
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (27): 3391-3398.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0541
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2023-08-01
Revised:2024-07-03
Published:2025-09-20
Online:2025-07-22
Contact:
CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu
通讯作者:
陈艳, 何志旭
作者简介:作者贡献:
徐艳朋进行论文构思、数据分析及统计、论文撰写等;黄佩协助指导论文设计;张平平、罗艳进行临床资料及数据收集;施晓琪、吴柳松进行试验;陈艳、何志旭负责文章审校、监督管理。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0541
| 组别 | 例数 | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 15 | 0.184±0.036 | 0.359±0.096 | 0.484±0.060 |
| T-ALL初诊组 | 23 | 0.361±0.089ab | 0.764±0.128ab | 0.821±0.071ab |
| T-ALL缓解组 | 17 | 0.202±0.059 | 0.380±0.084 | 0.492±0.059 |
| F值 | 32.774 | 90.271 | 176.849 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Results of β-AR protein expression in T-ALL cells in 3 groups
| 组别 | 例数 | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 15 | 0.184±0.036 | 0.359±0.096 | 0.484±0.060 |
| T-ALL初诊组 | 23 | 0.361±0.089ab | 0.764±0.128ab | 0.821±0.071ab |
| T-ALL缓解组 | 17 | 0.202±0.059 | 0.380±0.084 | 0.492±0.059 |
| F值 | 32.774 | 90.271 | 176.849 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | WBC[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | HB(g/L) | PLT[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 诱导化疗8 d后外周血白血病细胞[例(%)] | 化疗15 d后骨髓中白血病细胞[例(%)] | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | |||||||||
| 中危亚组 | 9 | 118.19(3.18,156.98) | 86.89±34.16 | 140.00(48.50,256.00) | 0.60±0.22 | 4(44.4) | 5(55.6) | 8(88.9) | 1(11.1) | 0.36±0.09 | 0.74±0.10 | 0.78±0.04 |
| 高危亚组 | 14 | 144.24(6.66,310.84) | 97.86±28.76 | 148.00(45.00,199.00) | 0.59±0.21 | 6(42.9) | 8(57.1) | 6(42.9) | 8(57.1) | 0.36±0.09 | 0.78±0.14 | 0.85±0.08 |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.882a | 0.830b | 0.567a | <0.001b | — | — | 0.033b | 0.504b | 3.198b | |||
| P值 | 0.378 | 0.416 | 0.571 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.077 | 0.974 | 0.614 | 0.005 | |||
Table 2 Comparison of clinical data and β-AR protein expression between medium-risk subgroup and high-risk subgroup
| 组别 | 例数 | WBC[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | HB(g/L) | PLT[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 诱导化疗8 d后外周血白血病细胞[例(%)] | 化疗15 d后骨髓中白血病细胞[例(%)] | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | |||||||||
| 中危亚组 | 9 | 118.19(3.18,156.98) | 86.89±34.16 | 140.00(48.50,256.00) | 0.60±0.22 | 4(44.4) | 5(55.6) | 8(88.9) | 1(11.1) | 0.36±0.09 | 0.74±0.10 | 0.78±0.04 |
| 高危亚组 | 14 | 144.24(6.66,310.84) | 97.86±28.76 | 148.00(45.00,199.00) | 0.59±0.21 | 6(42.9) | 8(57.1) | 6(42.9) | 8(57.1) | 0.36±0.09 | 0.78±0.14 | 0.85±0.08 |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.882a | 0.830b | 0.567a | <0.001b | — | — | 0.033b | 0.504b | 3.198b | |||
| P值 | 0.378 | 0.416 | 0.571 | >0.999 | >0.999 | 0.077 | 0.974 | 0.614 | 0.005 | |||
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β3-AR | 1.951 | 0.884 | 4.872 | 7.036 | 1.244~39.783 | 0.027 |
| 化疗15 d骨髓白血病细胞 | 2.367 | 1.190 | 3.955 | 10.667 | 1.035~109.941 | 0.047 |
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of high-risk factors in T-ALL children
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β3-AR | 1.951 | 0.884 | 4.872 | 7.036 | 1.244~39.783 | 0.027 |
| 化疗15 d骨髓白血病细胞 | 2.367 | 1.190 | 3.955 | 10.667 | 1.035~109.941 | 0.047 |
| 组别 | 例数 | WBC[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | HB(g/L) | PLT[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 诱导化疗8 d后外周血白血病细胞[例(%)] | 化疗15 d后骨髓中白血病细胞[例(%)] | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | |||||||||
| 预后良好亚组 | 13 | 60.95(5.34,338.05) | 88.62±30.59 | 110.50(37.50,195.00) | 0.66±0.27 | 6(46.2) | 7(53.8) | 8(61.5) | 5(38.5) | 0.35±0.10 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.79±0.04 |
| 预后不良亚组 | 10 | 40.20(6.66,473.83) | 100.00±31.25 | 119.00(56.00,224.00) | 0.51±0.34 | 4(40.0) | 6(60.0) | 5(50.0) | 5(50.0) | 0.37±0.07 | 0.77±0.18 | 0.87±0.08 |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.744a | 0.877b | 1.054a | 0.869b | — | — | 0.454b | 0.248b | 2.853b | |||
| P值 | 0.457 | 0.391 | 0.292 | 0.385 | 0.768 | 0.580 | 0.654 | 0.804 | 0.004 | |||
Table 4 Comparison of clinical data and β-AR protein expression between good prognosis subgroup and poor prognosis subgroup
| 组别 | 例数 | WBC[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | HB(g/L) | PLT[M(Q1,Q3),×109/L] | 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 诱导化疗8 d后外周血白血病细胞[例(%)] | 化疗15 d后骨髓中白血病细胞[例(%)] | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | |||||||||
| 预后良好亚组 | 13 | 60.95(5.34,338.05) | 88.62±30.59 | 110.50(37.50,195.00) | 0.66±0.27 | 6(46.2) | 7(53.8) | 8(61.5) | 5(38.5) | 0.35±0.10 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.79±0.04 |
| 预后不良亚组 | 10 | 40.20(6.66,473.83) | 100.00±31.25 | 119.00(56.00,224.00) | 0.51±0.34 | 4(40.0) | 6(60.0) | 5(50.0) | 5(50.0) | 0.37±0.07 | 0.77±0.18 | 0.87±0.08 |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.744a | 0.877b | 1.054a | 0.869b | — | — | 0.454b | 0.248b | 2.853b | |||
| P值 | 0.457 | 0.391 | 0.292 | 0.385 | 0.768 | 0.580 | 0.654 | 0.804 | 0.004 | |||
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β3-AR | 2.134 | 0.863 | 6.117 | 8.447 | 1.557~45.819 | 0.013 |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of adverse prognostic factors in children with T-ALL
| 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β3-AR | 2.134 | 0.863 | 6.117 | 8.447 | 1.557~45.819 | 0.013 |
| 指标 | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | |
| WBC | 0.164a | 0.456 | 0.444a | 0.034 | 0.139a | 0.526 |
| HB | 0.314 | 0.145 | 0.104 | 0.637 | 0.332 | 0.122 |
| PLT | 0.028a | 0.898 | 0.145a | 0.508 | 0.372a | 0.081 |
| 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 0.131 | 0.551 | 0.449 | 0.032 | 0.227 | 0.299 |
| 化疗8 d外周血白血病细胞 | 0.139 | 0.527 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.106 | 0.631 |
| 化疗15 d骨髓白血病细胞 | 0.202 | 0.357 | 0.470 | 0.024 | 0.121 | 0.583 |
| 危险度 | 0.060a | 0.784 | 0.107a | 0.626 | 0.524a | 0.010 |
| 预后不良 | 0.126a | 0.568 | 0.053a | 0.811 | 0.608a | 0.002 |
Table 6 Results of correlation analysis of risk and clinical data between β-AR and T-ALL children
| 指标 | β1-AR | β2-AR | β3-AR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | r(rs)值 | P值 | |
| WBC | 0.164a | 0.456 | 0.444a | 0.034 | 0.139a | 0.526 |
| HB | 0.314 | 0.145 | 0.104 | 0.637 | 0.332 | 0.122 |
| PLT | 0.028a | 0.898 | 0.145a | 0.508 | 0.372a | 0.081 |
| 初诊骨髓白血病细胞比例 | 0.131 | 0.551 | 0.449 | 0.032 | 0.227 | 0.299 |
| 化疗8 d外周血白血病细胞 | 0.139 | 0.527 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.106 | 0.631 |
| 化疗15 d骨髓白血病细胞 | 0.202 | 0.357 | 0.470 | 0.024 | 0.121 | 0.583 |
| 危险度 | 0.060a | 0.784 | 0.107a | 0.626 | 0.524a | 0.010 |
| 预后不良 | 0.126a | 0.568 | 0.053a | 0.811 | 0.608a | 0.002 |
| [6] |
李晓燕,李亚星,贾漪涛. β-肾上腺素能受体在肿瘤发生和发展中的研究进展[J]. 肿瘤,2021,41(9):650-656. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2021.2010-0897.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
王卫平,孙锟,常立文. 儿科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:348-353.
|
| [12] |
蔡文娟,李雨航,万幸,等. β-肾上腺素受体与乳腺癌相关性的研究进展[J]. 生理科学进展,2021,52(1):77-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0559-7765.2021.01.017.
|
| [13] |
张巧英,李本义. β-肾上腺素能受体与前列腺癌的研究进展[J]. 中国男科学杂志,2015,29(9):68-71.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [1] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [2] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [3] | HUANG Haili, LI Yuhong, YU Yang, GUO Ping, HAN Changzheng, LIU Ping. A Mixed Study of Fertility Intention and Its Influencing Factors among the Childbearing-age Women in Anhui Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2887-2894. |
| [4] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [5] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [6] | LIU Xiaoyu, ZHU Rongxin, ZHANG Bo, SU Hang, REN Xianqing. Defining Clinical Questions and Outcome Indicators in Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Nocturnal Enuresis in Children with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Based on Modified Delphi Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2050-2055. |
| [7] | XIONG Xiaoman, LI Aijun, ZHENG Yuehong, YANG Qiuyan, ZHANG Yanli. To Explore the Necessity of Bronchodilation Test in Children with Normal FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC but Decreased Small Airway Function [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 1992-1997. |
| [8] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [9] | SHEN Yong, ZHOU Jingying, WANG Xueping, JIA Meixiang, LIU Jiajia, ZHAN Haojian, WANG Lifang, YAN Hao, PENG Danyuan, YUE Weihua. Construction of Support Services List for Parents of Children with Autism Based on "Timing It Right" Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1688-1698. |
| [10] | YAN Beibei, XU Huaifu. Children's Type 1 Diabetes-specific Self-reported Outcomes Scales: Measurement Properties Evaluation Based on COSMIN Guidelines [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1624-1632. |
| [11] | YANG Jingran, MA Fang, WANG Yu, ZHANG Yimei, ZHOU Min. Summary of Best Evidence for Pain Management after Open-heart Surgery in Children with Congenital Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1473-1480. |
| [12] | LIU Xiang, CHEN Hong, CUI Rui, GUO Zhichao, LI Panpan, CAO Zilong, JI Yiqing, YU Wenya. Consistencies and Differences in Early Childhood Development Characteristics in Megacities: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1411-1421. |
| [13] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [14] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [15] | GUAN Yanping, WU Yunxiao, XU Zhifei. Correlation between Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Emotional-behavioural Problems in Preschool Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1155-1160. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||