
Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (36): 4515-4521.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0184
• Monographic Rescarch·Lipid Management • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-03-26
Revised:2024-07-26
Published:2024-12-20
Online:2024-09-19
Contact:
SUN Kangyun
通讯作者:
孙康云
作者简介:作者贡献:
李渊提出研究目标,负责研究的构思、设计,研究实施,并撰写论文;李渊、马弘阳、李标负责受试者入组、数据收集;岳岸娜、邵娅庆负责数据的整理以及文章修订;孙康云负责对研究过程的质量审查,全面协调研究进展及文章撰写。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0184
| 项目 | 分值(分) |
|---|---|
| 家族史 | |
| 一级亲属有早发冠心病史(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 1 |
| 经年龄和性别校正,一级亲属中血LDL-C水平超过人群95%可信限 | 1 |
| 一级亲属有腱黄素瘤和/或脂性角膜弓 | 2 |
| 经年龄和性别校正,<18岁一级亲属血LDL-C水平超过人群95%可信限 | 2 |
| 临床病史 | |
| 早发冠心病(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 2 |
| 早发脑血管病或外周血管病(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 1 |
| 体格检查 | |
| 腱黄素瘤 | 6 |
| 脂性角膜弓(<45岁) | 4 |
| 血LDL-C水平 | |
| >8.5 mmol/L(>325 mg/dL) | 8 |
| 6.5~8.4 mmol/L(251~325 mg/dL) | 5 |
| 5.0~6.4 mmol/L(191~250 mg/dL) | 3 |
| 4.0~4.9 mmol/L(155~190 mg/dL) | 1 |
| 分子遗传学实验(DNA分析)在LDLR、ApoB或PCSK9基因上发现致病突变 | 8 |
Table 1 The Dutch Lipid Clinical Network(DLCN)criteria for FH diagnosis
| 项目 | 分值(分) |
|---|---|
| 家族史 | |
| 一级亲属有早发冠心病史(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 1 |
| 经年龄和性别校正,一级亲属中血LDL-C水平超过人群95%可信限 | 1 |
| 一级亲属有腱黄素瘤和/或脂性角膜弓 | 2 |
| 经年龄和性别校正,<18岁一级亲属血LDL-C水平超过人群95%可信限 | 2 |
| 临床病史 | |
| 早发冠心病(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 2 |
| 早发脑血管病或外周血管病(男性<55岁,女性<60岁) | 1 |
| 体格检查 | |
| 腱黄素瘤 | 6 |
| 脂性角膜弓(<45岁) | 4 |
| 血LDL-C水平 | |
| >8.5 mmol/L(>325 mg/dL) | 8 |
| 6.5~8.4 mmol/L(251~325 mg/dL) | 5 |
| 5.0~6.4 mmol/L(191~250 mg/dL) | 3 |
| 4.0~4.9 mmol/L(155~190 mg/dL) | 1 |
| 分子遗传学实验(DNA分析)在LDLR、ApoB或PCSK9基因上发现致病突变 | 8 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 既往史[例(%)] | 服降脂药[例(%)] | BMI (kg/m2) | TC (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高血压 | 糖尿病 | 高脂血症 | |||||||
| Q1组 | 43 | 60.6±11.2 | 8/35 | 18(41.9) | 2(4.7) | 15(34.9) | 9(20.9) | 24.0±3.8 | 7.0±0.4 |
| Q2组 | 40 | 59.5±10.3 | 4/36 | 20(50.0) | 6(15.0) | 18(45.0) | 10(25.0) | 26.2±11.1 | 7.2±0.3 |
| Q3组 | 41 | 62.1±8.5 | 12/29 | 17(42.5) | 3(7.3) | 12(29.3) | 8(19.5) | 25.2±4.5 | 7.5±0.3 |
| Q4组 | 40 | 56.9±13.1 | 10/30 | 11(27.5) | 1(2.5) | 19(47.5) | 9(22.5) | 24.6±6.4 | 8.7±1.3 |
| F(χ2)值 | 1.635 | 5.183a | 4.357a | 5.047a | 3.758a | 0.393a | 1.738 | 48.574 | |
| P值 | 0.183 | 0.159 | 0.225 | 0.168 | 0.289 | 0.942 | 0.161 | 0.001 | |
| 组别 | TG (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | 血糖(mmol/L) | 肌酐(μmol/L) | 尿酸(μmol/L) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | |
| Q1组 | 1.9±1.1 | 4.99±0.06 | 1.6±0.3 | 5.8±1.1 | 60.4±14.7 | 318.9±65.2 | 32.4±34.1 | 28.9±21.4 | |
| Q2组 | 2.6±2.4 | 5.21±0.06 | 1.5±0.3 | 6.4±2.6 | 64.8±37.9 | 343.2±67.1 | 29.4±25.1 | 23.4±11.4 | |
| Q3组 | 2.0±0.9 | 5.51±0.11 | 1.6±0.3 | 6.3±1.8 | 60.7±16.1 | 331.9±67.3 | 31.4±26.0 | 24.7±15.6 | |
| Q4组 | 1.9±0.8 | 6.47±0.98 | 1.5±0.3 | 5.7±0.9 | 60.3±14.1 | 320.4±96.4 | 25.3±13.0 | 22.0±8.1 | |
| F(χ2)值 | 1.818 | 70.470 | 0.533 | 1.189 | 0.323 | 0.814 | 0.499 | 1.382 | |
| P值 | 0.146 | <0.001 | 0.660 | 0.317 | 0.809 | 0.488 | 0.684 | 0.251 | |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline data in groups Q1 to Q4
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别(男/女) | 既往史[例(%)] | 服降脂药[例(%)] | BMI (kg/m2) | TC (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高血压 | 糖尿病 | 高脂血症 | |||||||
| Q1组 | 43 | 60.6±11.2 | 8/35 | 18(41.9) | 2(4.7) | 15(34.9) | 9(20.9) | 24.0±3.8 | 7.0±0.4 |
| Q2组 | 40 | 59.5±10.3 | 4/36 | 20(50.0) | 6(15.0) | 18(45.0) | 10(25.0) | 26.2±11.1 | 7.2±0.3 |
| Q3组 | 41 | 62.1±8.5 | 12/29 | 17(42.5) | 3(7.3) | 12(29.3) | 8(19.5) | 25.2±4.5 | 7.5±0.3 |
| Q4组 | 40 | 56.9±13.1 | 10/30 | 11(27.5) | 1(2.5) | 19(47.5) | 9(22.5) | 24.6±6.4 | 8.7±1.3 |
| F(χ2)值 | 1.635 | 5.183a | 4.357a | 5.047a | 3.758a | 0.393a | 1.738 | 48.574 | |
| P值 | 0.183 | 0.159 | 0.225 | 0.168 | 0.289 | 0.942 | 0.161 | 0.001 | |
| 组别 | TG (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | 血糖(mmol/L) | 肌酐(μmol/L) | 尿酸(μmol/L) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | |
| Q1组 | 1.9±1.1 | 4.99±0.06 | 1.6±0.3 | 5.8±1.1 | 60.4±14.7 | 318.9±65.2 | 32.4±34.1 | 28.9±21.4 | |
| Q2组 | 2.6±2.4 | 5.21±0.06 | 1.5±0.3 | 6.4±2.6 | 64.8±37.9 | 343.2±67.1 | 29.4±25.1 | 23.4±11.4 | |
| Q3组 | 2.0±0.9 | 5.51±0.11 | 1.6±0.3 | 6.3±1.8 | 60.7±16.1 | 331.9±67.3 | 31.4±26.0 | 24.7±15.6 | |
| Q4组 | 1.9±0.8 | 6.47±0.98 | 1.5±0.3 | 5.7±0.9 | 60.3±14.1 | 320.4±96.4 | 25.3±13.0 | 22.0±8.1 | |
| F(χ2)值 | 1.818 | 70.470 | 0.533 | 1.189 | 0.323 | 0.814 | 0.499 | 1.382 | |
| P值 | 0.146 | <0.001 | 0.660 | 0.317 | 0.809 | 0.488 | 0.684 | 0.251 | |
| 分组 | 例数 | DLCN标准评分[M(P25,P75),分] | DLCN标准判断[例(%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 确诊FH(DLCN评分>8分) | 疑似FH(DLCN评分≥3分) | |||
| Q1组 | 43 | 2(1,3) | 0 | 22(51.2) |
| Q2组 | 40 | 3(3,3) | 0 | 40(100.0) |
| Q3组 | 41 | 3(3,3) | 0 | 41(100.0) |
| Q4组 | 40 | 4(3,5) | 2(5.0) | 40(100.0) |
| χ2(H)值 | 28.698a | 5.721 | 67.771 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.126 | <0.001 | |
Table 3 Comparison of the results of DLCN standard scores in Q1-Q4 groups
| 分组 | 例数 | DLCN标准评分[M(P25,P75),分] | DLCN标准判断[例(%)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 确诊FH(DLCN评分>8分) | 疑似FH(DLCN评分≥3分) | |||
| Q1组 | 43 | 2(1,3) | 0 | 22(51.2) |
| Q2组 | 40 | 3(3,3) | 0 | 40(100.0) |
| Q3组 | 41 | 3(3,3) | 0 | 41(100.0) |
| Q4组 | 40 | 4(3,5) | 2(5.0) | 40(100.0) |
| χ2(H)值 | 28.698a | 5.721 | 67.771 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.126 | <0.001 | |
| 分组 | 例数 | 致病 | 可能致病 | 基因型 | FH基因变异 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 杂合 | 纯合 | LDLR | ApoB | PCSK9 | LDLRAP1 | ||||
| Q1组 | 43 | 1(2.3) | 1(2.3) | 2(4.7) | 0 | 1(2.3) | 1(2.3) | 0 | 0 |
| Q2组 | 40 | 3(7.5) | 1(2.5) | 4(10.0) | 0 | 4(10.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Q3组 | 41 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 0 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 0 |
| Q4组 | 40 | 10(25.0) | 6(15.0) | 16(40.0) | 0 | 13(32.5) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 0 |
| χ2值 | 13.079 | 11.262 | 27.844 | 27.538 | 3.388 | 2.841 | |||
| P值 | 0.004 | 0.010 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.336 | 0.417 | |||
Table 4 Comparison of main results of gene sequencing
| 分组 | 例数 | 致病 | 可能致病 | 基因型 | FH基因变异 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 杂合 | 纯合 | LDLR | ApoB | PCSK9 | LDLRAP1 | ||||
| Q1组 | 43 | 1(2.3) | 1(2.3) | 2(4.7) | 0 | 1(2.3) | 1(2.3) | 0 | 0 |
| Q2组 | 40 | 3(7.5) | 1(2.5) | 4(10.0) | 0 | 4(10.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Q3组 | 41 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 0 | 2(4.9) | 0 | 0 |
| Q4组 | 40 | 10(25.0) | 6(15.0) | 16(40.0) | 0 | 13(32.5) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 0 |
| χ2值 | 13.079 | 11.262 | 27.844 | 27.538 | 3.388 | 2.841 | |||
| P值 | 0.004 | 0.010 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.336 | 0.417 | |||
| 分组 | 例数 | 基因变异 | LDLR | LDLRAP1 | PCSK9 | ApoB | ABCG5 | ABCG8 | 其他基因 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1组 | 43 | 32(74.4) | 2(4.7) | 0 | 1(2.3) | 7(16.3) | 2(4.7) | 2(4.7) | 18(41.9) |
| Q2组 | 40 | 27(67.5) | 1(2.5) | 0 | 3(7.5) | 3(7.5) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 17(42.5) |
| Q3组 | 41 | 31(75.6) | 2(4.9) | 0 | 1(2.4) | 3(7.3) | 5(12.2) | 3(7.3) | 17(41.4) |
| Q4组 | 40 | 25(62.5) | 0 | 1(2.5) | 2(5.0) | 2(5.0) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 17(42.5) |
| χ2值 | 2.209 | 3.238 | 2.841 | 1.759 | 3.475 | 2.343 | 1.505 | 0.013 | |
| P值 | 0.530 | 0.356 | 0.417 | 0.624 | 0.324 | 0.504 | 0.681 | 1.000 |
Table 5 Comparison of secondary results of gene sequencing
| 分组 | 例数 | 基因变异 | LDLR | LDLRAP1 | PCSK9 | ApoB | ABCG5 | ABCG8 | 其他基因 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1组 | 43 | 32(74.4) | 2(4.7) | 0 | 1(2.3) | 7(16.3) | 2(4.7) | 2(4.7) | 18(41.9) |
| Q2组 | 40 | 27(67.5) | 1(2.5) | 0 | 3(7.5) | 3(7.5) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 17(42.5) |
| Q3组 | 41 | 31(75.6) | 2(4.9) | 0 | 1(2.4) | 3(7.3) | 5(12.2) | 3(7.3) | 17(41.4) |
| Q4组 | 40 | 25(62.5) | 0 | 1(2.5) | 2(5.0) | 2(5.0) | 2(5.0) | 1(2.5) | 17(42.5) |
| χ2值 | 2.209 | 3.238 | 2.841 | 1.759 | 3.475 | 2.343 | 1.505 | 0.013 | |
| P值 | 0.530 | 0.356 | 0.417 | 0.624 | 0.324 | 0.504 | 0.681 | 1.000 |
| [1] |
中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022概要[J]. 中国循环杂志,2023,38(6):583-612. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.06.001.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
国家卫生健康委员会疾病预防控制局. 中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告2020[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.
|
| [7] |
中国高血压调查研究组. 2012—2015年我国≥35岁人群血脂异常状况调查[J]. 中国循环杂志,2019,34(7):681-687. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.07.011.
|
| [8] |
盛迅伦. 《ACMG遗传变异分类标准与指南》解读[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(9):898-903. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230419-00142.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
中华医学会心血管病学分会动脉粥样硬化及冠心病学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 家族性高胆固醇血症筛查与诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2018,46(2):99-103. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.02.006.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [1] | XU Baichuan, WANG Yan, ZHANG Peng, LI Yiting, LIU Feilai, XIE Yang. Research and Analysis of Screening Tools for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Comorbidity Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3847-3852. |
| [2] | YU Wenhua, LI Jianguo, DUAN Wenyan, GAO Xuyan, LI Xiaxia, ZHANG Zilong, ZHANG Li, MA Lina. Reliability and Validity of the Function Impairment Screening Tool among Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3000-3004. |
| [3] | SHI Jiarui, WANG Zili, ZHANG Xueqing, SONG Yulei, XU Guihua, BAI Yamei. The Current Status of Initial Cognitive Screening Services in Community-based Cognitive Services Centers in Nanjing [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2784-2790. |
| [4] | LI Jia, TAN Wenbin. The Dilemma of Prevention and Treatment of Secondary Osteoporosis and Its Countermeasures [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2075-2081. |
| [5] | ZHANG Qi, HE Shen, LI Hua. Interpretation of Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1823-1830. |
| [6] | ZENG Yongtian, CHEN Riling, NONG Xueyan, LIU Zhou, LIANG Lizhong, ZHU Zijian. Clinical Research Progress and Challenges of Digital Therapeutics from Screening to Intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1702-1708. |
| [7] | WU Dadong, LIU Huimin, ZHANG Jiayi, LIU Siyuan, ZHAO Guanglin, JIN Shuyan, JIANG Lei. Application and Evaluation of the Mobile Platform for Perinatal Depression Screening and Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1773-1780. |
| [8] | CHI Xun, LIU Sisi, CHEN Qiao, HU Yue, WANG Weixian. The Suitability of Four Nutritional Screening Tools for Nutritional Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1395-1402. |
| [9] | MA Hongyang, YUE Anna, SUN Kangyun. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Diagnostic Differences between Domestic and Foreign Guidelines [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 655-665. |
| [10] | SHU Ting, LAN Zhipeng, WU Xia, LUO Yingjuan, YANG Liu. Study on the Infection and Related Factors of High-risk HPV in Cervical Cancer Screening Women: Based on 450 000 Participants in Chengdu [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 213-219. |
| [11] | ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Long, ZHANG Yan, LI Jianping. Advances in Molecular Biotechnology for Diagnosing and Treating Familial Hypercholesterolemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(36): 4498-4504. |
| [12] | LUO Qin, GOU Lianping, CHEN Yin, SU Feng. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Calf Circumference, Upper Arm Circumference and Ishii Score in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Sarcopenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(35): 4403-4411. |
| [13] | ZHU Suyan, ZHENG Xiaomeng, FAN Miao, CHEN Chunyan. Interpretation of the Screening Tool of Older Person's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) Criteria (Version 3) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(33): 4097-4104. |
| [14] | ZHOU Zhensen, HUANG Yan, CHENG Siwei, ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiaoyu, SUN Ting, YANG Xianjun, XIE Hui, MA Zuchang. Construction and Validation of a Screening Model for Early Atherosclerosis Risk in the Aorta [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(33): 4147-4154. |
| [15] | MA Yuxia, YANG Yiyi, WEI Xiaoqin, CHEN Yanru, QIN Jiangxia, YUAN Yue, CHEN Yajing, WU Yinping, HAN Lin. The Accuracy of Screening for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Assessment Tools: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(32): 4066-4076. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||