
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12): 1435-1440.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.110
Special Issue: 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-09-25
Revised:2021-11-20
Published:2022-02-17
Online:2022-03-21
Contact:
Shaolong ZHOU
About author:
通讯作者:
周少珑
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.110
| 组别 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 46 | 306.3±28.1 | 411.6±35.8 |
| TBM组 | 114 | 213.7±17.4 | 127.1±16.7 |
| t值 | 25.228 | 68.560 | |
| P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline serum NCAM1 and TTR levels between healthy physical examinees and tuberculous meningitis patients
| 组别 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 46 | 306.3±28.1 | 411.6±35.8 |
| TBM组 | 114 | 213.7±17.4 | 127.1±16.7 |
| t值 | 25.228 | 68.560 | |
| P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 病情程度 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ期 | 31 | 222.1±7.7 | 137.5±5.1 |
| Ⅱ期 | 45 | 212.5±10.5a | 126.4±10.2a |
| Ⅲ期 | 38 | 208.2±6.1ab | 119.3±6.1ab |
| F值 | 76.261 | 102.318 | |
| P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline serum NCAM1 and TTR levels in tuberculous meningitis patients by the stage distinguished by British Medical Research Council staging system
| 病情程度 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ期 | 31 | 222.1±7.7 | 137.5±5.1 |
| Ⅱ期 | 45 | 212.5±10.5a | 126.4±10.2a |
| Ⅲ期 | 38 | 208.2±6.1ab | 119.3±6.1ab |
| F值 | 76.261 | 102.318 | |
| P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 预后 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线 | 入院7 d | 入院14 d | 随访1个月 | 随访6个月 | 随访12个月 | 基线 | 入院7 d | 入院14 d | 随访1个月 | 随访6个月 | 随访12个月 | ||
| 预后不良 | 51 | 205.3±6.7a | 216.4±5.1a | 219.4±6.0a | 204.1±5.1a | 200.0±6.4a | 192.4±5.3a | 120.1±9.7a | 126.4±10.4a | 139.4±13.5a | 132.1±11.7a | 129.4±8.1a | 126.4±6.1a |
| 预后良好 | 63 | 220.5±10.4 | 229.4±12.3 | 232.2±20.5 | 252.3±26.5 | 286.4±31.0 | 302.4±36.6 | 132.7±10.2 | 149.4±16.4 | 153.3±26.4 | 205.4±35.2 | 231.5±36.9 | 296.4±42.4 |
| F值 | F组间=106.352,F时间=53.024,F交互=43.057 | F组间=169.352,F时间=79.119,F交互=56.712 | |||||||||||
| P值 | P组间<0.05,P时间<0.05,P交互<0.05 | P组间<0.05,P时间<0.05,P交互<0.05 | |||||||||||
Table 3 Differences of serum NCAM1 and TTR levels in tuberculous meningitis patients with good and poor prognosis
| 预后 | 例数 | NCAM1 | TTR | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线 | 入院7 d | 入院14 d | 随访1个月 | 随访6个月 | 随访12个月 | 基线 | 入院7 d | 入院14 d | 随访1个月 | 随访6个月 | 随访12个月 | ||
| 预后不良 | 51 | 205.3±6.7a | 216.4±5.1a | 219.4±6.0a | 204.1±5.1a | 200.0±6.4a | 192.4±5.3a | 120.1±9.7a | 126.4±10.4a | 139.4±13.5a | 132.1±11.7a | 129.4±8.1a | 126.4±6.1a |
| 预后良好 | 63 | 220.5±10.4 | 229.4±12.3 | 232.2±20.5 | 252.3±26.5 | 286.4±31.0 | 302.4±36.6 | 132.7±10.2 | 149.4±16.4 | 153.3±26.4 | 205.4±35.2 | 231.5±36.9 | 296.4±42.4 |
| F值 | F组间=106.352,F时间=53.024,F交互=43.057 | F组间=169.352,F时间=79.119,F交互=56.712 | |||||||||||
| P值 | P组间<0.05,P时间<0.05,P交互<0.05 | P组间<0.05,P时间<0.05,P交互<0.05 | |||||||||||
| 预后 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 合并疾病〔n(%)〕 | 既往病史〔n(%)〕 | 入院症状〔n(%)〕 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 糖尿病 | 艾滋病 | 肺结核 | 结核患者接触史 | 结核病史 | 体质量减轻 | 意识改变 | 癫痫 | 认知功能障碍 | |||
| 预后不良 | 51 | 39.1±6.3 | 31(60.8) | 20(39.2) | 15(29.4) | 10(19.6) | 21(41.2) | 11(21.6) | 8(15.7) | 20(39.2) | 27(52.9) | 7(13.7) | 18(35.3) |
| 预后良好 | 63 | 32.2±5.0 | 36(57.1) | 27(42.9) | 19(30.2) | 14(22.2) | 26(41.3) | 17(27.0) | 12(19.1) | 28(44.4) | 18(28.6) | 9(14.3) | 10(15.9) |
| 检验统计量值 | 6.628a | 0.154b | 0.008b | 0.116b | 0.001b | 0.446b | 0.220b | 0.316b | 7.006b | 0.007b | 5.992b | ||
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.695 | 0.931 | 0.734 | 0.992 | 0.504 | 0.639 | 0.574 | 0.008 | 0.932 | 0.014 | ||
| 预后 | 入院生命体征 | 入院体格检查〔n(%)〕 | 影像学检查〔n(%)〕 | ||||||||||
| 心率〔M(P25,P75),次/min〕 | 呼吸(次/min) | 收缩压(mm Hg) | 舒张压〔M(P25,P75),mm Hg〕 | 颅神经麻痹 | 脑膜刺激征 | 外周神经功能异常 | 脑积水 | 脑梗死病灶 | 结核瘤 | ||||
| 预后不良 | 86(80,95) | 20.5±3.3 | 126.4±8.5 | 72.2(67.1,85.6) | 12(23.5) | 21(41.2) | 7(13.7) | 15(29.4) | 4(7.8) | 6(11.8) | |||
| 预后良好 | 86(79,97) | 20.7±3.5 | 125.0±7.2 | 71.9(65.2,87.7) | 4(6.4) | 27(42.9) | 11(17.5) | 8(12.7) | 7(11.1) | 9(14.3) | |||
| 检验统计量值 | 0.139c | 0.329a | 0.909a | 0.216c | 6.895b | 0.033b | 0.296b | 4.889b | 0.345b | 0.157b | |||
| P值 | 0.890 | 0.743 | 0.365 | 0.829 | 0.009 | 0.857 | 0.587 | 0.027 | 0.557 | 0.692 | |||
| 预后 | MRC分期〔n(%)〕 | 住院时间(d) | 发病至抗结核治疗时间(d) | 实验室检查指标 | |||||||||
| Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | 血白细胞计数(×1012/L) | 脑脊液有核细胞数(个/μL) | 脑脊液有核细胞/单核细胞比值 | 血清白蛋白(g/L) | 血钠(mmol/L) | 血钾(mmol/L) | |||||
| 预后不良 | 12(23.5) | 15(29.4) | 24(47.1) | 35.3±2.4 | 28.2±6.2 | 7.7±1.7 | 126.4±6.2 | 0.7±0.2 | 38.7±4.1 | 133.3±6.6 | 3.8±0.3 | ||
| 预后良好 | 19(30.2) | 30(47.6) | 14(22.2) | 31.1±3.1 | 27.1±6.1 | 7.5±1.5 | 120.4±5.5 | 0.5±0.1 | 37.9±4.0 | 135.1±6.5 | 3.7±0.4 | ||
| 检验统计量值 | 8.038b | 7.917a | 0.890a | 0.469a | 5.407a | 4.004a | 1.004a | 1.544a | 1.084a | ||||
| P值 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.375 | 0.640 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.317 | 0.125 | 0.281 | ||||
Table 4 Univariate analysis of associated factors for prognosis in tuberculous meningitis patients
| 预后 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 合并疾病〔n(%)〕 | 既往病史〔n(%)〕 | 入院症状〔n(%)〕 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 糖尿病 | 艾滋病 | 肺结核 | 结核患者接触史 | 结核病史 | 体质量减轻 | 意识改变 | 癫痫 | 认知功能障碍 | |||
| 预后不良 | 51 | 39.1±6.3 | 31(60.8) | 20(39.2) | 15(29.4) | 10(19.6) | 21(41.2) | 11(21.6) | 8(15.7) | 20(39.2) | 27(52.9) | 7(13.7) | 18(35.3) |
| 预后良好 | 63 | 32.2±5.0 | 36(57.1) | 27(42.9) | 19(30.2) | 14(22.2) | 26(41.3) | 17(27.0) | 12(19.1) | 28(44.4) | 18(28.6) | 9(14.3) | 10(15.9) |
| 检验统计量值 | 6.628a | 0.154b | 0.008b | 0.116b | 0.001b | 0.446b | 0.220b | 0.316b | 7.006b | 0.007b | 5.992b | ||
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.695 | 0.931 | 0.734 | 0.992 | 0.504 | 0.639 | 0.574 | 0.008 | 0.932 | 0.014 | ||
| 预后 | 入院生命体征 | 入院体格检查〔n(%)〕 | 影像学检查〔n(%)〕 | ||||||||||
| 心率〔M(P25,P75),次/min〕 | 呼吸(次/min) | 收缩压(mm Hg) | 舒张压〔M(P25,P75),mm Hg〕 | 颅神经麻痹 | 脑膜刺激征 | 外周神经功能异常 | 脑积水 | 脑梗死病灶 | 结核瘤 | ||||
| 预后不良 | 86(80,95) | 20.5±3.3 | 126.4±8.5 | 72.2(67.1,85.6) | 12(23.5) | 21(41.2) | 7(13.7) | 15(29.4) | 4(7.8) | 6(11.8) | |||
| 预后良好 | 86(79,97) | 20.7±3.5 | 125.0±7.2 | 71.9(65.2,87.7) | 4(6.4) | 27(42.9) | 11(17.5) | 8(12.7) | 7(11.1) | 9(14.3) | |||
| 检验统计量值 | 0.139c | 0.329a | 0.909a | 0.216c | 6.895b | 0.033b | 0.296b | 4.889b | 0.345b | 0.157b | |||
| P值 | 0.890 | 0.743 | 0.365 | 0.829 | 0.009 | 0.857 | 0.587 | 0.027 | 0.557 | 0.692 | |||
| 预后 | MRC分期〔n(%)〕 | 住院时间(d) | 发病至抗结核治疗时间(d) | 实验室检查指标 | |||||||||
| Ⅰ期 | Ⅱ期 | Ⅲ期 | 血白细胞计数(×1012/L) | 脑脊液有核细胞数(个/μL) | 脑脊液有核细胞/单核细胞比值 | 血清白蛋白(g/L) | 血钠(mmol/L) | 血钾(mmol/L) | |||||
| 预后不良 | 12(23.5) | 15(29.4) | 24(47.1) | 35.3±2.4 | 28.2±6.2 | 7.7±1.7 | 126.4±6.2 | 0.7±0.2 | 38.7±4.1 | 133.3±6.6 | 3.8±0.3 | ||
| 预后良好 | 19(30.2) | 30(47.6) | 14(22.2) | 31.1±3.1 | 27.1±6.1 | 7.5±1.5 | 120.4±5.5 | 0.5±0.1 | 37.9±4.0 | 135.1±6.5 | 3.7±0.4 | ||
| 检验统计量值 | 8.038b | 7.917a | 0.890a | 0.469a | 5.407a | 4.004a | 1.004a | 1.544a | 1.084a | ||||
| P值 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.375 | 0.640 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.317 | 0.125 | 0.281 | ||||
| 因素 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | -0.083 | 0.073 | 1.293 | 0.257 | 0.920(0.798,1.062) |
| 住院时间 | 0.321 | 0.296 | 1.176 | 0.365 | 1.379(0.772,2.462) |
| 意识改变(以否为对照) | 0.129 | 0.115 | 1.258 | 0.296 | 1.138(0.908,1.425) |
| 认知功能障碍(以否为对照) | 0.032 | 0.025 | 1.638 | 0.206 | 1.033(0.983,1.084) |
| 颅神经麻痹(以否为对照) | 0.159 | 0.141 | 1.272 | 0.261 | 1.172(0.889,1.546) |
| 脑积水(以否为对照) | 0.092 | 0.089 | 1.069 | 0.426 | 1.096(0.921,1.305) |
| MRC分级(以Ι~Ⅱ期为对照) | 0.495 | 0.124 | 15.936 | <0.001 | 1.640(1.287,2.092) |
| 脑脊液有核细胞数 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 1.155 | 0.316 | 1.075(0.942,1.225) |
| 脑脊液有核细胞/单核细胞比值 | 0.195 | 0.186 | 1.099 | 0.372 | 1.215(0.844,1.750) |
| 基线NCAM1 | -0.402 | 0.139 | 8.364 | 0.003 | 0.669(0.509,0.878) |
| 基线TTR | -0.375 | 0.125 | 9.000 | 0.002 | 0.687(0.538,0.926) |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of prognostic factors in tuberculous meningitis patients
| 因素 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | -0.083 | 0.073 | 1.293 | 0.257 | 0.920(0.798,1.062) |
| 住院时间 | 0.321 | 0.296 | 1.176 | 0.365 | 1.379(0.772,2.462) |
| 意识改变(以否为对照) | 0.129 | 0.115 | 1.258 | 0.296 | 1.138(0.908,1.425) |
| 认知功能障碍(以否为对照) | 0.032 | 0.025 | 1.638 | 0.206 | 1.033(0.983,1.084) |
| 颅神经麻痹(以否为对照) | 0.159 | 0.141 | 1.272 | 0.261 | 1.172(0.889,1.546) |
| 脑积水(以否为对照) | 0.092 | 0.089 | 1.069 | 0.426 | 1.096(0.921,1.305) |
| MRC分级(以Ι~Ⅱ期为对照) | 0.495 | 0.124 | 15.936 | <0.001 | 1.640(1.287,2.092) |
| 脑脊液有核细胞数 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 1.155 | 0.316 | 1.075(0.942,1.225) |
| 脑脊液有核细胞/单核细胞比值 | 0.195 | 0.186 | 1.099 | 0.372 | 1.215(0.844,1.750) |
| 基线NCAM1 | -0.402 | 0.139 | 8.364 | 0.003 | 0.669(0.509,0.878) |
| 基线TTR | -0.375 | 0.125 | 9.000 | 0.002 | 0.687(0.538,0.926) |
| 因素 | 截断值 | ROC曲线下面积(95%CI) | P值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 约登指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线NCAM1 | 210.15 mg/L | 0.665(0.571,0.751) | <0.001 | 68.63 | 71.43 | 0.401 |
| 基线TTR | 125.36 mg/L | 0.689(0.596,0.772) | <0.001 | 64.71 | 74.60 | 0.393 |
| 联合 | 3.21 | 0.879(0.805,0.933) | <0.001 | 88.24 | 87.30 | 0.755 |
Table 6 Efficacy of baseline NCAM1 and TTR,either alone or in combination,in predicting prognosis of tuberculous meningitis patients
| 因素 | 截断值 | ROC曲线下面积(95%CI) | P值 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) | 约登指数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线NCAM1 | 210.15 mg/L | 0.665(0.571,0.751) | <0.001 | 68.63 | 71.43 | 0.401 |
| 基线TTR | 125.36 mg/L | 0.689(0.596,0.772) | <0.001 | 64.71 | 74.60 | 0.393 |
| 联合 | 3.21 | 0.879(0.805,0.933) | <0.001 | 88.24 | 87.30 | 0.755 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
叶任高,陆再英. 内科学[M]. 6版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:156-160.
|
| [6] | |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [1] | HAN Congcong, QIU Xinyu, SHAN Chunfang, SONG Ning, CHEN Qingjie, MULADILI· Abudureheman, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining, ZHAO Qian. Impact of Metabolic Obesity Phenotype on Long-term Prognosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2950-2958. |
| [2] | LIU Yang, ZHOU Guoping, LI Xiaoshi, LI Ping, ZHANG Xin. Impact of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Etiology on the Prognostic Value of Driving Pressure: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2638-2647. |
| [3] | LUAN Xiaoqing, SUN Jingjing, LI Xiaoling, WANG Manxia. Research Progress on Potential Biomarkers of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2418-2424. |
| [4] | XIONG Siyu, LU Bing, JIANG Wenhong, YU Tingting. Study on the Relationship between Fructose-1, 6-Bisphosphate Aldolase A Expression before and after Targeted Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Patient Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1883-1889. |
| [5] | SUN Xia, SHEN Wen, TANG Xiang, ZHONG Wei, WANG Kailin, DAI Zhiyin, ZHANG Chaopu, YUAN Wei, YUAN Guoyue. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients with Different Weight Statuses and the Influence of Weight Management on the Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1448-1455. |
| [6] | XIA Ning, SHI Lan, DING Wanbao, ZHANG Jie, LONG Yi, DAI Hui, ZHANG Can, DAI Hailong. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Amyloidosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1161-1167. |
| [7] | WANG Lina, LEI Jingshu, LI Kuibao, WANG Ruiying, LI Xinmiao, WANG Fangfang, GUO Xiaorong, NIU Ruihao, ZHAO Wei, ZHOU Fangfang, ZHAO Jingjing, LEE CHONGYOU. Review on Inflammatory Response in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 790-801. |
| [8] | LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, LIU Zihan, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Primary Sjögren's Disease with Dryness and Blood-stasis Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 718-725. |
| [9] | WANG Xue, YANG Chengming, WANG Ziyun, ZHOU Zhong. Analysis on Prognosis and Influencing Factors in Patients with Post-tuberculosis Bronchiectasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 606-611. |
| [10] | FU Jiyi, ZHENG Boyue, WU Jiafei, WANG Jun, LI Hui. Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Regimen of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(04): 483-489. |
| [11] | ZHOU Qianmei, MIAO Kali, ZHONG Yongming, ZHANG Fuman, ZHANG Zhe, LI Chengyi. Gas6 Expression in Breast Cancer and Correlation with Clinical Pathological Features and Prognosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4449-4456. |
| [12] | NONG Jingtang, YANG Chengmin, MO Shenglong, LU Zhicheng, TANG Lina, JIAN Chongdong, SHANG Jingwei. Research Progress on Prognostic Biomarkers after Cerebral Infarction: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3711-3720. |
| [13] | LI Yibing, JIA Hongbo, FAN Xiaonong, ZHAO Wenjun, LIU Wei, GE Wenyi, LI Songjiao, LEI Kangchen, ZHANG Menglong, ZHANG Weiwei, CHEN Yang, LI Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Prognostic Factors Affecting Dysphagia after Stroke: an Umbrella Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3631-3637. |
| [14] | XU Yanpeng, HUANG Pe, ZHANG Pingping, LUO Yan, SHI Xiaoqi, WU Liusong, CHEN Yan, HE Zhixu. Expression of β-Adrenergic Receptors in Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3391-3398. |
| [15] | YANG Chen, CHEN Tong, ZHANG Lifang, ZHANG Hongxu, LI Pengfei, ZHANG Xuejuan. Prognostic Impact of Dapagliflozin in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3053-3058. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||