Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1351-1356.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.01.001
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Iurnal Variability of Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma Patients
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510000,China
*Corresponding author:ZHU Zheng,Attending physician;E-mail:ching1262006@126.com
Received:
2021-10-19
Revised:
2022-02-11
Published:
2022-04-15
Online:
2022-03-28
通讯作者:
朱政
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YU Xinxin, ZHENG Jinping, GAO Yi, XIE Yanqing, AN Jiaying, LIU Wenting, ZHONG Liping, WU Zhongping, ZHU Zheng.
Iurnal Variability of Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(11): 1351-1356.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.01.001
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(![]() | 身高(![]() | 体质量(![]() | BMI(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午组 | 81 | 30/51 | 43.4±12.4 | 161.6±7.3 | 60.5±11.2 | 23.1±3.7 |
下午组 | 121 | 36/85 | 40.0±12.2 | 160.2±8.8 | 57.7±10.6 | 22.4±3.1 |
t(χ2)值 | -1.08a | 1.88 | 1.14 | 1.84 | 1.57 | |
P值 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characteristics between morning group and afternoon group
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(![]() | 身高(![]() | 体质量(![]() | BMI(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午组 | 81 | 30/51 | 43.4±12.4 | 161.6±7.3 | 60.5±11.2 | 23.1±3.7 |
下午组 | 121 | 36/85 | 40.0±12.2 | 160.2±8.8 | 57.7±10.6 | 22.4±3.1 |
t(χ2)值 | -1.08a | 1.88 | 1.14 | 1.84 | 1.57 | |
P值 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
组别 | 例数 | FVC%pred(![]() | FEV1%pred(![]() | PEF%pred(![]() | MMEF%pred(![]() | MEF50%pred(![]() | MEF25%pred(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午组 | 81 | 98.40±13.33 | 88.38±11.50 | 92.79±16.16 | 53.63±17.58 | 59.04±17.45 | 48.07±20.74 |
下午组 | 121 | 98.15±12.78 | 90.52±11.43 | 91.66±12.88 | 58.67±21.39 | 64.33±20.48 | 52.89±26.20 |
t(Z)值 | 0.13 | -1.31 | 0.55 | -1.76 | -1.91 | -1.39 | |
P值 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 0.58 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.17 |
Table 2 Comparison of main pulmonary function indexes and PD20 between morning group and afternoon group
组别 | 例数 | FVC%pred(![]() | FEV1%pred(![]() | PEF%pred(![]() | MMEF%pred(![]() | MEF50%pred(![]() | MEF25%pred(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午组 | 81 | 98.40±13.33 | 88.38±11.50 | 92.79±16.16 | 53.63±17.58 | 59.04±17.45 | 48.07±20.74 |
下午组 | 121 | 98.15±12.78 | 90.52±11.43 | 91.66±12.88 | 58.67±21.39 | 64.33±20.48 | 52.89±26.20 |
t(Z)值 | 0.13 | -1.31 | 0.55 | -1.76 | -1.91 | -1.39 | |
P值 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 0.58 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.17 |
组别 | 例数 | FVC%pred(![]() | FEV1%pred(![]() | PEF%pred(![]() | MMEF%pred(![]() | MEF50%pred(![]() | MEF25%pred(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初诊组 | 98 | 98.85±13.80 | 91.35±11.70 | 93.62±13.95 | 59.47±21.36 | 64.82±20.33 | 53.63±25.24 |
复诊组 | 104 | 97.68±12.18 | 88.07±11.08 | 90.69±14.67 | 53.00±18.46 | 59.75±18.34 | 48.44±23.07 |
t(Z)值 | 0.65 | 2.05 | 1.46 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 1.53 | |
P值 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
Table 3 Comparison of main pulmonary function indexes and PD20 between initial diagnosis group and follow-up group
组别 | 例数 | FVC%pred(![]() | FEV1%pred(![]() | PEF%pred(![]() | MMEF%pred(![]() | MEF50%pred(![]() | MEF25%pred(![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初诊组 | 98 | 98.85±13.80 | 91.35±11.70 | 93.62±13.95 | 59.47±21.36 | 64.82±20.33 | 53.63±25.24 |
复诊组 | 104 | 97.68±12.18 | 88.07±11.08 | 90.69±14.67 | 53.00±18.46 | 59.75±18.34 | 48.44±23.07 |
t(Z)值 | 0.65 | 2.05 | 1.46 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 1.53 | |
P值 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
指标 | 初诊组 | 复诊组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午(n=36) | 下午(n=62) | t(Z)值 | P值 | 上午(n=45) | 下午(n=59) | t(Z)值 | P值 | |
FVC%pred(![]() | 98.20±13.23 | 99.25±14.22 | -0.36 | 0.72 | 98.56±13.56 | 97.01±11.08 | 0.64 | 0.52 |
FEV1%pred(![]() | 90.55±12.40 | 91.81±11.36 | -0.51 | 0.61 | 88.63±10.54 | 89.17±11.44 | -1.16 | 0.25 |
PEF%pred(![]() | 94.38±17.45 | 93.19±11.59 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 91.53±15.13 | 90.06±14.04 | 0.51 | 0.61 |
MMEF%pred(![]() | 59.26±20.20 | 59.59±22.16 | -0.07 | 0.94 | 49.11±13.81 | 57.72±20.69 | -2.41 | 0.02 |
MEF50%pred(![]() | 64.39±20.24 | 65.07±20.55 | -0.16 | 0.88 | 54.76±13.64 | 63.56±20.55 | -2.47 | 0.02 |
MEF25%pred(![]() | 53.35±24.02 | 53.79±26.12 | -0.08 | 0.93 | 43.85±16.79 | 51.93±26.51 | -1.79 | 0.08 |
PD20-FVC〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 2.50(2.49,2.50) | 2.50(1.33,2.50) | -1.55a | 0.12 | 2.50(1.36,2.50) | 2.50(1.09,2.50) | -0.02a | 0.99 |
PD20-FEV1〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.51(0.16,1.42) | 0.60(0.20,1.20) | -0.14a | 0.89 | 0.30(0.03,1.36) | 0.36(0.14,1.20) | -0.82a | 0.41 |
PD20-PEF〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 2.13(0.23,2.50) | 1.04(0.30,2.50) | -0.95a | 0.34 | 0.31(0.06,1.98) | 0.51(0.15,1.91) | -0.51a | 0.61 |
PD20-MMEF〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.13) | 0.31(0.11,1.22) | -1.02a | 0.31 | 0.14(0.03,0.88) | 0.31(0.08,0.31) | -1.29a | 0.20 |
PD20-MEF25%〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | 0.31(0.15,1.26) | -0.41a | 0.68 | 0.31(0.50,1.25) | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | -1.17a | 0.24 |
PD20-MEF50%〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.22) | 0.31(0.11,1.13) | -0.23a | 0.82 | 0.16(0.01,0.90) | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | -1.42a | 0.16 |
Table 4 Comparison of main pulmonary function indexes and PD20 between initial diagnosis group and follow-up group in the morning and afternoon
指标 | 初诊组 | 复诊组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上午(n=36) | 下午(n=62) | t(Z)值 | P值 | 上午(n=45) | 下午(n=59) | t(Z)值 | P值 | |
FVC%pred(![]() | 98.20±13.23 | 99.25±14.22 | -0.36 | 0.72 | 98.56±13.56 | 97.01±11.08 | 0.64 | 0.52 |
FEV1%pred(![]() | 90.55±12.40 | 91.81±11.36 | -0.51 | 0.61 | 88.63±10.54 | 89.17±11.44 | -1.16 | 0.25 |
PEF%pred(![]() | 94.38±17.45 | 93.19±11.59 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 91.53±15.13 | 90.06±14.04 | 0.51 | 0.61 |
MMEF%pred(![]() | 59.26±20.20 | 59.59±22.16 | -0.07 | 0.94 | 49.11±13.81 | 57.72±20.69 | -2.41 | 0.02 |
MEF50%pred(![]() | 64.39±20.24 | 65.07±20.55 | -0.16 | 0.88 | 54.76±13.64 | 63.56±20.55 | -2.47 | 0.02 |
MEF25%pred(![]() | 53.35±24.02 | 53.79±26.12 | -0.08 | 0.93 | 43.85±16.79 | 51.93±26.51 | -1.79 | 0.08 |
PD20-FVC〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 2.50(2.49,2.50) | 2.50(1.33,2.50) | -1.55a | 0.12 | 2.50(1.36,2.50) | 2.50(1.09,2.50) | -0.02a | 0.99 |
PD20-FEV1〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.51(0.16,1.42) | 0.60(0.20,1.20) | -0.14a | 0.89 | 0.30(0.03,1.36) | 0.36(0.14,1.20) | -0.82a | 0.41 |
PD20-PEF〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 2.13(0.23,2.50) | 1.04(0.30,2.50) | -0.95a | 0.34 | 0.31(0.06,1.98) | 0.51(0.15,1.91) | -0.51a | 0.61 |
PD20-MMEF〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.13) | 0.31(0.11,1.22) | -1.02a | 0.31 | 0.14(0.03,0.88) | 0.31(0.08,0.31) | -1.29a | 0.20 |
PD20-MEF25%〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | 0.31(0.15,1.26) | -0.41a | 0.68 | 0.31(0.50,1.25) | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | -1.17a | 0.24 |
PD20-MEF50%〔M(P25,P75),mg〕 | 0.31(0.08,1.22) | 0.31(0.11,1.13) | -0.23a | 0.82 | 0.16(0.01,0.90) | 0.31(0.08,1.25) | -1.42a | 0.16 |
组别 | 上午 | 下午 | 初诊 | 复诊 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | PD20-FEV1 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | Z值 | P值 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | Z值 | P值 | |
极轻度组 | 23 | 1.77(1.45,2.15) | 35 | 1.77(1.35,2.05) | -0.53 | 0.60 | 31 | 1.79(1.22,2.08) | 27 | 1.77(1.45,2.13) | -0.42 | 0.67 |
轻度组 | 20 | 0.60(0.39,0.86) | 43 | 0.57(0.38,0.73) | -0.89 | 0.38 | 33 | 0.61(0.43,0.82) | 30 | 0.54(0.36,0.73) | -1.37 | 0.17 |
中度组 | 22 | 0.19(0.13,0.23) | 30 | 0.16(0.11,0.20) | -1.21 | 0.22 | 25 | 0.16(0.10,0.21) | 27 | 0.16(0.12,0.21) | -0.28 | 0.78 |
重度组 | 16 | 0.01(0.01,0.02) | 13 | 0.01(0.01,0.03) | -0.62 | 0.54 | 9 | 0.02(0.01,0.02) | 20 | 0.01(0.01,0.02) | -0.57 | 0.57 |
Table 5 Comparison of PD20-FEV1 in patients with different degrees of airway hyperresponsiveness
组别 | 上午 | 下午 | 初诊 | 复诊 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | PD20-FEV1 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | Z值 | P值 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | 例数 | PD20-FEV1 | Z值 | P值 | |
极轻度组 | 23 | 1.77(1.45,2.15) | 35 | 1.77(1.35,2.05) | -0.53 | 0.60 | 31 | 1.79(1.22,2.08) | 27 | 1.77(1.45,2.13) | -0.42 | 0.67 |
轻度组 | 20 | 0.60(0.39,0.86) | 43 | 0.57(0.38,0.73) | -0.89 | 0.38 | 33 | 0.61(0.43,0.82) | 30 | 0.54(0.36,0.73) | -1.37 | 0.17 |
中度组 | 22 | 0.19(0.13,0.23) | 30 | 0.16(0.11,0.20) | -1.21 | 0.22 | 25 | 0.16(0.10,0.21) | 27 | 0.16(0.12,0.21) | -0.28 | 0.78 |
重度组 | 16 | 0.01(0.01,0.02) | 13 | 0.01(0.01,0.03) | -0.62 | 0.54 | 9 | 0.02(0.01,0.02) | 20 | 0.01(0.01,0.02) | -0.57 | 0.57 |
[1] | Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention;2021[EB/OL].[2021-09-14]. . |
[2] | HUANG K W,YANG T,XU J Y,et al. Prevalence,risk factors,and management of asthma in China: a national cross-sectional study[J]. Lancet,2019,394(10196): 407-418. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31147-X. |
[3] | Global strategy for asthma management and prevention global initiative for asthma (GINA) 2019[EB/OL].[2021-09-14]. . |
[4] | 林升焰,戴木森,周其林,等. 哮喘气道高反应性昼夜节律变化的意义[J]. 中华内科杂志,1995,34(4): 270-271. |
[5] | 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺功能专业组. 肺功能检查指南(第三部分)——组织胺和乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(8):566-571. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2014.08.003. |
[6] | MILLER M R,HANKINSON J,BRUSASCO V,et al. Standardisation of spirometry[J]. Eur Respir J,2005,26(2):319-338. DOI:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. |
[7] | LANGE P,PARNER J,VESTBO J,et al. A 15-year follow-up study of ventilatory function in adults with asthma[J]. N Engl J Med,1998,339(17): 1194-1200. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199810223391703. |
[8] | WOOLCOCK A J,JENKINS C R. Assessment of bronchial responsiveness as a guide to prognosis and therapy in asthma[J]. Med Clin North Am,1990,74(3): 753-765. DOI:10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30550-8. |
[9] | GROL M H,GERRITSEN J,VONK J M,et al. Risk factors for growth and decline of lung function in asthmatic individuals up to age 42 years. A 30-year follow-up study[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1999,160(6): 1830-1837. DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9812100. |
[10] | BIJL-HOFLAND I D,CLOOSTERMAN S G,FOLGERING H T,et al. Relation of the perception of airway obstruction to the severity of asthma[J]. Thorax,1999,54(1): 15-19. DOI:10.1136/thx.54.1.15. |
[11] | KOH Y I,CHOI I S,LIM H. Airway responsiveness as a direct factor contributing to the dyspnoea perception in asthma[J]. Respir Med,2001,95(6):464-470. DOI:10.1053/rmed.2001.1068. |
[12] | 李一龙,景小莹. 支气管哮喘患者血清LXA4水平及凝血功能与肺功能及哮喘病程的相关性研究[J]. 河北医药,2019,41(8): 1200-1203. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2019.08.020. |
[13] | WECHSLER M E,COX G P. Comment on: international ERS/ATS guidelines on definition,evaluation and treatment of severe asthma[J]. Eur Respir J,2014,44(1): 267. DOI:10.1183/09031936.00043514. |
[14] | 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺功能专业组.肺功能检查指南(第二部分)—肺量计检查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(7):481-486. |
[15] | OLIVEIRA M J,VIEIRA M,COUTINHO D,et al. Severe asthma in obese patients: improvement of lung function after treatment with omalizumab[J]. Pulmonology,2019,25(1): 15-20. DOI:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.01.005. |
[16] | QIN R D,AN J Y,XIE J X,et al. FEF25-75% is a more sensitive measure reflecting airway dysfunction in patients with asthma: a comparison study using FEF25-75% and FEV1%[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract,2021,9(10):3649-3659.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.027. |
[1] | LIANG Xuan, NA Feiyang, QIN Mengyao, YANG Hui, GUO Li, GUO Qi, REN Lei, CHEN De, LIU Donghai, ZHANG Rongfang. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Bronchial Asthma Combined with Obstructive Sleep Apnea-hypopnea Syndrome in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4225-4230. |
[2] | LI Jingbo, PANG Gaofeng, REN Yanling, SHA Xixue, NI Huiping. Executive Function of GO/NOGO Paradigm Experiment in Children with Bronchial Asthma and Its Relationship with Pulmonary Function [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2503-2507. |
[3] | HU Xiaofeng, CAI Guangyun, XIAO Kun, XU Pusheng, YU Chunhong, LIN Haihuan. Effects of Exposure to Environmental Factors on Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels in Patients with Non-acute Exacerbation of Bronchial Asthma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1086-1091. |
[4] | HU Yiqing, FANG Jiwei, LIU Huanbing. Attaching Importance to the Application of Lung Function Examination Technology in Grassroots Medical and Health Institutions——Expert Answers to Key Questions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(05): 532-540. |
[5] | Shenzhen Group of Integrated Medical and Preventive Medicine Program for Respiratory Diseases, Shenzhen Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Respiratory Diseases, Shenzhen Community Health Association. Early Screening and Standardized Management Pathway for Bronchial Asthma in Shenzhen Community Healthcare Settings (Trial Version) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 262-267. |
[6] | SUN Rui, PAN Yi, TAN Aihua, WANG Jianxin, WANG Xuan, ZHANG Lijing. Hypertension with Bronchial Asthma: Interaction Mechanism and Management [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 274-279. |
[7] | WANG Jun, ZHANG Dong, FENG Zhenzhen, ZHANG Shujuan, ZHAO Guixiang, ZHANG Hailong, LI Jiansheng. Literature-based Research on Common Syndromes of Cough Variant Asthma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 321-328. |
[8] | CHANG Chun, SUN Yongchang. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention: Interpretation of the Updates in 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(35): 4355-4362. |
[9] | YANG Jiang, WANG Minghang, LI Jiansheng, LIN Xiaohong, LIU Yuanyuan, XIE Yang, LI Suyun. Risk Prediction Questionnaire and Item Screening for Acute Exacerbation of Asthma Based on the Modified Delphi Technique [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(35): 4425-4432. |
[10] | Yalin WANG, Jing ZHANG, Muyun ZHU. Clinical Study on Low Attenuation Area Ratio and Pectoral Major Parameters in Evaluating Severity of Pulmonary Ventilation Function Impairmentin Elderly Patients with COPD [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(27): 3358-3364. |
[11] | Weihong HAN, Huanhuan ZHAO, Xinmin TU, Minghang WANG. Inflammatory Phenotypes and Associated Factors in Bronchial Asthma Patients: a Cross-sectional Survey [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(24): 2984-2991. |
[12] | Zelin CHEN, Rui JIAO, Siyu WU, Zheng WANG, Guangwei ZHOU, Jing LI, Xinxiu LIU, Aihong MENG. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Response to Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Different Inflammatory Phenotypes of AECOPD and ACO [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(14): 1730-1735. |
[13] | Jiang YANG, Xinmin TU, Huanhuan ZHAO, Xiaohong LIN, Yang XIE, Suyun LI, Minghang WANG. A Comparative Study of Levels of Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Different Stages of Asthma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(14): 1700-1706. |
[14] | Yide WANG, Zongxiang TIAN, Zheng LI, Fengsen LI. Pulmonary Function and Imaging Characteristics of Tuberculosis Associated Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Propensity Score-matched Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(14): 1718-1723. |
[15] |
HUO Hongmin, YANG Yaofang, DONG Jiatian, MAO Zixian, HU Ping, SONG Fengchun.
Development of a Personalized Pharmacologic Treatment Repository for Bronchial Asthma Based on the 2018 Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Bronchial Asthma in Primary Care(Practice Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(10): 1181-1185. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||