Chinese General Practice ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (14): 1672-1677.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0272
• Article·Vertigo Section • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-04-23
Revised:
2023-07-26
Published:
2024-05-15
Online:
2024-03-22
Contact:
CHEN Ganggang
通讯作者:
陈钢钢
作者简介:
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0272
组别 | 例数 | 性别[例(%)] | 年龄( | |
---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | |||
对照组 | 40 | 22(55.0) | 18(45.0) | 47.7±14.9 |
观察组 | 41 | 22(53.7) | 19(46.3) | 49.0±13.9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.015 | -0.413a | ||
P值 | 0.904 | 0.680 |
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 性别[例(%)] | 年龄( | |
---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | |||
对照组 | 40 | 22(55.0) | 18(45.0) | 47.7±14.9 |
观察组 | 41 | 22(53.7) | 19(46.3) | 49.0±13.9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.015 | -0.413a | ||
P值 | 0.904 | 0.680 |
组别 | 例数 | DHI | DHI-F | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 40 | 51.00±9.94 | 37.10±10.73a | 21.95±5.60a | 21.05±6.01 | 16.15±4.95a | 9.95±3.99a |
观察组 | 41 | 49.51±10.28 | 24.88±8.97ab | 14.29±6.51ab | 19.95±4.16 | 12.49±4.79ab | 6.00±3.46ab |
F值 | F时间=669.21,F组间=13.74,F交互=12.83 | F时间=269.66,F组间=12.60,F交互=4.24 | |||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001,P交互<0.001 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001,P交互=0.016 | |||||
组别 | DHI-E | DHI-P | |||||
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 13.35±3.63 | 9.95±4.09a | 6.00±2.90a | 16.85±3.89 | 11.00±3.65a | 6.00±2.90a | |
观察组 | 13.71±4.97 | 6.20±3.54ab | 4.15±2.25ab | 15.85±5.11 | 6.20±3.43ab | 4.15±2.30ab | |
F值 | F时间=150.30,F组间=7.41,F交互=11.23 | F时间=201.39,F组间=20.51,F交互=9.42 | |||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.008,P交互<0.001 | P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001,P交互<0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of DHI subscores and total score before and after intervention in the two groups
组别 | 例数 | DHI | DHI-F | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 40 | 51.00±9.94 | 37.10±10.73a | 21.95±5.60a | 21.05±6.01 | 16.15±4.95a | 9.95±3.99a |
观察组 | 41 | 49.51±10.28 | 24.88±8.97ab | 14.29±6.51ab | 19.95±4.16 | 12.49±4.79ab | 6.00±3.46ab |
F值 | F时间=669.21,F组间=13.74,F交互=12.83 | F时间=269.66,F组间=12.60,F交互=4.24 | |||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001,P交互<0.001 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001,P交互=0.016 | |||||
组别 | DHI-E | DHI-P | |||||
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 13.35±3.63 | 9.95±4.09a | 6.00±2.90a | 16.85±3.89 | 11.00±3.65a | 6.00±2.90a | |
观察组 | 13.71±4.97 | 6.20±3.54ab | 4.15±2.25ab | 15.85±5.11 | 6.20±3.43ab | 4.15±2.30ab | |
F值 | F时间=150.30,F组间=7.41,F交互=11.23 | F时间=201.39,F组间=20.51,F交互=9.42 | |||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.008,P交互<0.001 | P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001,P交互<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | HADS-A | HADS-D | HADS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 40 | 6.30±2.38 | 4.23±1.66a | 2.70±1.44a | 5.40±2.48 | 4.00±2.04a | 3.20±1.79a | 11.68±4.26 | 8.23±3.03a | 5.83±2.55a |
观察组 | 41 | 6.51±2.10 | 3.63±1.97a | 2.68±1.68a | 5.12±2.28 | 3.54±1.86a | 2.59±1.61a | 11.63±3.50 | 7.17±3.41a | 5.27±2.86a |
F值 | F时间=107.49,F组间=0.16,F交互=2.49 | F时间=63.63,F组间=1.43,F交互=0.35 | F时间=179.66,F组间=0.74,F交互=1.11 | |||||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.695,P交互=0.090 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.235,P交互=0.708 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.391,P交互=0.335 |
Table 3 Comparison of HADS subscores and total score before and after intervention in the two groups
组别 | 例数 | HADS-A | HADS-D | HADS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | 干预前 | 干预后7 d | 干预后14 d | ||
对照组 | 40 | 6.30±2.38 | 4.23±1.66a | 2.70±1.44a | 5.40±2.48 | 4.00±2.04a | 3.20±1.79a | 11.68±4.26 | 8.23±3.03a | 5.83±2.55a |
观察组 | 41 | 6.51±2.10 | 3.63±1.97a | 2.68±1.68a | 5.12±2.28 | 3.54±1.86a | 2.59±1.61a | 11.63±3.50 | 7.17±3.41a | 5.27±2.86a |
F值 | F时间=107.49,F组间=0.16,F交互=2.49 | F时间=63.63,F组间=1.43,F交互=0.35 | F时间=179.66,F组间=0.74,F交互=1.11 | |||||||
P值 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.695,P交互=0.090 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.235,P交互=0.708 | P时间<0.001,P组间=0.391,P交互=0.335 |
[1] |
余津颖,陈飞云,赵欢娣,等. 突发性聋伴眩晕患者头脉冲抑制试验特征分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2021,29(4):434-437. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2021.04.017.
|
[2] |
中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会. 突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,50(6):443-447. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.06.002.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
危昔均,韦亦茜,秦萍,等. 虚拟现实技术在国内临床康复治疗中的应用情况调查[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(7):832-837. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2021.07.012.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
林晨珏,席淑新,王璟. 前庭康复训练对前庭外周性眩晕患者眩晕残障症状的改善作用[J]. 中华医学杂志,2020,100(32):2503-2506. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191202-02621.
|
[13] |
刘斌,段作伟,张海峰,等. 前庭康复训练治疗良性发作性位置性眩晕患者残余头晕的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2017,39(11):860-862. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2017.11.016.
|
[14] |
舒福,石磊,张琦,等. 沉浸式前庭功能康复训练系统治疗BPPV复位后的残余症状[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2021,29(5):509-513. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2021.05.008.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
薛静刚,秦金. 轻度认知障碍患者康复训练中虚拟现实技术的应用效果分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2021,24(S1):110-112.
|
[22] |
焦粤农,林颖,张欣睿,等. 沉浸式虚拟现实系统辅助前庭功能康复的应用[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,34(5):447-451. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.015.
|
[23] |
文艺,吕萍,丁大雄,等. 突发性聋患者的全身共患病分析[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2022,20(3):385-391. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2022.03.004.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
邢英姿,裴建军,孙玉涛,等. 突聋伴眩晕患者焦虑和抑郁状态的临床研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2017,31(24):1919-1922. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.24.012.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[1] | PANG Lan, LI Peifan, ZHU Xiaogang, YANG Zaihong, ZHENG Lei. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Escitalopram Oxalate in the Treatment of Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2098-2103. |
[2] | ZHOU Xinyang, YU Shujian, WANG Qian, YU Hong. Clinical Characteristics of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and the Influence of Psychological Factors on Residual Symptoms after Reduction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(14): 1685-1691. |
[3] | ZHANG Yong, WANG Senli, HUANG Ronghua, XU Fengping, LIU Dan. Intervention Effect of Music Therapy on Patients with Alzheimers Disease: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(12): 1511-1518. |
[4] | GAO Yuan, ZHOU Min, QIN Manfen, XU Xuan, YANG Liping, FU Yahong, HUANG Ying, WANG Wei. Effects of Health Coaching Combined with Wearable Devices on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Self-management Behavior in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(08): 908-914. |
[5] | ZHENG Rong, LIU Zhidong, WANG Miao, ZHANG Xiao, CHEN Junlan, ZHOU Shigao. A Randomized Controlled Study on Gehu Tiaozhi Decoction Intervening Patients with Metabolic Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(03): 343-347. |
[6] | YAO lin, SHANG Danmei, ZHAO Hui, LIU Xinyu, LIU Yongwei, JIANG Yong. The Effect and Satisfaction of Mobile Network in the Hypertension Management of Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(01): 85-90. |
[7] | YAO Yuzhong, MA Xiaojun, SONG Huan, ZHONG Yu. The Management Effect of Diabetes "1358 model" on Community Diabetes Patients Based on "Precision Management Combining General Care and Specialty Care" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4308-4314. |
[8] | LI Jingjing, YUAN Ding, WANG Xiuling, KANG Hongfei, LAI Chengcheng, WANG Peisong, LU Guangping, GAO Yanxia. Evaluation of the Application Effect of Virtual Reality Technology in Standardized Training of General Practice Residents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4322-4328. |
[9] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yunshu, YAN Baoping, WANG Jian, MA Yanjuan, WANG Yuan, QIN Yingjie, NA Long, REN Zhiyong, SUN Junwei, DENG Huaili, MA Hongjun, QU Xuehui, ZHOU Nan, SI Tianmei. Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Microspheres for Injection (Ⅱ) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4007-4012. |
[10] | The Vertigo Committee of the Chinese Medical Education Association. Expert Consensus on Betahistine Mesylate in the Treatment of Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3591-3598. |
[11] | YAO Junjie, SHANG Qiangqiang, WANG Yufeng, LI Jiahui, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting. Wearable Inertial Sensors-based Efficacy Evaluation of Comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Due to Qi-stagnation and Blood-stasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3450-3455. |
[12] | LIU Minghao, WANG Pan, GAO Lijian, XU Shuqing, WANG Huanhuan, ZHAO Guangxian, CHEN Jue, QIAO Shubin, XU Bo, YUAN Jinqing. Feasibility, Safety and Timing of Secondary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Artery Approach [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3366-3372. |
[13] | LU Bin, XIANG Chong, YUAN Xuesong, CAI Gaojun, WEI Wenfeng, YAN Yongmin. Effectiveness, Safety and Satisfaction of Distal Transradial Artery Approach in Cerebral Angiography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3378-3382. |
[14] | GAO Yang, WANG Yunxia, GAO Chuanyu. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in 45-year-old and Younger Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Blood Lipid Control Effect [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2232-2237. |
[15] | YANG Bei, HAN Lin, WANG Yin, CHENG Kangyao. Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection in Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults: a Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1892-1901. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||