Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (27): 3441-3449.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0346
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-03-06
Revised:
2022-11-11
Published:
2023-09-20
Online:
2023-01-12
Contact:
KUANG Zaoyuan, XU Qin
通讯作者:
邝枣园, 许沁
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0346
动物表现 | 评分(分) |
---|---|
无神经功能缺损症状,两前肢均显示正常力量,可伸直 | 0 |
不能完全伸展患侧前爪 | 1 |
向患侧转圈,但在休息时保持正常姿势 | 2 |
行走时靠患侧倾斜 | 3 |
无自发行走,意识水平低 | 4 |
死亡 | 5 |
Table 1 Scoring criteria for neurological deficits using the Longa Score
动物表现 | 评分(分) |
---|---|
无神经功能缺损症状,两前肢均显示正常力量,可伸直 | 0 |
不能完全伸展患侧前爪 | 1 |
向患侧转圈,但在休息时保持正常姿势 | 2 |
行走时靠患侧倾斜 | 3 |
无自发行走,意识水平低 | 4 |
死亡 | 5 |
组别 | 只数 | Longa评分 |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 10 | 0a |
模型+玉米油组 | 9 | 1.0(0.5,1.5) |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 9 | 0(0,1.0)a |
H值 | 15.73 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
Table 2 Comparison of the Longa Score of three groups of mice on the 28th day after modeling
组别 | 只数 | Longa评分 |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 10 | 0a |
模型+玉米油组 | 9 | 1.0(0.5,1.5) |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 9 | 0(0,1.0)a |
H值 | 15.73 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | 健侧大脑面积/患侧大脑面积系数 |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 0.99±0.01 |
模型+玉米油组 | 5 | 1.96±0.27a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 5 | 1.59±0.13ab |
F值 | 39.46 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
Table 3 Comparison of the ratio of healthy brain area to affected brain area in three groups of mice on the 28th day after modeling
组别 | 只数 | 健侧大脑面积/患侧大脑面积系数 |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 0.99±0.01 |
模型+玉米油组 | 5 | 1.96±0.27a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 5 | 1.59±0.13ab |
F值 | 39.46 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 1.40±0.84 | 1.70±0.82 | 1.24±0.92 | 1.70±0.82 | 1.30±0.95 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 1.44±1.01 | 11.48±5.04a | 10.17±5.90a | 9.59±3.82a | 5.78±4.68a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 1.11±0.60 | 5.33±1.23ab | 5.49±4.04ab | 3.56±2.55b | 2.69±1.55b |
F值 | F交互=7.122,F组间=19.960,F时间=33.970 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
Table 4 Comparison of rate of committing foot-faults in the grid-walking test in three groups of mice at five time points
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 1.40±0.84 | 1.70±0.82 | 1.24±0.92 | 1.70±0.82 | 1.30±0.95 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 1.44±1.01 | 11.48±5.04a | 10.17±5.90a | 9.59±3.82a | 5.78±4.68a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 1.11±0.60 | 5.33±1.23ab | 5.49±4.04ab | 3.56±2.55b | 2.69±1.55b |
F值 | F交互=7.122,F组间=19.960,F时间=33.970 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 4.00±5.16 | 5.00±5.27 | 2.00±4.22 | 3.00±4.83 | 4.00±6.99 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 3.33±5.00 | 65.56±20.68a | 45.56±18.11a | 45.56±18.11a | 38.89±17.63a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 3.33±5.00 | 43.33±14.14ab | 28.89±11.67ab | 27.78±13.94ab | 21.11±10.54ab |
F值 | F交互=3.486,F组间=17.310,F时间=9.099 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
Table 5 Dragging rates in three groups at five time points in the cup climbing test
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 4.00±5.16 | 5.00±5.27 | 2.00±4.22 | 3.00±4.83 | 4.00±6.99 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 3.33±5.00 | 65.56±20.68a | 45.56±18.11a | 45.56±18.11a | 38.89±17.63a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 3.33±5.00 | 43.33±14.14ab | 28.89±11.67ab | 27.78±13.94ab | 21.11±10.54ab |
F值 | F交互=3.486,F组间=17.310,F时间=9.099 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 2.47±0.95 | 3.51±1.66 | 4.14±2.42 | 2.87±1.87 | 2.24±0.66 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 3.53±1.04 | 16.56±13.12a | 13.47±6.99a | 11.51±8.13a | 7.86±7.33a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 4.19±2.39 | 8.99±5.58ab | 4.19±1.82b | 1.88±0.63b | 2.72±0.95 |
F值 | F交互=12.890,F组间=45.020,F时间=66.680 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
Table 6 The time-to-contact of mice in three groups at five time points in the adhesive removal test
组别 | 只数 | 基线 | 造模后7 d | 造模后14 d | 造模后21 d | 造模后28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 9 | 2.47±0.95 | 3.51±1.66 | 4.14±2.42 | 2.87±1.87 | 2.24±0.66 |
模型+玉米油组 | 10 | 3.53±1.04 | 16.56±13.12a | 13.47±6.99a | 11.51±8.13a | 7.86±7.33a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 10 | 4.19±2.39 | 8.99±5.58ab | 4.19±1.82b | 1.88±0.63b | 2.72±0.95 |
F值 | F交互=12.890,F组间=45.020,F时间=66.680 | |||||
P值 | P交互<0.01,P组间<0.01,P时间<0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | IBA1 | GFAP |
---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 3 | 18.13±4.95 | 10.73±4.78 |
模型+玉米油组 | 5 | 50.56±11.88a | 51.32±13.63a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 5 | 36.16±2.99ab | 36.52±4.51ab |
F值 | 16.14 | 19.39 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Table 7 Comparison of IBA1 protein expression levels in penumbra of three groups of mice on the 14th day after modeling
组别 | 只数 | IBA1 | GFAP |
---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 3 | 18.13±4.95 | 10.73±4.78 |
模型+玉米油组 | 5 | 50.56±11.88a | 51.32±13.63a |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 5 | 36.16±2.99ab | 36.52±4.51ab |
F值 | 16.14 | 19.39 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
组别 | 只数 | IL-1β |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 3 | 1.03±0.05a |
模型+玉米油组 | 6 | 1.75±0.13 |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 6 | 1.26±0.29a |
F值 | 13.51 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
Table 8 Comparison of IL-1β protein expression levels in striatum of mice in three groups on the second after modeling
组别 | 只数 | IL-1β |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 3 | 1.03±0.05a |
模型+玉米油组 | 6 | 1.75±0.13 |
模型+丹皮酚组 | 6 | 1.26±0.29a |
F值 | 13.51 | |
P值 | <0.01 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
宋宁宁,武继彪,魏欣冰,等. 丹皮酚减轻大鼠海马神经元缺糖缺氧损伤及抑制NMDA受体激活[J]. 药学学报,2009,44(11):1228-1232. DOI:10.16438/j.0513-4870.2009.11.015.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[1] | XIN Gongkai, CONG Xin, YUAN Lei, CHENG Yuetong, NI Cuiping, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Yu. Research Progress on Comprehensive Assessment Tools for the Elderly with Dementia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4103-4109. |
[2] | YIN Haiyan, SONG Yulei, XU Guihua, DU Shizheng, LUO Dan, ZHANG Xueqing, BAI Yamei. Effects of Intellectual Activities on Different Domains of Cognitive Function in Elderly People [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3314-3319. |
[3] | ZHENG Siting, HE Chunyu, ZHOU Jun, KONG Ye, YANG Xinyao, ZHOU Haiying, WEI Xiaofei. Summary of Best Evidence for Self-Management of Patients with Motor Dysfunction after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3230-3237. |
[4] | ZHANG Guoqing, TONG Tingting, WANG Ying, LI Kuiwu, ZHANG Lida, WU Xiaoqing, LI Chenglong, WANG Junli, ZHANG Junyu, HAN Wei. Effect and Mechanism of Tongdu Tiaoshen Electroacupuncture Pretreatment-mediated MiR-124-3p/GSK-3β/Cyp-D Signaling Pathway on Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in Cerebral Cortex of Rats with Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3050-3060. |
[5] | YU Yanxue, BAI Ruyu, YU Wenlong, GUO Xia, WU Li'e. Occurrence Status and Influencing Factors of Cognitive Dysfunction in Population Aged 60 and Above [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2581-2588. |
[6] | XU Mingzhu, LIN Run, WEN Huaneng, WANG Yixiao, LIU Lu, WANG Bihan, CHEN Kexun, XUAN Chunyu, CUI Shaoyang. Effect of Jin's Three Needles Therapy Combined with Mirror Therapy on Lower Limb Dysfunction with Cerebral Infarction Patients: Analysis Based on Surface Electromyography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2162-2168. |
[7] | LI Xiaoxiao, BAI Yanjie, WANG Yan, ZHANG Yongchuang, CHEN Shuying, CHEN Limin. Advances of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2176-2182. |
[8] | China Gerontological Nursing Alliance, Xiang Ya Nursing School (Xiangya Oceanwide Health Management Research Institute of Central South University), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders), Beijing Hospital (National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders), ZENG Xianmei, HU Mingyue, FENG Hui. Clinical Practice Guideline on Non-pharmacological Interventions for Older Adults with Cognitive Dysfunction: Physical Activity [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(16): 1927-1937. |
[9] | WANG Junwei, LIN Lingjun, SONG Linling, CHENG Xiaocui, NIE Xiuling. Association between Serum Potassium and Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Primary Gout [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1479-1484. |
[10] | DONG Linrui, CHANG Qingqing, MA Jianjun, LIU Chuanze, GUO Dashuai, LI Xiaohuan, FAN Yongyan, LI Dongsheng. Correlation between Autonomic Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1450-1455. |
[11] | NIE Huanhuan, LI Huaibiao, YANG Linsheng, HU Bing, SUN Liang, SHENG Jie, ZHANG Dongmei, CHEN Guimei, CHENG Beijing, MENG Xianglong, XU Peiru, XUE Guizhi, TAO Fangbiao. Association of Nighttime Sleep Duration with Cognitive Impairment among Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(10): 1250-1256. |
[12] | HUA Qiaoli, LIU Huiling, XU Xiaohua, ZHENG Danwen, WANG Qian, LIU Yuntao, ZHOU Xin, YANG Rongyuan, DING Banghan, GUO Jianwen, ZHANG Zhongde. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Very Early Cognitive Impairment in COVID-19 Convalescents: a Study Using Data from a Questionnaire Survey [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(10): 1234-1240. |
[13] | MA Wanrui, LI Manna, WANG Liqun, WANG Zhizhong. Influencing Factors of Hypertension Combined with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Community Population over 55 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1075-1079. |
[14] | XIONG Dan, XIE Haihua, LI Hao, ZHANG Hong, TAN Jie, ZHAO Ning. Effect of Different Modalities of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 997-1007. |
[15] | YE Qingfang, WANG Yini, LI Ling, LIU Guojie, LIN Ping, LI Qiujie. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Young and Middle-aged Hospitalized Patients with Hypertension [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(02): 154-159. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||