
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (02): 233-240.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0579
Special Issue: 用药最新文章合辑; 老年问题最新文章合辑; 心力衰竭最新文章合辑; 心血管最新文章合辑
• Medication Guide·Precision Medication • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-08-08
Revised:2022-08-26
Published:2023-01-15
Online:2022-08-31
Contact:
LIU Kewei
About author:
通讯作者:
刘科卫
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0579
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 体质量(kg) | 冠心病〔n(%)〕 | NYHA心功能分级〔n(%)〕 | 糖尿病〔n(%)〕 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCAD | ACS | Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | ||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 91.0±4.6 | 110/2 | 64.8±8.6 | 107(95.5) | 5(4.5) | 44(39.3) | 47(42.0) | 21(18.8) | 42(37.5) |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 91.1±3.4 | 97/3 | 65.0±10.7 | 96(96.0) | 4(4.0) | 44(44.0) | 33(33.0) | 23(23.0) | 41(41.0) |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.013a | — | 0.013a | — | 1.868 | 0.145 | ||||
| P值 | 0.911 | 0.668 | 0.908 | 1.000 | 0.393 | 0.704 | ||||
| 组别 | 高血压〔n(%)〕 | CKD〔n(%)〕 | 硝酸类药物〔n(%)〕 | 抗血小板药物〔n(%)〕 | β受体阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | RAS抑制剂〔n(%)〕 | 钙通道阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | 曲美他嗪〔n(%)〕 | ||
| ACEI | ARB | |||||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85(75.9) | 28(25.0) | 44(39.3) | 70(62.5) | 75(67.0) | 17(15.2) | 26(23.2) | 35(31.2) | 63(56.2) | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 77(77.0) | 38(38.0) | 32(32.0) | 63(63.0) | 65(65.0) | 18(18.0) | 24(24.0) | 34(34.0) | 47(47.0) | |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.001 | 3.580 | 0.923 | 0 | 0.024 | 0.380 | 0.078 | 1.459 | ||
| P值 | 0.978 | 0.058 | 0.337 | 1.000 | 0.876 | 0.826 | 0.780 | 0.227 | ||
| 组别 | 口服利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 呋塞米剂量〔n(%)〕 | 螺内酯剂量〔n(%)〕 | 静脉注射利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 随访时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | |||||
| 呋塞米 | 螺内酯 | 呋塞米+螺内酯 | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 18(16.1) | 26(23.2) | 43(38.4) | 51(45.5) | 10(8.9) | 59(52.7) | 10(8.9) | 50(44.6) | 383.0(168.5,1 108.0) | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 13(13.0) | 25(25.0) | 34(34.0) | 41(41.0) | 6(6.0) | 42(42.0) | 17(17.0) | 53(53.0) | 362.5(142.8,787.8) | |
| 检验统计量值 | 1.373 | 1.451 | 4.058 | 1.161 | 2.864b | |||||
| P值 | 0.712 | 0.484 | 0.131 | 0.281 | 0.091 | |||||
| 组别 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔n(%)〕 | 用药前24 h尿量(ml) | LVEF(%) | 左心室后壁厚度(mm) | 左心室舒张末内径(mm) | 左心房内径(mm) | |||
| 7~13 d | 14~29 d | ≥30 d | ||||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85.0(36.5,275.8) | 10(8.9) | 17(15.2) | 85(75.9) | 1 809.5±652.4 | 56.7±5.2 | 10.1±0.7 | 44.6±4.1 | 38.1±6.6 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 126.0(56.2,361.5) | 10(10.0) | 10(10.0) | 80(80.0) | 1 621.7±555.4 | 55.4±4.3 | 10.0±0.5 | 44.1±4.7 | 37.2±8.0 | |
| 检验统计量值 | 2.006b | 1.291 | 4.948a | 2.845a | 0.130a | 0.606a | 0.596a | |||
| P值 | 0.064 | 0.524 | 0.027 | 0.088 | 0.719 | 0.437 | 0.441 | |||
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 体质量(kg) | 冠心病〔n(%)〕 | NYHA心功能分级〔n(%)〕 | 糖尿病〔n(%)〕 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCAD | ACS | Ⅱ级 | Ⅲ级 | Ⅳ级 | ||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 91.0±4.6 | 110/2 | 64.8±8.6 | 107(95.5) | 5(4.5) | 44(39.3) | 47(42.0) | 21(18.8) | 42(37.5) |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 91.1±3.4 | 97/3 | 65.0±10.7 | 96(96.0) | 4(4.0) | 44(44.0) | 33(33.0) | 23(23.0) | 41(41.0) |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.013a | — | 0.013a | — | 1.868 | 0.145 | ||||
| P值 | 0.911 | 0.668 | 0.908 | 1.000 | 0.393 | 0.704 | ||||
| 组别 | 高血压〔n(%)〕 | CKD〔n(%)〕 | 硝酸类药物〔n(%)〕 | 抗血小板药物〔n(%)〕 | β受体阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | RAS抑制剂〔n(%)〕 | 钙通道阻滞剂〔n(%)〕 | 曲美他嗪〔n(%)〕 | ||
| ACEI | ARB | |||||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85(75.9) | 28(25.0) | 44(39.3) | 70(62.5) | 75(67.0) | 17(15.2) | 26(23.2) | 35(31.2) | 63(56.2) | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 77(77.0) | 38(38.0) | 32(32.0) | 63(63.0) | 65(65.0) | 18(18.0) | 24(24.0) | 34(34.0) | 47(47.0) | |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.001 | 3.580 | 0.923 | 0 | 0.024 | 0.380 | 0.078 | 1.459 | ||
| P值 | 0.978 | 0.058 | 0.337 | 1.000 | 0.876 | 0.826 | 0.780 | 0.227 | ||
| 组别 | 口服利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 呋塞米剂量〔n(%)〕 | 螺内酯剂量〔n(%)〕 | 静脉注射利尿剂〔n(%)〕 | 随访时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | |||||
| 呋塞米 | 螺内酯 | 呋塞米+螺内酯 | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ≤20 mg/d | >20 mg/d | ||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 18(16.1) | 26(23.2) | 43(38.4) | 51(45.5) | 10(8.9) | 59(52.7) | 10(8.9) | 50(44.6) | 383.0(168.5,1 108.0) | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 13(13.0) | 25(25.0) | 34(34.0) | 41(41.0) | 6(6.0) | 42(42.0) | 17(17.0) | 53(53.0) | 362.5(142.8,787.8) | |
| 检验统计量值 | 1.373 | 1.451 | 4.058 | 1.161 | 2.864b | |||||
| P值 | 0.712 | 0.484 | 0.131 | 0.281 | 0.091 | |||||
| 组别 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔M(P25,P75),d〕 | 托伐普坦应用时间〔n(%)〕 | 用药前24 h尿量(ml) | LVEF(%) | 左心室后壁厚度(mm) | 左心室舒张末内径(mm) | 左心房内径(mm) | |||
| 7~13 d | 14~29 d | ≥30 d | ||||||||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 85.0(36.5,275.8) | 10(8.9) | 17(15.2) | 85(75.9) | 1 809.5±652.4 | 56.7±5.2 | 10.1±0.7 | 44.6±4.1 | 38.1±6.6 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 126.0(56.2,361.5) | 10(10.0) | 10(10.0) | 80(80.0) | 1 621.7±555.4 | 55.4±4.3 | 10.0±0.5 | 44.1±4.7 | 37.2±8.0 | |
| 检验统计量值 | 2.006b | 1.291 | 4.948a | 2.845a | 0.130a | 0.606a | 0.596a | |||
| P值 | 0.064 | 0.524 | 0.027 | 0.088 | 0.719 | 0.437 | 0.441 | |||
| 组别 | 例数 | BUN(mmol/L) | Cr(μmol/L) | eGFR〔ml·min-1(1.73 m2) -1〕 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 8.5±5.3 | 8.9±5.2 | 0.784 | 0.441 | 106.6±57.7 | 106.5±50.3 | 1.960 | 0.052 | 35.4±13.5 | 35.6±12.9 | 2.183 | 0.330 |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 8.6±5.2 | 10.3±6.4 | 3.320 | 0.001 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | <0.001 | 34.9±12.1 | 33.8±12.7 | -1.961 | 0.050 |
| t(Z)值 | 0.441 | 0.037 | 0.110 | 1.730 | 0.047 | 0.012 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.597 | 0.848 | 2.582 | 0.190 | 0.828 | 0.914 | |||||||
| 组别 | NT-proBNP〔M(P25,P75),ng/L〕 | cTnI〔M(P25,P75),μg/L〕 | 血钠(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1 082.0(396.7,2 832.0) | 890.3(321.6,1 764.0) | -1.759 | 0.081 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 1.273 | 0.206 | 132.2±5.8 | 137.6±4.3 | 7.947 | <0.001 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 992.8(457.5,3 552.0) | 969.9(310.5,2 529.0) | -2.024 | 0.046 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.05) | 1.083 | <0.001 | 133.2±5.5 | 137.8±5.2 | 8.994 | <0.001 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.906a | 2.391a | 0.314a | 0.950a | 2.912 | 0.269 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.341 | 0.122 | 0.576 | 0.330 | 0.090 | 0.605 | |||||||
| 组别 | 血钾(mmol/L) | 24 h尿量(ml) | ALT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 4.2±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | -0.190 | 0.846 | 1 809.5±652.4 | 2 082.9±589.1 | 4.093 | <0.001 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.756 | 0.177 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 4.1±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | 0.390 | 0.715 | 1 621.7±555.4 | 2 034.6±665.8 | 6.852 | <0.001 | 17.0(11.0,25.0) | 14.0(8.0,22.2) | -1.413 | 0.162 | |
| t(Z)值 | 1.055 | 0.518 | 4.948 | 3.863 | 1.295a | 1.42a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.306 | 0.473 | 0.027 | 0.051 | 0.255 | 0.233 | |||||||
| 组别 | AST〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | AKP〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | γ-GT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.417 | 0.251 | 73.0(57.0,91.0) | 72.0(59.0,92.5) | -0.266 | 0.807 | 28.0(22.0,41.0) | 30.0(19.0,47.0) | 0.210 | 0.847 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 21.0(16.0,31.0) | 20.0(16.5,29.0) | -0.650 | 0.510 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | 0.812 | 30.0(21.0,50.0) | 34.0(19.8,51.5) | 1.472 | 0.142 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.094a | 0.091a | 3.771 | 0.06 | 0.147a | 0.937a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.759 | 0.763 | 0.052 | 0.806 | 0.702 | 0.333 | |||||||
| 组别 | TBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | DBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | IBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 9.8(7.5,13.4) | 9.8(7.6,14.2) | 1.477 | 0.236 | 3.1(2.3,4.0) | 3.0(2.2,4.6) | 0.678 | 0.547 | 7.0(5.1,9.9) | 6.4(4.9,9.1) | 2.611 | 0.080 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 10.3(7.8,14.7) | 10.8(8.0,15.8) | 1.812 | 0.072 | 3.1(2.1,4.5) | 3.8(2.5,6.1) | 1.773 | 0.084 | 7.2(5.4,9.8) | 6.7(4.7,9.5) | -0.670 | 0.493 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.547a | 1.171a | 0.150a | 4.819a | 0.047a | 0.035a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.459 | 0.279 | 0.699 | 0.058 | 0.829 | 0.852 | |||||||
Table 2 Comparison of laboratory indices before and after tolvaptan treatment in two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | BUN(mmol/L) | Cr(μmol/L) | eGFR〔ml·min-1(1.73 m2) -1〕 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 112 | 8.5±5.3 | 8.9±5.2 | 0.784 | 0.441 | 106.6±57.7 | 106.5±50.3 | 1.960 | 0.052 | 35.4±13.5 | 35.6±12.9 | 2.183 | 0.330 |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 100 | 8.6±5.2 | 10.3±6.4 | 3.320 | 0.001 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | <0.001 | 34.9±12.1 | 33.8±12.7 | -1.961 | 0.050 |
| t(Z)值 | 0.441 | 0.037 | 0.110 | 1.730 | 0.047 | 0.012 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.597 | 0.848 | 2.582 | 0.190 | 0.828 | 0.914 | |||||||
| 组别 | NT-proBNP〔M(P25,P75),ng/L〕 | cTnI〔M(P25,P75),μg/L〕 | 血钠(mmol/L) | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1 082.0(396.7,2 832.0) | 890.3(321.6,1 764.0) | -1.759 | 0.081 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 1.273 | 0.206 | 132.2±5.8 | 137.6±4.3 | 7.947 | <0.001 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 992.8(457.5,3 552.0) | 969.9(310.5,2 529.0) | -2.024 | 0.046 | 0.01(0.01,0.04) | 0.01(0.01,0.05) | 1.083 | <0.001 | 133.2±5.5 | 137.8±5.2 | 8.994 | <0.001 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.906a | 2.391a | 0.314a | 0.950a | 2.912 | 0.269 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.341 | 0.122 | 0.576 | 0.330 | 0.090 | 0.605 | |||||||
| 组别 | 血钾(mmol/L) | 24 h尿量(ml) | ALT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 4.2±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | -0.190 | 0.846 | 1 809.5±652.4 | 2 082.9±589.1 | 4.093 | <0.001 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.756 | 0.177 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 4.1±0.6 | 4.1±0.5 | 0.390 | 0.715 | 1 621.7±555.4 | 2 034.6±665.8 | 6.852 | <0.001 | 17.0(11.0,25.0) | 14.0(8.0,22.2) | -1.413 | 0.162 | |
| t(Z)值 | 1.055 | 0.518 | 4.948 | 3.863 | 1.295a | 1.42a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.306 | 0.473 | 0.027 | 0.051 | 0.255 | 0.233 | |||||||
| 组别 | AST〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | AKP〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | γ-GT〔M(P25,P75),U/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 16.0(12.0,29.5) | 14.0(9.5,24.5) | -1.417 | 0.251 | 73.0(57.0,91.0) | 72.0(59.0,92.5) | -0.266 | 0.807 | 28.0(22.0,41.0) | 30.0(19.0,47.0) | 0.210 | 0.847 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 21.0(16.0,31.0) | 20.0(16.5,29.0) | -0.650 | 0.510 | 111.0±54.9 | 121.4±61.6 | 4.700 | 0.812 | 30.0(21.0,50.0) | 34.0(19.8,51.5) | 1.472 | 0.142 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.094a | 0.091a | 3.771 | 0.06 | 0.147a | 0.937a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.759 | 0.763 | 0.052 | 0.806 | 0.702 | 0.333 | |||||||
| 组别 | TBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | DBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | IBIL〔M(P25,P75),μmol/L〕 | ||||||||||
| 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | 基线水平 | 治疗后 | Z值 | P值 | ||
| 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 9.8(7.5,13.4) | 9.8(7.6,14.2) | 1.477 | 0.236 | 3.1(2.3,4.0) | 3.0(2.2,4.6) | 0.678 | 0.547 | 7.0(5.1,9.9) | 6.4(4.9,9.1) | 2.611 | 0.080 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 10.3(7.8,14.7) | 10.8(8.0,15.8) | 1.812 | 0.072 | 3.1(2.1,4.5) | 3.8(2.5,6.1) | 1.773 | 0.084 | 7.2(5.4,9.8) | 6.7(4.7,9.5) | -0.670 | 0.493 | |
| t(Z)值 | 0.547a | 1.171a | 0.150a | 4.819a | 0.047a | 0.035a | |||||||
| P值 | 0.459 | 0.279 | 0.699 | 0.058 | 0.829 | 0.852 | |||||||
| 变量 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 2.04(1.38,3.01) | 0.001 |
| 年龄 | 1.03(0.99,1.07) | 0.195 | 1.02(0.97,1.07) | 0.523 |
| NYHA(Ⅲ级) | 1.23(0.81,1.85) | 0.336 | 1.16(0.73,1.85) | 0.536 |
| NYHA(Ⅳ级) | 2.13(1.36,3.35) | 0.001 | 2.15(1.21,3.83) | 0.009 |
| CKD | 1.06(0.71,1.57) | 0.784 | 1.02(0.61,1.69) | 0.954 |
| β受体阻滞剂 | 0.92(0.63,1.33) | 0.644 | 0.89(0.6,1.31) | 0.562 |
| RAS抑制剂 | 0.64(0.43,0.93) | 0.021 | 0.72(0.48,1.07) | 0.105 |
| 口服呋塞米 | 1.91(1.05,3.48) | 0.034 | 2.27(1.08,4.76) | 0.030 |
| 螺内酯 | 1.19(0.68,2.07) | 0.552 | 1.72(0.93,3.19) | 0.086 |
| 呋塞米+螺内酯 | 1.82(1.11,3.00) | 0.018 | 2.05(1.15,3.66) | 0.015 |
| ALB | 0.94(0.9,0.98) | 0.002 | 0.95(0.90,1.00) | 0.035 |
| lgNTproBNP | 1.55(1.15,2.08) | 0.004 | 1.26(0.83,1.92) | 0.285 |
| eGFR | 0.87(0.85,1.08) | 0.348 | 0.99(0.97,1.02) | 0.564 |
Table 3 Cox risk regression analysis of two doses of tolvaptan and all-cause mortality in elderly patients with heart failure
| 变量 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 2.04(1.38,3.01) | 0.001 |
| 年龄 | 1.03(0.99,1.07) | 0.195 | 1.02(0.97,1.07) | 0.523 |
| NYHA(Ⅲ级) | 1.23(0.81,1.85) | 0.336 | 1.16(0.73,1.85) | 0.536 |
| NYHA(Ⅳ级) | 2.13(1.36,3.35) | 0.001 | 2.15(1.21,3.83) | 0.009 |
| CKD | 1.06(0.71,1.57) | 0.784 | 1.02(0.61,1.69) | 0.954 |
| β受体阻滞剂 | 0.92(0.63,1.33) | 0.644 | 0.89(0.6,1.31) | 0.562 |
| RAS抑制剂 | 0.64(0.43,0.93) | 0.021 | 0.72(0.48,1.07) | 0.105 |
| 口服呋塞米 | 1.91(1.05,3.48) | 0.034 | 2.27(1.08,4.76) | 0.030 |
| 螺内酯 | 1.19(0.68,2.07) | 0.552 | 1.72(0.93,3.19) | 0.086 |
| 呋塞米+螺内酯 | 1.82(1.11,3.00) | 0.018 | 2.05(1.15,3.66) | 0.015 |
| ALB | 0.94(0.9,0.98) | 0.002 | 0.95(0.90,1.00) | 0.035 |
| lgNTproBNP | 1.55(1.15,2.08) | 0.004 | 1.26(0.83,1.92) | 0.285 |
| eGFR | 0.87(0.85,1.08) | 0.348 | 0.99(0.97,1.02) | 0.564 |
| 因变量 | 自变量 | 未调整模型 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
| 全因死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 1.73(1.19,2.50) | 0.004 | 1.76(1.22,2.60) | 0.003 | 2.03(1.34,2.99) | 0.001 | |
| 心血管死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 2.48(1.40,4.39) | 0.002 | 2.50(1.41,4.45) | 0.002 | 2.75(1.52,4.96) | 0.001 | 2.51(1.40,4.50) | 0.002 | |
Table 4 Cox proportional risk regression models for the effect of two doses of tolvaptan on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality
| 因变量 | 自变量 | 未调整模型 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | HR(95%CI) | P值 | ||
| 全因死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 1.70(1.18,2.46) | 0.005 | 1.73(1.19,2.50) | 0.004 | 1.76(1.22,2.60) | 0.003 | 2.03(1.34,2.99) | 0.001 | |
| 心血管死亡 | 托伐普坦7.5 mg/d组 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1 | — | |
| 托伐普坦15.0 mg/d组 | 2.48(1.40,4.39) | 0.002 | 2.50(1.41,4.45) | 0.002 | 2.75(1.52,4.96) | 0.001 | 2.51(1.40,4.50) | 0.002 | |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志编辑委员会. 心力衰竭容量管理中国专家建议[J]. 中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2018,2(1):8-16.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018 [J] . 中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(10):760-789. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.10.004.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
徐先静,黄改荣,刘雪亚,等. 托伐普坦治疗75岁及以上难治性心力衰竭患者的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2020,39(9):1038-1041.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [1] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [2] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [3] | LIU Shuai, YUAN Shizhao, LIU Yan, JIA Shuoxian, ZHAO Yan, WANG Ziyi, ZHOU Chunhua, YU Jing. Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safetyand Economy of Different Amphotericin B Formulationsin Invasive Fungal Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2967-2974. |
| [4] | REYILAI· Maimaiti, ZHOU Yiran, WU Yun, LIU Zhencheng, LU Yaoqin, WU Haiyan. Association between Novel Obesity Indicators and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2836-2845. |
| [5] | BAO Ruolin, LU Chao, FENG Xin, YE Chunmei, LAI Fenhua, NI Zuowei, YANG Dongbo, ZHENG Yongtao. Predictive Model for Breakthrough Influenza Cases in the Elderly Population: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2671-2677. |
| [6] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [7] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [8] | QIU Xinyu, ZHAO Qian, CHEN Yufei, JIAMULE· Maimaitiyiming, HAN Congcong, AIKEDAN· Aierken, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining. Weight Status and Metabolic Characteristics on the Longitudinal Trajectory of Systolic Blood Pressure: a Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2006-2013. |
| [9] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [10] | ZOU Jian, LI Wanping, GE Handa, JIN Zhe, RUFEINA· Tuerxun, LI Juan, WEI Anhua, FENG Da. Study on Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use among the Community Elderly Patients in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1759-1765. |
| [11] | LIU Xiang, CHEN Hong, CUI Rui, GUO Zhichao, LI Panpan, CAO Zilong, JI Yiqing, YU Wenya. Consistencies and Differences in Early Childhood Development Characteristics in Megacities: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1411-1421. |
| [12] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [13] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [14] | LI Qiuchun, SU Ping, PANG Jinhong, CHEN Qiaoqiao, ZHAO Yingying, HE Ruiyan, WANG Yue, CHEN Xueyu, QIAO Junpeng, CHI Weiwei. Association of Triglyceride Glucose Index with Cardiovascular Disease in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stage 0-3 Population: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1129-1136. |
| [15] | YANG Juan, LIU Shan, LI Fei, MENG Haodong, QIAO Hui, XIE Yongxin. Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Influencing Factors of Health Shocks in Rural Middle Aged and Elderly People in Ningxia: Empirical Research Based on 14 Years and Four Periods of Follow-up Data before and after Poverty Alleviation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 914-921. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||