Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (02): 233-240.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0579
Special Issue: 心力衰竭最新文章合辑; 心血管最新文章合辑; 用药最新文章合辑; 老年问题最新文章合辑
• Medication Guide·Precision Medication • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-08-08
Revised:
2022-08-26
Published:
2023-01-15
Online:
2022-08-31
Contact:
LIU Kewei
About author:
通讯作者:
刘科卫
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0579
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 体质量(kg) | 冠心病〔n(%)〕 | NYHA心功能分级〔n(%)〕 | 糖尿病〔n(%)〕 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAD | ACS | Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | ||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 91.0±4.6 | 110/2 | 64.8±8.6 | 107(95.5) | 5(4.5) | 44(39.3) | 47(42.0) | 21(18.8) | 42(37.5) |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 91.1±3.4 | 97/3 | 65.0±10.7 | 96(96.0) | 4(4.0) | 44(44.0) | 33(33.0) | 23(23.0) | 41(41.0) |
检验统计量值 | 0.013a | — | 0.013a | — | 1.868 | 0.145 | ||||
P值 | 0.911 | 0.668 | 0.908 | 1.000 | 0.393 | 0.704 | ||||
组别 | 高血压〔n(%)〕 | CKD〔n(%)〕 | 硝酸类药物〔n(%)〕 | 抗血小板药物〔n(%)〕 | β受体阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | RAS抑制剂〔n(%)〕 | 钙通道阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | 曲美他嗪〔n(%)〕 | ||
ACEI | ARB | |||||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85(75.9) | 28(25.0) | 44(39.3) | 70(62.5) | 75(67.0) | 17(15.2) | 26(23.2) | 35(31.2) | 63(56.2) | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 77(77.0) | 38(38.0) | 32(32.0) | 63(63.0) | 65(65.0) | 18(18.0) | 24(24.0) | 34(34.0) | 47(47.0) | |
检验统计量值 | 0.001 | 3.580 | 0.923 | 0 | 0.024 | 0.380 | 0.078 | 1.459 | ||
P值 | 0.978 | 0.058 | 0.337 | 1.000 | 0.876 | 0.826 | 0.780 | 0.227 | ||
组别 | 口服利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 呋塞米剂量〔n(%)〕 | 螺内酯剂量〔n(%)〕 | 静脉注射利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 随访时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | |||||
呋塞米 | 螺内酯 | 呋塞米+螺内酯 | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 18(16.1) | 26(23.2) | 43(38.4) | 51(45.5) | 10(8.9) | 59(52.7) | 10(8.9) | 50(44.6) | 383.0(168.5,1 108.0) | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 13(13.0) | 25(25.0) | 34(34.0) | 41(41.0) | 6(6.0) | 42(42.0) | 17(17.0) | 53(53.0) | 362.5(142.8,787.8) | |
检验统计量值 | 1.373 | 1.451 | 4.058 | 1.161 | 2.864b | |||||
P值 | 0.712 | 0.484 | 0.131 | 0.281 | 0.091 | |||||
组别 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔n(%)〕 | 用药前24 h尿量(ml) | LVEF(%) | 左心室后壁厚度(mm) | 左心室舒张末内径(mm) | 左心房内径(mm) | |||
7~13 d | 14~29 d | ≥30 d | ||||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85.0(36.5,275.8) | 10(8.9) | 17(15.2) | 85(75.9) | 1 809.5±652.4 | 56.7±5.2 | 10.1±0.7 | 44.6±4.1 | 38.1±6.6 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 126.0(56.2,361.5) | 10(10.0) | 10(10.0) | 80(80.0) | 1 621.7±555.4 | 55.4±4.3 | 10.0±0.5 | 44.1±4.7 | 37.2±8.0 | |
检验统计量值 | 2.006b | 1.291 | 4.948a | 2.845a | 0.130a | 0.606a | 0.596a | |||
P值 | 0.064 | 0.524 | 0.027 | 0.088 | 0.719 | 0.437 | 0.441 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 体质量(kg) | 冠心病〔n(%)〕 | NYHA心功能分级〔n(%)〕 | 糖尿病〔n(%)〕 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAD | ACS | Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | ||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 91.0±4.6 | 110/2 | 64.8±8.6 | 107(95.5) | 5(4.5) | 44(39.3) | 47(42.0) | 21(18.8) | 42(37.5) |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 91.1±3.4 | 97/3 | 65.0±10.7 | 96(96.0) | 4(4.0) | 44(44.0) | 33(33.0) | 23(23.0) | 41(41.0) |
检验统计量值 | 0.013a | — | 0.013a | — | 1.868 | 0.145 | ||||
P值 | 0.911 | 0.668 | 0.908 | 1.000 | 0.393 | 0.704 | ||||
组别 | 高血压〔n(%)〕 | CKD〔n(%)〕 | 硝酸类药物〔n(%)〕 | 抗血小板药物〔n(%)〕 | β受体阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | RAS抑制剂〔n(%)〕 | 钙通道阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | 曲美他嗪〔n(%)〕 | ||
ACEI | ARB | |||||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85(75.9) | 28(25.0) | 44(39.3) | 70(62.5) | 75(67.0) | 17(15.2) | 26(23.2) | 35(31.2) | 63(56.2) | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 77(77.0) | 38(38.0) | 32(32.0) | 63(63.0) | 65(65.0) | 18(18.0) | 24(24.0) | 34(34.0) | 47(47.0) | |
检验统计量值 | 0.001 | 3.580 | 0.923 | 0 | 0.024 | 0.380 | 0.078 | 1.459 | ||
P值 | 0.978 | 0.058 | 0.337 | 1.000 | 0.876 | 0.826 | 0.780 | 0.227 | ||
组别 | 口服利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 呋塞米剂量〔n(%)〕 | 螺内酯剂量〔n(%)〕 | 静脉注射利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 随访时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | |||||
呋塞米 | 螺内酯 | 呋塞米+螺内酯 | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 18(16.1) | 26(23.2) | 43(38.4) | 51(45.5) | 10(8.9) | 59(52.7) | 10(8.9) | 50(44.6) | 383.0(168.5,1 108.0) | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 13(13.0) | 25(25.0) | 34(34.0) | 41(41.0) | 6(6.0) | 42(42.0) | 17(17.0) | 53(53.0) | 362.5(142.8,787.8) | |
检验统计量值 | 1.373 | 1.451 | 4.058 | 1.161 | 2.864b | |||||
P值 | 0.712 | 0.484 | 0.131 | 0.281 | 0.091 | |||||
组别 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔n(%)〕 | 用药前24 h尿量(ml) | LVEF(%) | 左心室后壁厚度(mm) | 左心室舒张末内径(mm) | 左心房内径(mm) | |||
7~13 d | 14~29 d | ≥30 d | ||||||||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85.0(36.5,275.8) | 10(8.9) | 17(15.2) | 85(75.9) | 1 809.5±652.4 | 56.7±5.2 | 10.1±0.7 | 44.6±4.1 | 38.1±6.6 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 126.0(56.2,361.5) | 10(10.0) | 10(10.0) | 80(80.0) | 1 621.7±555.4 | 55.4±4.3 | 10.0±0.5 | 44.1±4.7 | 37.2±8.0 | |
检验统计量值 | 2.006b | 1.291 | 4.948a | 2.845a | 0.130a | 0.606a | 0.596a | |||
P值 | 0.064 | 0.524 | 0.027 | 0.088 | 0.719 | 0.437 | 0.441 |
组别 | 例数 | BUN(mmol/L) | Cr(μmol/L) | eGFR〔ml·min-1(1.73 m2) -1〕 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 8.5±5.3 | 8.9±5.2 | 0.784 | 0.441 | 106.6±57.7 | 106.5±50.3 | 1.960 | 0.052 | 35.4±13.5 | 35.6±12.9 | 2.183 | 0.330 |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 8.6±5.2 | 10.3±6.4 | 3.320 | 0.001 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | <0.001 | 34.9±12.1 | 33.8±12.7 | -1.961 | 0.050 |
t(Z)值 | 0.441 | 0.037 | 0.110 | 1.730 | 0.047 | 0.012 | |||||||
P值 | 0.597 | 0.848 | 2.582 | 0.190 | 0.828 | 0.914 | |||||||
组别 | NT-proBNP〔M(P25,P75),ng/L〕 | cTnI〔M(P25,P75),μg/L〕 | 血钠(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1 082.0(396.7,2 832.0) | 890.3(321.6,1 764.0) | -1.759 | 0.081 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 1.273 | 0.206 | 132.2±5.8 | 137.6±4.3 | 7.947 | <0.001 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 992.8(457.5,3 552.0) | 969.9(310.5,2 529.0) | -2.024 | 0.046 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.05) | 1.083 | <0.001 | 133.2±5.5 | 137.8±5.2 | 8.994 | <0.001 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.906a | 2.391a | 0.314a | 0.950a | 2.912 | 0.269 | |||||||
P值 | 0.341 | 0.122 | 0.576 | 0.330 | 0.090 | 0.605 | |||||||
组别 | 血钾(mmol/L) | 24 h尿量(ml) | ALT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 4.2±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | -0.190 | 0.846 | 1 809.5±652.4 | 2 082.9±589.1 | 4.093 | <0.001 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.756 | 0.177 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 4.1±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | 0.390 | 0.715 | 1 621.7±555.4 | 2 034.6±665.8 | 6.852 | <0.001 | 17.0(11.0,25.0) | 14.0(8.0,22.2) | -1.413 | 0.162 | |
t(Z)值 | 1.055 | 0.518 | 4.948 | 3.863 | 1.295a | 1.42a | |||||||
P值 | 0.306 | 0.473 | 0.027 | 0.051 | 0.255 | 0.233 | |||||||
组别 | AST〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | AKP〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | γ-GT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.417 | 0.251 | 73.0(57.0,91.0) | 72.0(59.0,92.5) | -0.266 | 0.807 | 28.0(22.0,41.0) | 30.0(19.0,47.0) | 0.210 | 0.847 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 21.0(16.0,31.0) | 20.0(16.5,29.0) | -0.650 | 0.510 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | 0.812 | 30.0(21.0,50.0) | 34.0(19.8,51.5) | 1.472 | 0.142 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.094a | 0.091a | 3.771 | 0.06 | 0.147a | 0.937a | |||||||
P值 | 0.759 | 0.763 | 0.052 | 0.806 | 0.702 | 0.333 | |||||||
组别 | TBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | DBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | IBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 9.8(7.5,13.4) | 9.8(7.6,14.2) | 1.477 | 0.236 | 3.1(2.3,4.0) | 3.0(2.2,4.6) | 0.678 | 0.547 | 7.0(5.1,9.9) | 6.4(4.9,9.1) | 2.611 | 0.080 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 10.3(7.8,14.7) | 10.8(8.0,15.8) | 1.812 | 0.072 | 3.1(2.1,4.5) | 3.8(2.5,6.1) | 1.773 | 0.084 | 7.2(5.4,9.8) | 6.7(4.7,9.5) | -0.670 | 0.493 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.547a | 1.171a | 0.150a | 4.819a | 0.047a | 0.035a | |||||||
P值 | 0.459 | 0.279 | 0.699 | 0.058 | 0.829 | 0.852 |
Table 2 Comparison of laboratory indices before and after tolvaptan treatment in two groups
组别 | 例数 | BUN(mmol/L) | Cr(μmol/L) | eGFR〔ml·min-1(1.73 m2) -1〕 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 8.5±5.3 | 8.9±5.2 | 0.784 | 0.441 | 106.6±57.7 | 106.5±50.3 | 1.960 | 0.052 | 35.4±13.5 | 35.6±12.9 | 2.183 | 0.330 |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 8.6±5.2 | 10.3±6.4 | 3.320 | 0.001 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | <0.001 | 34.9±12.1 | 33.8±12.7 | -1.961 | 0.050 |
t(Z)值 | 0.441 | 0.037 | 0.110 | 1.730 | 0.047 | 0.012 | |||||||
P值 | 0.597 | 0.848 | 2.582 | 0.190 | 0.828 | 0.914 | |||||||
组别 | NT-proBNP〔M(P25,P75),ng/L〕 | cTnI〔M(P25,P75),μg/L〕 | 血钠(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1 082.0(396.7,2 832.0) | 890.3(321.6,1 764.0) | -1.759 | 0.081 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 1.273 | 0.206 | 132.2±5.8 | 137.6±4.3 | 7.947 | <0.001 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 992.8(457.5,3 552.0) | 969.9(310.5,2 529.0) | -2.024 | 0.046 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.05) | 1.083 | <0.001 | 133.2±5.5 | 137.8±5.2 | 8.994 | <0.001 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.906a | 2.391a | 0.314a | 0.950a | 2.912 | 0.269 | |||||||
P值 | 0.341 | 0.122 | 0.576 | 0.330 | 0.090 | 0.605 | |||||||
组别 | 血钾(mmol/L) | 24 h尿量(ml) | ALT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 4.2±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | -0.190 | 0.846 | 1 809.5±652.4 | 2 082.9±589.1 | 4.093 | <0.001 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.756 | 0.177 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 4.1±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | 0.390 | 0.715 | 1 621.7±555.4 | 2 034.6±665.8 | 6.852 | <0.001 | 17.0(11.0,25.0) | 14.0(8.0,22.2) | -1.413 | 0.162 | |
t(Z)值 | 1.055 | 0.518 | 4.948 | 3.863 | 1.295a | 1.42a | |||||||
P值 | 0.306 | 0.473 | 0.027 | 0.051 | 0.255 | 0.233 | |||||||
组别 | AST〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | AKP〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | γ-GT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.417 | 0.251 | 73.0(57.0,91.0) | 72.0(59.0,92.5) | -0.266 | 0.807 | 28.0(22.0,41.0) | 30.0(19.0,47.0) | 0.210 | 0.847 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 21.0(16.0,31.0) | 20.0(16.5,29.0) | -0.650 | 0.510 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | 0.812 | 30.0(21.0,50.0) | 34.0(19.8,51.5) | 1.472 | 0.142 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.094a | 0.091a | 3.771 | 0.06 | 0.147a | 0.937a | |||||||
P值 | 0.759 | 0.763 | 0.052 | 0.806 | 0.702 | 0.333 | |||||||
组别 | TBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | DBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | IBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | ||||||||||
基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 9.8(7.5,13.4) | 9.8(7.6,14.2) | 1.477 | 0.236 | 3.1(2.3,4.0) | 3.0(2.2,4.6) | 0.678 | 0.547 | 7.0(5.1,9.9) | 6.4(4.9,9.1) | 2.611 | 0.080 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 10.3(7.8,14.7) | 10.8(8.0,15.8) | 1.812 | 0.072 | 3.1(2.1,4.5) | 3.8(2.5,6.1) | 1.773 | 0.084 | 7.2(5.4,9.8) | 6.7(4.7,9.5) | -0.670 | 0.493 | |
t(Z)值 | 0.547a | 1.171a | 0.150a | 4.819a | 0.047a | 0.035a | |||||||
P值 | 0.459 | 0.279 | 0.699 | 0.058 | 0.829 | 0.852 |
变量 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 2.04(1.38,3.01) | 0.001 |
年龄 | 1.03(0.99,1.07) | 0.195 | 1.02(0.97,1.07) | 0.523 |
NYHA(Ⅲ级) | 1.23(0.81,1.85) | 0.336 | 1.16(0.73,1.85) | 0.536 |
NYHA(Ⅳ级) | 2.13(1.36,3.35) | 0.001 | 2.15(1.21,3.83) | 0.009 |
CKD | 1.06(0.71,1.57) | 0.784 | 1.02(0.61,1.69) | 0.954 |
β受体阻滞剂 | 0.92(0.63,1.33) | 0.644 | 0.89(0.6,1.31) | 0.562 |
RAS抑制剂 | 0.64(0.43,0.93) | 0.021 | 0.72(0.48,1.07) | 0.105 |
口服呋塞米 | 1.91(1.05,3.48) | 0.034 | 2.27(1.08,4.76) | 0.030 |
螺内酯 | 1.19(0.68,2.07) | 0.552 | 1.72(0.93,3.19) | 0.086 |
呋塞米+螺内酯 | 1.82(1.11,3.00) | 0.018 | 2.05(1.15,3.66) | 0.015 |
ALB | 0.94(0.9,0.98) | 0.002 | 0.95(0.90,1.00) | 0.035 |
lgNTproBNP | 1.55(1.15,2.08) | 0.004 | 1.26(0.83,1.92) | 0.285 |
eGFR | 0.87(0.85,1.08) | 0.348 | 0.99(0.97,1.02) | 0.564 |
Table 3 Cox risk regression analysis of two doses of tolvaptan and all-cause mortality in elderly patients with heart failure
变量 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 2.04(1.38,3.01) | 0.001 |
年龄 | 1.03(0.99,1.07) | 0.195 | 1.02(0.97,1.07) | 0.523 |
NYHA(Ⅲ级) | 1.23(0.81,1.85) | 0.336 | 1.16(0.73,1.85) | 0.536 |
NYHA(Ⅳ级) | 2.13(1.36,3.35) | 0.001 | 2.15(1.21,3.83) | 0.009 |
CKD | 1.06(0.71,1.57) | 0.784 | 1.02(0.61,1.69) | 0.954 |
β受体阻滞剂 | 0.92(0.63,1.33) | 0.644 | 0.89(0.6,1.31) | 0.562 |
RAS抑制剂 | 0.64(0.43,0.93) | 0.021 | 0.72(0.48,1.07) | 0.105 |
口服呋塞米 | 1.91(1.05,3.48) | 0.034 | 2.27(1.08,4.76) | 0.030 |
螺内酯 | 1.19(0.68,2.07) | 0.552 | 1.72(0.93,3.19) | 0.086 |
呋塞米+螺内酯 | 1.82(1.11,3.00) | 0.018 | 2.05(1.15,3.66) | 0.015 |
ALB | 0.94(0.9,0.98) | 0.002 | 0.95(0.90,1.00) | 0.035 |
lgNTproBNP | 1.55(1.15,2.08) | 0.004 | 1.26(0.83,1.92) | 0.285 |
eGFR | 0.87(0.85,1.08) | 0.348 | 0.99(0.97,1.02) | 0.564 |
因变量 | 自变量 | 未调整模型 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
全因死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 1.73(1.19,2.50) | 0.004 | 1.76(1.22,2.60) | 0.003 | 2.03(1.34,2.99) | 0.001 | |
心血管死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 2.48(1.40,4.39) | 0.002 | 2.50(1.41,4.45) | 0.002 | 2.75(1.52,4.96) | 0.001 | 2.51(1.40,4.50) | 0.002 |
Table 4 Cox proportional risk regression models for the effect of two doses of tolvaptan on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality
因变量 | 自变量 | 未调整模型 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
全因死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 1.73(1.19,2.50) | 0.004 | 1.76(1.22,2.60) | 0.003 | 2.03(1.34,2.99) | 0.001 | |
心血管死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 2.48(1.40,4.39) | 0.002 | 2.50(1.41,4.45) | 0.002 | 2.75(1.52,4.96) | 0.001 | 2.51(1.40,4.50) | 0.002 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志编辑委员会. 心力衰竭容量管理中国专家建议[J]. 中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2018,2(1):8-16.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018 [J] . 中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(10):760-789. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.10.004.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
徐先静,黄改荣,刘雪亚,等. 托伐普坦治疗75岁及以上难治性心力衰竭患者的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2020,39(9):1038-1041.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[1] | LI Ling, LI Yaping, QIAN Shixing, NIE Jing, LU Chunhua, LI Xia. Research on Influencing Factors and Risk Prediction of Cognitive Function in Community-dwelling Middle-aged and Elderly People [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3773-3778. |
[2] | CHENG Yuxin, FANG Jiamin, LIANG Hao, WANG Zhiling, WEI Li, LIAO Huilian, XU Mingming, CHEN Yumei, LI Yanfen, DONG Lijuan, GUO Yingui. Preoperative Platelet-to-albumin Ratio in Elective Geriatric Surgery Patients and Its Correlation with Postoperative Incidental Frailty: a Multicenter Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3359-3367. |
[3] | XU Yanpeng, HUANG Pe, ZHANG Pingping, LUO Yan, SHI Xiaoqi, WU Liusong, CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu. Expression of β-Adrenergic Receptors in Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3391-3398. |
[4] | YAN Fanghong, PENG Guotian, ZHANG Guoli, SUN Ruiyi, MA Yuxia, HAN Lin. Matching Analysis of the Content of Chronic Disease Management for the Elderly in Medical Union: Based on the Perspective of "Guidance-Practice-Need" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3119-3126. |
[5] | YANG Chen, CHEN Tong, ZHANG Lifang, ZHANG Hongxu, LI Pengfei, ZHANG Xuejuan. Prognostic Impact of Dapagliflozin in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3053-3058. |
[6] | CHEN Fei, WANG Jinying, YU Haibo, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, SHEN Man, ZHAN Xiaokai, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, ZHANG Tianyu, HUANG Zhongxia. Significance of Elevated Urinary NGAL, TIM-1, VCAM-1 and Activin A in Patients with New Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2740-2749. |
[7] | MEI Jingyan, CHEN Min, ZHANG Lieqiang, PAN Yunxi, WANG Xin, ZHAO Xiaodeng, ZHAN Wei, LIU Tao, WANG Yiying. Association between Cumulative Lipid Accumulation Index and Hypertension: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2205-2211. |
[8] | HE Ting, LI Jia, TAN Wenbin. Research Progress of Circulatory System Diseases and Secondary Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2101-2112. |
[9] | AN Qinyu, WANG Yiying, ZHANG Xiaodan, ZHANG Tianlin, ZHAN Qingqing, ZHANG Fuyan, LIU Tao, WU Yanli. Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Healthy Lifestyle on Cardiovascular Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 2017-2024. |
[10] | ZHANG Xin, ZHU Qing, LI Nanfang. Association of Lipid Accumulation Product Index and Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Hypertension with Abnormal Glucose Metabolism: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1840-1846. |
[11] | CAO Gan, DENG Yifan, HE Shenghu, ZHANG Jing. Study on the Correlation between the Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-albumin Ratio and Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Emergency PCI [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1878-1883. |
[12] | ZHANG Shujing, SUN Lixin, CAO Yuqing. Comparative Study on the Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic between HPV-related and Non-HPV-related Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1758-1764. |
[13] | NI Xuetong, AHEYEERKE Halengbieke, TANG Jianmin, CAO Tengrui, TAO Lixin, ZHENG Deqiang, LI Qiang, HAN Yumei, YANG Xinghua. The Bidirectional Temporal Causal Association Study between Dysglycaemia and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Based on the Beijing Health Management Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1607-1613. |
[14] | WANG Dexiang, YUAN Jiawen, LU Qinyun, HANG Yuhao, LU Jun, CHENG Lu. Influences of Treatment Timing of the TCM prescription Qingfei Huayu Tongfu Formula on the Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis of Sepsis-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1500-1505. |
[15] | LI Qiujing, SHANG Na, GAO Qian, YANG Li, GUO Shubin. Predictive Value of Abdominal CT Based-skeletal Muscle Mass Combined with Critical Illness Score for Prognosis in Older Patients with Intra-abdominal Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1459-1464. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||