
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (03): 356-366.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0544
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-04-06
Revised:2022-08-12
Published:2023-01-20
Online:2022-09-30
Contact:
LIU Annuo
About author:
通讯作者:
刘安诺
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0544
| 第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 中心数量 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 诊断标准 | 影响因素 | NOS评分(分) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病例组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
| ABELE-HORN[ | 1998 | 德国 | 3 | 队列研究 | 48 | 49 | a | ①⑬⑭⑮⑰(21) | 9 |
| MARSHALL[ | 1999 | 美国 | 13 | 队列研究 | 224 | 641 | b | ⑧⑭⑮ | 9 |
| PI-YING[ | 2005 | 中国 | 8 | 队列研究 | 538 | 1 225 | b | ⑦⑧⑱(21) | 8 |
| TAPIA[ | 2006 | 南美 | 16 | 队列研究 | 446 | 1 379 | b | ⑭⑮⑱⑲(21) | 8 |
| HENDERSON-SMART[ | 2006 | 澳大利亚+新西兰 | 25 | 队列研究 | 2 710 | 8 743 | b | ⑨ | 8 |
| GUIMARÃES[ | 2010 | 葡萄牙 | 5 | 队列研究 | 33 | 223 | c | ⑧⑰⑳(21) | 7 |
| FARSTAD[ | 2011 | 挪威 | 全国 | 队列研究 | 324 | 53 | c | ⑬⑭⑱ | 8 |
| GORTNER[ | 2011 | 欧洲 | 10国 | 队列研究 | 677 | 3 508 | b | ③⑨⑩⑪ | 8 |
| GAGLIARDI[ | 2011 | 意大利 | 14 | 队列研究 | 196 | 1 064 | c | ⑨⑩⑯(21) | 9 |
| ROJAS[ | 2012 | 哥伦比亚 | 8 | 病例对照研究 | 64 | 148 | c | ②⑮⑱(21) | 7 |
| YEN[ | 2013 | 中国 | 21 | 队列研究 | 2 006 | 3 747 | b | ④⑦⑧⑨⑰⑱(21) | 9 |
| KLINGER[ | 2013 | 以色列 | 28 | 队列研究 | 1 663 | 10 476 | b | ③⑨⑩⑫ | 8 |
| TOLIA[ | 2014 | 美国 | 200 | 队列研究 | 3 011 | 3 199 | b | ⑦⑩⑮ | 9 |
| LAPCHAROENSAP[ | 2015 | 美国 | 116 | 队列研究 | 7 081 | 7 971 | b | ②③⑤⑨⑪ | 7 |
| ROCHA[ | 2019 | 葡萄牙 | 11 | 队列研究 | 119 | 375 | c | ④⑤⑮ | 8 |
| VALENZUELA-STUTMAN[ | 2019 | 智利 | 15 | 队列研究 | 2 580 | 13 827 | d | ⑥⑨⑫⑭⑯⑰⑱⑲(21) | 7 |
| JUNG[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 69 | 队列研究 | 1 906 | 2 756 | c | ⑨⑰ | 9 |
| EUISEOK[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 64 | 队列研究 | 816 | 618 | c | ⑨⑬⑱⑳(21) | 9 |
| 江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组[ | 2019 | 中国 | 19 | 病例对照研究 | 191 | 577 | c | ⑮⑰(21) | 8 |
| SHIN[ | 2020 | 韩国 | KNN | 队列研究 | 764 | 1 603 | c | ①⑦⑨⑩⑰⑱ | 9 |
| NAKASHIMA[ | 2021 | 日本 | 218 | 队列研究 | 7 792 | 9 334 | c | ①⑩⑱ | 8 |
| FALEH[ | 2021 | 瑞士 | 9 | 队列研究 | 138 | 1 087 | c | ⑭⑱ | 8 |
| LI[ | 2021 | 中国 | 33 | 队列研究 | 181 | 446 | b | ⑥⑨⑫⑯ | 7 |
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included literature and the quality evaluation outcomes
| 第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 中心数量 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 诊断标准 | 影响因素 | NOS评分(分) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病例组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
| ABELE-HORN[ | 1998 | 德国 | 3 | 队列研究 | 48 | 49 | a | ①⑬⑭⑮⑰(21) | 9 |
| MARSHALL[ | 1999 | 美国 | 13 | 队列研究 | 224 | 641 | b | ⑧⑭⑮ | 9 |
| PI-YING[ | 2005 | 中国 | 8 | 队列研究 | 538 | 1 225 | b | ⑦⑧⑱(21) | 8 |
| TAPIA[ | 2006 | 南美 | 16 | 队列研究 | 446 | 1 379 | b | ⑭⑮⑱⑲(21) | 8 |
| HENDERSON-SMART[ | 2006 | 澳大利亚+新西兰 | 25 | 队列研究 | 2 710 | 8 743 | b | ⑨ | 8 |
| GUIMARÃES[ | 2010 | 葡萄牙 | 5 | 队列研究 | 33 | 223 | c | ⑧⑰⑳(21) | 7 |
| FARSTAD[ | 2011 | 挪威 | 全国 | 队列研究 | 324 | 53 | c | ⑬⑭⑱ | 8 |
| GORTNER[ | 2011 | 欧洲 | 10国 | 队列研究 | 677 | 3 508 | b | ③⑨⑩⑪ | 8 |
| GAGLIARDI[ | 2011 | 意大利 | 14 | 队列研究 | 196 | 1 064 | c | ⑨⑩⑯(21) | 9 |
| ROJAS[ | 2012 | 哥伦比亚 | 8 | 病例对照研究 | 64 | 148 | c | ②⑮⑱(21) | 7 |
| YEN[ | 2013 | 中国 | 21 | 队列研究 | 2 006 | 3 747 | b | ④⑦⑧⑨⑰⑱(21) | 9 |
| KLINGER[ | 2013 | 以色列 | 28 | 队列研究 | 1 663 | 10 476 | b | ③⑨⑩⑫ | 8 |
| TOLIA[ | 2014 | 美国 | 200 | 队列研究 | 3 011 | 3 199 | b | ⑦⑩⑮ | 9 |
| LAPCHAROENSAP[ | 2015 | 美国 | 116 | 队列研究 | 7 081 | 7 971 | b | ②③⑤⑨⑪ | 7 |
| ROCHA[ | 2019 | 葡萄牙 | 11 | 队列研究 | 119 | 375 | c | ④⑤⑮ | 8 |
| VALENZUELA-STUTMAN[ | 2019 | 智利 | 15 | 队列研究 | 2 580 | 13 827 | d | ⑥⑨⑫⑭⑯⑰⑱⑲(21) | 7 |
| JUNG[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 69 | 队列研究 | 1 906 | 2 756 | c | ⑨⑰ | 9 |
| EUISEOK[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 64 | 队列研究 | 816 | 618 | c | ⑨⑬⑱⑳(21) | 9 |
| 江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组[ | 2019 | 中国 | 19 | 病例对照研究 | 191 | 577 | c | ⑮⑰(21) | 8 |
| SHIN[ | 2020 | 韩国 | KNN | 队列研究 | 764 | 1 603 | c | ①⑦⑨⑩⑰⑱ | 9 |
| NAKASHIMA[ | 2021 | 日本 | 218 | 队列研究 | 7 792 | 9 334 | c | ①⑩⑱ | 8 |
| FALEH[ | 2021 | 瑞士 | 9 | 队列研究 | 138 | 1 087 | c | ⑭⑱ | 8 |
| LI[ | 2021 | 中国 | 33 | 队列研究 | 181 | 446 | b | ⑥⑨⑫⑯ | 7 |
| 影响因素 | 敏感性分析前 | 敏感性分析后 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | |
| 母亲合并绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 1.46 | (1.18,1.80) | 0.000 6 | 1.34 | (1.11,1.62) | 0.000 2 |
| 母亲合并妊娠期高血压 | 1.26 | (1.15,1.37) | <0.000 01 | 1.23 | (1.14,1.33) | <0.000 01 |
| 母亲合并胎膜早破 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 |
| 母亲产前使用类固醇 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.54 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.53 |
| 母亲合并子痫前期 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 |
| 母亲合并妊娠期糖尿病 | 1.50 | (0.35,6.44) | 0.58 | 0.80 | (0.23,2.75) | 0.72 |
| 早产儿出生体质量 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿胎龄 | 0.80 | (0.73,0.87) | <0.000 01 | 0.77 | (0.71,0.85) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿SGA | 2.64 | (1.85,3.77) | <0.000 01 | 2.46 | (1.74,3.47) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿产房气管插管 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.50) | 0.002 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.51) | 0.002 |
| 早产儿5 min Apgar评分<7分 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 |
| 男性早产儿 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿机械通气 | 1.59 | (1.28,1.96) | <0.000 1 | 1.39 | (1.14,1.71) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿机械通气>7 d | 7.99 | (4.47,14.29) | <0.000 01 | 6.55 | (3.63,11.80) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿肺表面活性物质 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿使用类固醇 | 2.42 | (1.93,3.03) | <0.000 01 | 2.51 | (1.86,3.40) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿RDS | 3.40 | (2.01,5.75) | <0.000 01 | 3.23 | (1.93,5.41) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿PDA | 1.96 | (1.38,2.79) | 0.000 2 | 1.96 | (1.38,2.80) | 0.000 2 |
| 早产儿败血症 | 1.82 | (1.36,2.44) | <0.000 1 | 1.74 | (1.30,2.34) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿NEC | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 |
| 早产儿ROP | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 |
Table 2 Sensitivity analysis results
| 影响因素 | 敏感性分析前 | 敏感性分析后 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | |
| 母亲合并绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 1.46 | (1.18,1.80) | 0.000 6 | 1.34 | (1.11,1.62) | 0.000 2 |
| 母亲合并妊娠期高血压 | 1.26 | (1.15,1.37) | <0.000 01 | 1.23 | (1.14,1.33) | <0.000 01 |
| 母亲合并胎膜早破 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 |
| 母亲产前使用类固醇 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.54 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.53 |
| 母亲合并子痫前期 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 |
| 母亲合并妊娠期糖尿病 | 1.50 | (0.35,6.44) | 0.58 | 0.80 | (0.23,2.75) | 0.72 |
| 早产儿出生体质量 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿胎龄 | 0.80 | (0.73,0.87) | <0.000 01 | 0.77 | (0.71,0.85) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿SGA | 2.64 | (1.85,3.77) | <0.000 01 | 2.46 | (1.74,3.47) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿产房气管插管 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.50) | 0.002 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.51) | 0.002 |
| 早产儿5 min Apgar评分<7分 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 |
| 男性早产儿 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿机械通气 | 1.59 | (1.28,1.96) | <0.000 1 | 1.39 | (1.14,1.71) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿机械通气>7 d | 7.99 | (4.47,14.29) | <0.000 01 | 6.55 | (3.63,11.80) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿肺表面活性物质 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿使用类固醇 | 2.42 | (1.93,3.03) | <0.000 01 | 2.51 | (1.86,3.40) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿RDS | 3.40 | (2.01,5.75) | <0.000 01 | 3.23 | (1.93,5.41) | <0.000 01 |
| 早产儿PDA | 1.96 | (1.38,2.79) | 0.000 2 | 1.96 | (1.38,2.80) | 0.000 2 |
| 早产儿败血症 | 1.82 | (1.36,2.44) | <0.000 1 | 1.74 | (1.30,2.34) | <0.000 1 |
| 早产儿NEC | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 |
| 早产儿ROP | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 |
| [1] |
World health organization:preterm birth[EB/OL]. (2018-02-19) [2021-12-01].
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组. 多中心回顾性分析极低及超低出生体重儿支气管肺发育不良的临床特点及高危因素[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2019,57(1):33-39. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.01.009.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
原晋芳,韩彤妍. 绒毛膜羊膜炎与早产儿肺部疾病研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2019,34(10):794-796. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.10.018.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [1] | AN Yanhong, WANG Shidong, LI Xiaoran, GUO Jiayang, WANG Zhe, SHA Peilin, MENG Yijun, LI Xiaoxuan, SHI Xue, YU Zexing, XIAO Yonghua. Study on Risk Factors and Nomogram Prediction Model for Diabetic Kidney Disease: Based on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Technology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2995-3003. |
| [2] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [3] | SONG Zhenzhen, CHEN Yang, WANG Jiwen, LIU Huishan, SHEN Simeng, SUN Ying, CHEN Xing. Study of Maternal Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Asphyxia in Late Preterm and Term Infants [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2874-2878. |
| [4] | LI Yutong, ZHAO Danting, JIANG Feng, WANG Yanna, LIU Yizong, LIANG Wenjuan, LU Jiahai. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mRNA and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752. |
| [5] | ZHANG Wenbo, WANG Junlong, ZHANG Yuping, JIANG Shuai, WANG Huaqi. The Risk of Pre-COPD Populations Progressing to COPD under Different Criteria: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2735-2743. |
| [6] | ZHAO Huili, LU Lina, ZHUO Ya, WANG Xin. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Recurrence of Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2648-2655. |
| [7] | ZHEN Rui, GU Xufang, GAO Shengwei, ZHANG Bowen, REN Zhenjuan, YANG Ruixuan. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Attributable to Metabolic Risk Factors in China 1990—2021 and Projected Trends from 2022 to 2035 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2077-2083. |
| [8] | QIU Yanli, GAO Yongyin, BIAN Xueyan, WANG Xue, LI Yue. The Predictive Value of Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity for All-cause and Cardiovascular-related Mortality in Cancer Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1890-1897. |
| [9] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [10] | ZHAN Li, HENG Zhaoyang, HE Liangyu, ZHAO Jie, CHEN Jie, XING Jinshan. Efficacy and Safety of CAR-T Therapy Targeting the B Cell Maturation Antigen on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Chinese People: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930. |
| [11] | HU Jiaqi, LI Duan, FANG Hao, FAN Xingying, DU Wei, ZHOU Hanni. Study on Predictive Model of Non-genetic Risk Factors for Hyperuricemia in a Physical Examination Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1324-1333. |
| [12] | WANG Fei, HAN Weiyu, SUN Tao. Moxibustion Combined with Three-step Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer Pain: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1203-1211. |
| [13] | PEI Zhiyi, ZHANG Xiaoxin, LIN Jiayi, ZHANG Xiangyi, KANG Xiaofeng. Systematic Review of the Quality and Application of Patient Decision Aids in Cardiovascular Disease Based on IPDAS 4.0 Criteria [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 945-952. |
| [14] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [15] | ZHU Chenrui, LI Na, WU Yuntao, ZHAO Haiyan, HUANG Zhe, LIU Yan, JI Chunpeng, WU Shouling. The Impact of Serum Uric Acid Levels on New-onset Atrioventricular Block: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 583-590. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||