Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (08): 939-947.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0201
• Original Research • Previous Articles
Received:
2024-06-10
Revised:
2024-08-10
Published:
2025-03-15
Online:
2025-01-02
Contact:
YANG Le
通讯作者:
杨乐
作者简介:
作者贡献:
杨乐负责文章的构思、设计与修改,对文章整体负责;李振浩负责论文撰写与修订;姚典瑞、杨洋负责数据清理和分析;孙玉芳、何莹负责对论文的讨论部分进行修改。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0201
项目 | 例数 | 认知功能障碍 | χ2值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 认知功能障碍 | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | -1.764 | 0.078 | 饮酒 | -0.648 | 0.517 | ||||
男 | 946 | 193(20.4) | 否 | 1 656 | 401(24.2) | ||||
女 | 902 | 235(26.1) | 是 | 192 | 27(14.1) | ||||
年龄(岁) | -6.480 | <0.001 | 躯体锻炼 | -2.588 | 0.010 | ||||
60~79 | 1 586 | 330(20.8) | 否 | 375 | 119(31.7) | ||||
≥80 | 262 | 98(37.4) | 是 | 1 473 | 309(21.0) | ||||
受教育水平 | 6.372 | <0.001 | 睡眠质量 | 10.583 | 0.001 | ||||
小学及以下 | 1 311 | 333(25.4) | 不好 | 892 | 236(26.5) | ||||
初中/中专 | 419 | 81(19.3) | 好 | 956 | 192(20.1) | ||||
高中及以上 | 118 | 14(11.9) | 慢性病罹患情况 | -1.629 | 0.104 | ||||
婚姻状况 | -2.758 | 0.006 | 是 | 1 299 | 309(23.8) | ||||
非在婚 | 503 | 148(29.4) | 否 | 549 | 119(21.7) | ||||
在婚 | 1 345 | 280(20.8) | BMI | 2.511 | 0.012 | ||||
居住安排 | -1.063 | 0.288 | 低体质量 | 251 | 84(33.5) | ||||
独居 | 344 | 90(26.2) | 正常体质量 | 1 013 | 241(23.8) | ||||
非独居 | 1 504 | 338(22.5) | 超重 | 452 | 76(16.8) | ||||
个人月收入(元) | 0.719 | 0.472 | 肥胖 | 132 | 27(20.5) | ||||
≤500 | 1 369 | 350(25.6) | 搬迁安置方式 | 1.686 | 0.092 | ||||
501~1 000 | 291 | 52(17.9) | 集中安置 | 1 741 | 410(23.5) | ||||
>1 000 | 188 | 26(13.8) | 分散安置 | 107 | 18(16.8) | ||||
吸烟 | -0.143 | 0.886 | 安置区设置老年活动中心 | -1.820 | 0.069 | ||||
否 | 1 248 | 305(24.4) | 是 | 1 344 | 303(22.5) | ||||
是 | 600 | 123(20.5) | 否 | 504 | 125(24.8) |
Table 1 Comparison of the detection rate of cognitive dysfunction among the elderly people relocated from poverty alleviation areas with different characteristics in Shanxi Province
项目 | 例数 | 认知功能障碍 | χ2值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 认知功能障碍 | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | -1.764 | 0.078 | 饮酒 | -0.648 | 0.517 | ||||
男 | 946 | 193(20.4) | 否 | 1 656 | 401(24.2) | ||||
女 | 902 | 235(26.1) | 是 | 192 | 27(14.1) | ||||
年龄(岁) | -6.480 | <0.001 | 躯体锻炼 | -2.588 | 0.010 | ||||
60~79 | 1 586 | 330(20.8) | 否 | 375 | 119(31.7) | ||||
≥80 | 262 | 98(37.4) | 是 | 1 473 | 309(21.0) | ||||
受教育水平 | 6.372 | <0.001 | 睡眠质量 | 10.583 | 0.001 | ||||
小学及以下 | 1 311 | 333(25.4) | 不好 | 892 | 236(26.5) | ||||
初中/中专 | 419 | 81(19.3) | 好 | 956 | 192(20.1) | ||||
高中及以上 | 118 | 14(11.9) | 慢性病罹患情况 | -1.629 | 0.104 | ||||
婚姻状况 | -2.758 | 0.006 | 是 | 1 299 | 309(23.8) | ||||
非在婚 | 503 | 148(29.4) | 否 | 549 | 119(21.7) | ||||
在婚 | 1 345 | 280(20.8) | BMI | 2.511 | 0.012 | ||||
居住安排 | -1.063 | 0.288 | 低体质量 | 251 | 84(33.5) | ||||
独居 | 344 | 90(26.2) | 正常体质量 | 1 013 | 241(23.8) | ||||
非独居 | 1 504 | 338(22.5) | 超重 | 452 | 76(16.8) | ||||
个人月收入(元) | 0.719 | 0.472 | 肥胖 | 132 | 27(20.5) | ||||
≤500 | 1 369 | 350(25.6) | 搬迁安置方式 | 1.686 | 0.092 | ||||
501~1 000 | 291 | 52(17.9) | 集中安置 | 1 741 | 410(23.5) | ||||
>1 000 | 188 | 26(13.8) | 分散安置 | 107 | 18(16.8) | ||||
吸烟 | -0.143 | 0.886 | 安置区设置老年活动中心 | -1.820 | 0.069 | ||||
否 | 1 248 | 305(24.4) | 是 | 1 344 | 303(22.5) | ||||
是 | 600 | 123(20.5) | 否 | 504 | 125(24.8) |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | |
性别(以男性为参照) | ||||||||
女性 | -0.609(-1.146~-0.073) | 0.026 | -0.390(-1.001~0.221) | 0.211 | -0.350(-0.953~0.252) | 0.254 | -0.438(-1.038~0.163) | 0.153 |
年龄(以60~79岁为参照) | ||||||||
≥80岁 | -2.859(-3.3598~-2.120) | <0.001 | -2.789(-3.524~-2.054) | <0.001 | -2.342(-3.074~-1.610) | <0.001 | -2.355(-3.083~-1.627) | <0.001 |
受教育水平(以高中及以上为参照) | ||||||||
小学及以下 | -2.731(-3.818~-1.644) | <0.001 | -0.390(-3.578~-1.406) | <0.001 | -2.308(-3.372~-1.243) | <0.001 | -2.189(-3.250~-1.128) | <0.001 |
初中/中专 | -0.660(-1.808~0.488) | 0.260 | -2.789(-1.631~0.658) | 0.404 | -0.295(-1.417~0.826) | 0.606 | -0.222(-1.338~0.895) | 0.697 |
婚姻状况(以在婚为参照) | ||||||||
非在婚 | -1.441(-2.205~-0.676) | <0.001 | -1.355(-2.116~-0.595) | <0.001 | -1.024(-1.773~-0.276) | 0.007 | -0.987(-1.732~-0.242) | 0.009 |
居住安排(以非独居为参照) | ||||||||
独居 | 0.829(-0.039~1.698) | 0.061 | 0.757(-0.106~1.621) | 0.086 | 0.408(-0.442~1.258) | 0.346 | 0.427(-0.418~1.272) | 0.322 |
个人月收入(以>1 000元为参照) | ||||||||
≤500元 | -0.512(-1.389~0.364) | 0.252 | -0.425(-1.297~0.447) | 0.339 | -0.284(-1.139~0.572) | 0.516 | -0.252(-1.105~0.600) | 0.562 |
501~1 000元 | -0.222(-1.257~0.812) | 0.673 | -0.183(-1.210~0.845) | 0.727 | 0.005(-1.004~1.015) | 0.992 | 0.011(-0.993~1.016) | 0.982 |
吸烟(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | 0.015(-0.616~0.645) | 0.964 | 0.025(-0.595~0.646) | 0.936 | 0.055(-0.562~0.671) | 0.862 |
饮酒(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | 0.678(-0.218~1.574) | 0.138 | 0.494(-0.390~1.378) | 0.273 | 0.384(-0.497~1.265) | 0.392 |
躯体锻炼(以是为参照) | ||||||||
否 | — | — | -1.528(-2.161~-0.894) | <0.001 | -0.943(-1.577~-0.309) | 0.004 | -0.792(-1.425~-0.159) | 0.014 |
睡眠质量(以好为参照) | ||||||||
不好 | — | — | -0.636(-1.157~-0.116) | 0.017 | -0.311(-0.836~0.213) | 0.245 | -0.245(-0.768~0.277) | 0.357 |
慢性病(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | — | — | 0.464(-0.099~1.027) | 0.106 | 0.435(-0.125~0.995) | 0.128 |
BMI(以低体质量为参照) | — | — | — | — | ||||
正常体质量 | — | — | — | — | 0.619(-0.143~1.381) | 0.111 | 0.557(-0.202~1.316) | 0.150 |
超重 | — | — | — | — | 1.088(0.228~1.947) | 0.013 | 1.034(0.179~1.890) | 0.018 |
肥胖 | — | — | — | — | 1.001(-0.159~2.160) | 0.091 | 1.034(-0.122~2.190) | 0.079 |
日常活动能力得分 | — | — | — | — | 0.912(0.646~1.178) | <0.001 | 0.900(0.636~1.164) | <0.001 |
抑郁状况得分 | — | — | — | — | -0.112(-0.158~-0.067) | <0.001 | -0.089(-0.136~-0.042) | <0.001 |
搬迁安置方式(以集中安置为参照) | ||||||||
分散安置 | — | — | 0.807(-0.253~1.867) | 0.135 | ||||
安置区设置老年活动中心(以是为参照) | ||||||||
否 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.521(-1.082~0.040) | 0.069 |
社会资本得分 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.125(0.071~0.178) | <0.001 |
R2 | 0.087 | 0.103 | 0.144 | 0.156 | ||||
F值 | 21.963 | 8.267 | 14.417 | 8.476 | ||||
调整R2 | 0.083 | 0.098 | 0.136 | 0.146 |
Table 2 Hierarchical linear regression analysis of influencing factors for CMMSE scores of older adults relocated for poverty alleviation in Shanxi Province
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | B(95%CI) | P值 | |
性别(以男性为参照) | ||||||||
女性 | -0.609(-1.146~-0.073) | 0.026 | -0.390(-1.001~0.221) | 0.211 | -0.350(-0.953~0.252) | 0.254 | -0.438(-1.038~0.163) | 0.153 |
年龄(以60~79岁为参照) | ||||||||
≥80岁 | -2.859(-3.3598~-2.120) | <0.001 | -2.789(-3.524~-2.054) | <0.001 | -2.342(-3.074~-1.610) | <0.001 | -2.355(-3.083~-1.627) | <0.001 |
受教育水平(以高中及以上为参照) | ||||||||
小学及以下 | -2.731(-3.818~-1.644) | <0.001 | -0.390(-3.578~-1.406) | <0.001 | -2.308(-3.372~-1.243) | <0.001 | -2.189(-3.250~-1.128) | <0.001 |
初中/中专 | -0.660(-1.808~0.488) | 0.260 | -2.789(-1.631~0.658) | 0.404 | -0.295(-1.417~0.826) | 0.606 | -0.222(-1.338~0.895) | 0.697 |
婚姻状况(以在婚为参照) | ||||||||
非在婚 | -1.441(-2.205~-0.676) | <0.001 | -1.355(-2.116~-0.595) | <0.001 | -1.024(-1.773~-0.276) | 0.007 | -0.987(-1.732~-0.242) | 0.009 |
居住安排(以非独居为参照) | ||||||||
独居 | 0.829(-0.039~1.698) | 0.061 | 0.757(-0.106~1.621) | 0.086 | 0.408(-0.442~1.258) | 0.346 | 0.427(-0.418~1.272) | 0.322 |
个人月收入(以>1 000元为参照) | ||||||||
≤500元 | -0.512(-1.389~0.364) | 0.252 | -0.425(-1.297~0.447) | 0.339 | -0.284(-1.139~0.572) | 0.516 | -0.252(-1.105~0.600) | 0.562 |
501~1 000元 | -0.222(-1.257~0.812) | 0.673 | -0.183(-1.210~0.845) | 0.727 | 0.005(-1.004~1.015) | 0.992 | 0.011(-0.993~1.016) | 0.982 |
吸烟(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | 0.015(-0.616~0.645) | 0.964 | 0.025(-0.595~0.646) | 0.936 | 0.055(-0.562~0.671) | 0.862 |
饮酒(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | 0.678(-0.218~1.574) | 0.138 | 0.494(-0.390~1.378) | 0.273 | 0.384(-0.497~1.265) | 0.392 |
躯体锻炼(以是为参照) | ||||||||
否 | — | — | -1.528(-2.161~-0.894) | <0.001 | -0.943(-1.577~-0.309) | 0.004 | -0.792(-1.425~-0.159) | 0.014 |
睡眠质量(以好为参照) | ||||||||
不好 | — | — | -0.636(-1.157~-0.116) | 0.017 | -0.311(-0.836~0.213) | 0.245 | -0.245(-0.768~0.277) | 0.357 |
慢性病(以否为参照) | ||||||||
是 | — | — | — | — | 0.464(-0.099~1.027) | 0.106 | 0.435(-0.125~0.995) | 0.128 |
BMI(以低体质量为参照) | — | — | — | — | ||||
正常体质量 | — | — | — | — | 0.619(-0.143~1.381) | 0.111 | 0.557(-0.202~1.316) | 0.150 |
超重 | — | — | — | — | 1.088(0.228~1.947) | 0.013 | 1.034(0.179~1.890) | 0.018 |
肥胖 | — | — | — | — | 1.001(-0.159~2.160) | 0.091 | 1.034(-0.122~2.190) | 0.079 |
日常活动能力得分 | — | — | — | — | 0.912(0.646~1.178) | <0.001 | 0.900(0.636~1.164) | <0.001 |
抑郁状况得分 | — | — | — | — | -0.112(-0.158~-0.067) | <0.001 | -0.089(-0.136~-0.042) | <0.001 |
搬迁安置方式(以集中安置为参照) | ||||||||
分散安置 | — | — | 0.807(-0.253~1.867) | 0.135 | ||||
安置区设置老年活动中心(以是为参照) | ||||||||
否 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.521(-1.082~0.040) | 0.069 |
社会资本得分 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.125(0.071~0.178) | <0.001 |
R2 | 0.087 | 0.103 | 0.144 | 0.156 | ||||
F值 | 21.963 | 8.267 | 14.417 | 8.476 | ||||
调整R2 | 0.083 | 0.098 | 0.136 | 0.146 |
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别(以男性为参照) | 躯体锻炼(以是为参照) | ||||||||||
女性 | 0.164 | 0.144 | 1.286 | 0.325 | 1.150(0.870~1.521) | 否 | 0.343 | 0.144 | 5.661 | <0.001 | 1.673(1.276~2.193) |
年龄(以60~79岁为参照) | 睡眠质量(以好为参照) | ||||||||||
≥80岁 | 0.574 | 0.159 | 13.115 | <0.001 | 1.894(1.398~2.566) | 不好 | -0.127 | 0.122 | 1.096 | 0.295 | 0.880(0.694~1.118) |
受教育水平(以高中及以上为参照) | 慢性疾病(以否为参照) | ||||||||||
小学及以下 | -0.491 | 0.306 | 2.565 | 0.109 | 0.612(0.336~1.116) | 是 | -0.007 | 0.129 | 0.003 | 0.959 | 0.993(0.772~1.279) |
初中/中专 | -0.340 | 0.322 | 1.116 | 0.291 | 0.712(0.379~1.337) | BMI(以低体质量为参照) | |||||
个人月收入(以>1 000元为参照) | 正常体质量 | -0.279 | 0.168 | 2.743 | 0.058 | 0.731(0.528~1.010) | |||||
≤500元 | -0.514 | 0.232 | 4.907 | 0.027 | 0.598(0.380~0.943) | 超重 | -0.563 | 0.203 | 7.736 | 0.002 | 0.543(0.368~0.804) |
501~1 000元 | -0.121 | 0.273 | 0.198 | 0.656 | 0.886(0.519~1.511) | 肥胖 | -0.434 | 0.276 | 2.481 | 0.097 | 0.635(0.372~1.085) |
婚姻状况(以在婚为参照) | 日常活动能力得分 | -0.215 | 0.054 | 15.756 | <0.001 | 0.805(0.823~0.895) | |||||
非在婚 | 0.355 | 0.174 | 4.183 | 0.016 | 1.507(1.078~2.106) | 抑郁状况得分 | -0.040 | 0.013 | 9.473 | 0.371 | 1.124(0.870~1.454) |
居住安排(以非独居为参照) | 社会资本得分 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 2.014 | 0.001 | 0.958(0.934~0.983) | |||||
独居 | -0.070 | 0.190 | 0.135 | 0.713 | 0.932(0.642~1.354) | 搬迁安置方式(以集中安置为参照) | |||||
吸烟(以否为参照) | 分散安置 | 0.294 | 0.274 | 1.143 | 0.285 | 1.341(0.783~2.297) | |||||
是 | 0.013 | 0.144 | 0.008 | 0.927 | 1.013(0.764~1.343) | 安置区设置老年活动中心(以是为参照) | |||||
饮酒(以否为参照) | 否 | -0.214 | 0.130 | 2.701 | 0.100 | 0.807(0.625~1.042) | |||||
是 | 0.393 | 0.235 | 2.781 | 0.095 | 1.481(0.934~2.348) | 常量 | -0.173 | 0.609 | 0.080 | 0.850 |
Table 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors for cognitive function of older adults relocated for poverty alleviation in Shanxi Province
变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | 变量 | B | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别(以男性为参照) | 躯体锻炼(以是为参照) | ||||||||||
女性 | 0.164 | 0.144 | 1.286 | 0.325 | 1.150(0.870~1.521) | 否 | 0.343 | 0.144 | 5.661 | <0.001 | 1.673(1.276~2.193) |
年龄(以60~79岁为参照) | 睡眠质量(以好为参照) | ||||||||||
≥80岁 | 0.574 | 0.159 | 13.115 | <0.001 | 1.894(1.398~2.566) | 不好 | -0.127 | 0.122 | 1.096 | 0.295 | 0.880(0.694~1.118) |
受教育水平(以高中及以上为参照) | 慢性疾病(以否为参照) | ||||||||||
小学及以下 | -0.491 | 0.306 | 2.565 | 0.109 | 0.612(0.336~1.116) | 是 | -0.007 | 0.129 | 0.003 | 0.959 | 0.993(0.772~1.279) |
初中/中专 | -0.340 | 0.322 | 1.116 | 0.291 | 0.712(0.379~1.337) | BMI(以低体质量为参照) | |||||
个人月收入(以>1 000元为参照) | 正常体质量 | -0.279 | 0.168 | 2.743 | 0.058 | 0.731(0.528~1.010) | |||||
≤500元 | -0.514 | 0.232 | 4.907 | 0.027 | 0.598(0.380~0.943) | 超重 | -0.563 | 0.203 | 7.736 | 0.002 | 0.543(0.368~0.804) |
501~1 000元 | -0.121 | 0.273 | 0.198 | 0.656 | 0.886(0.519~1.511) | 肥胖 | -0.434 | 0.276 | 2.481 | 0.097 | 0.635(0.372~1.085) |
婚姻状况(以在婚为参照) | 日常活动能力得分 | -0.215 | 0.054 | 15.756 | <0.001 | 0.805(0.823~0.895) | |||||
非在婚 | 0.355 | 0.174 | 4.183 | 0.016 | 1.507(1.078~2.106) | 抑郁状况得分 | -0.040 | 0.013 | 9.473 | 0.371 | 1.124(0.870~1.454) |
居住安排(以非独居为参照) | 社会资本得分 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 2.014 | 0.001 | 0.958(0.934~0.983) | |||||
独居 | -0.070 | 0.190 | 0.135 | 0.713 | 0.932(0.642~1.354) | 搬迁安置方式(以集中安置为参照) | |||||
吸烟(以否为参照) | 分散安置 | 0.294 | 0.274 | 1.143 | 0.285 | 1.341(0.783~2.297) | |||||
是 | 0.013 | 0.144 | 0.008 | 0.927 | 1.013(0.764~1.343) | 安置区设置老年活动中心(以是为参照) | |||||
饮酒(以否为参照) | 否 | -0.214 | 0.130 | 2.701 | 0.100 | 0.807(0.625~1.042) | |||||
是 | 0.393 | 0.235 | 2.781 | 0.095 | 1.481(0.934~2.348) | 常量 | -0.173 | 0.609 | 0.080 | 0.850 |
[1] |
国务院关于印发"十三五"国家老龄事业发展和养老体系建设规划的通知[EB/OL].(2017-03-06)[2024-04-12].
|
[2] |
吴越,姚建军,程灶火,等. 无锡市社区老年人轻度认知功能障碍调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2017,44(2):259-263.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
国家发展改革委. "十三五"易地扶贫搬迁:伟大成就与实践经验[J]. 宏观经济管理,2021(9):4-9.
|
[8] |
冯应斌,吴爽,辜磊. 易地扶贫搬迁农户市民化水平测度及其影响因素研究——基于贵州省631户搬迁安置农户的调查[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2024,38(3):46-55.
|
[9] |
刘欢欢. 大型易地扶贫搬迁集中安置社区的治理风险及对策研究[D]. 秦皇岛:燕山大学,2023.
|
[10] |
杨泰沣,肖婷. 易地搬迁移民的社会适应性问题与对策研究[J]. 农村经济与科技,2023,34(17):173-175,233. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2023.17.047.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
侯珍珍. 社会工作介入易地搬迁老年人的社会适应问题研究[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2023.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
张晓静,孙佶英,肖卫忠,等. 5种认知功能筛查量表在老年人中的应用效果分析[J]. 护理研究,2024,38(7):1162-1167. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.07.005.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
郭玉婷,杨乐,李泽远,等. 易地扶贫搬迁老年人社会资本量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究,2024,38(10):1719-1725.
|
[21] |
周梦雨,田茂再. 基于Guass-Seidel型迭代分层线性模型的参数估计[J/OL]. 数理统计与管理,(2023-10-18)[2024-02-02].
|
[22] |
张映琦,周华东,李敬诚,等. 重庆市老年人认知功能障碍的社区调查[J]. 重庆医学,2002,31(10):992-993. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2002.10.044.
|
[23] |
袁梓健,郭立燕,张妍,等. 中国老年人轻度认知障碍现状及其影响因素[J]. 济宁医学院学报,2022,45(3):183-188. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2022.03.007.
|
[24] |
郭帅,刘尚君,肖阳梅,等. 中国老年人认知障碍患病率的变化趋势:受教育水平提高的作用[J]. 残疾人研究,2021(2):74-80.
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
刘燕. 中国家庭消费碳排放及影响因素研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2023.
|
[28] |
吴帆,王琳. 中国家庭多代代际关系网络的图景与形态——基于6个典型家庭的分析[J]. 人口研究,2021,45(4):36-53.
|
[29] |
江立华,曾铎. 易地扶贫搬迁人口的空间变动与身体适应[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究,2021,12(4):37-42,56.
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
丁玲,吴炳义,郑晓瑛,等. 山东省老年人心理健康状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2014,31(12):948-951.
|
[33] |
史路平,姚水洪,王薇. 中国老年人群轻度认知障碍患病率及发展趋势的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(1):109-114. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.315.
|
[34] |
周东升,徐银儿,陈中鸣,等. 老年人轻度认知功能障碍患病调查[J]. 中国公共卫生,2011,27(11):1375-1377.
|
[35] |
唐彩云,黄蓉,王瑶,等. 农村丧偶独居老年女性抑郁、孤独感与生活质量的关系[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版),2023,48(12):1865-1873.
|
[36] |
Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators. Global,regional,and national incidence,prevalence,and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries,1990-2013:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013[J]. Lancet,2015,386(9995):743-800. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4.
|
[37] |
张莉. 从性别和婚姻状况的角度探讨代际支持对我国老年人抑郁的影响[J]. 华中科技大学学报:社会科学版,2019,33(5):28-38. DOI:10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2019.05.04.
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
余素君,赵磊,董朝晖. 运动频率对社区60岁及以上户籍老人认知功能的影响研究[J]. 现代预防医学,2024,51(5):910-915. DOI:10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202308351.
|
[40] |
刘志勇. 体育锻炼对老年人认知功能影响的研究进展[C]//第一届湖北省体育科学大会论文集(第二册).黄冈:[出版者不详],2023.
|
[41] |
陈蕾,李久虎,张桃桃. 体重指数、腰围和高龄老年人死亡风险的关联[J]. 现代预防医学,2023,50(11):1945-1950.
|
[42] |
王琳,郭嘉玮,张龙海,等. 老年人身体活动、健康体适能与认知功能的相关性研究[J]. 福建体育科技,2023,42(3):34-39.
|
[43] |
吕娇娇,刘宇. 身体活动对轻度认知损害老年人认知功能的影响及其可能机制[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(7):809-813. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2016.07.023.
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
白涛,武丽,姜雪锦,等. 农村地区老年人社会支持与抑郁关系[J]. 中国公共卫生,2012,28(8):1044-1048.
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
董文烁,王美娟,李梦丽,等. 农村老年人抑郁症状的潜在剖面及与认知功能的关系[J]. 护理学杂志,2024,39(1):98-102. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2024.01.098.
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[1] | LIU Qin, CHENG Min, JIANG Fengqiong, LI Xiaoyu. Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Factors Affecting Enuresis in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 763-770. |
[2] | DONG Xiaomei, ZHAO Hongyan, GENG Zhongli, XU Tianchao, WANG Qi. The Effect of Cerebellar Vermal rTMS with TBS Paradigm on Negative Symptoms, Cognitive Function and Serum Inflammatory Factors in Elderly Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 575-580. |
[3] | HE Yuxin, WU Yixin, YANG Shan, XIN Bo, LI Mengchi, JIANG Wenhui. Prevalence of Disability in Older Adults with Chronic Disease in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 159-168. |
[4] | YU Haidong, PAN Miaomiao, GU Hongqin, LIU Tao, DAI Jie, LIU Linghua, HOU Junping, YANG Li, SHI Meifang, ZHAO Chao. Correlation Analysis between Depressive, Cognitive Symptoms and Nutritional Metabolism in the Elderly in Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(28): 3540-3545. |
[5] | WANG Chenyu, ZHANG Chen, SHI Lulu, ZHU Mengna, WANG Lina. Advances in Cognitive Function Health Management Strategies for Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(26): 3273-3280. |
[6] | TU Shuting, LIN Jiaying, ZHUANG Jinyang, XIANG Jingnan, WEI Dongshuai, XIE Yong, JIA Jie. Incidence and Related Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study Based on Full-cycle Rehabilitation in Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(23): 2829-2837. |
[7] | LAI Qingling, XU Chuanchuan, FENG Yuanyuan, LIANG Peifeng, LI Yinshan. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Implementation of Medical Defense Integration Based on the Horn-mitte Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2700-2705. |
[8] | WANG Xiaoxia, CAO Xuehua, LI Yan, XIONG Langyu, HU Wanqin, XIANG Feng, JIA Yu. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Frailty in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(20): 2534-2544. |
[9] | QIAN Zhen, LU Tongbo, HE Jun, ZHU Haiying, WANG Jin, GONG Zunke. Efficacy and Preliminary Mechanism of Precise Exercise Prescriptions for Anxiety, Depression, and Cognitive Function in Patients with Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(20): 2445-2450. |
[10] | ZHAO Ziyin, ZHANG Jiajun, SUN Wenjun, LI Huining, XING Xing, ZHU He. Complex Pattern of Multiple Chronic Physical Conditions and Its Effect on Healthcare Utilization among Older Adults in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(20): 2498-2504. |
[11] | PANG Lan, LI Peifan, ZHU Xiaogang, YANG Zaihong, ZHENG Lei. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Escitalopram Oxalate in the Treatment of Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2098-2103. |
[12] | ZHAO Ningxuan, JIANG Lin, HU Meijing, YAO Qiang, MAO Yineng, ZHU Cairong. Association between Cumulative Episodes of C-reactive Protein Elevations and Somatic/Non-somatic Depressive Symptoms among Chinese Middle-aged and Older Adults: Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(17): 2070-2076. |
[13] | XU Zhijie, QIAN Yi, YAN Ming, LU Yiting, ZHAO Yang. The Influencing Factors and Management Strategies of Multimorbidity Based on Syndemic Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1288-1295. |
[14] | SONG Weimei, WANG Xuchun, REN Hao, ZHAO Ying, CHEN Liming, QIU Lixia. A Study on the Prevalence Trend of Overweight and Obesity among Adults Aged 20 and above in Shanxi Province from 2010 to 2018 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(10): 1245-1251. |
[15] | WANG Qingyu, LIN Zheng, LEI Yang, SUN Caiyun, WANG Mi, GU Junyi, ZHU Zhanhui, TANG Lichen. Assessment and Treatment of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1028-1033. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||