Content of Research Methods and Tools in our journal

        Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    Research and Analysis of Screening Tools for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Comorbidity Lung Cancer
    XU Baichuan, WANG Yan, ZHANG Peng, LI Yiting, LIU Feilai, XIE Yang
    Chinese General Practice    2025, 28 (30): 3847-3852.   DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0110
    Abstract239)   HTML10)    PDF(pc) (1093KB)(188)       Save

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer (LC) are high-incidence and high-mortality diseases of the respiratory system. COPD is an independent high-risk factor for LC, and the two conditions influence each other, posing challenges for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Early detection and early treatment are crucial for improving prognosis, making preliminary screening particularly important. This article starts from the current research status of COPD-LC, comprehensively introducing the existing screening tools, including low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), the COPD-LUCSS score and its improved version, the COPD-LUCSS-DLCO score, as well as other COPD-LC risk prediction models. By objectively analyzing the advantages and limitations of existing screening tools, this article proposes countermeasures and precautions for developing new screening tools and envisions future application prospects, aiming to provide support for future COPD-LC screening research.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Living Systematic Reviews: Methods and Processes for Development
    TIAN Chen, LIU Jianing, TIAN Jinhui, GE Long
    Chinese General Practice    2025, 28 (30): 3853-3860.   DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0772
    Abstract293)   HTML28)    PDF(pc) (1109KB)(391)       Save

    Living Systematic Reviews (LSRs) represent an evolving methodology for systematic review that is continuously updated to incorporate new evidence in a timely manner, ensuring that healthcare professionals and policymakers have access to the most last information to make optimal decisions. Compared to traditional systematic reviews, LSRs ensure the timeliness and accuracy of information by conducting regular searches, screenings, and analyses of new evidence, thereby better meeting the needs of rapidly changing clinical practices. This article aims to introduce the applicability, and production methods and processes of LSRs by comparing them with traditional systematic reviews and rapid reviews, discusses the challenges and opportunities faced during the implementation of LSRs, and illustrates the production process and key aspects of living updating with examples, in order to provide scholars with references and insights for conducting LSRs.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics