANG Dali, PENG Yanbo. Impact of Cumulative Defined Daily Dose of Statins on Recurrence Risk in Ischemic Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1821-1826. |
| [6] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [7] | LIU Yang, LIANG Fang, WU Ling, LI Wenlei, LI Pengfei. Diagnostic Value of Non-conventional Lipids and the Triglyceride-glucose Index in First-onset Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1422-1429. |
| [8] | WANG Xiaonan, RUAN Xiaonan, LIU Yang, WU Kang, QIU Hua, LIU Qingping, SONG Jiahui, GAO Jiaojiao, ZHOU Yi, LIU Xiaolin. Correlation between Anthropometric Indices and the Risk of Stroke: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 1020-1028. |
| [9] | CAO Lei, LIU Xuechun, JIANG Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Sunhong, DU Jing. Study on the Prediction of Muscle Attenuation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke by the Cross-sectional Area and Thickness of the Temporalis Muscle [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 997-1007. |
| [10] | HU Naixiao, ZHANG Hao, WANG Bo, QI Xin, DONG Jianhong, XUE Ruizhong, ZHANG Qingsu. Study of the Therapeutic Effect of Intraoral Balloon Dilation Combined with K-point Stimulation in Patients with Post-stroke Pseudobulbar Palsy Associated Dysphagia and Trismus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 591-596. |
| [11] | ZHAO Xuejiao, LI Juan, LI Yujie, LU Ting, Xian Lihong, YAN Huan. Prevalence Trends and Influencing Factors for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 380-392. |
| [12] | FAN Zhuanzhuan, LI Wenting, MA Guoliang. Relationship between the Chinese Visceral Adipose Index and Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 180-187. |
| [13] | YU Hao, LIAO Peng, LUO Li. Digital Therapy for Stroke: Progress and Challenges from Screening to Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 240-246. |
| [14] | LONG Yutong, LU Shiyu, TAN Jie, YANG Bolu, DUAN Jingying, YANG Tongde, YAN Lijing, GONG Enying, SHAO Ruitai. Long-term Medication Adherence Attitudes and Behaviors of Stroke Patients in Rural Areas of China and Related Factors: Based on Follow-up Data from a Certain County in Hebei Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 170-179. |
| [15] | SUN Haixin, JIANG Bin. Practical Evidence and Reflection on Hypertension Control Strategies in Stroke Prevention and Management in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3601-3607. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||