Applicability of the SRHMS V1.0 in the Rural Elderly：an Analysis of 2 048 Cases

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.218

Abstract

Abstract: Background　To achieve healthy aging along with global aging，integrated geriatric care using person-centered approach has been recognized to be a useful way to satisfy older people's health needs as an international consensus. It is particularly important and urgent to develop a tool to assess the physical，psychological，social，spiritual and environmental health of the elderly in rural China. Objective　To evaluate the applicability of the SRHMS V1.0 in rural elderly people. Methods　From October 2018 to May 2019，2 048 individuals aged 60 or over were selected from Yunnan's rural areas by use of multistage stratified sampling，and received a household survey using a Demographic Questionnaire and the SRHMS V1.0. The reliability and validity of the SRHMS V1.0 were analyzed，and the SRHMS V1.0 normative scores for Chinese rural elderly people in the age group were determined. Results　The survey obtained a response rate of 85.33%. The mean total score and the mean scores of physical，psychological and social health subscales of the SRHMS V1.0 were （63.63±13.69），（64.72±16.94），（62.59±15.34） and （50.71±13.04），respectively. The Cronbach's α of the SRHMS V1.0 was 0.941，and that for the physical，psychological and social health subscales were 0.877，0.885 and 0.875，respectively. With the exception of items 4，5 and 7，and physical symptoms/organ function subscale，item 27 and psychological symptoms/negative emotion subscale with a value of r≤0.600，all the items and corresponding subscales had a value of r≥ 0.600（P<0.001）. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the modified CFA model with χ2/df=5.509，RMSEA=0.047，NFI=0.929，IFI=0.941，TLI=0.933，CFI=0.941，showing an excellent goodness for fit. The The SRHMS V1.0 normative scores for rural elderly people were determined as：very poor［0，49.93），poor［49.93，56.78），fair［56.78，70.48），good ［70.48，77.32），very good ［77.32，100］．Conclusion　The SRHMS V1.0 has good reliability and validity in assessing the health status among rural elderly people，which may be applied and popularized as an assistant tool by general practitioners to perform comprehensive health assessment and deliver community interventions.

Key words: Health services for the aged, Rural health, SRHMS V1.0

摘要： 背景　伴随全球老龄化，以老年人健康需求为中心的综合照护，已成为“健康老龄化”的国际共识。开发适用于中国农村老人“身-心-社-灵-环境”健康评估工具尤显重要和紧迫。目的　评价自测健康评定量表（SRHMS V1.0）在农村地区的适用性及效果。方法　2018年10月—2019年5月，采用多阶段分层抽样法对2 400例≥60岁云南省农村老年人进行入户人口学资料和SRHMS V1.0的问卷调查。分析SRHMS V1.0的信效度，建立农村老年人SRHMS V1.0得分的划界常模。结果　共发放问卷2 400份，获有效样本2 048份，问卷有效回收率为85.33%。2 048例农村老年人SRHMS V1.0总分及生理、心理、社会健康得分分别为（63.63±13.69）、（64.72±16.94）、（62.59±15.34）、（50.71±13.04）分。SRHMS V1.0内部一致性Cronbach's α系数为0.941；生理、心理、社会健康子量表的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.877、0.885、0.875。除条目4、5、7 与身体症状与器官功能维度，以及条目27和心理症状与负向情绪维度相关系数r≤0.600外，其余条目与相应维度的相关系数r≥0.600（P<0.001）。验证因子分析显示，修正后的CFA模型χ2/df=5.509，RMSEA=0.047，NFI=0.929，IFI=0.941，TLI=0.933，CFI=0.941，拟合度优。获得农村老年人健康划界常模，分别为健康很差［0，49.93）、健康较差［49.93，56.78）、健康一般［56.78，70.48）、健康较好［70.48，77.32），健康很好［77.32，100］。结论　SRHMS V1.0在农村老年人运用具有良好信效度，可作为全科医生综合健康评估及社区干预工具推广运用。

关键词: 老年人保健服务, 农村卫生, 自测健康评定量表

GAO Chuqun,ZHANG Hechuan,LUO Songlan, et al. Applicability of the SRHMS V1.0 in the Rural Elderly：an Analysis of 2 048 Cases　[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(19): 2418-2422. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.218.
高矗群,张河川,罗松兰等. SRHMS V1.0在2 048例农村老年人中的应用研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(19): 2418-2422. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.218.

References

［1］许军．自测健康评定量表测试版的信息研究［J］．中国学术期刊文摘（科技快报），1999，5（10）：1319.
［2］许军，胡敏燕，刘世霆，等．自测健康评定量表修订版（SRHMS V1.0）的条目分析［J］．现代康复，2001，5（19）：58-59.
［3］杨秀兰，王婉露，吴萌，等．大学生自测健康状况及其影响因素研究［J］．中国全科医学，2019，22（36）：4476-4481．DOI：10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.672.
YANG X L，WANG W L，WU M，et al．Self-rated health status and influencing factors in college students［J］．Chinese General Practice，2019，22（36）：4476-4481．DOI：10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.672.
［4］钟先阳，向仕平，叶汉深，等．热带海域岛礁环境对守礁军人自测健康的影响［J］．中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志，2006，13（4）：249-252．
［5］王启源，黄靖康，兰实，等．218例老人院老年人自测健康的对照研究［J］．中华行为医学与脑科学杂志，2001，10（5）：488-489．DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2001.05.053.
［6］夏聪，许军，杨枭楠，等．深圳市城镇老年人自测健康评定量表得分常模的制定［J］．中国全科医学，2017，20（33）：4162-4166．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.00.112.
XIA C，XU J，YANG X N，et al．Establishment of the norm for Serf-rated Health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 scores in urban elderly people in Shenzhen［J］．Chinese General Practice，2017，20（33）：4162-4166．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.00.112.
［7］张远妮，许军，姜虹，等．广东省城镇居民亚健康评定量表的常模研究［J］．中国全科医学，2014，17（28）：172-177．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2014.28.012.
ZHANG Y N，XU J，JIANG H，et al．Norms on the construction of Sub-health Measurement Scale of Guangdong urban residents［J］．Chinese General Practice，2014，17（28）：172-177．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2014.28.012.
［8］林沅锜，许军，储雪琴，等．广东省城镇老年人口自测健康评定量表常模的制定［J］．广东医学，2018，39（11）：1708-1712.
［9］林沅锜，许军，李文源，等．深圳市福田区老年人自测健康影响因素分析［J］．现代预防医学，2018，44（4）：625-629．
［10］许军，王斌会，胡敏燕，等．自测健康评定量表测试版的信息研究［J］．科技快报，1999，5（10）：1319.
［11］夏聪，许军，杨枭楠，等．自测健康评定量表评价广州市城镇居民健康状况的信效度研究［J］．中国卫生统计，2018，35（1）：29-32．DOI：CNKI:SUN:ZGWT.0.2018-01-008.
［12］于慧慧，王莎莎，王祥，等．山东省某市社区老年人社会支持及影响因素［J］．中国老年学杂志，2018，38（14）：3499-3501.
［13］张超，徐燕，陈平雁．探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析在量表研究中的比较与应用［J］．南方医科大学学报，2007，27（11）：1699-1700．DOI：10.3321/j.issn:1673-4254.2007.11.052.
［14］夏聪，许军，杨枭楠，等．自测健康评定量表评价城镇老年人健康状况的信效度研究［J］．中国全科医学，2017，20（27）：3405-3415．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.00.035.
XIA C，XU J，YANG X N，et al．Reliability and validity of Self-rated Health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 in measuring health status of elderly people［J］．Chinese Journal of Health Statistics，2017，20（27）：3405-3415．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.00.035.

[1]	QIAO Hui, XIE Yongxin, XIAO Wenwen, GAO Baokai, CHEN Kexin. Progress and Effectiveness of the Health Status and Equity of Health Service Utilization of Rural Residents in Ningxia During 10 Years after the New Healthcare Reform [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(22): 2726-2733.
[2]	CHEN Kexin, WANG Wenlong, HU Zhaoyan, GAO Baokai, QIAO Hui. Changes and Equity of Health Service Utilization in Middle-aged and Elderly People in Rural Mountainous Areas of Southern Ningxia during 10 Years after the New Healthcare Reform [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(22): 2734-2739.
[3]	WANG Wenlong, GAO Baokai, HU Zhaoyan, CHEN Kexin, QIAO Hui. Equity and Influencing Factors of Health Service Utilization among Middle-aged and Elderly Adults with Disabilities in Rural Mountainous Areas of Southern Ningxia During 10 Years after the New Healthcare Reform [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(22): 2740-2747.
[4]	GAO Baokai, HU Zhaoyan, WANG Wenlong, CHEN Kexin, QIAO Hui. Changes and Equity of Health Service Utilization in Married Women of Childbearing Age in Rural Mountainous Areas of Southern Ningxia after 10 Years of the New Healthcare Reform [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(22): 2748-2755.
[5]	ZHA Qianqian, XU Lianying, CHEN Juan, HUANG Wen, ZHANG Xinqiong. Summary of Best Evidence for Prevention of Recurrence of Late-life Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2332-2338.
[6]	LIU Jiamin, DAI Fumin, ZHAO Yasha, HAN Lin. Advances in Falls in the Elderly with Hearing Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(13): 1661-1666.
[7]	MA Wanrui, LI Manna, WANG Liqun, WANG Zhizhong. Influencing Factors of Hypertension Combined with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Community Population over 55 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1075-1079.
[8]	MA Ximin, LI Peiwen, HE Jiahui, YANG Jiafei, QIAO Hui. Health Equity and Its Decomposition Analysis among Middle-aged and Older Adults in Pilot Counties of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(07): 830-835.
[9]	WANG Yu, HAO Xijun, CHEN Changxiang, ZHU Ying. Development, Reliability and Validity of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Filial Piety Ethics Questionnaires for Offspring and Grandchildren during Caring the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(07): 836-842.
[10]	XU Xiaobing, LI Di, SUN Yang, SHU Qin, XIAO Lian, XU Shourong, FAN Yunzhou. Influence of Multimorbidity on Disability among Middle-aged and Older People in Rural Areas: a Propensity-score Matching Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(04): 434-439.
[11]	CHENG Meng, WANG Jian, LI Zhipeng, ZHAO Qi, SUN Xiaoming. Participation Intention in Fall-prevention Project and Related Influencing Factors in Community-living Elderly Residents at High Risk of Falls [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(34): 4286-4291.
[12]	GAN Yingying, WANG Shuping, WU Xiaofan, YAN Lina. Enhancing Access to Health Workers in Remote Areas Using the Modified Monash Model: Australia's Experience and Implications for China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(31): 3843-3850.
[13]	Dan WANG, Yuehua LIU, Xuemin ZHU, Haopeng YANG, Jingdong SUO, Xianlei SHEN, Wannian LIANG. Action Plans on Dementia from the WHO and 25 Countries (Regions) and Implications for China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(25): 3075-3082.
[14]	Jiaojiao CHENG, Beibei LIU, Yun SU, Yangyang ZHANG, Shuhan WANG, Han ZHANG, Zongshang OUYANG, Qingfeng TIAN. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Comprehensive Disability in Empty and Non-empty Nesters [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1833-1837,1844.
[15]	ZHANG Ruyi, PENG Yingchun, ZHANG Zhiying. Application Effect and Countermeasures of the Family Contract Service Model Based on "the Consortium of Rural Doctors and Community Doctors" Among the Elderly Residents in the Mountainous Area of North Beijing [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(04): 445-452.