
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (06): 704-710.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0581
Special Issue: 泌尿系统疾病最新文章合辑; 用药最新文章合辑
• Precision Medication·Renal Anemia • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-07-21
Revised:2022-10-11
Published:2023-02-20
Online:2022-10-20
Contact:
LI Qing
About author:
通讯作者:
李青
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0581
| 第一作者 | 发表年份(年) | 国家 | NCT | 单中心/多中心 | 临床研究阶段 | 样本量(例) | 男性〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | ||||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 2020 | 日本 | NCT02952092 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 150 | 151 | 101(67.3) | 107(70.9) | 64.6±11.7 | 64.9±10.1 |
| AKIZAWA[ | 2019 | 日本 | NCT01964196 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 13 | 43 | 10(76.9) | 26(60.5) | 64.4±8.7 | 61.9±10.6 |
| CHEN[ | 2019 | 中国 | NCT02652806 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 204 | 100 | 126(61.8) | 58(58.0) | 47.6±11.7 | 51.0±11.8 |
| CHEN[ | 2017 | 中国 | NCT01596855 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 74 | 22 | 45(60.4) | 13(59.1) | 50.0±12.8 | 53.8±10.0 |
| PROVENZANO[ | 2016 | 美国 | NCT01147666 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 41 | 13 | 27(66.0) | 9(69.0) | 55.8±13.4 | 59.5±10.1 |
| PROVENZANO[ | 2016 | 美国 | NCT01147666 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 67 | 23 | 45(67.0) | 14(61.0) | 56.9±12.1 | 57.0±11.6 |
| 第一作者 | 基线血红蛋白(g/dl) | 干预措施 | 罗沙司他剂量 | 干预时间(周) | 结局指标 | ||||||
| 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 11.00±0.56 | 11.00±0.60 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 70 mg、100 mg,TIW | 24 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 9.35±0.75 | 10.85±0.54 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 50 mg、70 mg,TIW;70 mg、100 mg,TIW | 24 | ①②③④⑤⑦⑧ | ||||
| CHEN[ | 10.40±0.70 | 10.50±0.70 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 100 mg(体质量45~<60 kg)、120 mg(体质量≥60 kg) | 26 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| CHEN[ | 10.80±0.70 | 10.60±1.00 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.1~1.8 mg/kg、1.5~3.0 mg/kg、1.7~2.3 mg/kg,TIW | 6 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| PROVENZANO[ | 11.30±0.60 | 11.50±0.60 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.0 mg/kg、1.5 mg/kg、1.8 mg/kg、2.0 mg/kg,TIW | 6 | ①②③⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| PROVENZANO[ | 11.20±0.70 | 11.20±1.00 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.0 mg/kg、1.5 mg/kg、1.8 mg/kg、2.0 mg/kg,TIW | 19 | ①②③⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis
| 第一作者 | 发表年份(年) | 国家 | NCT | 单中心/多中心 | 临床研究阶段 | 样本量(例) | 男性〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | ||||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 2020 | 日本 | NCT02952092 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 150 | 151 | 101(67.3) | 107(70.9) | 64.6±11.7 | 64.9±10.1 |
| AKIZAWA[ | 2019 | 日本 | NCT01964196 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 13 | 43 | 10(76.9) | 26(60.5) | 64.4±8.7 | 61.9±10.6 |
| CHEN[ | 2019 | 中国 | NCT02652806 | 多中心 | Ⅲ期 | 204 | 100 | 126(61.8) | 58(58.0) | 47.6±11.7 | 51.0±11.8 |
| CHEN[ | 2017 | 中国 | NCT01596855 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 74 | 22 | 45(60.4) | 13(59.1) | 50.0±12.8 | 53.8±10.0 |
| PROVENZANO[ | 2016 | 美国 | NCT01147666 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 41 | 13 | 27(66.0) | 9(69.0) | 55.8±13.4 | 59.5±10.1 |
| PROVENZANO[ | 2016 | 美国 | NCT01147666 | 多中心 | Ⅱ期 | 67 | 23 | 45(67.0) | 14(61.0) | 56.9±12.1 | 57.0±11.6 |
| 第一作者 | 基线血红蛋白(g/dl) | 干预措施 | 罗沙司他剂量 | 干预时间(周) | 结局指标 | ||||||
| 试验组 | 对照组 | 试验组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 11.00±0.56 | 11.00±0.60 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 70 mg、100 mg,TIW | 24 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| AKIZAWA[ | 9.35±0.75 | 10.85±0.54 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 50 mg、70 mg,TIW;70 mg、100 mg,TIW | 24 | ①②③④⑤⑦⑧ | ||||
| CHEN[ | 10.40±0.70 | 10.50±0.70 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 100 mg(体质量45~<60 kg)、120 mg(体质量≥60 kg) | 26 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| CHEN[ | 10.80±0.70 | 10.60±1.00 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.1~1.8 mg/kg、1.5~3.0 mg/kg、1.7~2.3 mg/kg,TIW | 6 | ①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| PROVENZANO[ | 11.30±0.60 | 11.50±0.60 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.0 mg/kg、1.5 mg/kg、1.8 mg/kg、2.0 mg/kg,TIW | 6 | ①②③⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| PROVENZANO[ | 11.20±0.70 | 11.20±1.00 | 罗沙司他 | ESAs | 1.0 mg/kg、1.5 mg/kg、1.8 mg/kg、2.0 mg/kg,TIW | 19 | ①②③⑤⑥⑦⑧ | ||||
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
孟松,朱晶晶,李少华,等. 授权教育结合思维导图对维持性血液透析重度肾性贫血患者的影响[J]. 国际移植与血液净化杂志,2021,19(6):43-45. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115399-20210421-06012.
|
| [15] | |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
KDOQI, NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for anemia in chronic kidney disease[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2006,47(5 Suppl 3):S11-145. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.010.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
李辉锋,毛永炎. 罗沙司他治疗慢性肾脏病透析患者合并肾性贫血的效果和安全性[J]. 中国实用医刊,2021,48(22):99-102. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20210820-02744.
|
| [1] | LI Yutong, ZHAO Danting, JIANG Feng, WANG Yanna, LIU Yizong, LIANG Wenjuan, LU Jiahai. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mRNA and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752. |
| [2] | ZHANG Wenbo, WANG Junlong, ZHANG Yuping, JIANG Shuai, WANG Huaqi. The Risk of Pre-COPD Populations Progressing to COPD under Different Criteria: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2735-2743. |
| [3] | LI Jiawei, GE Aoqi, GAO Xinyi, LI Juanjuan, YUAN Beibei. The Concept, Connotation, and Pathways of the Integration of Medical Care and Preventive Services in China: a Systematic Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2156-2166. |
| [4] | WANG Yang, JIN Hua, YANG Sen, YANG Hui, YU Dehua. Reconfiguring the Functional Features of Primary Care in a Non-gatekeeping Context: a 15-Year Mixed-methods Systematic Review from China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2140-2155. |
| [5] | ZHAN Li, HENG Zhaoyang, HE Liangyu, ZHAO Jie, CHEN Jie, XING Jinshan. Efficacy and Safety of CAR-T Therapy Targeting the B Cell Maturation Antigen on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Chinese People: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930. |
| [6] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [7] | ZHANG Qiang, ZHAO Wenxia, WANG Ziyi, YAN Le, LIANG Haowei, WANG Jinfan, FANG Jinhua, LU Cuncun. Interpretation of the Reporting Guideline for Systematic Reviews of Outcome Measurement Instruments (PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1766-1775. |
| [8] | WANG Gaoming, WANG Minghang, YANG Jiang, MENG Yuanyuan, ZHAO Di, DONG Xiaosheng. Systematic Evaluation and Reflection on the Quality of Bronchial Asthma Guidelines in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1239-1245. |
| [9] | ZHANG Huijuan, LI Xinghui, ZHANG Xiaoming, YIN Long, SHAO Long. Efficacy and Safety of Selective Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1194-1202. |
| [10] | WANG Fei, HAN Weiyu, SUN Tao. Moxibustion Combined with Three-step Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer Pain: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1203-1211. |
| [11] | GE Aoqi, GAO Xinyi, LI Jiawei, LI Juanjuan, YUAN Beibei. Education Training on Health Behaviors Management of Chronic Diseases among Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1109-1120. |
| [12] | PEI Zhiyi, ZHANG Xiaoxin, LIN Jiayi, ZHANG Xiangyi, KANG Xiaofeng. Systematic Review of the Quality and Application of Patient Decision Aids in Cardiovascular Disease Based on IPDAS 4.0 Criteria [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 945-952. |
| [13] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [14] | JIANG Xiaorui, YAN Yuyao, WEI Jingjing, QIAO Lijie, PENG Guangcao, ZHU Mingjun. Systematic Review of Risk Prediction Models for Concurrent Heart Failure with Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 393-402. |
| [15] | ZHAO Xuejiao, LI Juan, LI Yujie, LU Ting, Xian Lihong, YAN Huan. Prevalence Trends and Influencing Factors for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 380-392. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||