
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (27): 3447-3455.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0499
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-08-10
Revised:2024-12-15
Published:2025-09-20
Online:2025-07-22
Contact:
HUANG Zhongxia
通讯作者:
黄仲夏
作者简介:作者贡献:
张天宇进行论文构思、统计学处理、结果分析和论文撰写;于海搏和陈飞协助进行统计学处理;李新、张佳佳、詹晓凯、申曼、汤然、范斯斌和赵凤仪进行文献资料整理;黄仲夏对文章进行可行性分析、论文修订和质量监督管理,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0499
| 第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 结局指标 | 中位年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 干预措施 | 质量评价得分(分) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI[ | 2011 | 中国 | 单中心前瞻性研究 | 31 | ①②③④⑤ | 21(15,36) | MD | 15 |
| MISAWA[ | 2016 | 日本 | 多中心、随机对照试验 | 24 | ④⑤ | 62(54,69) | TD/安慰剂 | 6 |
| KUWABARA[ | 2008 | 日本 | 开放性前瞻研究 | 9 | ②④⑤ | 65(42,85) | TD | 14 |
| LI[ | 2018 | 中国 | 前瞻性Ⅱ期、单中心、单臂研究 | 41 | ①②③④⑤ | 49(21,70) | RD | 15 |
| ROYER[ | 2012 | 法国 | 回顾性研究 | 20 | ①②③④⑤ | 60(32,79) | RD | 14 |
| NOZZA[ | 2017 | 意大利 | 前瞻性单臂研究 | 18 | ①③⑤ | 60(44,76) | RD | 14 |
| CAI[ | 2014 | 中国 | 回顾性研究 | 12 | ①②③④⑤ | 46(27,71) | RD | 14 |
| SUICHI[ | 2020 | 日本 | 前瞻性单臂临床试验 | 5 | ②③④⑤ | 52(45,58) | RD | 14 |
| LI[ | 2023 | 中国 | 单中心回顾性研究 | 239 | ①②③ | 46(23,66) | ASCT | 14 |
| COOK[ | 2016 | 欧洲 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 127 | ① | 50(26,69) | ASCT | 14 |
| KAWAJIRI-MANAKO[ | 2018 | 日本 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 95 | ①⑤ | 53(28,72) | ASCT | 13 |
| KOOK[ | 2024 | 韩国 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 84 | ①② | 53(26,77) | ASCT | 14 |
| D'SOUZA[ | 2012 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 59 | ①② | 51(20,70) | ASCT | 15 |
| DISPENZIERI[ | 2008 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 30 | ① | 48.5(20,70) | ASCT | 13 |
Table 1 Basic characteristics of included literature
| 第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 结局指标 | 中位年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 干预措施 | 质量评价得分(分) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI[ | 2011 | 中国 | 单中心前瞻性研究 | 31 | ①②③④⑤ | 21(15,36) | MD | 15 |
| MISAWA[ | 2016 | 日本 | 多中心、随机对照试验 | 24 | ④⑤ | 62(54,69) | TD/安慰剂 | 6 |
| KUWABARA[ | 2008 | 日本 | 开放性前瞻研究 | 9 | ②④⑤ | 65(42,85) | TD | 14 |
| LI[ | 2018 | 中国 | 前瞻性Ⅱ期、单中心、单臂研究 | 41 | ①②③④⑤ | 49(21,70) | RD | 15 |
| ROYER[ | 2012 | 法国 | 回顾性研究 | 20 | ①②③④⑤ | 60(32,79) | RD | 14 |
| NOZZA[ | 2017 | 意大利 | 前瞻性单臂研究 | 18 | ①③⑤ | 60(44,76) | RD | 14 |
| CAI[ | 2014 | 中国 | 回顾性研究 | 12 | ①②③④⑤ | 46(27,71) | RD | 14 |
| SUICHI[ | 2020 | 日本 | 前瞻性单臂临床试验 | 5 | ②③④⑤ | 52(45,58) | RD | 14 |
| LI[ | 2023 | 中国 | 单中心回顾性研究 | 239 | ①②③ | 46(23,66) | ASCT | 14 |
| COOK[ | 2016 | 欧洲 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 127 | ① | 50(26,69) | ASCT | 14 |
| KAWAJIRI-MANAKO[ | 2018 | 日本 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 95 | ①⑤ | 53(28,72) | ASCT | 13 |
| KOOK[ | 2024 | 韩国 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 84 | ①② | 53(26,77) | ASCT | 14 |
| D'SOUZA[ | 2012 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 59 | ①② | 51(20,70) | ASCT | 15 |
| DISPENZIERI[ | 2008 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 30 | ① | 48.5(20,70) | ASCT | 13 |
| 亚组 | 血液学反应率(95%CI) | VEGF反应率(95%CI) | 神经系统反应率(95%CI) | ≥3级不良反应 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发生率(95%CI) | 末次随访时的存活率(95%CI) | ||||
| MD | 0.806(0.625~0.925) | 0.958(0.789~0.999) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) | 0.194(0.075~0.375) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) |
| TD+RD | 0.726(0.517~0.897) | 0.887(0.798~0.956) | 0.642(0.325~0.909) | 0.047(0.000~0.204) | 0.978(0.930~1.000) |
| ASCT | 0.830(0.730~0.912) | 0.800(0.484~0.989) | 0.926(0.882~0.958) | 0.543(0.419~0.663) | 0.908(0.878~0.934) |
Table 2 Outcomes of subgroup analysis based on type of systemic therapy regimen
| 亚组 | 血液学反应率(95%CI) | VEGF反应率(95%CI) | 神经系统反应率(95%CI) | ≥3级不良反应 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发生率(95%CI) | 末次随访时的存活率(95%CI) | ||||
| MD | 0.806(0.625~0.925) | 0.958(0.789~0.999) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) | 0.194(0.075~0.375) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) |
| TD+RD | 0.726(0.517~0.897) | 0.887(0.798~0.956) | 0.642(0.325~0.909) | 0.047(0.000~0.204) | 0.978(0.930~1.000) |
| ASCT | 0.830(0.730~0.912) | 0.800(0.484~0.989) | 0.926(0.882~0.958) | 0.543(0.419~0.663) | 0.908(0.878~0.934) |
| 亚组 | 血液学反应率 | VEGF反应率 | 神经系统反应率 | ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 末次随访时的存活率 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | |
| MD | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| TD+RD | 71.098 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.647 | 87.468 | <0.001 | 80.418 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.438 |
| ASCT | 83.009 | <0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17.428 | 0.301 |
Table 3 Heterogeneity in subgroup analysis based on type of systemic therapy regimen
| 亚组 | 血液学反应率 | VEGF反应率 | 神经系统反应率 | ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 末次随访时的存活率 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | |
| MD | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| TD+RD | 71.098 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.647 | 87.468 | <0.001 | 80.418 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.438 |
| ASCT | 83.009 | <0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17.428 | 0.301 |
| 项目 | 斜率(Intercept) | 95%CI | 截距(Slope) | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 血液学反应率 | 0.479 | 0.546~0.953 | 0.190 | -1.286~1.667 | 0.777 |
| VEGF反应率 | 0.841 | 0.575~1.107 | 0.017 | -1.670~1.705 | 0.981 |
| 神经系统反应率 | 1.066 | 0.838~1.294 | -1.487 | -3.062~0.089 | 0.060 |
| ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 0.601 | 0.109~1.092 | -1.850 | -4.298~0.598 | 0.117 |
| 末次随访时的存活率 | 0.872 | 0.814~0.930 | 0.387 | -0.069~0.843 | 0.088 |
| 末次随访时的复发率 | 0.122 | -0.431~0.676 | -0.156 | -2.970~2.658 | 0.885 |
Table 4 Outcomes of Egger's test
| 项目 | 斜率(Intercept) | 95%CI | 截距(Slope) | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 血液学反应率 | 0.479 | 0.546~0.953 | 0.190 | -1.286~1.667 | 0.777 |
| VEGF反应率 | 0.841 | 0.575~1.107 | 0.017 | -1.670~1.705 | 0.981 |
| 神经系统反应率 | 1.066 | 0.838~1.294 | -1.487 | -3.062~0.089 | 0.060 |
| ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 0.601 | 0.109~1.092 | -1.850 | -4.298~0.598 | 0.117 |
| 末次随访时的存活率 | 0.872 | 0.814~0.930 | 0.387 | -0.069~0.843 | 0.088 |
| 末次随访时的复发率 | 0.122 | -0.431~0.676 | -0.156 | -2.970~2.658 | 0.885 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
陈月红,杜亮,耿兴远,等. 无对照二分类数据的Meta分析在RevMan软件中的实现[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(7):889-896. DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20140147.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] | |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [1] | LI Yutong, ZHAO Danting, JIANG Feng, WANG Yanna, LIU Yizong, LIANG Wenjuan, LU Jiahai. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mRNA and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752. |
| [2] | ZHANG Wenbo, WANG Junlong, ZHANG Yuping, JIANG Shuai, WANG Huaqi. The Risk of Pre-COPD Populations Progressing to COPD under Different Criteria: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2735-2743. |
| [3] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [4] | ZHAN Li, HENG Zhaoyang, HE Liangyu, ZHAO Jie, CHEN Jie, XING Jinshan. Efficacy and Safety of CAR-T Therapy Targeting the B Cell Maturation Antigen on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Chinese People: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930. |
| [5] | WANG Fei, HAN Weiyu, SUN Tao. Moxibustion Combined with Three-step Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer Pain: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1203-1211. |
| [6] | PEI Zhiyi, ZHANG Xiaoxin, LIN Jiayi, ZHANG Xiangyi, KANG Xiaofeng. Systematic Review of the Quality and Application of Patient Decision Aids in Cardiovascular Disease Based on IPDAS 4.0 Criteria [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 945-952. |
| [7] | ZHONG Lanfang, YU Xinyu, PI Zheyu, LI Bin. Drug-induced Cardiotoxicity in the Chinese Population: Current Analysis and Considerations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 767-776. |
| [8] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [9] | ZHAO Xuejiao, LI Juan, LI Yujie, LU Ting, Xian Lihong, YAN Huan. Prevalence Trends and Influencing Factors for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 380-392. |
| [10] | ZHOU Wenchao, LIANG Jiaqi, YAO Shangman, XUE Zhao, LIU Long, GUO Xiangjie. Identification of Shared Loci between Hypertension and Parkinson's Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 201-206. |
| [11] | XIANG Fengling, WANG Yuankun, WANG Xiaoyan, HE Shengjie, GAN Jinhua. The Prevalence of Hyperuricemia among Children and Adolescents in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4206-4213. |
| [12] | SHANG Luxiang, ZHU Mingqi, ZHOU Xianhui, GAO Mei, TANG Baopeng, HOU Yinglong. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Atrial Fibrillation among Adults in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4192-4198. |
| [13] | ZHENG Boyue, FU Jiyi, WU Jiafei, WANG Jun, LI Hui. Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Carfilzomib in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3806-3814. |
| [14] | XU Jialan, YAN Hong, WEN Jun, ZHOU Zitong, WANG Siyu. Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Adults with Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3815-3822. |
| [15] | WU Xiangpeng, LI Enjun, LI Xiongwei, WANG Haihong, CUI Wei, WU Xiangli, QI Weihua, HOU Senlin. Timing of Administration and Combination Therapy of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for the Prevention of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3823-3830. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||