中国全科医学

• •

老年人数字健康素养提升随机对照研究

彭骏, 丁静林, 郝辰业, 吴骋, 朱荣慧, 顾春光, 管文琪, 万辉   

  1. 上海健康医学院图文信息中心, 上海 201318 中国
    海军军医大学卫生勤务学系军队卫生统计学教研室, 上海 200433 中国
    上海市杨浦区长海社区卫生服务中心, 上海 200082 中国
    上海市杨浦区中心医院, 上海 200090 中国
    海军军医大学医疗管理室, 上海 200433 中国
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-27 修回日期:2024-10-07 接受日期:2024-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 万辉
  • 基金资助:
    上海“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究项目(23692112100)

A randomized controlled study on improving digital health literacy among the elderly

  1. , Shanghai University Medicine & Health Sciences 201318, China
    , Naval Medical University 200433, China
    , Changhai Community Health Service Center 200082, China
    , Shanghai Yangpu District Central Hospital 200090, China
  • Received:2024-08-27 Revised:2024-10-07 Accepted:2024-11-21
分享到

摘要: 目的:本文调研分析提升老年人数字健康素养的有效路径,为相关部门决策提供依据。方法:本研究采用随机对照试验方法,将研究对象分为线上干预组(简称线上组)、线下干预组(简称线下组)和对照组,围绕“如何查找健康资源信息、如何区分健康资源信息质量、如何自信做出健康信息决定”三个维度开展线上或线下DHL提升培训,对比干预前后eHEALS量表得分,观察不同干预的作用效果。结果:干预前,对照组、线上组、线下组eHEALS总评分分别为21.38±7.533、24.31±10.224、19.49±7.246,结果显示三组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。干预后,三组总评分分别为21.95±4.987、27.90±8.747、36.80±3.227,三组之间存在显著性差异,且线上组和线下组均高于对照组;线下组高于线上组(P<0.05)。结论:线上教育和线下教育均有助于提升老年人数字健康素养,线下教育形式优于线上教育。

关键词: 数字健康素养, 素养提升, 培训方式, 随机对照

Abstract: Purpose: This article investigates and analyzes effective ways to enhance the digital health literacy of the elderly, providing a basis for decision-making by relevant departments. Method: This study used a randomized controlled trial method to divide the research subjects into an online intervention group (referred to as the online group), an offline intervention group (referred to as the offline group), and a control group. Online or offline DHL improvement training was conducted around three dimensions: "how to search for health resource information, how to distinguish the quality of health resource information, and how to confidently make health information decisions". The eHEALS scores before and after the intervention were compared to observe the effects of different interventions. Result: Before intervention, the total eHEALS scores of the control group, online group, and offline group were 21.38 ± 7.533, 24.31 ± 10.224, and 19.49 ± 7.246, respectively. The results showed no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05). After intervention, the total scores of the three groups were 21.95 ± 4.987, 27.90 ± 8.747, and 36.80 ± 3.227, respectively, with significant differences between the three groups, and both the online and offline groups were higher than the control group; The offline group was higher than the online group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both online and offline education can help improve the digital health literacy of the elderly, and offline education forms are superior to online education.

Key words: Digital health literacy, Improvement of literacy, Training methods, randomized controlled