Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (24): 3050-3060.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
Special Issue: 中医最新文章合辑; 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-12-20
Revised:
2023-03-10
Published:
2023-08-20
Online:
2023-03-28
Contact:
HAN Wei
通讯作者:
韩为
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
---|---|---|---|
β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
Table 1 Primer sequence of target gene and internal reference gene
基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
---|---|---|---|
β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of mNSS score and infarct volume of brain tissue of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of AI,GSK-3β,p-GSK-3β,Cyp-D protein positive expression in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of miR-124-3p,GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 mRNA expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
F值 | 313.385 | |
P值 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of openness degree of MPTP in cerebral cortex neurons of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
F值 | 313.385 | |
P值 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
余曙光,徐斌. 实验针灸学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2021.
|
[18] |
包新杰,赵浩,魏俊吉,等. 线栓法建立大鼠局灶性脑缺血模型的改进[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2011,8(5):248-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2011.05.006.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
郑仕平,韩为,储浩然,等. 通督调神针灸预处理对脑缺血再灌注大鼠相关微小RNA调控机制的研究[J]. 针刺研究,2015,40(2):99-103. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.2015.02.003.
|
[22] |
彭静,陈曦. "补肾通督,醒脑益智"法电针治疗血管性痴呆80例[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(6):623-624. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210413-0005.
|
[23] |
刘燕,王陈妮,兰崴,等. 通督调神针刺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经功能及VEGF、NGF、MBP表达的影响[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2022,28(2):218-223. DOI:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2022.02.020.
|
[24] |
谷诗浓,刘毓佳,王振杰,等. 基于细胞自噬探讨通督调神针法对缺血再灌注大鼠神经功能及Beclin-1蛋白表达的影响[J]. 针灸临床杂志,2020,36(10):64-68.
|
[25] |
黄亚光,杨松柏,杜利鹏,等. 电针预处理通过调控皮层区自噬改善大鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤[J]. 针刺研究,2019,44(12):867-872. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.190307.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
李杰,马跃文,康楠,等. 体外放散式冲击波促进脑梗死大鼠海马区神经干细胞增殖并抑制miR-124的表达[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(31):4981-4987.
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
张利达,韩为,高志波,等. "通督调神"法针刺联合颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄:随机对照研究[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(2):121-125. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210202-k0007.
|
[41] |
罗佛赐,韩为,张利达,等. 通督调神针刺联合西药对短暂性脑缺血发作合并高尿酸血症患者颈动脉斑块的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2021,40(7):789-794. DOI:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2021.07.0789.
|
[1] | YANG Ji, ZHANG Yao, ZHAO Yingqiang, ZHANG Qiuyue. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of TCM Three-level Prevention and Control Model in the Management of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: a Single-center, Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2750-2761. |
[2] | TAN Yi, ZHU Lihong, YIN Zengwei, HOU Shunan, YU Houming. A Real-world Study of MRI-guided Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2508-2515. |
[3] | CHU Tianyu, GU Yan. Carotid Artery Calcification Features in Plaque Stability and Clinical Events [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2247-2252. |
[4] | TAN Wenbin, LI Jia, LIU Mingyu, LU Yongxin, CHENG Yaxin. Research Progress on the Influence of Nervous System Diseases and Related Therapeutic Drugs on Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2092-2100. |
[5] | LI Mei, JIANG Dongsheng, ZHAO Jingjing, CAO Yajing, ZHANG Fan, TANG Lijuan, LIU Xiaoli. Correlation Analysis of Homocysteine and Stroke in People over 40 Years Old [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1723-1729. |
[6] | ZHAO Zhixin, MEI Yongxia, WANG Xiaoxuan, JIANG Hu, WANG Wenna, ZHANG Zhenxiang. Cognition and Experience of Social Participation in Stroke Survivors: a Meta-synthesis Based on Qualitative Studies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1273-1280. |
[7] | LIU Zuting, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, MO Jiali, LIU Xingyu, DU Huijie, ZHANG Huiqin, YI Yingping, KUANG Jie. Correlation between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and Risk of Ischemic Stroke Recurrence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 541-547. |
[8] | ZHOU Chenxi, LIN Beilei, TANG Shangfeng, ZHANG Zhenxiang, WANG Xiaoxuan, JIANG Hu, ZHANG Dudu, LIU Bowen, LI Xin. Construction of Conceptual Framework of Proactive Health Behavior in Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 534-540. |
[9] | NI Xiaojia, LIN Hao, LUO Xufei, KUANG Zhuoran, LIU Yunlan, GUO Jianwen, CHEN Yaolong, CAI Yefeng, Working Group of Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (2023 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 521-533. |
[10] | DU Huijie, LIU Xingyu, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, ZHANG Huiqin, MO Jiali, LU Yi, KUANG Jie. Advances in the Prognostic Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Using Machine Learning Predictive Models as an Example [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 554-560. |
[11] | ZHANG Pingshu, XUE Jing, XING Aijun, WANG Lianhui, MA Qian, FU Yongshan, YUAN Xiaodong. Study on Sleep Status and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Acute Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 548-553. |
[12] | REN Xiaoqiao, WANG Pan, WU Hao, JI Yong, SHI Zhihong. Correlation of Serum Uric Acid to Serum Creatinine Ratio with the Recurrence of Cerebrovascular Events and Mortality in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 175-182. |
[13] | YUAN Dan, WANG Ying, WANG Yingpeng, XU Li, XUE Jia, CHENG Jingjing, WANG Haipeng. Effect of the Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke beyond Time Window: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 169-174. |
[14] | JIA Jie. Reflections and Strategies for Full-cycle Stroke Rehabilitation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 129-134. |
[15] | LIN Jiali, ZHANG Shuyang, LIN Jiaying, ZHOU Yuxin, ZHAO Yuehua, CHEN Yun, JIA Jie. Correlation between Upper Limb Motor Function and Attention after Stroke: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 208-213. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||