Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (35): 4464-4471.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0129
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-03-01
Revised:
2023-04-06
Published:
2023-12-15
Online:
2023-04-28
Contact:
LI Zhifei
About author:
通讯作者:
李智斐
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0129
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 手术时间(min) | 术中出血(mL) | 住院时间(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 20/15 | 52.6±8.2 | 157.3±22.4 | 110.9±38.8 | 5.1±1.4 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 31/26 | 51.3±7.8 | 156.7±23.0 | 112.1±39.7 | 5.2±1.5 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 25/22 | 53.1±5.4 | 158.4±24.3 | 108.8±42.7 | 5.2±1.5 |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 18/14 | 54.3±6.5 | 153.1±24.5 | 119.4±47.6 | 5.1±1.4 |
F(χ2)值 | 0.156a | 1.359 | 0.345 | 0.432 | 0.094 | |
P值 | 0.984 | 0.257 | 0.793 | 0.730 | 0.963 |
Table 1 Comparison of general data among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 手术时间(min) | 术中出血(mL) | 住院时间(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 20/15 | 52.6±8.2 | 157.3±22.4 | 110.9±38.8 | 5.1±1.4 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 31/26 | 51.3±7.8 | 156.7±23.0 | 112.1±39.7 | 5.2±1.5 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 25/22 | 53.1±5.4 | 158.4±24.3 | 108.8±42.7 | 5.2±1.5 |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 18/14 | 54.3±6.5 | 153.1±24.5 | 119.4±47.6 | 5.1±1.4 |
F(χ2)值 | 0.156a | 1.359 | 0.345 | 0.432 | 0.094 | |
P值 | 0.984 | 0.257 | 0.793 | 0.730 | 0.963 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 33.88±2.61 | 16.71±1.25 | 12.42±1.26 | 9.22±0.84 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 34.00±2.51 | 16.82±1.24 | 12.64±1.20 | 9.74±1.04a |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 33.85±2.47 | 16.91±1.19 | 13.17±1.03ab | 10.19±1.35ab |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 34.13±2.42 | 17.03±1.14 | 13.31±1.35ab | 10.34±1.24ab |
F值 | F交互=0.969,F组间=4.406,F时间=4 433.689 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.465,P组间=0.005,P时间<0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of ODI score among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 33.88±2.61 | 16.71±1.25 | 12.42±1.26 | 9.22±0.84 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 34.00±2.51 | 16.82±1.24 | 12.64±1.20 | 9.74±1.04a |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 33.85±2.47 | 16.91±1.19 | 13.17±1.03ab | 10.19±1.35ab |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 34.13±2.42 | 17.03±1.14 | 13.31±1.35ab | 10.34±1.24ab |
F值 | F交互=0.969,F组间=4.406,F时间=4 433.689 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.465,P组间=0.005,P时间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 6.20±1.23 | 4.06±0.87 | 2.00±0.59 | 1.68±0.58 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 6.19±1.12 | 4.04±0.88 | 2.04±0.49 | 1.98±0.52a |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 6.14±1.18 | 4.08±0.88 | 2.17±0.48 | 2.08±0.54a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 6.31±1.17 | 4.18±0.97 | 2.09±0.53 | 2.03±0.54a |
F值 | F交互=1.072,F组间=0.960,F时间=697.803 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.382,P组间=0.441,P时间<0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of VAS score among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 6.20±1.23 | 4.06±0.87 | 2.00±0.59 | 1.68±0.58 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 6.19±1.12 | 4.04±0.88 | 2.04±0.49 | 1.98±0.52a |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 6.14±1.18 | 4.08±0.88 | 2.17±0.48 | 2.08±0.54a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 6.31±1.17 | 4.18±0.97 | 2.09±0.53 | 2.03±0.54a |
F值 | F交互=1.072,F组间=0.960,F时间=697.803 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.382,P组间=0.441,P时间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 13.94±1.21 | 20.83±1.58 | 23.63±0.81 | 23.88±0.83 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 13.86±1.18 | 20.87±1.67 | 23.42±1.02 | 23.47±0.98 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 13.91±1.24 | 20.21±2.24 | 23.13±1.36 | 23.28±1.15a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 13.93±1.19 | 19.93±3.18 | 23.03±1.40 | 23.13±1.34a |
F值 | F交互=1.423,F组间=3.417,F时间=1 927.491 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.175,P组间=0.019,P时间<0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of JOA score among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 13.94±1.21 | 20.83±1.58 | 23.63±0.81 | 23.88±0.83 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 13.86±1.18 | 20.87±1.67 | 23.42±1.02 | 23.47±0.98 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 13.91±1.24 | 20.21±2.24 | 23.13±1.36 | 23.28±1.15a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 13.93±1.19 | 19.93±3.18 | 23.03±1.40 | 23.13±1.34a |
F值 | F交互=1.423,F组间=3.417,F时间=1 927.491 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.175,P组间=0.019,P时间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 20.08±2.32 | 6.17±1.32 | 5.54±1.31 | 6.83±1.01 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 20.31±2.33 | 6.53±0.93 | 5.70±1.25 | 6.60±0.88 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 20.32±2.19 | 6.57±0.92 | 5.77±1.30 | 5.62±1.24a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 20.22±2.31 | 6.41±1.10 | 5.63±1.26 | 5.65±1.06a |
F值 | F交互=4.051,F组间=1.368,F时间=2 042.740 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P组间=0.255,P时间<0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of the degree of lumbar spondylolisthesis among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 20.08±2.32 | 6.17±1.32 | 5.54±1.31 | 6.83±1.01 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 20.31±2.33 | 6.53±0.93 | 5.70±1.25 | 6.60±0.88 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 20.32±2.19 | 6.57±0.92 | 5.77±1.30 | 5.62±1.24a |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 20.22±2.31 | 6.41±1.10 | 5.63±1.26 | 5.65±1.06a |
F值 | F交互=4.051,F组间=1.368,F时间=2 042.740 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P组间=0.255,P时间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 43.47°±1.85° | 51.57°±1.72° | 51.14°±1.80° | 51.68°±1.99° |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 43.31°±1.66° | 50.85°±1.52° | 50.70°±1.56° | 51.07°±1.65° |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 43.17°±1.66° | 51.06°±1.76° | 50.72°±1.57° | 51.04°±1.75° |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 43.25°±1.72° | 50.94°±2.02° | 51.14°±2.11° | 51.25°±1.70° |
F值 | F交互=1.311,F组间=3.691,F时间=798.519 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.919,P组间=0.013,P时间<0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of lumbar lordosis angle among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 43.47°±1.85° | 51.57°±1.72° | 51.14°±1.80° | 51.68°±1.99° |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 43.31°±1.66° | 50.85°±1.52° | 50.70°±1.56° | 51.07°±1.65° |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 43.17°±1.66° | 51.06°±1.76° | 50.72°±1.57° | 51.04°±1.75° |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 43.25°±1.72° | 50.94°±2.02° | 51.14°±2.11° | 51.25°±1.70° |
F值 | F交互=1.311,F组间=3.691,F时间=798.519 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.919,P组间=0.013,P时间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 82.42±4.79 | 113.05±4.45 | 112.11±4.16 | 112.14±4.00 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 82.91±4.89 | 112.86±4.68 | 112.35±4.52 | 111.98±4.55 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 82.77±4.79 | 110.77±4.95ab | 110.02±4.51ab | 109.59±4.28ab |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 82.71±4.63 | 110.19±4.94ab | 109.81±4.64ab | 109.18±4.06ab |
F值 | F交互=1.408,F组间=4.336,F时间=906.684 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.181,P组间=0.006,P时间<0.001 |
Table 7 Comparison of dural cross-sectional area among four groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 术前 | 术后即刻 | 术后6个月 | 术后12个月 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endo-P/TLIF+可调节融合器组 | 35 | 82.42±4.79 | 113.05±4.45 | 112.11±4.16 | 112.14±4.00 |
Endo-P/TLIF+普通融合器组 | 57 | 82.91±4.89 | 112.86±4.68 | 112.35±4.52 | 111.98±4.55 |
Endo-TLIF+普通融合器组 | 47 | 82.77±4.79 | 110.77±4.95ab | 110.02±4.51ab | 109.59±4.28ab |
UBE+普通融合器组 | 32 | 82.71±4.63 | 110.19±4.94ab | 109.81±4.64ab | 109.18±4.06ab |
F值 | F交互=1.408,F组间=4.336,F时间=906.684 | ||||
P值 | P交互=0.181,P组间=0.006,P时间<0.001 |
[1] |
杨善智,易红蕾,许俊杰,等. 极外侧腰椎间融合术治疗轻度腰椎滑脱症[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(9):774-779. DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2020.09.02.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
胡震,杨阳,赵树雄,等. 单侧双通道内镜技术的临床应用与展望[J/OL].解放军医学杂志. [2023-04-05].
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
孙凤龙,梁庆晨,王宏庆,等. 脊柱内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳的早期临床研究[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(10):754-760. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2019.10.03.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] | |
[24] |
陈博来,李永津,苏国义,等. 后外侧入路经皮内窥镜下腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2021,31(6):527-533. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2021.06.07.
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
许伟,李智斐,万通,等. 高度可调钛金材质融合器在脊柱内镜下腰椎融合中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2022,26(33):5335-5341.
|
[27] |
丁一,海涌,杨晋才,等. Pango可撑开椎间融合器联合微创螺钉内固定系统治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症初步探讨[J]. 实用医学杂志,2020,36(6):808-812. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.06.020.
|
[1] | LU Guangqi, ZHUANG Minghui, ZHU Liguo, GAO Jinghua, WEI Xu, LI Luguang, YU Jie. Interpretation of Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST) : Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) in 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 3995-4000. |
[2] | CHEN Lulu, ZHANG Liping, LI Jingwen, DONG Wenjie, WU Xin'ai. Clinical Effect and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors plus Fruquintinib as Later-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2262-2267. |
[3] | AN Yi, CHEN Hong, ZHOU Yanji, LIU Luping, CHEN Qianji, LEI Yuan, SUN Yanyan, WANG Xiyou, LIU Changxin, ZHANG Yang, YU Changhe. Quality Evaluation and Comparative Analysis on Recommendations of Guidelines for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1310-1317. |
[4] |
ZHOU Yanji, LIU Changxin, LIU Yangang, WANG Xiyou, AN Yi, YUAN Yi, LI Duoduo, YU Changhe.
Systematic Review of the Spine Patient Outcome Research Trial for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(05): 535-541. |
[5] | GAO Shangju,LI Wenyi,ZHANG Long,WEI Jingchao,CAO Can. Percutaneous Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients at High Risk for General Anesthesia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(27): 3433-3439. |
[6] | Asihati?Nuermaimaiti,YANG Yi,Nuerhanati?Shayilanbieke,Hali?Habulihan,JIN Gele. Value of Cauda Equina Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in the Diagnosis of Diffrent Kinds of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(14): 1747-1752. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||