Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (20): 2527-2533.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0908
Special Issue: 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-12-06
Revised:
2024-03-02
Published:
2024-07-15
Online:
2024-04-08
Contact:
LI Juan
通讯作者:
李娟
作者简介:
作者贡献:
先丽红负责文章构思与设计、数据收集与整理、论文撰写及修订;先丽红、薛超、赵雪姣负责文献检索、数据提取、质量评价及数据分析;先丽红、卢婷、颜欢负责结果的分析与解释;李娟负责文章审校及质量控制,并对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0908
编号 | 检索策略 |
---|---|
#1 | Cerebral microbleeds OR Microbleed OR microhemorrhage OR Cerebral microhemorrhages OR CMBs[Title/Abstract] |
#2 | Incidence OR Occurrence OR Prevalence OR epidemi*[Title/Abstract] |
#3 | Chinese OR China OR HongKong OR TaiWan OR MaCao [Title/Abstract] |
#4 | #1 AND #2 AND #3 |
Table 1 Search strategy in PubMed
编号 | 检索策略 |
---|---|
#1 | Cerebral microbleeds OR Microbleed OR microhemorrhage OR Cerebral microhemorrhages OR CMBs[Title/Abstract] |
#2 | Incidence OR Occurrence OR Prevalence OR epidemi*[Title/Abstract] |
#3 | Chinese OR China OR HongKong OR TaiWan OR MaCao [Title/Abstract] |
#4 | #1 AND #2 AND #3 |
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 地区 | 总样本量(例) | 男/女(例) | 病例数(例) | AHRQ得分(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUN[ | 2009 | 广东 | 998 | 588/410 | 273 | 9 |
HAN[ | 2009 | 北京 | 247 | 176/71 | 72 | 8 |
LIU[ | 2010 | 北京 | 447 | 235/212 | 95 | 7 |
SUN[ | 2012 | 北京 | 436 | 273/163 | 202 | 8 |
吴小燕[ | 2013 | 江苏 | 248 | 141/107 | 122 | 9 |
WANG[ | 2014 | 广东 | 348 | 207/141 | 160 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2014 | 山东 | 485 | 297/188 | 151 | 8 |
毛蓉嫣[ | 2014 | 浙江 | 389 | 203/186 | 132 | 8 |
叶筱红[ | 2015 | 浙江 | 393 | 235/158 | 206 | 10 |
苏慧[ | 2015 | 山东 | 524 | 316/208 | 111 | 9 |
YANG[ | 2015 | 北京 | 1 289 | 692/597 | 188 | 9 |
YAN[ | 2015 | 浙江 | 333 | 223/110 | 133 | 9 |
CHUNG[ | 2016 | 台湾 | 401 | 193/208 | 47 | 10 |
陈后勤[ | 2017 | 安徽 | 308 | 178/130 | 116 | 10 |
SU[ | 2107 | 北京 | 770 | 269/501 | 78 | 8 |
CHUNG[ | 2017 | 台湾 | 962 | 425/537 | 134 | 7 |
马利[ | 2017 | 陕西 | 215 | 122/93 | 112 | 9 |
HE[ | 2017 | 贵州 | 247 | 134/113 | 103 | 9 |
HAN[ | 2018 | 北京 | 1 211 | 453/758 | 128 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2018 | 广东 | 1 847 | 740/1 107 | 142 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2018 | 山东 | 983 | 539/444 | 215 | 10 |
白家赫[ | 2019 | 山东 | 444 | 216/228 | 92 | 9 |
SU[ | 2019 | 北京 | 1 029 | 369/660 | 107 | 10 |
张春华[ | 2020 | 山东 | 408 | 175/233 | 44 | 10 |
ZHU[ | 2020 | 江苏 | 549 | 250/299 | 103 | 10 |
ZHANG[ | 2020 | 江苏 | 904 | 404/500 | 147 | 8 |
LI[ | 2020 | 上海 | 792 | 426/366 | 231 | 9 |
苏宁[ | 2021 | 北京 | 997 | 346/651 | 94 | 8 |
FAN[ | 2021 | 四川 | 481 | — | 76 | 8 |
SHU[ | 2021 | 北京 | 943 | 340/603 | 102 | 9 |
LIANG[ | 2022 | 山东 | 300 | 160/140 | 110 | 8 |
YU[ | 2022 | 北京 | 544 | 217/327 | 119 | 9 |
吴延佳[ | 2022 | 陕西 | 202 | 125/77 | 80 | 9 |
MU[ | 2022 | 广西 | 409 | 184/225 | 47 | 8 |
QIN[ | 2022 | 湖北 | 204 | 120/84 | 42 | 10 |
CHEN[ | 2023 | 北京 | 755 | 532/223 | 286 | 10 |
HONG[ | 2023 | 福建 | 522 | 320/202 | 212 | 9 |
YANG[ | 2023 | 浙江 | 3 063 | 1 425/1 638 | 313 | 9 |
GUO[ | 2023 | 河北 | 230 | 160/70 | 111 | 9 |
Table 2 Basic features of included studies and bias risk assessment results
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 地区 | 总样本量(例) | 男/女(例) | 病例数(例) | AHRQ得分(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUN[ | 2009 | 广东 | 998 | 588/410 | 273 | 9 |
HAN[ | 2009 | 北京 | 247 | 176/71 | 72 | 8 |
LIU[ | 2010 | 北京 | 447 | 235/212 | 95 | 7 |
SUN[ | 2012 | 北京 | 436 | 273/163 | 202 | 8 |
吴小燕[ | 2013 | 江苏 | 248 | 141/107 | 122 | 9 |
WANG[ | 2014 | 广东 | 348 | 207/141 | 160 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2014 | 山东 | 485 | 297/188 | 151 | 8 |
毛蓉嫣[ | 2014 | 浙江 | 389 | 203/186 | 132 | 8 |
叶筱红[ | 2015 | 浙江 | 393 | 235/158 | 206 | 10 |
苏慧[ | 2015 | 山东 | 524 | 316/208 | 111 | 9 |
YANG[ | 2015 | 北京 | 1 289 | 692/597 | 188 | 9 |
YAN[ | 2015 | 浙江 | 333 | 223/110 | 133 | 9 |
CHUNG[ | 2016 | 台湾 | 401 | 193/208 | 47 | 10 |
陈后勤[ | 2017 | 安徽 | 308 | 178/130 | 116 | 10 |
SU[ | 2107 | 北京 | 770 | 269/501 | 78 | 8 |
CHUNG[ | 2017 | 台湾 | 962 | 425/537 | 134 | 7 |
马利[ | 2017 | 陕西 | 215 | 122/93 | 112 | 9 |
HE[ | 2017 | 贵州 | 247 | 134/113 | 103 | 9 |
HAN[ | 2018 | 北京 | 1 211 | 453/758 | 128 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2018 | 广东 | 1 847 | 740/1 107 | 142 | 8 |
ZHANG[ | 2018 | 山东 | 983 | 539/444 | 215 | 10 |
白家赫[ | 2019 | 山东 | 444 | 216/228 | 92 | 9 |
SU[ | 2019 | 北京 | 1 029 | 369/660 | 107 | 10 |
张春华[ | 2020 | 山东 | 408 | 175/233 | 44 | 10 |
ZHU[ | 2020 | 江苏 | 549 | 250/299 | 103 | 10 |
ZHANG[ | 2020 | 江苏 | 904 | 404/500 | 147 | 8 |
LI[ | 2020 | 上海 | 792 | 426/366 | 231 | 9 |
苏宁[ | 2021 | 北京 | 997 | 346/651 | 94 | 8 |
FAN[ | 2021 | 四川 | 481 | — | 76 | 8 |
SHU[ | 2021 | 北京 | 943 | 340/603 | 102 | 9 |
LIANG[ | 2022 | 山东 | 300 | 160/140 | 110 | 8 |
YU[ | 2022 | 北京 | 544 | 217/327 | 119 | 9 |
吴延佳[ | 2022 | 陕西 | 202 | 125/77 | 80 | 9 |
MU[ | 2022 | 广西 | 409 | 184/225 | 47 | 8 |
QIN[ | 2022 | 湖北 | 204 | 120/84 | 42 | 10 |
CHEN[ | 2023 | 北京 | 755 | 532/223 | 286 | 10 |
HONG[ | 2023 | 福建 | 522 | 320/202 | 212 | 9 |
YANG[ | 2023 | 浙江 | 3 063 | 1 425/1 638 | 313 | 9 |
GUO[ | 2023 | 河北 | 230 | 160/70 | 111 | 9 |
组别 | 纳入研究数量(篇) | 异质性检验 | 效应模型 | 患病率(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P值 | I2值 | ||||
总患病率 | 39[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 25.0%(21.0%~29.0%) |
年龄(岁) | |||||
51~60 | 3[ | <0.001 | 97.9% | 随机 | 27.0%(12.0%~44.0%) |
61~70 | 12[ | <0.001 | 98.3% | 随机 | 23.0%(16.0%~30.0%) |
71~80 | 8[ | <0.001 | 97.1% | 随机 | 27.0%(20.0%~35.0%) |
性别 | |||||
男 | 24[ | <0.001 | 97.6% | 随机 | 14.0%(11.0%~18.0%) |
女 | 24[ | <0.001 | 95.2% | 随机 | 10.0%(8.0%~12.0%) |
地理区域 | |||||
华北地区 | 12[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 21.0%(15.0%~28.0%) |
华东地区 | 18[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 26.0%(21.0%~33.0%) |
华南地区 | 4[ | <0.001 | 99.2% | 随机 | 21.0%(8.0%~39.0%) |
华中地区 | 1[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 21.0%(16.0%~27.0%) | |
西南地区 | 2[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 24.0%(21.0%~27.0%) | |
西北地区 | 2[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 46.0%(41.0%~51.0%) | |
高血压病史 | |||||
是 | 16[ | <0.001 | 98.5% | 随机 | 19.0%(13.0%~26.0%) |
否 | 16[ | <0.001 | 94.9% | 随机 | 8.0%(6.0%~11.0%) |
吸烟史 | |||||
是 | 13[ | <0.001 | 97.3% | 随机 | 9.0%(5.0%~14.0%) |
否 | 13[ | <0.001 | 96.2% | 随机 | 16.0%(12.0%~21.0%) |
发表年份(年) | |||||
2009—2013 | 5[ | <0.001 | 95.9% | 随机 | 34.0%(24.0%~44.0%) |
2014—2018 | 16[ | <0.001 | 98.6% | 随机 | 26.0%(19.0%~34.0%) |
2019—2023 | 18[ | <0.001 | 98.1% | 随机 | 22.0%(16.0%~27.0%) |
Table 3 Meta-analysis results of the prevalence of CMBs in China
组别 | 纳入研究数量(篇) | 异质性检验 | 效应模型 | 患病率(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P值 | I2值 | ||||
总患病率 | 39[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 25.0%(21.0%~29.0%) |
年龄(岁) | |||||
51~60 | 3[ | <0.001 | 97.9% | 随机 | 27.0%(12.0%~44.0%) |
61~70 | 12[ | <0.001 | 98.3% | 随机 | 23.0%(16.0%~30.0%) |
71~80 | 8[ | <0.001 | 97.1% | 随机 | 27.0%(20.0%~35.0%) |
性别 | |||||
男 | 24[ | <0.001 | 97.6% | 随机 | 14.0%(11.0%~18.0%) |
女 | 24[ | <0.001 | 95.2% | 随机 | 10.0%(8.0%~12.0%) |
地理区域 | |||||
华北地区 | 12[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 21.0%(15.0%~28.0%) |
华东地区 | 18[ | <0.001 | 98.4% | 随机 | 26.0%(21.0%~33.0%) |
华南地区 | 4[ | <0.001 | 99.2% | 随机 | 21.0%(8.0%~39.0%) |
华中地区 | 1[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 21.0%(16.0%~27.0%) | |
西南地区 | 2[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 24.0%(21.0%~27.0%) | |
西北地区 | 2[ | <0.001 | 随机 | 46.0%(41.0%~51.0%) | |
高血压病史 | |||||
是 | 16[ | <0.001 | 98.5% | 随机 | 19.0%(13.0%~26.0%) |
否 | 16[ | <0.001 | 94.9% | 随机 | 8.0%(6.0%~11.0%) |
吸烟史 | |||||
是 | 13[ | <0.001 | 97.3% | 随机 | 9.0%(5.0%~14.0%) |
否 | 13[ | <0.001 | 96.2% | 随机 | 16.0%(12.0%~21.0%) |
发表年份(年) | |||||
2009—2013 | 5[ | <0.001 | 95.9% | 随机 | 34.0%(24.0%~44.0%) |
2014—2018 | 16[ | <0.001 | 98.6% | 随机 | 26.0%(19.0%~34.0%) |
2019—2023 | 18[ | <0.001 | 98.1% | 随机 | 22.0%(16.0%~27.0%) |
[1] |
|
[2] |
郝佳佳,周沛萱,丘惠嫦. 老年急性脑梗死患者并发脑微出血影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2022,42(21):5177-5180. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2022.21.006.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
曾宪涛,刘慧,陈曦,等. Meta分析系列之四:观察性研究的质量评价工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(4):297-299. DOI:10.3969/j.1674-4055.2012.04.004.
|
[7] |
唐萍,王佳琳,谢婉青,等. 中国老年人述情障碍发生现状的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2021,21(7):779-786. DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.202103048.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
吴小燕,王少会,薛忠元,等. 脑梗死患者脑内微出血的发生及危险因素分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2013,21(4):473-476. DOI:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2013.04.041.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
毛蓉嫣. 急性脑梗死患者并发脑微出血相关因素分析[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理,2014,34(10):1298-1299.
|
[16] |
叶筱红,陈嘉凤,阮筱珠,等. 脑血管病脑微出血相关危险因素分析及护理策略[J]. 中国现代医生,2015,53(13):130-133.
|
[17] | |
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
陈后勤,吕秋石,何敏,等. 急性腔隙性脑梗死患者慢性肾功能不全与脑微出血的相关性研究[J]. 医学研究生学报,2017,30(3):294-297. DOI:10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2017.03.015.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
马利,王娟娟,刘强. 不同脑血管病病人的脑微出血患病率及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2017,15(14):1794-1796. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2017.14.037.
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
白家赫,于永鹏,刘丽君,等. 脑微出血影像学分类与血浆血管内皮生长因子水平及载脂蛋白E基因分型的关系研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2019,14(9):856-864. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2019.09.002.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
张春华,仇发美,赵颖馨,等. 老年人脑微出血与收缩压晨峰的相关性[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2020,22(1):24-27. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2020.01.007.
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
苏宁,王全,梁新宇,等. 社区人群脑微出血与基底节区核团体积的相关性研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2021,16(4):335-342. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.04.004.
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
吴延佳,李毓新,吉智,等. 脑血管病患者脑微出血的患病率调查分析及对策[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(4):607-608. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2022.04.055.
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
胡红梅,胡文立. 不同空间分布脑微出血的常见病因和影像学特征的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):8-11.
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
徐大飞,楚兰. 缺血性脑卒中患者合并脑微出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2020,27(2):143-146. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2963.2020.013.
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
白家赫,王永超,李凯,等. 脑微出血危险因素的meta分析[J]. 中国医药科学,2022,12(10):38-42. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2022.10.011.
|
[57] |
|
[1] | XU Jialan, YAN Hong, WEN Jun, ZHOU Zitong, WANG Siyu. Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Adults with Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3815-3822. |
[2] | ZHANG Tianyu, YU Haibo, CHEN Fei, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, ZHAN Xiaokai, SHEN Man, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, HUANG Zhongxia. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatment for POEMS Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3447-3455. |
[3] | QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431. |
[4] | CHU Yijing, YAN Yuge, GU Jie, XI Biao, ZHU Shanzhu, HUANG Jiaoling. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Retention Intention of Primary Healthcare Workers in China: a Comparison Based on Urban-rural Differences [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3161-3168. |
[5] | JIANG Shihua, ZHU Zheng, REN Yingying, ZHU Yaolei, WANG Yue, GAO Xibin. Meta Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3043-3052. |
[6] | LI Hao, LI Jiangtao, LIU Dan, WANG Jianjun. Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab, Anifrolumab, and Telitacicept on the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2924-2933. |
[7] | WANG Xiaolin, LI Qiuyue, ZHOU Yanjun, ZHANG Jinhui, LIANG Tao. Incidence and Risk of Cardiovascular Toxicity with Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2934-2940. |
[8] | MA Panpan, WANG Sijing, YOU Na, DING Dafa, LU Yibing. Efficacy and Safety of Danuglipron and Orforglipron in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2679-2685. |
[9] | HU Wanqin, YU Shenyan, CAO Xuehua, XIANG Feng, JIA Yu. Factors Associated with Precocious Puberty in Chinese Children: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2661-2671. |
[10] | ADILI Tuersun, CHENG Gang. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2686-2691. |
[11] | GUO Shengteng, ZHANG Fenfen, WAN Di, YU Dongmei, WANG Qinghua. Risk Factors for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Lung Injury: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2546-2554. |
[12] | WANG Biqing, ZHANG Ping, YANG Hongxia, WANG Qian, JU Chunxiao, ZHAO Junnan, MEI Jun, ZHANG Ying, XU Fengqin. Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Development Trend of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Hypertensive Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2186-2192. |
[13] | FAN Yu, LI Rong, GONG Shuangying, YANG Xiaojuan, LI Rui. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Maternal Spouses in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2179-2185. |
[14] | CHEN Xingchao, GAO Zhenhua, XU Shenggang, ZOU Yonggang, QIAN Jun, WEI Jiantong. Disease Burden of Osteoarthritis in the World, China, and Regions with Different Socio-demographic Index from 1990 to 2021 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2172-2178. |
[15] | HE Yun, FAN Huanfang, MA Pan, XU Shaoqing, YANG Liu, JIN Mingzhe, ZHANG Mingrui, CHEN Jiaqi. Effect of Postoperative Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treated with Different Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1788-1794. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||