中国全科医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (18): 2200-2205.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.035

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Stretta射频治疗与toupet胃底折叠术对胃食管反流病的疗效比较研究

李伟学1,田宋君1*,詹争明1,林先盛2   

  1. 1.430050湖北省武汉市,武汉科技大学附属汉阳医院普外科 2.230001安徽省合肥市,安徽省立医院普外科
    *通信作者:田宋君,副主任医师;E-mail:tiansongjundr@163.com
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1608085QH197)

Efficacy of Stretta Radiofrequency Ablation and Toupet Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease:a Comparative Study 

LI Weixue1,TIAN Songjun1*,ZHAN Zhengming1,LIN Xiansheng2   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery,Hanyang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430050,China
    2.Department of General Surgery,Anhui Provincial Hospital,Hefei 230001,China
    *Corresponding author:TIAN Songjun,Associate chief physician;E-mail:tiansongjundr@163.com
  • Published:2019-06-20 Online:2019-06-20

摘要: 背景 胃食管反流病(GERD)是由于下食管括约肌功能障碍引起胃内容物反流导致的一系列慢性症状和食管黏膜损害,可引起胃灼热、胸痛、反酸等临床症状,严重影响患者生活质量。GERD通常需要长期的药物治疗或手术治疗,常用的手术方式为toupet胃底折叠术,疗效较好。已有研究显示Stretta射频治疗可明显改善GERD症状和患者生活质量。目的 对比Stretta射频治疗与toupet胃底折叠术治疗GERD的临床疗效。方法 选取2014年1月—2016年1月于武汉科技大学附属汉阳医院确诊为GERD并行toupet胃底折叠术或Stretta射频治疗的患者118例为研究对象。其中行toupet胃底折叠术者73例(toupet胃底折叠术组),行Stretta射频治疗者45例(Stretta射频治疗组)。分析两组患者的基线资料,治疗前、治疗后6个月反流情况,治疗前、治疗后2个月、治疗后6个月DeMeester计分、食管下括约肌(LES)压力,疾病转归。结果 随访结束时,toupet胃底折叠术组失访3例,Stretta射频治疗组失访2例,最终共113例患者纳入本研究。两组治疗前、治疗后6个月反流时间、反流次数、酸反流时间百分比比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗方式与时间在DeMeester计分、LES压力上存在交互作用(P<0.05),治疗方式、时间在DeMeester计分、LES压力上主效应显著(P<0.05)。Stretta射频治疗组治疗后6个月DeMeester计分低于toupet胃底折叠术组,LES压力高于toupet胃底折叠术组(P<0.05)。两组吞咽困难、腹胀、腹泻、慢性疼痛、GERD复发、因GERD严重并发症死亡发生率、生存曲线比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素Cox比例回归分析结果显示,治疗后6个月反流次数〔RR=1.202,95%CI(1.729,3.981),P=0.031〕、DeMeester计分〔RR=1.567,95%CI(1.132,2.170),P=0.001〕、LES压力〔RR=1.302,95%CI(1.809,2.096),P=0.037〕是toupet胃底折叠术组患者预后不良的影响因素,治疗后6个月反流次数〔RR=1.583,95%CI(1.168,2.145),P=0.022〕、DeMeester计分〔RR=1.792,95%CI(1.422,2.258),P=0.004〕、LES压力〔RR=1.653,95%CI(1.365,4.477),P=0.015〕是Stretta射频治疗组患者预后不良的影响因素。结论 与传统toupet胃底折叠术相比,Stretta射频治疗在不增加预后风险的情况下,同样能够明显改善GERD患者食管内pH及压力,有望进一步广泛应用于临床作为顽固性GERD的有效治疗方式。

关键词: 胃食管反流, Stretta射频治疗, toupet胃底折叠术, 疗效比较研究, 胃灼热, 生存分析, 预后

Abstract: Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)has a series of chronic symptoms and esophageal mucosal damage caused by reflux of gastric contents due to dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter.It can cause clinical symptoms such as heartburn,chest pain and acid reflux,affecting the lives of patients.GERD is a common disease that usually requires long-term medical or surgical treatment.The commonly used surgical method is toupet fundoplication,which has a good effect and Stretta radiofrequency ablation has been shown to significantly improve GERD symptoms and quality of life in several studies.Objective To compare the clinical value of Stretta radiofrequency ablation and toupet fundoplication for GERD.Methods A total of 118 GERD patients treated with toupet fundoplication or Stretta radiofrequency ablation at Hanyang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from January 2014 to January 2016 were enrolled.There were 73 patients treated with toupet fundoplication(toupet fundoplication group)and 45 patients with Stretta radiofrequency therapy(Stretta radiofrequency treatment group).Baseline data of the two groups were analyzed,including reflux condition before and 6 months after treatment,DeMeester score and lower esophageal sphincter(LES)pressure before and after 2,6 months of treatment,and prognosis of disease.Results At the end of the follow-up,3 patients were lost contact in the toupet fundoplication group and 2 patients lost contactin the Stretta radiofrequency treatment group.A total of 113 patients were included in the study.There was no significant difference in the reflux time and frequency,and percentage of acid reflux time between the two groups before and 6 months after treatment(P>0.05).There was an interaction between treatment and time on DeMeester score and LES pressure(P<0.05).The main treatment effect was significant in treatment mode and time on DeMeester score and LES pressure(P<0.05).The DeMeester score of Stretta radiofrequency treatment group was lower than that of toupet fundoplication group 6 months after treatment,and the LES pressure was higher than that of toupet fundoplication group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in dysphagia,abdominal distension,diarrhea,chronic pain,recurrence of GERD,mortality rate and survival curve between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis showed that the reflux frequency 6 months after treatment〔RR=1.202,95%CI(1.729,3.981),P=0.031〕,DeMeester score〔RR=1.567,95%CI(1.132,2.170),P=0.001〕and LES pressure〔RR=1.302,95%CI(1.809,2.096),P=0.037〕were influential factors of poor prognosis in the toupet fundoplication group,while the reflux frequency 6 months after treatment〔RR=1.583,95%CI(1.168,2.145),P=0.022〕,DeMeester score〔RR=1.792,95%CI(1.422,2.258),P=0.004〕and LES pressure〔RR=1.653,95%CI(1.365,4.477),P=0.015〕were factors influencing the prognosis of patients in the Stretta radiofrequency treatment group.Conclusion Compared with traditional toupet fundoplication,Stretta radiofrequency treatment can significantly improve the esophageal pH and pressure in patients with GERD without increasing the risk of prognosis.It is expected to be widely used as an effective treatment for refractory GERD.

Key words: Gastroesophageal reflux, Stretta radiofrequency ablation, Toupet fundoplication, Comparative effectiveness research, Heartburn, Survival analysis, Prognosis