
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 1500-1505.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0107
• Original Research·Research Trends of Traditional Chinese Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-25
Revised:2024-07-03
Published:2025-04-20
Online:2025-02-06
Contact:
CHENG Lu
通讯作者:
程璐
作者简介:作者贡献:
王德祥进行论文构思,研究设计,数据整理,撰写论文;原佳雯负责研究的实施,数据收集;陆沁云、杭宇豪完成数据收集;鲁俊、程璐提出主要研究目标,负责研究的构思与设计;程璐负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责、监督。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0107
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别[例(%)] | 糖尿病[例(%)] | APACHEⅡ[M(P25,P75),分] | SOFA[M(P25,P75),分] | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HGB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | |||||||||
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 80(70,86) | 73(67.0) | 36(33.0) | 41(37.6) | 26(23,28) | 7.0(6.0,7.5) | 11.41(8.39,16.06) | 100.0(84.5,122.5) | 170.0(123.5,237.5) |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 82(71,87) | 63(74.1) | 22(25.9) | 34(40.0) | 27(24,29) | 7.0(6.0,8) | 11.63(8.99,14.09) | 96.0(80.0,113.0) | 169.0(114.0,231.5) |
| Z(χ2)值 | -1.236 | 1.163a | 0.115a | -1.951 | -1.785 | -0.309 | -1.38 | -0.361 | ||
| P值 | 0.216 | 0.281 | 0.735 | 0.051 | 0.074 | 0.757 | 0.167 | 0.718 | ||
| 组别 | CRP[M(P25,P75),mg/L] | PCT[M(P25,P75),ng/mL] | AST[M(P25,P75),U/L] | ALT[M(P25,P75),U/L] | Scr[M(P25,P75),μmol/L] | pH值[M(P25,P75)] | 氧合指数[M(P25,P75)] | PaCO2[M(P25,P75),mmHg] | ||
| 早期干预组 | 78.48(28.64,161.05) | 0.98(0.25,5.59) | 25(17,48) | 20(12,37) | 93.0(66.6,154.8) | 7.44(7.38,7.48) | 194.14(162.60,233.15) | 36.3(31.9,44.0) | ||
| 晚期干预组 | 83.23(44.78,138.52) | 0.98(0.42,4.84) | 30(17,43) | 19(11,37) | 112.1(62.8,169.7) | 7.44(7.40,7.48) | 179.53(141.75,228.55) | 36.7(31.0,43.2) | ||
| Z(χ2)值 | -0.675 | -0.350 | -0.384 | -0.223 | -1.061 | -0.281 | -1.482 | -0.406 | ||
| P值 | 0.500 | 0.726 | 0.701 | 0.824 | 0.298 | 0.779 | 0.138 | 0.684 | ||
Table 1 Baseline conditions between the early intervention group and late intervention group
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 性别[例(%)] | 糖尿病[例(%)] | APACHEⅡ[M(P25,P75),分] | SOFA[M(P25,P75),分] | WBC[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | HGB[M(P25,P75),g/L] | PLT[M(P25,P75),×109/L] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | |||||||||
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 80(70,86) | 73(67.0) | 36(33.0) | 41(37.6) | 26(23,28) | 7.0(6.0,7.5) | 11.41(8.39,16.06) | 100.0(84.5,122.5) | 170.0(123.5,237.5) |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 82(71,87) | 63(74.1) | 22(25.9) | 34(40.0) | 27(24,29) | 7.0(6.0,8) | 11.63(8.99,14.09) | 96.0(80.0,113.0) | 169.0(114.0,231.5) |
| Z(χ2)值 | -1.236 | 1.163a | 0.115a | -1.951 | -1.785 | -0.309 | -1.38 | -0.361 | ||
| P值 | 0.216 | 0.281 | 0.735 | 0.051 | 0.074 | 0.757 | 0.167 | 0.718 | ||
| 组别 | CRP[M(P25,P75),mg/L] | PCT[M(P25,P75),ng/mL] | AST[M(P25,P75),U/L] | ALT[M(P25,P75),U/L] | Scr[M(P25,P75),μmol/L] | pH值[M(P25,P75)] | 氧合指数[M(P25,P75)] | PaCO2[M(P25,P75),mmHg] | ||
| 早期干预组 | 78.48(28.64,161.05) | 0.98(0.25,5.59) | 25(17,48) | 20(12,37) | 93.0(66.6,154.8) | 7.44(7.38,7.48) | 194.14(162.60,233.15) | 36.3(31.9,44.0) | ||
| 晚期干预组 | 83.23(44.78,138.52) | 0.98(0.42,4.84) | 30(17,43) | 19(11,37) | 112.1(62.8,169.7) | 7.44(7.40,7.48) | 179.53(141.75,228.55) | 36.7(31.0,43.2) | ||
| Z(χ2)值 | -0.675 | -0.350 | -0.384 | -0.223 | -1.061 | -0.281 | -1.482 | -0.406 | ||
| P值 | 0.500 | 0.726 | 0.701 | 0.824 | 0.298 | 0.779 | 0.138 | 0.684 | ||
| 项目 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 0.72 | 0.30 | 2.41 | 0.016 | 2.05 | 1.14~3.68 |
| 模型2 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 2.48 | 0.013 | 2.17 | 1.18~4.01 |
| 模型3 | 0.74 | 0.32 | 2.35 | 0.019 | 2.11 | 1.13~3.91 |
Table 2 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the influence of treatment timings on the all-cause mortality of sepsis-related ARDS
| 项目 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 0.72 | 0.30 | 2.41 | 0.016 | 2.05 | 1.14~3.68 |
| 模型2 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 2.48 | 0.013 | 2.17 | 1.18~4.01 |
| 模型3 | 0.74 | 0.32 | 2.35 | 0.019 | 2.11 | 1.13~3.91 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 205.57±132.45 | 319.87±95.32 | -7.22 | <0.001 |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 182.27±59.42 | 259.55±99.72 | -5.98 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 1.48 | 4.20 | |||
| P值 | 0.140 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Oxygen index before and after treatment in the early intervention group and late intervention group
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 205.57±132.45 | 319.87±95.32 | -7.22 | <0.001 |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 182.27±59.42 | 259.55±99.72 | -5.98 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 1.48 | 4.20 | |||
| P值 | 0.140 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | CRP(mg/L) | PCT(ng/mL) | WBC(×109/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 78.48(28.64,161.05) | 19.39(8.16,44.47)a | 0.980(0.245,5.59) | 0.175(0.089,0.750)a | 11.41(8.39,16.06) | 8.75(6.68,10.34)a |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 83.23(44.78,138.52) | 38.01(17.53,86.05)a | 0.983(0.415,4.84) | 0.460(0.143,1.850)a | 11.63(8.99,14.09) | 8.42(6.86,11.98)a |
| Z值 | -0.67 | -3.86 | -0.35 | -2.87 | -0.31 | -0.78 | |
| P值 | 0.50 | <0.001 | 0.727 | 0.004 | 0.758 | 0.436 | |
Table 4 Inflammatory indicators between the early intervention group and late intervention group
| 组别 | 例数 | CRP(mg/L) | PCT(ng/mL) | WBC(×109/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 早期干预组 | 109 | 78.48(28.64,161.05) | 19.39(8.16,44.47)a | 0.980(0.245,5.59) | 0.175(0.089,0.750)a | 11.41(8.39,16.06) | 8.75(6.68,10.34)a |
| 晚期干预组 | 85 | 83.23(44.78,138.52) | 38.01(17.53,86.05)a | 0.983(0.415,4.84) | 0.460(0.143,1.850)a | 11.63(8.99,14.09) | 8.42(6.86,11.98)a |
| Z值 | -0.67 | -3.86 | -0.35 | -2.87 | -0.31 | -0.78 | |
| P值 | 0.50 | <0.001 | 0.727 | 0.004 | 0.758 | 0.436 | |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
张松,龙坤兰,钱琳,等. 复苏合剂联合西医常规治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的多中心前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志,2022,42(3):298-304. DOI:10.7661/j.cjim.20211130.227.
|
| [10] |
曾倩柔,吴铁军,钟平,等. 加味宣白承气汤联合机械通气治疗脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效观察[J]. 实用中医内科杂志,2023,37(5):96-98. DOI:10.13729/j.issn.1671-7813.Z20221021.
|
| [11] |
邵峰,陈建荣,高想,等. 清肺汤对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼出气冷凝液中一氧化氮和8-异前列腺素的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志,2015,35(5):541-544. DOI:10.7661/CJIM.2015.05.0541.
|
| [12] |
陈金亮,陈建荣,高想,等. 清肺汤治疗对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼出气冷凝液中TNF-α水平影响的研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志,2015,16(11):829-832. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2015.11.004.
|
| [13] |
吴斌,金丹群,丁洁,等. 清肺汤联合机械通气对急性肺损伤合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征肺功能、血清细胞间ICAM-1及TNF-α的影响探究[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2022,40(2):177-179. DOI:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2022.02.041.
|
| [14] |
周易,陈广,董若兰.黄芩及其有效成分治疗脓毒症急性肺损伤机制研究进展[J].中西医结合研究,2024,16(1):57-60.
|
| [15] |
付晨菲,梁群,李建龙.中药单体治疗脓毒症急性肺损伤的研究进展[J].长春中医药大学学报,2024,40(2):219-225.DOI:10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2024.02.021.
|
| [16] |
程璐,张炎,何淑寅,等. 通腑泻肺法对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2020,32(8):970-975. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200506-00361.
|
| [17] |
张安,李延萍,邱敏,等. 中药使用时机对重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的治疗效果及预后的影响[J]. 中国医学科学院学报,2020,42(4):521-530. DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.12915.
|
| [18] |
朱雪,胡渊龙,沈宁,等. 基于真实世界研究中药介入时机对新型冠状病毒肺炎康复时间的影响[J]. 中西医结合研究,2021,13(3):145-148,158. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4616.2021.03.001.
|
| [19] |
邵琳,穆静丽. 中药不同时机介入治疗脑梗死急性期的效果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2020,11(8):90-93. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.08.039.
|
| [20] |
唐喜玉,査景园,许奎,等. 急性胰腺炎早期中药干预治疗的时机选择探讨[J]. 中医药临床杂志,2013,25(7):588-590. DOI:10.16448/j.cjtcm.2013.07.003.
|
| [21] |
张军,舒婷婷,罗卫东,等.中药早期干预对新型冠状病毒肺炎重症患者疾病转归影响的回顾性临床研究[J].中医杂志,2021,62(12):1046-1051.DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2021.12.008.
|
| [22] | |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
乔智灏,张梦雅,游凯斌,等. 脓毒症致ARDS患者死亡的影响因素及炎症因子水平对预后评估的价值[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2021,16(11):1334-1337. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb.211120.
|
| [25] |
孙媛,王琳,李筱妍. 脓毒症相关性急性呼吸窘迫综合征生物标志物研究进展[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2023,22(10):745-748.
|
| [1] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [2] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [3] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [4] | QIU Yanli, GAO Yongyin, BIAN Xueyan, WANG Xue, LI Yue. The Predictive Value of Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity for All-cause and Cardiovascular-related Mortality in Cancer Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1890-1897. |
| [5] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [6] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [7] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [8] | WANG Lina, LEI Jingshu, LI Kuibao, WANG Ruiying, LI Xinmiao, WANG Fangfang, GUO Xiaorong, NIU Ruihao, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Fangfang, ZHAO Jingjing, LEE CHONGYOU. Review on Inflammatory Response in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 790-801. |
| [9] | LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, LIU Zihan, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Primary Sjögren's Disease with Dryness and Blood-stasis Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 718-725. |
| [10] | ZHU Chenrui, LI Na, WU Yuntao, ZHAO Haiyan, HUANG Zhe, LIU Yan, JI Chunpeng, WU Shouling. The Impact of Serum Uric Acid Levels on New-onset Atrioventricular Block: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 583-590. |
| [11] | WANG Xue, YANG Chengming, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Analysis on Prognosis and Influencing Factors in Patients with Post-tuberculosis Bronchiectasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 606-611. |
| [12] | FU Jiyi, ZHENG Boyue, WU Jiafei, WANG Jun, LI Hui. Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Regimen of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(04): 483-489. |
| [13] | ZENG Minghui, KUAI Wentao, CHEN Lin, HAN Jiaxin, XU Lianxin, GE Liying, DAI Rongrong, MI Yuqiang, XU Liang. Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Efficacy of Nucleoside (Acid) Analogues in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4414-4420. |
| [14] | ZHOU Qianmei, MIAO Kali, ZHONG Yongming, ZHANG Fuman, ZHANG Zhe, LI Chengyi. Gas6 Expression in Breast Cancer and Correlation with Clinical Pathological Features and Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4449-4456. |
| [15] | NONG Jingtang, YANG Chengmin, MO Shenglong, LU Zhicheng, TANG Lina, JIAN Chongdong, SHANG Jingwei. Research Progress on Prognostic Biomarkers after Cerebral Infarction: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3711-3720. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||