
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (36): 5420-5427.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0325
• Original Research·Research Trends of Traditional Chinese Medicine • Previous Articles
Received:2024-07-12
Revised:2025-06-22
Published:2026-12-20
Online:2026-10-30
Contact:
JIANG Lingfei
通讯作者:
蒋凌飞
作者简介:作者贡献:
陈炜提出研究思路;苏明阳负责进行实验,动物饲养及检测,论文书写;黄德庆负责数据收集;卓桂锋负责数据收集;朱小敏负责统计学分析;张金枝负责动物组织样本采集;符玉岚负责实验器械清洗;李钟彤负责图表处理,论文书写;蒋凌飞负责最终版本修订,对论文负责。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0325
| 引物名称 | 序列(5'→3') |
|---|---|
| AMPK | F:CAACAAGCCCACCCGATTC |
| R:TGCCACTTTGCCTTCCGT | |
| mTOR | F:TGCTGAGTATGTGGAGTTTG |
| R:TGCTGGAAGAAGAAGGTG | |
| ULK1 | F:CCCCATCAAGAAATCCCC |
| R:AAAGCCAGCAGCATCAGC | |
| LC3 | F:GCCGCCTGCAACTCAACC |
| R:ATCCGTCTTCATCCTTCTCCTG | |
| P62 | F:TGACATCTTCCGCATCTA |
| R:CAACCATCACAAATCACG |
Table 1 Sequence of related gene primers
| 引物名称 | 序列(5'→3') |
|---|---|
| AMPK | F:CAACAAGCCCACCCGATTC |
| R:TGCCACTTTGCCTTCCGT | |
| mTOR | F:TGCTGAGTATGTGGAGTTTG |
| R:TGCTGGAAGAAGAAGGTG | |
| ULK1 | F:CCCCATCAAGAAATCCCC |
| R:AAAGCCAGCAGCATCAGC | |
| LC3 | F:GCCGCCTGCAACTCAACC |
| R:ATCCGTCTTCATCCTTCTCCTG | |
| P62 | F:TGACATCTTCCGCATCTA |
| R:CAACCATCACAAATCACG |
| 组别 | 只数 | 逃避潜伏期(s) | 穿越平台次数(次) |
|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 10 | 25.49±3.13 | 3.59±0.53 |
| M组 | 10 | 55.68±2.54a | 1.50±0.20a |
| Z组 | 10 | 37.13±4.51b | 2.86±0.40b |
| Y组 | 10 | 46.05±5.47b | 2.13±0.47b |
| D组 | 10 | 50.33±3.77b | 1.98±0.37b |
| YZ组 | 10 | 47.14±4.63b | 1.95±0.37b |
| DZ组 | 10 | 52.10±2.31b | 1.97±0.33b |
| F值 | 69.597 | 32.289 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Escape latency and times of crossing the platform in Morris water maze experiment of rats in each group on day 6
| 组别 | 只数 | 逃避潜伏期(s) | 穿越平台次数(次) |
|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 10 | 25.49±3.13 | 3.59±0.53 |
| M组 | 10 | 55.68±2.54a | 1.50±0.20a |
| Z组 | 10 | 37.13±4.51b | 2.86±0.40b |
| Y组 | 10 | 46.05±5.47b | 2.13±0.47b |
| D组 | 10 | 50.33±3.77b | 1.98±0.37b |
| YZ组 | 10 | 47.14±4.63b | 1.95±0.37b |
| DZ组 | 10 | 52.10±2.31b | 1.97±0.33b |
| F值 | 69.597 | 32.289 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | p-AMPK/AMPK | p-mTOR/mTOR | p-S757-ULK1/ULK1 | LC3Ⅱ/LC3Ⅰ | P62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 3 | 0.36±0.12 | 2.70±0.50 | 0.60±0.03 | 0.36±0.20 | 1.05±0.12 |
| M组 | 3 | 1.40±0.38a | 0.35±0.31a | 2.95±1.30a | 3.09±0.42a | 0.15±0.08a |
| Z组 | 3 | 0.58±0.19b | 2.04±0.50b | 0.85±0.39b | 0.96±0.22b | 0.67±0.07b |
| Y组 | 3 | 1.05±0.44a | 0.70±0.19a | 1.62±0.51b | 2.09±0.32b | 0.46±0.02b |
| D组 | 3 | 1.22±0.11a | 0.19±0.15a | 2.21±0.47a | 3.00±0.42a | 0.07±0.01a |
| YZ组 | 3 | 0.56±0.26b | 2.15±0.58b | 0.67±0.15b | 0.44±0.06b | 0.86±0.04b |
| DZ组 | 3 | 0.73±0.21b | 0.72±0.06a | 1.19±0.22b | 2.19±0.21ab | 0.38±0.11b |
| F值 | 6.040 | 21.228 | 6.746 | 46.568 | 66.927 | |
| P值 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Effects of YFXFJZF on the protein expressions of p-AMPK/AMPK, p-mTOR/mTOR, p-S757-ULK1/ULK1, LC3Ⅱ/LC3Ⅰ and P62 in the hippocampal tissue of VD rats
| 组别 | 只数 | p-AMPK/AMPK | p-mTOR/mTOR | p-S757-ULK1/ULK1 | LC3Ⅱ/LC3Ⅰ | P62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 3 | 0.36±0.12 | 2.70±0.50 | 0.60±0.03 | 0.36±0.20 | 1.05±0.12 |
| M组 | 3 | 1.40±0.38a | 0.35±0.31a | 2.95±1.30a | 3.09±0.42a | 0.15±0.08a |
| Z组 | 3 | 0.58±0.19b | 2.04±0.50b | 0.85±0.39b | 0.96±0.22b | 0.67±0.07b |
| Y组 | 3 | 1.05±0.44a | 0.70±0.19a | 1.62±0.51b | 2.09±0.32b | 0.46±0.02b |
| D组 | 3 | 1.22±0.11a | 0.19±0.15a | 2.21±0.47a | 3.00±0.42a | 0.07±0.01a |
| YZ组 | 3 | 0.56±0.26b | 2.15±0.58b | 0.67±0.15b | 0.44±0.06b | 0.86±0.04b |
| DZ组 | 3 | 0.73±0.21b | 0.72±0.06a | 1.19±0.22b | 2.19±0.21ab | 0.38±0.11b |
| F值 | 6.040 | 21.228 | 6.746 | 46.568 | 66.927 | |
| P值 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 只数 | AMPK | mTOR | ULK1 | LC3 | P62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 3 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 |
| M组 | 3 | 1.99±0.13a | 2.13±0.22a | 2.21±0.18a | 2.01±0.34a | 0.33±0.13a |
| Z组 | 3 | 1.20±0.10b | 1.57±0.14b | 1.20±0.11b | 1.13±0.21b | 0.84±0.19b |
| Y组 | 3 | 1.76±0.11a | 1.92±0.17a | 1.35±0.11b | 1.28±0.33b | 0.60±0.10b |
| D组 | 3 | 2.15±0.14a | 2.33±0.23a | 1.53±0.11a | 2.17±0.37a | 0.32±0.05a |
| YZ组 | 3 | 1.31±0.24b | 1.43±0.21b | 1.04±0.08b | 0.82±0.14b | 0.88±0.15b |
| DZ组 | 3 | 1.56±0.11b | 1.61±0.14a | 1.41±0.13b | 1.42±0.27ab | 0.52±0.10b |
| F值 | 29.660 | 19.520 | 37.441 | 10.638 | 16.000 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Effects of YFXFJZF on the mRNA expressions of AMPK, mTOR, ULK1, LC3, and P62 in the hippocampal tissue of VD rats
| 组别 | 只数 | AMPK | mTOR | ULK1 | LC3 | P62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K组 | 3 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 |
| M组 | 3 | 1.99±0.13a | 2.13±0.22a | 2.21±0.18a | 2.01±0.34a | 0.33±0.13a |
| Z组 | 3 | 1.20±0.10b | 1.57±0.14b | 1.20±0.11b | 1.13±0.21b | 0.84±0.19b |
| Y组 | 3 | 1.76±0.11a | 1.92±0.17a | 1.35±0.11b | 1.28±0.33b | 0.60±0.10b |
| D组 | 3 | 2.15±0.14a | 2.33±0.23a | 1.53±0.11a | 2.17±0.37a | 0.32±0.05a |
| YZ组 | 3 | 1.31±0.24b | 1.43±0.21b | 1.04±0.08b | 0.82±0.14b | 0.88±0.15b |
| DZ组 | 3 | 1.56±0.11b | 1.61±0.14a | 1.41±0.13b | 1.42±0.27ab | 0.52±0.10b |
| F值 | 29.660 | 19.520 | 37.441 | 10.638 | 16.000 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
唐桂华, 胡雪梅, 唐中生, 等. 穴位埋线改善血管性痴呆大鼠学习记忆能力与海马自噬相关蛋白的影响[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2023, 34(11): 2801-2803. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2023.11.63.
|
| [3] |
陈炜, 朱小敏, 胡跃强, 等. 益肺宣肺降浊方通过EGFR调节PI3K/Akt-MAPK/Erk通路改善血管性痴呆大鼠的记忆[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2023, 41(8): 46-50, 266-269.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
张佳玉, 贾玉梅, 朱才丰, 等. 艾灸督脉调控Wnt/β-catenin信号通路对APP/PS1双转基因小鼠自噬水平的影响[J]. 山东中医药大学学报, 2024, 48(1): 65-72, 111. DOI: 10.16294/j.cnki.1007-659x.2024.01.012.
|
| [6] |
张磊, 赵敏. 白藜芦醇通过调节SIRT1/AMPK信号通路介导自噬反应对膝关节骨性关节炎大鼠细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2024, 40(3): 466-470, 477.
|
| [7] |
陈婕, 唐鑫, 陈盼, 等. 基于改良大鼠双侧颈总动脉结扎法建立血管性痴呆模型探讨脑血流量变化规律及对血管新生相关蛋白的影响[J]. 中国实验动物学报, 2023, 31(11): 1423-1430. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4847.2023.11.006.
|
| [8] |
王飞雪, 黄小波, 裴卉, 等. 血管性痴呆中医病机理论的传承和发扬[J]. 世界中医药, 2022, 17(2): 221-224, 228.
|
| [9] |
姜明贺, 张鼎, 朱欢欢, 等. 温肺降浊方对血管性痴呆大鼠海马神经元的作用机制[J]. 陕西中医, 2024, 45(3): 291-296. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2024.03.001.
|
| [10] |
焦海蕾, 徐冰, 李亚娟. 探析风药对血管性痴呆的精准治疗[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2021, 48(2): 75-77. DOI: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2021.02.021.
|
| [11] |
王晋平, 唐农, 刘布谷, 等. 益肺宣肺降浊方对血管性痴呆大鼠海马神经细胞凋亡及cAMP/PKA信号通路关键因子的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2016, 34(4): 778-781.
|
| [12] |
唐农, 胡跃强, 吴林, 等. 益肺宣肺降浊胶囊治疗血管性痴呆患者107例临床观察[J]. 中医杂志, 2014, 55(12): 1025-1028. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2014.12.010.
|
| [13] |
彭涛, 张慧, 杨一帆, 等. 黄芪治疗血管性痴呆药理机制研究进展[J]. 中国医药, 2024, 19(2): 297-302.
|
| [14] |
陈欣悦, 宋冬冬, 赵晴. 人参皂苷Re、灯盏花素组合物对血管性痴呆大鼠的神经保护作用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(24): 6036-6039. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2023.24.037.
|
| [15] |
毛成远, 顾应江, 侯小林, 等. 三七皂苷Rg1通过调控MEK5/ERK5信号通路改善血管性痴呆大鼠神经损伤及认知功能[J]. 中药材, 2020, 43(4): 981-985.
|
| [16] |
李玉芳, 杨瑞林, 高媛, 等. 石菖蒲抗血管性痴呆的药理机制研究进展[J]. 环球中医药, 2024, 17(3): 537-543.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
孙杨, 刘媛媛, 隋月林, 等. 辣木叶发酵物通过NGF/TrkA通路调控LC3、Beclin-1表达改善血管性痴呆小鼠学习记忆能力和神经功能[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(4): 949-952.
|
| [1] | LYU Xiaojiao, BAI Zihan, MA Yan, CHEN Wei, QU Yang, SUI Guoyuan, SHANG Bing, CONG Peiwei. Study on Erchen Decoction Intervening in ATG7/FTH1 Pathway to Improve Follicular Function of Rats with Phlegm-damp PCOS [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 649-655. |
| [2] | GAO Guiying, HU Yang, ZHANG Shiyi, MENG Yi, DENG Jie. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Exercise Rehabilitation in Improving Coronary Microcirculation Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2570-2576. |
| [3] | ZHU Ziyi, HE Guixin, QIN Weibin, SONG Hui, ZHANG Liwen, TANG Weizhi, YANG Feifei, LIU Lingyun, OUYANG Bin. Research Progress of Mitochondrial Autophagy in Improving Myocardial Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction and Intervention of Traditional Chinese Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2294-2300. |
| [4] | GU Shanye, ZHOU Ziyi, CAI Yefeng. Study on Risk Prediction of Non-dementia Vascular Cognitive Impairment in Glycolipid Metabolic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(35): 4412-4416. |
| [5] | LIU Yu, YUE Ting, YANG Dongyu, ZHAO Zhongting, YANG Jibo, ZHU Tiantian. Research Progress on Mechanism of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3710-3714. |
| [6] | WU Changyong, BAO Suli, XU Fei, PENG Yunzhu. Latest Advances in Exercise-induced Autophagy in Improving Cardiovascular Disease Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(05): 629-634. |
| [7] | GUO Dongwei, ZHANG Pengfei, REN Mingjun, LIAO Lijun, HUANG Ruyan, LUO Xiangrong. Mechanistic of Ginkgo Biloba Extract in the Prevention and Treatment of COPD: Regulating Autophagy in Alveolar Macrophages via PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathways [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 293-303. |
| [8] | CHEN Yanyan,ZHANG Yehao,XU Li,YAO Mingjiang,WANG Guangrui,SONG Wenting. Effect of Tongluoqingnao Powder Injection on Protecting the Brain and Expression of Neuronic Autophagy-related Proteins in a Rat Model of Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(15): 1951-1958. |
| [9] | YAO LIN,MU Qiong. Novel Advances in Regulatory Mechanism of Microglia Autophagy,Inflammation and Their Interaction in Intracerebral Hemorrhage [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(30): 3888-3894. |
| [10] | CHEN Haiyan,DING Xiaoqing. Effects of Dioscin on the Growth of Tamoxifen-resistant Breast Cancer Cells [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(29): 3570-3575. |
| [11] | GUO Zhi-guo*,XIN Yi. Novel Developments in the Pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(20): 2400-2403. |
| [12] | WANG Yi-ming1,YANG Xiao-yue1,ZHANG Xin-xin2*. Effect and Mechanism of Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Protecting against Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in ZDF Rats #br# [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(14): 1699-1703. |
| [13] | GONG Jian-guang, JIN Juan, ZHAO Li, LIN Bo, LIANG Shi-kai, HE Qiang, LI Yi-wen. Effect of Autophagy on Cardiac Myocytes Injury in Uremic Cardiomyopathy Mice [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(36): 4489-4494. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||